ObjectiveTo acquaint the development process and item composition of the appraisal tools and reporting standards of clinical pathways worldwide, in order to improve the development and evaluation of clinical pathways.
MethodsWe searched databases including PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data for articles about the appraisal tools and reporting standards of clinical pathways from inception to Jan, 2014. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and compared the difference in development process and item composition among included appraisal tools and reporting standards of clinical pathways.
ResultsA total of 7 appraisal tools and reporting standards were included. Among them, 3 were from UK, 1 from China, 1 from Australia, 1 from Belgium, and 1 from Saudi Arabia. All included appraisal tools contained 4 to 15 domains and 14 to 99 items. Based on the comparison of different domains and items of included appraisal tools, "Clinical Pathway Management Guidelines" published by the National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China and the research of Vannhaecht, we identified 17 key elements of clinical pathway as follows:organizational commitment, pathway project management, format of doc, content of pathway, multidisciplinary involvement, variance management, EBM/guidelines, maintenance of pathway, accountability, patient involvement, development of pathway, additional support systems & documents, operational arrangement, implementation, outcome management, safety and organization of the care process.
ConclusionCurrently, the appraisal tools and reporting standards of clinical pathways are rudimentary, so we desperately needs to establish mature appraisal tool and reporting standard of clinical pathways to guide the development and implementation of clinical pathway, so as to improve their application effects in clinical practice and medical quality.
ObjectivesTo investigate sources of evidence of the clinical pathways approved by the Chinese government.MethodsThe approved clinical pathways were obtained from the website of the National Health and Family Planning Commission. Two reviewers independently extracted the basic information, approval date, types of evidence of the clinical pathways and time of evidence. The variance analysis was performed for the diagnosis and treatment parts of clinical pathways and the LSD method was further used for comparison.ResultsThe main types of evidence were guidelines, textbooks, standard indicators and consensus views. Approximately 80% of the pathways cited clinical practice guidelines and 36% cited the textbooks. The median number of evidence for each clinical pathway was 2. Approximately 85% of the evidence could be obtained the time when the evidence published. The average time interval (between the time when the pathways released and the time when the evidence published) was 5.2 years. Specifically, textbooks constituted the largest proportion in all evidence that was over 15 years of time interval. In addition to the textbook comparison standard indicators, there were significant differences in time interval between guidelines or consensus and textbooks or standard indicators.Conclusions The evidence types selection is based on the concept of evidence-based medicine, yet the time span of the referred evidence is larger. Therefore, developing clinical pathways not only need to refer to the latest research evidence comprehensively and enhance transparency of clinical pathways, but also use evidence quality evaluation standards to evaluate and select the referred evidences.
Due to optimizing medical service resources and improving service efficiency, day surgery has attracted the attention of medical and management experts worldwide. In 2019, day surgery was included as one of the performance assessment indicators of tertiary public hospitals. In recent years, hospital-based day surgery centers have begun to plan and build. Although the basic facilities have been perfectly improved, but how to efficiently and safely operate and manage the centralized day surgery has become the primary problem to clinicians and managers. The purpose of this paper is to introduce how the Day Surgery Center of West China Hospital of Sichuan University uses scientific management tools and establishes a professional multidisciplinary team, so as to carry out efficient operation management and control of medical quality and safety risks of the Day Surgery Center. And then provide practical experience guidance and suggestions with strong feasibility and operability for peers.
Objective To explore a scientific disease cost accounting. Method Disease cost accounting = disease cost accounting of clinic pathway + disease basis cost accounting. Conclusions It is the tendency with the medical reform for the social security department to pay by disease for the hospitals, as a result, both social security department and hospitals have to resort to the scientific way in terms of cost accounting of disease. And it is practical and effective by means of cost accounting for clinic pathway.
Objective To evaluate the feasibility of the clinical pathway based on the medical data information integration system to guide the treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis (PHH).
Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 106 PHH patients in the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from March 2012 through June 2015. The patients were divided into two groups including a day surgery group (52 patients) and a traditional group (54 patients). The patients in the day surgery group underwent day surgery guided by clinical pathway of PHH based on medical data information integration system. The patients in the traditional group stayed in hospital for 2-3 days. The pre-surgical situation, post-surgical effect of patients and cost of hospitalization were compared between the two groups.
Results Only one patient of PPH suffered from insufficient relief of symptoms. The other patients’ symptom of PPH disappeared. No serious complication occurred. The postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score of patients was lower than 2 points. The hospitalization expense of the day surgery group was significantly lower than that of the traditional operation group. The average follow-up time was 2.5 months (0.5 to 4 months). The symptoms of the whole group had no recurrence. All of the patients were not found with compensatory hyperhidrosis.
Conclusion Day-surgery clinical pathway of PHH based on medical data information integration system is safe and feasible. Day-surgery clinical pathway of PPH can accelerate the recovery of patients and save the cost of hospitalization.
Objective To evaluate the effect of clinical pathway (CP) teaching methods versus traditional methods in nursing clinical teaching. Methods The following electronic databases as PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CBM and CNKI were retrieved on computer from their establishment to April 2011 to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of comparing CP with traditional methods in nursing clinical teaching. The methodological quality of the included RCTs was assessed by two reviewers independently according to the scale of criteria for methodological quality developed by Smits PB, and the meta-analysis was conducted by using the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan5.1 software. Results A total of 12 RCTs involving 1 269 participants were included, and nine of them were of high quality. The meta-analyses showed that compared with the traditional teaching method, the CP teaching tended to be superior (Plt;0.05) in improving nursing students’ objective knowledge, nursing operating skills, professional ability and satisfaction with teaching methods, and in improving patients’ satisfaction as well. Conclusion The clinical pathway teaching method is a scientific teaching model in nursing clinical teaching; it standardizes the teaching procedure, promotes students’ active learning and further enhances the teaching effect. But it is necessary to unify the method of assessment with more researches. In addition, researchers should pay more attention to improving the comprehensive quality of nursing students.
ObjectiveTo explore the application of clinical pathway in patients undergoing orthopedic day surgery.MethodsPatients who were scheduled for orthopedic treatment at Day Surgery Department of the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from May to October 2020 were selected as the clinical pathway group, and all of them were managed by clinical pathway. Patients who were scheduled for orthopedic treatment at Day Surgery Department of the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from May to October 2019 were selected as the routine group, and all of them were managed by conventional clinical methods. The general conditions of patients, physicians’ work efficiency, medical costs and medical quality were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe clinical pathway group included 246 patients, and the routine group included 391 patients. There was no significant difference in gender, age or disease distribution between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the routine group, the clinical pathway group had obvious advantages in terms of average time spent by a physician in issuing a medical order each time [(5.64±3.29) vs. (2.12±1.05) min], average number of revisions per physician’s order (1.40±0.24 vs. 0.38±0.19), rate of filing medical records within 3 days (90.28% vs. 97.97%), hospital costs [(7462.10±1035.01) vs. (6252.52±1189.05) yuan], drug costs [(652.21±88.53) vs. (437.17±108.20) yuan], length of stay [(1.23±1.04) vs. (1.02±0.18) d] and delayed discharge rate (7.93% vs. 2.03%), with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of unplanned reoperation rate, unplanned rehospitalization rate, or patient satisfaction (P>0.05).ConclusionCompared with routine clinical management, clinical pathway management can improve work efficiency, reduce medical cost and improve medical quality more effectively in the implementation of orthopedic day surgery, which has very positive effects and is worthy of promotion and application.
The two factors that affect enrollment of participants and the process of intervention in randomizedcontrolled pragmatic trials are similar to the situation of clinical practice, thus its effects are similar to the situation ofclinical practice. Therefore, when one estimates an intervention’s effect on a patient, it will be more similar to a real clinicalsituation than results taken from an explanatory trial. Due to the introduction of interventions and process variables usedin a pragmatic trial that conform to traditional Chinese medicine and acupuncture practices, more and more interest isgrowing among researchers in the traditional Chinese medicine field. This article introduces the principles and conceptsof the pragmatic trial, and the key points of design via some samples.
Day surgery has become an international and domestic medical service model, and it has received more and more attention from hospital administrators in terms of innovation and practical benefits for hospital management. However, from the perspective of standardization management, management norms have still been wanted. This paper introduces the general specification of clinical pathway management for day surgery in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, in order to provide reference for subsequent research, and hopes to provide certain standard models to provide reference for clinical pathway management practice.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effects of the participation of pharmacists in clinical pathways.MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect clinical studies about the participation of pharmacists in clinical pathways from inception to November 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies, then, a descriptive analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 23 studies involving 3 667 participants were included. The key link in which the pharmacists participated in clinical pathways was the implementation of clinical pathways. The participation of pharmacists in clinical pathways could improve the patients’ clinical outcomes, shorten the length of hospital stay, reduce the cost of treatment, improve patient satisfaction and compliance, and promote the rational use of drugs.ConclusionThe participation of pharmacists in clinical pathways could have a positive effect. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
