Clinical trial, an important research method, plays a crucial role in the development of medicine. It provides important decision support for medical workers. Medical research proposal should be posted at clinical trial registries. Researchers should update original data and research results, which contributes to data sharing. Clinical trial registration can avoid repetitive research and make clinical trials more transparent and standardized. This paper briefly introduces the clinical trial registration, including the definition, the significance, the history, the scope of registration, the organization of registration, and some common problems in the process of registration. Taking the application of clinical trial registration in the field of neurological research as an example, the article describes the current application status of clinical trial registration and explores it’s value and deficiency in specific clinical research, to provoke the awareness on trial registration, which can help to improve the quality of clinical trials.
Core Outcome Set (COS) is an important approach to address problems in which the outcomes are inconsistent, non-essential and reporting biased in clinical researches. In order to ensure the standardization of the COS development process, the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) has initiatively developed the Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development (COS-STAD). The recommendation includes 11 minimum standards, involving 3 common key domains: the scope, the stakeholders, and the consensus process. The COS-STAD is used by COS developers for standardizing research design, determining the quality of the methodology to develop a COS. Based on the background and conditions of clinical practice and clinical trials in China, especially the characteristics of the development of Core Outcome Set of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM-COS), this paper interprets the recommendations of COS-STAD, providing a reference for the potential users of COS in China.
The use of core outcome sets reduces heterogeneity in the reporting of outcomes in clinical trials, increasing the value and significance of research. This paper first introduces and interprets “core outcome sets for myocardial infarction (COS-MI) in clinical trials of traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine”, in order to help Chinese researchers better understand and use it. Second, this study surveyed the use of COS-MI in MI related clinical trials from January 1, 2023 to June 1, 2024, showing that 91% (10/11) of the 35 acute myocardial infarction clinical studies included reported core outcomes, and the median percentage of using core outcome sets was only 36% (4/11). As the publication time of the core outcome set is close to the literature search time, the understanding of domestic researchers about it is still unclear. Further research is needed to explore the application of core outcome sets for myocardial infarction in clinical trials of traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine, providing a reference for its update and improvement.
Clinical practice is very important in clinical pharmacology education. However, there are some deficiencies in this field in China. Clinical trial institutions in China are medical institutions that are qualified to undertake drug clinical trials. There are hardware and software for clinical pharmacology practice, and high-quality teaching personnel with medical, teaching, and scientific research backgrounds in the clinical trial institutions, which can be used as clinical pharmacology teaching practice bases. Therefore, this article discusses the practice of clinical pharmacology teaching reform using clinical trial institutions as a practical platform, and aims to put forward teaching reform ideas that combining students’ clinical pharmacology research practice on the basis of theoretical teaching.
In the process of evidence-based practice, the evaluation of evidence applicability relied on the subjective judgment of clinicians, while the systematic method of which was still in lack. The complex clinical information of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) enhanced the uncertainty and risk of applying evidence. Based on the analysis of the process of evidence-based practice, this paper introduced the method of TCM evidence applicability evaluation and used the raw data of clinical trials to develop a clinical prediction model to enable the assessment of the evidence applicability on individual patients. The establishment of individual evidence applicability evaluation method could promote the rational application of TCM evidence in the long term.
Objective To learn if appropriate methods and clinically relevant outcomes were used by analyzing methods of outcome assessment in Chinese acute stroke trials. Method Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials on acute stroke published before March 2003 in 6 Chinese neurological journals were included. Types of outcome measures, blinding of outcome assessment, duration of follow up, statistical methods used for data analysis and the significance of the results were evaluated. Types of outcomes were classified as death and four levels: ① Pathology. ② Impairment. ③ Disability. ④ Handicap/quality of life. Results Two hundreds and ten trials were included in this analysis. 57% of the trials used outcomes in pathology level, 77% in impairment level, 12% in disability level and none in the quality of life level. No dichotomous data was analyzed for disability measures. Only 16% of the trials reported number of death but few of them designed death as an outcome measure. Duration of follow up ranged from 3h to 3 years (median 17 d, interquartile range 14-30 d). Most trials did not assess outcomes blindly. Results in 95% of the trials were favorable to the tested interventions. Conclusions In Chinese acute stroke trials, outcome measures used were mainly in pathology and impairment levels and very few trials used functional outcome or death. Blinding of outcome assessment was not commonly used. The average duration of follow up was short.
The use of placebo controls in acupuncture trials has been an international concern for many years. We discussed some common problems in placebo controls and introduced four kinds of control methods (sham acupuncture, non-points acupuncture, minimal acupuncture and non-specific sites acupuncture). For sham acupuncture, non-points acupuncture and non-specific sites acupuncture, patients who have received acupuncture are liable to doubt the intervention they are taking. Minimal acupuncture has better reliability but is limited to use in many diseases for its physiological effect. Needling on some special parts of the body, for example, head and back side of the body, can make balance among factors as reliability, physiological effect and feasibility. This paper recommends a control method needling special parts according to the tradiontional acupuncture theory, which provides references for acupuncture clinical trials.
Economic evaluation used alongside clinical trials has become a hot spot in the development of clinical studies. The definition and classification of the cost were introduced in this article. The ways to conduct cost analysis in clinical trials were introduced systematically, including the identification, collection and analysis of the data of costs, and the concern of the analysis.
Sharing clinical trial data can increase the transparency of clinical trials and improve the its authenticity. The current requirements of clinical research data transparency is not fully adequate, and it is still difficult to create an environment in which the sharing of the clinical trial data becomes the norm. The article analyzed various concerns on data sharing and proposed solutions in data ownership, technology, implementation, and legal issues systematically, calling for clinical trial data sharing in order to promote transparency of clinical trials, and looking forward to minimize the risks and maximize the benefits of data sharing.
The complete, transparent, and standardized reporting of the outcome of a clinical trial is a key factor in ensuring the practicality, reproducibility, and transparency of the trial, and reducing bias in selective reporting. The consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) 2010 statement provides normative guidelines for reporting clinical trials. In December 2022, JAMA released the guidelines for reporting outcomes in trial reports (CONSORT-Outcomes) 2022 extension, aiming to explain the entries related to trial outcomes, sample size, statistical methods, and auxiliary analysis in the CONSORT 2010 statement, to further improve the standards for outcome reporting in clinical trial reports. This article combines research examples to interpret the CONSORT-Outcomes 2022 extension, in order to provide normative references for domestic scholars to report clinical research results.
