Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is the treatment of choice for critically ill patients with hemodynamic instability who require renal replacement therapy. This review summarizes the impact of CRRT treatment on nutritional support in critically ill patients, including: energy increase caused by citrate-based anticoagulants, energy loss caused by glucose-free replacement fluid and dialysate, a large amount of amino acids loss in the effluent, and the influences on the way of lipid emulsion administration, capacity, electrolyte, vitamins, and trace elements. It is hoped that the intensive care unit doctors, nephrologists, and nutritionists can fully cooperate to determine the CRRT prescription and the nutritional support prescription.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) to treat sepsis associated acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients aged over 80.MethodsForty-one patients diagnosed with sepsis and AKI were enrolled in geriatric RICU department of Huadong Hospital from January 2013 to July 2018, 38 patients were male and 3 were female. All patients were treated with anti-infection and fluid resuscitation therapy. After comprehensive judgment of the indication of renal replacement, they were divided into two groups by the choices of using CRRT. There were 20 patients in CRRT group and 21 in control group. Clinical data such as age, body mass index, previous diseases, 28-day mortality rate, blood cells, APACHEⅡ as well as SOFA scores were compared between two groups. Blood renal function and inflammatory markers at the first day were also compared to those after 3-day treatment of initial time.ResultsNo statistical difference was observed in sex ratio, age, body mass index and previous diseases between two groups (all P>0.05). There was also no difference in APACHEⅡ score, SOFA score, blood cells, hemoglobin and survival time. The 28-day mortality rate in CRRT group was lower than that in control group (P<0.05). The levels of serum UA and C reactive protein (CRP) in CRRT group decreased after 3-day treatment compared with those at the onset, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). The level of serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), uric acid (UA) and cystain C in control group increased after 3 days compared with those at the onset, and the difference were statistically significant (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in serum BUN, Cr, UA, cystain C, CRP and procalcitonin (PCT) between two groups at the onset (all P>0.05). After 3 days of CRRT, the levels of serum PCT, BUN, Cr and UA in CRRT group were lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05).ConclusionCRRT can improve hyperuricemia, control deterioration of renal function, reduce early systemic inflammatory response and 28-day mortality rate in aged patients with sepsis and AKI.
Objective To assess the relationship between the change in fluid overload at 48 h after initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed using data from the MIMIC-IV database from 2008 to 2019. Patients who received CRRT for AKI for more than 24 h within 14 d of admission to the intensive care unit were included. The exposure variable was the proportion of change of fluid overload (ΔFO%, defined as the difference between body weight normalized fluid input and output) at 48 h after CRRT initiation, and the endpoint was 28-day mortality. Generalized additive linear regression models and logistic regression models were used to determine the relationship between the exposure and endpoint. Results A total of 911 patients were included in the study, with a median (lower quartile, upper quartile) ΔFO% of ?3.27% (?6.03%, 0.01%) and a 28-day mortality of 40.1%. Generalized additive linear regression model showed that the ΔFO% at 48 h after CRRT initiation was associated with a J-shaped curve with 28-day mortality. After adjusting for other variables, as compared with the second quartile of ΔFO% group, the first quartile group [odds ratio (OR)=1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.81, 1.87), P=0.338] was not associated with higher risk of 28-day mortality, while the third quartile group [OR=1.54, 95%CI (1.01, 2.35), P=0.046] and the fourth quartile group [OR=2.05, 95%CI (1.32, 3.18), P=0.001] were significantly associated with higher risk of 28-day mortality. There was no significant relationship between ΔFO% groups and 28-day mortality in the first 24-hour after CRRT initiation (P>0.05), but there was a linear relationship between ΔFO% and 28-day mortality in the second 24-hour after CRRT initiation, the larger the ΔFO%, the higher the mortality rate [OR=1.10, 95%CI (1.04 1.16), P<0.001 for per 1% increase]. ConclusionIn critically ill patients with AKI, the ΔFO% greater than ?3.27% within 48 h after CRRT initiation is independently associated with an increased risk of 28-day mortality, and the goals of CRRT fluid management may be dynamical.
Acute kidney injury is a common complication and is associated with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome among critically ill patients in intensive care unit. Once renal replacement therapy in required, the mortality rate was high. Using slow and uninterrupted clearance of retained fluid and toxins, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can avoid hemodynamic instability while provide acid-base, electrolytes, and volume homeostasis. For decades, CRRT has become the dominant form of renal replacement therapy as well as multiple organ support in critically ill patient with acute kidney injury. However, there remains wide practice variation in the CRRT care when clinicians take into account the needs of individual patients, available resources, and limitations unique to an institution or type of practice, despite evidences to guide practice. In addition, CRRT is a complex technology that is resource-intensive, costly, and requires specialized training by health providers.Taiwan Society of Critical Care Medicine organized a group of experts in critical care and nephrology to review the recommendations and provide their clinical practice and concerns to write this operational manual. The purpose of this manual is to provide step-by-step instructions on the practice of CRRT and troubleshooting. In addition, it is designed to help the newbies to carry out this complex treatment correctly and efficiently. We hope that this operational manual is of value to improve clinical skills, quality of care, and patient safety.
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is one of the important therapeutic techniques for critically ill patients. In recent years, the field of artificial intelligence has developed rapidly and has been widely applied in manufacturing, automotive, and even daily life. The development and application of artificial intelligence in the medical field are also advancing rapidly, and artificial intelligence radiographic imaging result judgment, pathological result judgment, patient prognosis prediction are gradually being used in clinical practice. The development of artificial intelligence in the field of CRRT has also made rapid progress. Therefore, this article will elaborate on the current application status of artificial intelligence in CRRT, as well as its future prospects in CRRT, so as to provide a reference for understanding the application of artificial intelligence in CRRT.
Objective To summarize and analyze the clinical outcomes and experiences of continuous renal replacement therapy(CRRT) in patients with acute renal insufficiency after heart transplantation. Methods There were 39 patients received orthotopic heart transplantation from September 2007 to September 2008 in Fu Wai hospital. Seven cases required the use of PRISMA CRRT machine (Gambro Healthcare,Inc.) because of acute renal insufficiency after heart transplantation, and received continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration(CVVHDF) treatment via M100 blood filter (hemofilters). Activated coagulation time (ACT) was maintained in 160200 s. Results Six survivals with New York Heart Association (NYHA)Ⅰdischarged ，1 case died of multiple system organ failure (MSOF) and severe infection. The time of CRRT was 48658 h, with an average of 252 h. Seven patients were oliguric or anuric during CRRT, but hemodynamics and internal environment were stable. After stopping CRRT, the creatinine level rose to 267.1±68.5 μmol/L， then the creatinine level decreased to normal range with urine increasing gradually. Postoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 56.5±19.0 ml/min， and there was no statistical significance compared with preoperative GFR（Pgt;0.05）. Six survivals were followed up for 513(9.7±3.8)months，and their creatinine level was in normal range(90.6±26.7 μmol/L). There was no statistical significance compared with the creatinine level at discharge (83.2±26.5 μmol/L, Pgt;0.05）. Conclusion The prognostic outcomes of patients with acute renal insufficiency after heart ransplantation are excellent after using CRRT. No significant renal dysfunction is found.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in hospitalized individuals, associated with adverse outcomes and increased cost. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is used to treat critically ill patients with AKI, of which the cost in acute phase is higher than that of intermittent renal replacement therapy (IRRT). However, if treatment for subsequent chronic kidney disease or dialysis dependency following AKI is also considered, CRRT might be more cost-effective than IRRT. In this editorial, the cost and health economic evaluation of CRRT for critically ill patients is discussed.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of the continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for acute kidney injury (AKI) after the surgery of type A aortic dissection.
MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 58 hemodialysis patients with AKI after type A aortic dissection surgery in our hospital between January 2003 and January 2014.The 58 patients were divided into two groups including a bedside intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) group and a CRRT group based on the methods of hemodialysis. There were 38 patients with 29 males and 9 females at average age of 49.8± 13.7 years in the CRRT group. There were 20 patients in the IHD group with 14 males and 6 females at average age of 52.6± 11.0 years.
ResultsCompared with IHD, CRRT had significantly greater effect on reducing the simplified acute physiology scoring system (SAPS)Ⅱscore (Ftime=60.964, P=0.000; Ftime * group=3.178, P=0.041). However, there was no significant difference in reducing the acute tubular necrosis individual illness severity index (ATN-ISI) score between the two groups (Ftime=13.803, P=0.000; Ftime * group=0.222, P=0.951). Lower incidences of dialysis-related complications including hypotension (P=0.027) and acute congestive heart failure (P=0.011) were found in the CRRT group. There was no statistical difference in operation time (P=0.367) between the two groups. While statistical differences in duration of hospitalization in intensive care unit (P=0.006), in hospital time (P=0.047), frequency of dialysis (P=0.001), and dialysis time (P=0.039) were found between the two groups. However there were no significant differences in mortality during hospital (P=0.544)and incidences of recovery (P=0.056) between the two groups.
ConclusionCompared with IHD, CRRT had significantly positive effect on patients who suffered from AKI after type A aortic dissection surgery, which can help reduce incidences of dialysis-related complications, duration and cost of hospitalization in ICU.
Hypophosphatemia is a common and potentially serious complication during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), which is often underestimated and ignored. This article systematically searched and reviewed the relevant literature on previous CRRT and hypophosphatemia, and summarized the risk factors affecting hypophosphatemia during CRRT, the impact on the body, and the existing phosphorus supplement scheme during CRRT, so as to attract everyone’s attention to hypophosphatemia during CRRT in clinical work.
Objective To estimate the cost of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in public hospitals and analyze the main influencing factors of the cost, in order to provide evidence for the optimal application of CRRT technology. Methods In March 2021, activity-based costing was used to estimate and analyze the cost of CRRT, the data of which were collected from 5 hospitals in Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Henan, Sichuan and Xinjiang, and single factor sensitivity analysis was used to find the main influencing factors of the cost. Results The hourly treatment costs of CRRT in the 5 hospitals ranged from 265.30 to 474.44 yuan, with an average of 376.81 yuan. The costs of manpower and filters accounted for the top two largest proportions, the manpower cost of continuous veno-venous hemofiltration and continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration accounted for 22.90% and 21.51%, respectively, and the filters cost of the two types of CRRT accounted for 15.07% and 17.73%, respectively. The unit cost and cost composition varied greatly between hospitals. There were four factors affecting the unit cost, namely clinical operation, efficiency, price and patient, among which clinical operation difference was the primary factor leading to cost difference. Conclusions The application cost of CRRT technology varies greatly among hospitals, and there are many factors affecting the cost. Public hospitals face great pressure in cost control. It is necessary to strengthen the internal control operation management of public hospitals, establish CRRT clinical operation standards, and improve the quality of medical services in public hospitals.
