ObjectiveTo summarize the recent advancements in the researches on the pathogenesis of postoperative ileus and explain the clinical significances of postoperative ileus mechanisms for the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. MethodsRelevant literatures about the postoperative ileus mechanism published recently were collected and reviewed. ResultsThe occurrence of postoperative ileus were related to postoperative nerve reflex inhibition, inflammatory response, effects of drugs, and other factors, it was a variety of mechanisms modulating each other. ConclusionThe gastrointestinal motility of postoperative ileus is mainly regulated by neural reflexes, inflammatory reactions, and drug interactions, three of which act differently but as a whole in different time segments while the inflammatory response play a key role of postoperative ileus persistence.
In recent years, real-world evidence data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) have gained substantial attentions from healthcare practitioners and health authorities worldwide. In particular, the needs from regulatory bodies have promoted the production and use of real-world evidence. In the context of drug and device evaluation and regulation decisions, the pattern for using real world evidence may differ. This article aimed to discuss the potential uses of RWE for pre-approval clinical evaluation, post-approval monitoring and evaluation, and associated regulatory decisions, which may ultimately improve the production and use of RWE for regulatory decisions.
ObjectiveTo analyze the issues and risks associated with the policy of temporary import of urgently needed clinical drugs and offer optimized suggestions for this domain in our country. MethodsThe focus group interview method and in-depth interview method were employed, and 34 individuals related to the temporary import of urgently needed clinical drugs were selected for the interviews. Based on the results of the review of domestic and international policies for the temporary import of urgently needed clinical drugs and the conclusions drawn from the interviews, a questionnaire was formulated. The Delphi expert consultation method was utilized to select 14 experts from various relevant fields, and questionnaires were distributed and collected by mail for objective presentation. Through an expert consensus meeting, the final suggestions were formed. ResultsInitially, 20 suggestions were proposed for each stage of the temporary import of urgently needed clinical drugs. After expert consultation, 32 questionnaires were retrieved (a response rate of 91%), and all were valid (a validity rate of 100%). Through discussions at the expert consensus meeting, 17 policy suggestions were ultimately formed. ConclusionIt is recommended that the National Health Commission, in collaboration with the National Medical Products Administration and the customs department, conduct in-depth discussions and refine the specific implementation measures for the temporary import of urgently needed clinical drugs to guarantee the safety, efficacy, and timeliness of clinical drug use.
Drugs may induce hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation (HBV-R). Here we have reviewed the definition and harm of HBV-R, the risk drugs and their underlying mechanism, the influence factors, as well as the early intervention measures. It is shown that multiple drugs, including chemotherapy drugs, immunotherapy drugs, directly acting antivirals, cell therapy, etc., can induce HBV-R by affecting host immunity or directly activating HBV transcription factors. HBV-R could cause severe liver damage, even interruption of treatment of original diseases, affecting the prognosis of patients. Through precisely identifying risk drugs, monitoring the influence factors, and prescribing preventive anti-HBV regimen if necessary, the incidence of HBV-R can be significantly reduced. It is also suggested that clinical physicians should not only pay attention to the early identification and intervention of HBV-R, but also further study the mechanism of HBV-R in depth, especially the underlying mechanism between host, HBV and risk factors. This will help to promote the discovery of more valuable markers for risk prediction and targets for early intervention, and to further reduce the risk of HBV-R and improve the prognosis of patients.
ObjectiveThis study aims to compare different references for the fetal risk of drugs used in pregnancy to provide evidence for the safety of drug use in pregnancy.MethodsFour drug databases, including Lexicomp, Micromedex, TERIS, and Reprotox, as well as two books of drugs in pregnancy edited by Briggs and Schaefer, were searched. Descriptive analysis was performed regarding the definition of pregnancy recommendations and the specific content of medication.ResultsThe six references employed slightly different approaches to drugs in pregnancy, however, all of them included summaries of the risk in pregnancy, data of crossing the placenta, and human and animal data. The databases of Micromedex, TERIS, and a book edited by Briggs had their risk classification systems for drug use during pregnancy. For specific drugs, the summary of different information in pregnancy was different, the amount and content of listed evidence varied, and there was no evaluation of the quality and relevance of evidence among the references.ConclusionsThere is no consensus on the risk assessment of drugs in pregnancy. Risk classification systems for drugs in pregnancy are still an important method for determining the fetal risk of drugs. The existing references merely list studies of drugs in pregnancy, without comprehensive quality assessment. A methodological study of assessment of the risk of drugs in pregnancy is required.
