ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of heterotopic ossification of the elbow joint after trauma.
MethodsThe recent domestic and foreign literature concerning heterotopic ossification of the elbow joint after trauma was analysed and summarized.
ResultsThe mechanism of heterotopic ossification of the elbow joint after trauma is mainly related to bone morphogenetic protein signal transduction disorder. Now there are many treatments of heterotopic ossification, including non-surgical treatment, prevention, and surgical treatment. Non-surgical treatment and prevention mainly aim at patients who have no elbow heterotopic ossification or who have mild limited elbow motion because of elbow heterotopic ossification after trauma, including drug therapy, radiation therapy, Chinese medicine therapy, and rehabilitation treatment. For patients with invalid non-surgical treatment, choosing surgical treatment is a must. Surgical treatment includes surgical resection, arthroscopic resection, and joint replacement, priority should be given first to surgical resection.
ConclusionHeterotopic ossification of the elbow joint is common and there is not a recognized standard treatment, comprehensive use of non-surgical treatment and surgical treatment is the future direction.
Objective To retrospectively reviewed the operative therapy of the terrible triad of the elbow. Methods From October 2003 to September 2007, 10 cases of terrible triad were treated, with an elbow dislocation and an associated fracture of both the radial head and the coronoid process. There were 3 males and 7 females with the age of 18-66 years. The injury was caused by traffic accidents in 4 cases, fall ing from a height in 4 cases, and tumbl ing in 2 cases. The coronoid process fractures of the patients were 5 cases of type I, 3 cases of type II and 2 cases of type III according to Regan- Morrey classification. The radial head fractures of the patients were 1 case of type I, 6 cases of type II and 1 case of type IIIaccording to Mason classification, and their radial heads of the other 2 patiants were resected before they were in hospital. The general approach was to repair the damaged structures sequentially from deep to superficial, from coronoid to anterior capsule to radial head to lateral l igament complex to common extensor origin. And selected cases were repaired of the medial collateral l igaments and assisted mobile hinged external fixation to keep the forearm fixed in functional rotation position. The function of the elbows were evaluated with the criteria of the HSS2 score system. Results The other wounds healed by first intention except 1 case which had infection 7 days after operation and whose soft tissue defect in posterior elbow were repaired with the pedicle thoracoumbil ical flap. The patients were followed up 6 to 51 mouths (mean 24.9 mouths). The fracture heal ing time was 6 to 20 weeks (mean 9.6 weeks). Six mouths postoperatively, the mean flexion-extension arc of the elbow was 106.5° (85-130°), and the mean pronation-supination arc of the forearm was 138°( 100-160°) respectively. According to the criteria of the HSS2 score, the results were excellent in 4 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 2 cases. No compl ications such as stiffness and ulnohumeral arthrosis occurred. The radial nerve injury was found in 1 patient 1 day after operation who was treated with neurolysis, and the nerve function was recovered after 4-6 months. And heterotopic ossification occurred in 6 patients 6 months after operation and radiographic subluxation developed in 1 patient 36 months after operation, and conservative treatment weregiven. Conclusion The terrible triad of the elbow can lead to serious elbow instabil ity and should be treated with operationto restore the anatomic structures, to repair the articular capsule and the collateral l igament, using the adjuvant hinged external fixation and early exercise to avoid immobil ization and recover the articular function.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of periosteal autograft in repair of ankylosis of elbow joint. Methods From May 1985 to November 1999, 18 cases of elbow joints ankylosis (6 cases of osteo-ankylosis, 12 cases of fibroankylosis) were treated by repairing articular surface with periosteal autografting. Out of 18 cases, 13 were caused by old dislocation and fracture of elbow joints, 3 by late rheumatoid arthritis, and 2 by old total joint tuberculosis. In this surgical approach, periosteum from upper end of tibia was transplanted into articular surface after correction of the elbow joint from ankylosis deformity, and continuous passive or active movement of the operated joint was adopted with skeletal traction through olecranon of ulna for 4 weeks after operation. All of the cases were followed up for 1-9 years, 5.2 years on average, before clinical evaluation. Results The elbow joints in 11 cases were restored to normal, the joints in 4 cases obtained active movement in the range of 100°-0°, and thejoints in the other 3 cases could only have limited movement because of severe muscular atrophy. Conclusion The articular surface in arthroplasty of elbow joint ankylosis could be effectively repaired by periosteal autograft, and the function of the joints could be obviously improved by continuous movement of the joints after operation with skeletal traction.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness between paratricipital approach and chevron olecranon V osteotomy approach for the treatment of type C3 (AO/OTA) distal humeral fractures and investigate the details of operation.MethodsBetween April 2010 and September 2016, 36 type C3 (AO/OTA) distal humeral fractures were treated with open reduction and bicolumnar orthogonal locking plating fixation by paratricipital approach and chevron olecranon V osteotomy approach respectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups by approach, there were 17 cases in paratricipital group (group A) and the bicolumns and distal humeral joint surface were exposed by traction of triceps and olecranon, and the distal humeral joint surface of the 19 cases in chevron olecranon V osteotomy group (group B) were exposed by osteotomy of the olecranon and reversing of triceps. There was no significant difference in gender, age, dominant side, interval between injury and surgery, causes of injury between 2 groups (P>0.05). Patients were followed up, the postoperative range of motion of elbow joint, strength, pain, and stability in 2 groups were documented and compared; the elbow joint function was evaluated according to Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS).ResultsThe operation time of group A [(115.0±10.4) minutes] was less than that of group B [(121.0±12.3) minutes], but there was no significant difference (t=–1.580, P=0.123). All patients in 2 groups got over 1 year follow-up and there was no significant difference of the follow-up time between 2 groups (t=–0.843, P=0.405). There was 1 case of heterotopic ossification in each group; 1 case of incision infection in group A and 1 case of incision superficial infection in group B, and were cured after 2 weeks of intravenous antibiotics administration. There was no other operative complications in the 2 groups. At 3 months after operation, all the distal humerus healed. At last follow-up, the elbow flexion extension range of groups A and B were (102.0±12.6)° and (99.5±10.1)° respectively, showing no significant difference (t=–0.681, P=0.501). The MEPS scores of groups A and B were 82.9±7.3 and 81.3±7.2 respectively, showing no significant difference (t=0.670, P=0.507); and the evaluation grade also showed no significant difference between 2 groups (Z=–0.442, P=0.659).ConclusionBy paratricipital approach and proper traction of the olecranon, the distal humeral articular surface can be exposed in the operation of type C3 distal humeral fractures, followed with same stable fixation after reduction, the effectiveness is equal to by chevron olecranon V osteotomy approach.
Objective To investigate the method and effectiveness of operative treatment of anterior olecranon fracture-dislocation. Methods Between January 2007 and December 2010, 10 cases of anterior olecranon fracture-dislocation were treated. There were 6 males and 4 females with an average age of 46.1 years (range, 27-68 years). The injury was caused by traffic accident in 7 cases, falling from height in 2 cases, and falling in 1 case. Nine cases were fresh fracture and 1 case was old fracture. There were 9 cases of ulnar olecranon comminuted fracture and 1 case of simple oblique fracture. Associated fractures were Regan-Morrey type III coronoid process fractures in 5 cases, Mason type II radial head fracture in 1 case, and Mason type III radial head fracture in 1 case. Open reduction and internal fixation were performed in all cases: reconstruction plates were used in 4 cases, tension band and reconstruction plates in 5 cases, and tension band and one-third tubular plate in 1 case; bone graft was performed in 2 cases. Results All incisions healed by first intention. The patients were followed up 12-26 months (mean, 19.8 months). The X-ray films showed that fractures healing was achieved at 12-24 weeks (mean, 16.4 weeks). No failure of internal fixation, ulnohumeral joint instability, or traumatic arthritis occurred. At last follow-up, the elbow function score was 69-100 (mean, 89.1) according to the Broberg-Morrey evaluation criteria; the results were excellent in 4 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 2 cases with an excellent and good rate of 80%. The Disability of Arm-Shoulder-Hand (DASH) score was 0-22 (mean, 9). The visual analogue score (VAS) was 0-3 (mean, 0.5). Conclusion For anterior olecranon fracture-dislocation, an early and stable anatomic reconstruction of the trochlear notch of the ulna with plates and early active mobilization are given, the good functional results can be obtained.
Objective To investigate the effect of complete anterior bundle of medial collateral ligament (MCL) on the valgus stability of the elbow after reconstruction and to assess the efficacy of artificial tendon and interference screw in reconstruction the anterior bundle of MCL. Methods The bone-tendon of the elbow were made in 12 adult upper limb specimens. There were 8 males and 4 females, left side and right side in half. Using biomechanic ways and pressure sensitive film, the valgus laxity, the stress area of the humeroulnar joint, and the intra-articular pressure were measured in integrated anterior bundle of MCL (control group, n=12) and reconstructed anterior bundle of MCL with artificial tendon and interference screw (experimental group, n=12) in elbow flexion of 0, 30, 60, and 90°. Results There was no significant difference in the valgus laxity within group and between groups in different flexion degrees (P gt; 0.05). No significant difference was found in the intra-articular pressure in elbow flexion of 30, 60, and 90° within group and between groups (P gt; 0.05) except in elbow flexion of 0° (P lt; 0.05). The stress area of the humeroulnar joint in 0° flexion was significantly larger than that in 30, 60, and 90° flexion in the control group (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was found within group and between groups in the other flexion degrees (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The anterior bundle of MCL has important significance for maintaining the valgus stability of the elbow, after reconstructing the anterior bundle by using artificial tendon and interference screw, the medial stability of elbow can be recovered immediately.
Objective
To summarize the research progress in posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI) of the elbow joint.
Methods
The recent researches about the management of PMRI of the elbow joint from the aspects of pathological anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, and therapy were analyzed and summarized.
Results
The most important factors related to PMRI of the elbow joint are lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC) lesion, posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament complex (MCLC) lesion, and anteromedial coronoid fracture. Clinical physical examination include varus and valgus stress test of the elbow joint. X-ray examination, computed tomography, particularly three-dimensional reconstruction, are particularly useful to diagnose the fracture. Also MRI, arthroscopy, and dynamic ultrasound can assistantly evaluate the affiliated injury of the parenchyma. It is important to repair and reconstruct LCLC and MCLC and fix coronoid process fracture for recovering stability of the elbow joint. There are such ways to repair ligament injury as in situ repairation and functional reconstruction, which include direct suturation, borehole repairation, wire anchor repairation, and transplantation repairation etc. The methods for fixation of coronal fracture include screw fixation, plate fixation, unabsorbable suture fixation, and arthroscopy technology.
Conclusion
It is crucial that recovering the stability of the elbow joint and early functional exercise for the treatment of PMRI. Individual treatment is favorable to protect soft tissue, reduce surgical complications, and improve the functional recovery and the quality of life.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility of modified classification of terrible triad of the elbow and the effectiveness of treatment strategy which was chosen by modified classification results.
MethodsBetween March 2007 and November 2013, 12 cases of terrible triad of the elbow were treated by operation. There were 5 males and 7 females with an average age of 37.2 years (range, 26-74 years). The mechanism of injury was falling from height in 8 cases and traffic accident in 4 cases. The time from injury to operation was 4 to 11 days (mean, 6.8 days). According to the radial head, coronoid process, olecranon, and medial and lateral collateral ligament complexes injury situation, and based on Mason classification standard and O'Driscoll criteria, the classification standard of terrible triad of the elbow was improved. According to classification results, the approach was determined. The fracture reduction and fixation were performed and soft tissue was repaired.
ResultsDehiscence of incision occurred in 1 case and was cured after dressing change; primary healing was obtained in the other patients. All the cases were followed up 19-35 months (mean, 21.6 months). The X-ray films showed fracture healing at 10-17 weeks (mean 12.8 weeks). At last follow-up, the mean flexion-extension arc of the elbow was 117.9° (range, 95-135°) and the mean forearm pronation and supination were 77.1° (range, 70-85°) and 62.5° (range, 45-75°). According to Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), the results were excellent in 4 cases, good in 5 cases, and fair in 3 cases. One patient had valgus deformity of elbow who refused radial head replacement, and 5 cases had heterotopic ossification of the elbow on the X-ray films.
ConclusionThe modified classification of the terrible triad of the elbow is simple and practical, based on the damage assessment of bony structures (radial head, coronoid process, and olecranon) and the soft tissue (medial and lateral collateral ligament complexes). The modified classification can be used effectively for guiding treatment decisions.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of early rehabilitation nursing on elbow joint function recovery after artificial radial head replacement.
MethodsFrom June 2010 to June 2012, 42 patients with artificial radial head replacement were randomly divided into two groups:trial group and control group. The control group was treated by the doctor instructions following routine rehabilitation therapy and nursing. The trial group received the guidance of professional rehabilitation nursing and early rehabilitation training.
ResultsThe patients' range of elbow joint activities, alleviation of the pain, the strength grade, and the rehabilitation effect in the trial group was obviously better than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between two groups in joint stability (P<0.05).
ConclusionThe rehabilitation nursing should start early after the surgery for the artificial radial head replacement. It can prevent joint stiffness, joint conglutination and muscle disuse atrophy, reduce complications, and improve the quality of survival.
【Abstract】 Objective To review the progress in pathoanatomy, diagnosis, and treatment of posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) of the elbow. Methods Related literature concerning PLRI of the elbow was extensively reviewed, comprehensive analysis was done. Results The lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC), radial head, capitellum, and coronoid process are important constraints to PLRI. Muscle groups that cross the lateral elbow are secondary constraints to PLRI. Clinical examination includes lateral pivot-shift test, lateral pivot-shift apprehension test, chair sign, active floor push-up sign, tabletop relocation test, and posterolateral rotatory drawer test. Radiology, arthroscopy, and ultrasound can help diagnosis of PLRI. Reconstruction of bony fixation or soft tissue fixation can be used for treatment of injured LCLC. Conclusion The primary constraints to PLRI is LCLC. Ultrasound imaging is accurate for identification and measurement of normal LCLC. Therefore, ultrasound may prove valuable in assessment of abnormal lateral ulnar collateral ligaments. Reconstruction of soft tissue fixation, which can avoid iatrogenic fracture, is a selective treatment method.
