ObjectiveTo detect human papilloma virus (HPV)infection with fluorescent quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (FQ-PCR)in Minnan population, and explore the correlation between HPV infection and carcinogenesis of esophageal carcinoma (EC)of Minnan patients.
MethodsFQ-PCR was performed to examine HPV-6, HPV-11, HPV-16 and HPV-18 in 100 healthy Minnan people (healthy group, 66 males and 34 females with their age of 52.35±6.72 years)and 100 Minnan patients with squamous EC (EC group and tumor-adjacent normal tissue group, 64 males and 36 females with their age of 51.62±6.37 years)between October 2009 and December 2012.
ResultsThe incidences of HPV infection in 100 EC tissues, 100 tumor-adjacent normal tissues and 100 esophageal mucosa tissues of healthy people were 22/100, 8/100 and 6/100 respectively, which were statistically different (χ2=10.63, P < 0.01). Positive infection of HPV-6, HPV-11, HPV-16 and HPV-18 was observed in 11 cases, 11 cases, 14 cases and 15 cases in EC group respectively, 5 cases, 6 cases, 7 cases and 8 cases in tumor-adjacent normal tissue group respectively, and 5 cases, 5 cases, 6 cases and 6 cases in the healthy group respectively (P > 0.05). Positive HPV infection was observed in 1 patients with well differentiated squamous EC, 21 patients with moderately differentiated squamous EC and 5 patients with poorly differentiated squamous EC (P > 0.05).
ConclusionHPV infection may exist in tumor tissue of Minnan patients with squamous EC, and may be correlated with carcinogenesis and development of squamous EC.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect on complication after esophagectomy by comparing the different methods of anastomosis (cervical versus thoracic anastomosis).
MethodsWe searched the following databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang database to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cervical versus thoracic anastomosis for esophagectomy patients from establishment of each database to October 30, 2014. Quality of the included RCT was evaluated. Meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.2 software.
ResultsWe finally identified 4 RCTs involving 267 patients. In terms of the postoperative complication, the incidence of anastomotic leakage (RR=3.83, 95%CI 1.70 to 8.63, P=0.001) with cervical anastomosis was significantly higher than that of the patients with thoracic anastomosis. However, there was no statistical difference in incidence of anastomotic stricture (RR=1.04, 95%CI 0.62 to 1.76, P=0.87), pulmonary complication (RR=0.73, 95%CI 0.27 to 1.91, P=0.52), and mortality (RR=0.89, 95%CI 0.40 to 1.97, P=0.77) between cervical and thoracic anastomosis.
ConclusionCompared with thoracic anastomosis, the method of cervical anastomosis is associated with a higher incidence of anastomotic leakage. But there are many unclear factors about anastomotic stricture, pulmonary complication and mortality, further measurement should be taken.
ObjectiveTo explore the correlation of pretreatment systemic immune inflammation index (SII) with prognosis in esophageal cancer patients.MethodsWe searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, Chinese Biology Medicine, and Wanfang databases to identify eligible studies evaluating the relation between pretreatment SII and prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer from establishment of databases to December 2018. SII was defined as the absolute neutrophil count multiplied by the absolute platelet count divided by the absolute lymphocyte count. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival. The Stata 12.0 software was applied for the meta-analysis, and the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were assessed.ResultsA total of six retrospective studies involving 2 376 esophageal cancer patients were included and all patients were from China or Japan. The results revealed that elevated pretreatment SII was significantly associated with poor OS in esophageal cancer [HR=1.50, 95%CI (1.15, 1.95), P=0.002]. Subgroup analyses of OS indicated that SII had a high prognostic value in patients who received surgery [HR=1.54, 95%CI (1.14, 2.08), P=0.005] and were diagnosed as esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [HR=1.50, 95%CI (1.11, 2.02), P=0.007]; however, no significant relation was observed between SII and prognosis in esophageal cancer patients who were treated with radiotherapy [HR=1.318, 95%CI (0.611, 2.841), P=0.482]. Furthermore, compared with neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio, SII showed a higher predictive value for the prognosis of esophageal cancer.ConclusionsPretreatment SII may serve as an independent risk factor for prognosis of Chinese and Japanese esophageal cancer patients, especially patients who were treated with surgery and with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, more prospective studies with big samples from other countries or regions are still needed to verify our findings.
Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic operation of gastric and gastroesophageal junction diseases. Methods Between May 2004 and June 2009, 59 patients with gastric and gastroesophageal diseases were treated laparoscopically. The operative methods and maneuvers were evaluated and perioperative interventions, complications and efficacy of patients were analyzed. Results All operations were successfully completed laparoscopically except for one patient with gastric cancer who required a conversion to open surgery. No short-term complications occurred in all cases. No port transplant metastasis occurred for the patients with gastric cancer after an average of 36 months (1-60 months) follow-up. One patient died of liver metastasis 12 months after operation. The 3-year survival rate was 93.3% (14/15). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery of the gastric and gastroesophageal junction diseases is feasible and safe with minimal invasiveness, which is worth popularizing.
Abstract： Objective To summarize the technical characteristics and experience on the surgical treatment of esophagobrochial fistula induced by esophageal carcinoma and explore the safe and effective operation procedures. Methods This report retrospective1y summarized 12 cases of esophagobronchial fistula induced by esophageal cancer between January 2007 and November 2010 in Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University. There were 9 male patients and 3 female patients with their mean age of 51.24 years (ranging from 37 to 62 years). Four types of surgical procedures were performed to patients according to their respective conditions: (1) Esophagectomy ＋“tunnel”esophagogastrostomy ＋ pulmonary lobectomy (2 patients)； (2) Esophagectomy ＋ stapled esophagogastrostomy ＋ pulmonary lobectomy (5 patients)； (3) Esophagectomy ＋ colon interposition for esophagus ＋ pulmonary lobectomy (4 patients)； (4) Esophagectomy ＋ esophagogastrostomy ＋ left pneumonectomy (1 patient). Results Among those 12 cases presenting to our hospital, 2 patients died during the postoperative period and the overall morality was 16.67%(2/12). One patient died of acute congestive heart failure on the 4th postoperative day after esophagectomy, “tunnel”esophagogastrostomy and left lower lobectomy of the lung for esophageal carcinoma directly invading the left lower bronchus, and another patient died of severe infection and renal failure on the 11th postoperative day after esophagectomy, stapled esophagogastrostomy and left upper lobectomy of the lung for esophageal carcinoma directly invading the left upper bronchus. Four patients developed mild empyema and 1 patienthad bronchial fistula after surgery, who finally recovered and were discharged after treatment of antibiotics and drainage. The postoperative morbidity was 41.67%（5/12）. All surviving patients were followed up from 1 month to 3 years. During follow-up, there was one death, and the other patients were alive without any clinical events. Conclusion Individualized surgical procedure is a safe and effective therapeutic choice for patients with esophagobronchial fistula induced by esophageal carcinoma.
Esophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant cancers with a poor prognosis. For those non advanced stage patients, multi-disciplinary treatment based on surgery remains to be an important treatment strategy. Even though surgical techniques have developed rapidly, it still remains controversies in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. This review aimed to summarize and discuss those hot topics about the surgery of esophageal cancer, including surgical approaches of esophagectomy, anastomosis, lymphadenectomy, minimally invasive esophagectomy, and neoadjuvant therapy, hoping to provide evidence and perspectives in the surgical treatment for esophageal cancer.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and surgery on the clinical outcome of esophageal cancer.MethodsPubMed and EMbase databases from inception to March 2018 were retrieved by computer. A random-effect model was used for all meta-analyses irrespective of heterogeneity. The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan5.3 software. The primary outcomes were operative mortality, incidence of anastomotic leakage, and overall survival; secondary outcomes were pathologic complete remission rate, R0 resection rate, and positive resection margin rate.ResultsA total of 17 studies with 18 173 patients were included. Among them, 13 were original studies with 2 950 patients, and 4 were database-based studies with a total of 15 223 patients. The results showed a significant positive correlation between the interval and operative mortality (Spearman coefficient=0.360, P=0.027). Dose-response meta-analysis revealed that there was a relatively better time window for surgery after nCRT. Further analysis for primary outcomes at different time cut-offs found the following results: (1) when the time cut-off point within 30-70 days, the shorter interval was associated with a reduced operative mortality (7-8 weeks: RR=0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.81, P<0.05; 30-46 days: RR=0.63, 95%CI 0.47-0.85, P<0.05; 60-70 days: RR=0.64, 95%CI 0.48-0.85, P<0.05); (2) when the time cut-off point within 30-46 days, the shorter interval correlated with a reduced incidence of anastomotic leakage (RR=0.39, 95%CI 0.21-0.72, P<0.05); when the time cut-off point within 7-8 weeks, the shorter interval could achieve a critical-level effect of reducing the incidence of anastomotic leakage (RR=0.73, 95%CI 0.52-1.03, P>0.05); (3) when the time cut-off point within 7-8 weeks, increased interval significantly was associated with the poor overall survival (HR=1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36, P<0.05). Secondary outcomes found that the shorter interval could significantly reduce the positive resection margin rate (RR=0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.75, P<0.05) when time cut-off point within 56-60 days.ConclusionShortening the interval between nCRT and surgery can reduce the operative mortality, the incidence of anastomotic leakage, long-term mortality risk, and positive resection margin rate. It is recommended that surgery should be performed as soon as possible after the patient's physical recovery, preferably no more than 7-8 weeks, which supports the current study recommendation (within 3-8 weeks after nCRT).
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical features and the prognostic factors of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus.
MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 41 cases of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus admitted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between March 2008 and March 2014. There were 37 males and 4 females at a mean age of 61.1±7.9 years (ranged from 40 to 79 years). All patients underwent surgical resection and lymph node dissection.
ResultsNo severe complications occurred during the perioperative period, and no death occurred during the period of hospitalization.Thirteen patients received postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Eleven patients received simple postoperative chemotherapy. One patient received postoperative radiotherapy. The remaining 16 patients did not receive any special treatment. The patients were followed up for 6 to 61 (24.0±13.6)months. Twenty-two patients survived, the other 19 patients died. The 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, and 5-year survival rate was 80.49%, 39.02%, 21.95%, 7.32%, and 4.88%, respectively. The median survival of single surgical treatment and postoperative comprehensive treatment was 12.0 months and 25.0 months, respectively. The median survival of T2-T4 and T1 was 20.0 months and 37.5 months, respectively. The difference was statistically different (P<0.05). Cox regression analysis showed that the depth of tumor invasion, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were independent factors of prognosis (P<0.05).
ConclusionsNeuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus is rare and with a high degree of malignancy. It is expected to increase the long-term survival rate after surgical and postoperative comprehensive treatment.
ObjectiveTo give an annual data report of surgical treatment of esophageal cancer in Shanghai Chest Hospital to provide reference for treatment and research on esophageal cancer.MethodsThe clinical data of 414 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent endoscopy (9 patients) and esophagectomy (405 patients) in Shanghai Chest Hospital in 2015 were reviewed, including 334 males and 80 females. Their tumor biological characteristics and short-term and long-term treatment results were analyzed.ResultsPatients in this group were predominantly aged 60 to 69 years (46.9%), and the tumor was mainly located in the middle thorax (50.7%). About 79.9% of the patients received trans-right thoracic esophagectomy, 44.4% received minimally invasive surgery; 388 (93.7%) patients accepted upfront esophagectomy without induction therapy, and 179 (43.2%) patients received postoperative adjuvant therapy. The R0 resection rate was 90.6%, and the 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 1.4% and 2.4%, respectively. The 4-year overall survival rate of the R0 resection patients was 65.7%.ConclusionSatisfactory long-term survival results can be obtained for thoracic esophageal cancer if R0 resection can be achieved by trans-right thoracic esophagectomy and extended lymphadenectomy combined with appropriate postoperative adjuvant treatment.
ObjectiveTo investigate the influence of enteral nutrition (EN) and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) on liver, kidney and gastrointestinal function in patients after esophagectomy.
MethodsA total of 124 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy in the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College from January 2012 to August 2013 were enrolled in this study. There were 71 male and 53 female patients with their average age of 59.7 years (range 31 to 85 years). All the patients were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. Postoperatively, patients in the experimental group received EN via nasogastric/nasointestinal tube, and patients in the control group received TPN. Preoperatively, 1, 3 and 7 days postoperatively, plasma alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), indirect bilirubin (I_BIL), direct bilirubin (DB), total bilirubin (TB), total protein (TP) and albumin (ALB) were examined to evaluate liver function, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine (Scr) were examined to evaluate renal function. Postoperative time to first audible bowel sounds, time to first flatus, and time to first stool were examined to evaluate gastrointestinal function.
ResultsThere was no statistical difference in ALT, AST, I_BIL, DB or TB preoperatively and on the 1st postoperative day between the 2 groups (P > 0.05), but these parameters of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group on the 3rd and 7th postoperative day (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in TP or ALB between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). There was no statistical difference in BUN or Scr preoperatively, on the 1st or 3rd postoperative day between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). BUN (4.94±1.07 mmol/L vs. 6.67± 2.88 mmol/L, P < 0.05) and Scr (52.50±12.46 μmol/L vs. 68.23±7.61 μmol/L, P < 0.05) of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group on the 7th postoperative day. Postoperative time to first audible bowel sounds (42.00±1.68 hours vs. 50.00±1.54 hours), time to first flatus (64.15±10.35 hours vs. 70.64±14.73 hours) and time to first stool (4.20±1.50 days vs. 5.20 ±1.40 days) of the experimental group were significantly shorter than those of the control group (P < 0.05).
ConclusionPostoperative EN can promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function, and has less influence on liver and kidney function, which is beneficial to postoperative recovery and morbidity reduction after esophagectomy.
