Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) using evidence-based methods based on the burden of disease. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Five guidelines were included (four foreign guidelines, one domestic guideline; three based on evidence, two based on expert consensus). (2) Medicines recommended at least twice by the National Essential Medicine List (NEML, 2009 version) and Chinese National Formulary (CNF) contained: ipratropium bromide (four times), amoxicillin amp; clavulanate potassium (three times), and corticosteroid (three times), cefuroxime (twice), ciprofloxacin (twice), levofloxacin (twice), salbutamol (twice) and dextromethorphan (twice). (3) As for domestic study evidence, a result of one RCT indicated that amoxicillin amp; clavulanate potassium had efficiencies of 92.3% to 94.7% (n=77, low quality). A result of three RCTs (n=275, low quality) indicated that cefuroxime had efficiencies of 67.6% to 90% and an incidence of 5% as to adverse reaction that mainly included skin rashes, diarrhea, etc. A result of two RCTs (n=120, low quality) indicated that ciprofloxacin had efficiencies of 78.3% to 86.6%, bacterial clearance rates of 72.7% to 86.5% and the incidences of 8.7% to 16.2% as to adverse reaction that mainly included gastrointestinal reaction, skin rashes, etc. A result of seven RCTs (n=523, low quality) indicated that levofloxacin had efficiencies of 72.5% to 94.5%, bacterial clearance rates of 82.1% to 95.8% and the incidences of 5% to 7.5% as to adverse reaction. A result of two RCTs (n=239, low quality) indicated that salbutamol had efficiencies of 85.4% to 96.7%. A result of one RCT (n=95, low quality) indicated that ipratropium bromide had efficiencies of 98%. A result of five RCTs (n=466, low quality) indicated that the combined use of budesonide and bronchodilators had efficiencies of 93.4% to 97.8%. Conclusion (1) We offer a b recommendation for cefuroxime, amoxicillin amp; clavulanate potassium, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin used in the treatment of AECB. (2) We offer a b recommendation for glucocorticoid (budesonide, aerosol) and anticholinergic bronchodilator (ipratropium bromide) and a weak recommendation for short-acting β2-agonist bronchodilator (salbutamol) and antitussive agent (dextromethorphan) for alleviating symptoms due to AECB. (3) We make a recommendation against mucolytic agents and theophylline as routine use. (4) More large-scale, multi-center, double-blinded RCTs are needed in clinical and pharmacoeconomic studies on AECB and outcome indicator should be improved in order to produce high-quality local evidence.
Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for the treatment of coronary heart disease by means of evidence-based approaches based on the burden of disease for township health centers located in eastern, central and western regions of China. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) 11 clinical guidelines on coronary heart disease were included, three of which are evidence-based guidelines. (2) Totally, those guidelines contained 61 medicines (of 13 classes). (3) According to WHOEML (2011), NEML (2009), CNF (2010), other guidelines and the quantity and quality of evidence, we made a b recommendation for nitroglycerin, isosorbide dinitrate, metoprolol, nifedipine, verapamil, enalapril and aspirin as essential medicine for coronary heart disease. We made a weak recommendation for amlodipine, clopidogrel, heparin, propranolol, simvastatin and streptokinase. (4) 13 recommended medicines have been marketed in China and their prices were affordable. (5) Results of domestic low-quality studies indicated that nitroglycerin, isosorbide dinitrate, metoprolol, aspirin and heparin were effective for coronary heart disease. We didn’t find systematic reviews or pharmacoeconomic studies on the recommended medicines in Chinese literature databases. Conclusion For coronary heart disease: (1) We offer a b recommendation for nitroglycerin, isosorbide dinitrate, metoprolol, nifedipine, verapamil, enalapril and aspirin and a weak recommendation for propranolol, amlodipine, clopidogrel, heparin, simvastatin and streptokinase. (2) There is lack of high-quality evidence from relevant domestic studies, especially on pharmacoeconomic evaluation. (3) We propose that more studies should be carried out on clinical guideline of coronary heart disease and pharmacoeconomic comparison should be also made between recommended medicine and medicine of the same class.
Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for the treatment of cerebral circulation insufficiency by means of evidence-based approaches based on the burden of disease for township health centers located in the eastern, central and western regions of China. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Five clinical guidelines on transient ischaemic attack/ischaemic stroke were included, all of which were evidence-based clinical guidelines. (2) In total, there were 13 medicines (of five classes) listed in these guidelines. (3) We offer a b recommendation for aspirin as essential medicine for cerebral circulation insufficiency and a weak recommendation for warfarin, clopidogrel, heparin, paracetamol, insulin, normal saline and glucose/dextrose. We made a recommendation against tPA, GPⅡb/Ⅲa and antibiotics according to WHOEML (2011), NEML (2009), CNF (2010), other guidelines and the quantity and quality of evidence. (4) Recommended medicines have been marketed in China and their prices were affordable except Clopidogrel’s. (5) Some results of domestic low-quality studies indicated that recommend medicines were safe and effective, which had significant differences compared to high-quality evidence from foreign studies. Further studies were needed to be confirmed. Conclusion (1) We offer a b recommendation for aspirin and a weak recommendation for warfarin, clopidogrel, heparin, paracetamol, insulin, normal saline and glucose/dextrose. We make a recommendation against tPA, GPⅡb/Ⅲa and antibiotics. (2) There is lack of high-quality evidence from relevant domestic studies, especially on long-term safety and pharmacoeconomic evidence. (3) We propose that more studies should be carried out on the safety, special efficacy and pharmacoeconomic of Chinese medicine, Chinese medicinals and medicine with special efficacy. Besides, we also compare recommended medicine with those of the same class and construct Level 1 to 2 systems of preventing and treating cerebral vascular diseases.
Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for acute gastroenteritis using evidence-based approaches based on the burden of disease for township health centers located in eastern, central and western regions of China. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Five guidelines were included, two of which were evidence-based. (2) Recommended medicines included eight antidiarrheals (of four classes) and three antemetics. (3) According to WHOEML (2011), NEML (2009), CNF (2010), other guidelines and the quantity and quality of evidence, we offered a weak recommendation for ondansetron, metoclopramide, smectite, racecadotril and loperamide applied in the treatment of acute gastroenteritis. We made a recommendation against antibiotics, dexamethasone, kaolin-pectin, activated charcoal, attapulgite and bismuth subsalicylate. (4) Evidence from domestic studies: a result of 14 CCTs (n=1 635, low quality) indicated that in the significant efficiency and total efficiency, smectite (smecta) was superior to routine liquid infusion, norfloxacin, gentamicin or furaxone. Among these 14 CCTs, two CCTs reported smectite (smecta) caused nausea and vomiting (three cases); one CCT reported pain and distention in the abdomen (one case) and general discomfort (one case); and the rest reported no adverse reaction. A result of 10 CCTs (n=1 017, low quality) indicated that for acute diarrhea, racecadotril was superior to routine treatment in the significant efficiency (OR=2.55, 95%CI 1.64 to 3.94, Plt;0.01) and total efficiency (OR=4.32, 95%CI 2.96 to 6.30, Plt;0.01). A result of two CCTs (n=344, low quality) indicated that racecadotril was superior to smectite in the total efficiency in treating acute diarrhea. A result of two CCTs (n=1 056, low quality) indicated that racecadotril was superior to routine treatment in the total efficiency in treating acute adult diarrhea (OR=5.19, 95%CI 3.54 to 7.63, Plt;0.01). A result of two CCTs (n=182, low quality) reported children presented with nausea (two cases). A result of one CCT (n=947, low quality) reported adults presented with constipation (fifteen cases), anorexia (four cases), headache (nine cases) and abdominal pain (one case). Conclusion For acute gastroentitis, we offer a weak recommendation for smectite (powder, for oral use) used in adults (once 3 g, tid., mixed with warm water before intake), child under one year of age (3 g daily, bid.), and child above one year of age (once 3 g, qd. or bid.). Retention enema could be appiled to children with acute gastroenteritis. We also offer a weak recommendation for racecadotril (capsule) used in adults (one capsule, tid., taken continuously less than seven days). Due to the lack of evidence from clinical trials, we make a recommendation against racecadotril applied to women with pregnancy and lactation or children. In order to produce high-quality local evidence, we propose that (1) Further clinical studies should be standardized in diagnosis and criteria. (2) The design and implementation quality of clinical studies should be improved. (3) Original studies on pharmacoeconomic studies and drug applicability are needed.
Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for herniated lumbar disc based on the burden of disease for township health centers located in eastern, central and western regions of China. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Six clinical guidelines on herniated lumbar disc were included, five of which were evidence-based. (2) In total, there were 35 medicines (of four classes) listed in the guidelines. (3) We offer a b recommendation for paracetamol and ibuprofen as essential medicine and a weak recommendation for aspirin, indometacin and diazepam according to WHOEML (2011), NEML (2009), CNF (2010), clinical guidelines and the quantity and quality of evidence. (4) Five recommended medicines have been marketed in China with the dosage forms and specifications corresponding to guidelines and their prices were affordable (0.31 to 3.38 yuan daily). (5) Results of domestic low-quality studies indicated that ibuprofen and aspirin were effective with efficiencies of 63% to 84.5%; however, both of which were less effective than other trial medicines (efficiencies: 88.60% to 95.2%). We didn’t find any efficacy or pharmacoeconomic evidence of other medicines in Chinese literature databases. Conclusion (1) Pharmacotherapy should focus on symptomatic treatment of herniated lumbar disc. (2) We offer a b recommendation for paracetamol and ibuprofen used in the treatment of herniated lumbar disc and a weak recommendation for aspirin, indometacin and diazepam. (3) There is lack of evidence and high-quality guidelines on pharmacotherapy of lumbar intervertebral disc in China, especially pharmacoeconomic evidence. (4) We propose that guidelines should be established in basis of evidence so as to effectively direct clinical treatment. The effect of medicine in clinical practice should be based on current evidence from inside and outside China.
Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for urolithiasis using evidence-based methods based on the burden of disease. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Three evidence-based guidelines were included. Based on WHOEML (2011), NEML (2009), CNF (2010) and the quantity and quality of evidence, we made a recommendation for diclofenac sodium, nifedipine, allopurinol and ibuprofen used in symptomatic treatment of urolithiasis. (3) Results of domestic studies (including four RCTs, n=566; two observational studies, n=96) indicated that calculus-removed rates of diclofenac sodium, nifedipine and allopurinol were 91.5%, 86.4%~93.3% and 86.4% respectively with significant differences. Diclofenac sodium daily cost 7.00 to 8.57 yuan, nifedipine 1.48 to 4.44 yuan, and allopurinol 0.24 to 0.82 yuan. Ibuprofen had a total efficiency of 94.5% with a significant difference for alleviating renal colic, which cost 0.11 yuan daily. Four recommended medicines with safety, clinical efficacy, high economical efficiency and applicability had been marketed with specifications and dosage forms corresponding to guidelines in China. Conclusion For urolithiasis: (1) We offer a b recommendation for diclofenac sodium (capsule/tablet, 50 mg×24, or 25 mg×24) which is contradicted in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding and in pregnant women or women with planned pregnancy. (2) We offer a weak recommendation for nifedipine (tablet/capsule, 10 mg×100 or 10 mg×60) which is contraindicated in dialysis-receiving patients with malignant hypertension and should be cautiously used in patients with irreversible renal failure. (3) We offer a weak recommend allopurinol (tablet, 100 mg×100) which is contraindicated in patients with allergic reaction, severe insufficiency of the liver or kidney, or significant lack of blood cells. (4) We offer a b recommendation for ibuprofen (tablet, 20 mg×20) which is contraindicated in patients with allergic reaction to aspirin.
Objective?To evaluate and select essential antihypertensive medicine using evidence-based approaches based on the burden of disease for township health centers located in eastern, central and western regions of China. Methods?By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results?(1) Five clinical guidelines on hypertension were included, two of which were evidence-based. (2) Totally there were nine classes and 70 antihypertensive medicines listed in the guidelines. (3) According to WHOEML (2011), NEML (2009), CNF (2010), other guidelines, and the quantity and quality of evidence, we offered a b recommendation for nifedipine, verapamil and enalapril and a weak recommendation for hydrochlorothiazide, indapamide, spironolactone, propranolol, metoprolol and amlodipine. We made a recommendation against furosemide and timolol due to the lack of evidence from guidelines. (4) Nine recommended medicines have been marketed with the dosage forms and specifications corresponding to guidelines in China. The prices of metoprolol, amlodipine and enalapril were higher than those of other six (daily cost: metoprolol 3.80 to 7.60 yuan, amlodipine 2.16 to 4.32 yuan, and enalapril 0.86 to 6.88 yuan). As a whole, the prices of recommended antihypertensive medicine were affordable. (5) Results of domestic studies indicated that three bly-recommended medicines (including nifedipine, verapamil and enalapril) were safe, effective, economical and applicable. Conclusion?(1) We offer a b recommendation for nifedipine, verapamil and enalapril as antihypertensive medicine and a weak recommendation for hydrochlorothiazide, indapamide, spironolactone, propranolol, metoprolol and amlodipine. (2) There is lack of high-quality evidence from relevant domestic studies, especially on long-term safety and pharmacoeconomic evidence. (3) We propose that more studies should be carried out on the safety, efficacy and pharmacoeconomics of six medicines for which we make a weak recommendation to produce high-quality local evidence.
Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for abortion using evidence-based approaches based on the burden of disease. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Four guidelines on medicine for abortion were included, two of which are based on evidence. (2) Included guidelines referred to eight essential medicines used in drug abortion and four antibiotics used after abortion surgery. (3) According to WHOEML (2011), NEML (2009), CNF (2010), other guideline and the quantity and quality of evidence, we offered a b recommendation for misoprostol, mifepristone, oxytocin except prostaglandins used in abortion. (4) Published literature on oxytocin, misoprostol and mifepristone were found. Oxytocin with the dosage form and specification corresponding to guidelines has been marketed in China. Oxytocin (in vial, 10 U∶1 mL) cost 1.5 yuan/injection. Mifepristone (tablet, 25 mg×1) cost 13.0 to 27.5 yuan/tablet. Misoprostol (0.2 mg×3) cost 2.8 to 3.7 yuan/ tablet. (5) Results of domestic studies indicated that mifepristone combined with misoprostol and oxytocin was safe, efficient, convenient and applicable to the treatment of abortion. Conclusion For abortion: (1) We make a recommendation for mifepristone plus misoprostol. Mifepristone (25 to 50 mg/tablet) is orally taken twice a day, continually for 2 to 3 days, the total dose of 150 mg for three days. Misoprostol (0.2 mg/ tablet) 0.6 mg is orally given on an empty stomach within 36 to 48 hours after the intake of mifepristone. (2) Oxytocin (5 to 10 U in vial) injected after delivering the placenta can reduce the volume and time of vaginal bleeding. In future, clinical study should be standardized in order to improve design and implementation quality.
Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for bone fracture using evidence-based methods based on the burden of disease. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) 17 guidelines were included, six of which were evidence-based or based on expert consensus. We found that for fracture, global guidelines recommended surgical treatment and analgesics, while domestic guidelines recommended Chinese patent drugs. (2) A result of one RCT (low quality) indicated that Shang Ke Jie Gu Pian (name of a Chinese patent drug) shortened the clinical recovery time of fracture (MD=–4.2, 95%CI –5.25 to –3.14). A result of one RCT indicated that Shang Ke Jiu Ji Pian had a higher total clinical efficiency compared with San Qi Pian (name of a Chinese patent drug) (RR=1.28, 95%CI 1.11 to 1.47). A result of one RCT (low quality) indicated that Shang Ke Jiu Ji Pian (name of a Chinese patent drug) had a better effect than Shenyang Hong Yao Pian (name of a Chinese patent drug) in promoting the growth of osteotylus (RR=1.48, 95%CI 1.27 to 1.73) and also it had a higher clinical recovery rate (RR=1.62, 95%CI 1.37 to 1.9) compared to Shenyang Hong Yao Pian. A result of one RCT (moderate quality) indicated that Shang Ke Jiu Ji Pian was slightly better than Die Da Wan (name of Chinese patent drug) in regard to the recovery score of fracture (MD=0.25, 95%CI 0.026 to 0.47). A result of one RCT (low quality) indicated that compared to fracture reduction alone Shang Ke Jiu Ji Pian efficiently relieved pain (MD=–25.9, 95% –32.6 to –19.19) and shortened pain time (MD=–38.6, 95% –41.44 to –35.77). A result of one quasi-RCT (low quality) indicated that Shang Ke Jiu Ji Pian had a higher efficiency in relieving pain than benorylate (RR=1.13, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.23). A result of one RCT (low quality) indicated that Shang Ke Jiu Ji Pian had a higher efficiency than Shenyang Hong Yao Pian in relieving pain and swelling (RR=2.4, 95%CI 1.88 to 3.02). A result of one RCT (moderate quality) indicated that Shang Ke Jiu Ji Pian was superior to Die Da Wan in relieving pain and swelling (MD=–0.4, 95%CI –0.60 to –0.2). A result of two RCT (n=198) indicated that Shang Ke Jie Gu Pian caused no adverse reaction. With good applicability, Shang Ke Jie Gu Pian (taken with warm water or rice wine) cost 7.47 yuan daily. Conclusion (1) We offer a b recommendation for Shang Ke Jie Gu Pian and Jie Gu Qi Li Pian used in the treatment of adult fracture. (2) We should carry out more large-sample and controlled trials and improve outcome indicator in order to produce high-quality local evidence.
Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) using evidence-based methods based on the burden of disease. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Eleven guidelines were included (nine foreign guidelines, two domestic guidelines; nine based on evidence, two based on expert consensus). For CAP, amoxicillin amp; clavulanate potassium had efficiencies of 77.1% and an incidence of 18.8% as to adverse reaction that mainly included gastrointestinal reaction, skin rashes, etc. Piperacillin/tazobactam had an efficiency of 92.1% and a bacterial clearance rate of 88.9%. Cefuroxime had an efficiency of 89% and a bacterial clearance rate of 85.5%. There was no statistical significance between azithromycin and cefuroxime for CAP (RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.9 to 1.06); however, azithromycin was superior to cefuroxime in shortening fever-relief time (MD=–0.98, 95%CI –1.24 to –0.55) and cough-relief time (MD=–1.36, 95%CI –1.94 to –0.78). Efficiencies of ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, moxifloxacin and lavofloxacin were all more than 80% and among the three, moxifloxacin was the most efficient (RR=1.08, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.13, P=0.004). Meropenem had an efficiency of 90%, a bacterial clearance rate of 83.3% and an incidence of 3.33% as to adverse reaction that mainly included diarrhea. Conclusion (1) We offer a b recommendation for antibiotics such as amoxicillin, amoxicillin amp; clavulanate potassium, ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, doxycycline, azithromycin, clarithromycin, cefuroxim, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, lavofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ertapenem, meropenem, imipenem and vancocin. (2) We offer a weak recommendation for penicillin G, ciprofloxacin and erythromycin. (3) We propose that doctor should choose optimal antibiotics based on commonly-seen pathogenic bacteria that cause CAP, local criteria of antibiotic susceptibility, severity of CAP, and risk factors of patients.
