For the purposes of promoting the effect of secondary prevention of myocardial infarction, and improving the compliance with myocardial infarction (MI) secondary prevention, a guideline for strengthening patients self-management on non-pharmacological secondary prevention was produced by an multidiscipline team leaded by Chinese Association of Integrative Medicine clinical cardiovascular branch, Lanzhou University Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Peking University School of Nursing, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Beijing University of Chinese Medicine. This is the first version of patient guideline in China. This paper introduces the main methods, processes and characteristics of the patient guideline development. It will provide reference to future researchers to the development of the patient guideline.
Solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is defined as a rounded opacity≤3 cm in diameter surrounded by lung parenchyma. The majority of smokers who undergo thin-section CT have SPNs, most of which are smaller than 7 mm. In the past, multiple follow-up examinations over a two-year period, including CT follow-up at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, were recommended when such nodules are detected incidentally. This policy increases radiation burden for the affected population. Nodule features such as shape, edge characteristics, cavitation, and location have not yet been found to be accurate for distinguishing benign from malignant nodules. When SPN is considered to be indeterminate in the initial exam, the risk factor of the patients should be evaluated, which includes patients' age and smoking history. The 2005 Fleischner Society guideline stated that at least 99% of all nodules 4 mm or smaller are benign; when nodule is 5-9 mm in diameter, the best strategy is surveillance. The timing of these control examinations varies according to the nodule size (4-6, or 6-8 mm) and the type of patients, specifically at low or high risk of malignancy concerned. Noncalcified nodules larger than 8 mm diameter bear a substantial risk of malignancy, additional options such as contrast material-enhanced CT, positron emission tomography (PET), percutaneous needle biopsy, and thoracoscopic resection or videoassisted thoracoscopic resection should be considered.
ObjectiveTo review guidelines on diet intervention for hypertension, compare the similarities/differences and the regularity of the guidelines, discuss the prevention and treatment effects of diet intervention for hypertension, promote the understanding of the guide, and to explore the best method of diet intervention for hypertension.
MethodsDatabase such as CNKI, EMbase, PubMed, etc., as well as guideline websites were searched from inception to February 28th, 2014, for collecting guidelines on diet intervention in the prevention and treatment of hypertension. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE Ⅱ) were applied to assess methodological quality of the guidelines. Characteristics of diets recommended by the guidelines were analyzed through comparing the different regions and quality levels of the guidelines.
ResultsA total of 27 guidelines on diet intervention for hypertension were included. They were formulated by 5 continents, 9 countries, 2 regions (Taiwan of China and Europe), and 1 international organization (WHO). According to the AGREE Ⅱ instrument, 13 guidelines were graded as Level A (recommendation) and 14 were graded as Level B (recommended after changes), respectively. The domains were more than 60% except for "rigor of development" (57.89±7.71)% and "applicability" (58.39±6.29)%. Each guideline recommended low sodium diet (usually:5 to 6 g/d; Oceania:4 g/d; North America:the amount of sodium intake should be decreased as age increases). The amount of alcohol intake was generally 30 mL/d for men and 20 mL/d for women. All included guidelines recommended to increase the intake of fruits, vegetables, and potassium.
ConclusionCurrently, more than half of diet intervention recommendations for hypertension in different countries and regions are still needs to be improved and modified. Diet recommendations differ in regions, gender, and age.
Based on the site visit on the current application and practice of evidence-based medicine in USA, we find the difference between China and USA so as to further promote and plan the development of evidence-based medicine in China.
Multimorbidity is becoming a major issue in global health due to the increased prevalence of chronic diseases and the accelerated aging of the population. Clinical practice guidelines, as key tools for guiding clinical practice, play an important role in the field of multimorbidity, but also face many challenges. In this paper, we will review the necessity of developing multimorbidity guidelines, the current situation, challenges and opportunities, and on this basis, we will put forward our thoughts and suggestions to promote the development of guidelines in the field of multimorbidity in China.
ObjectiveTo adapt existing clinical practice guidelines to the management of medication adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in China, so as to provide evidence to support the development of practice guidelines that meet China's actual conditions.
MethodsAccording to ADAPTE methodology and status of HAART in China, we searched, appraised, selected and adapted current clinical practice guidelines on the management of medication adherence to HAART.
ResultsA total of 10 guidelines were included, and the final clinical practice guidelines for the management of medication adherence to HAART involved 3 aspects, including influential factors, assessment methods, and interventions. High quality evidence resources had been formed, and the quality of final clinical practice guidelines was higher.
ConclusionIt is feasible to develop clinical practice guidelines according to the ADAPTE method, and reliable evidence support has been provided for the development of clinical practice guidelines based on guideline adaption.
The management of malignant pleural effusion remains a clinical challenge. In November 2018, American Thoracic Society, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society of Thoracic Radiology summarized the recent advances and provided 7 recommendations for clinical problems of the management of malignant pleural effusion. This paper interprets these recommendations to provide references for management and research on malignant pleural effusion.
With the publication of a vast amount of clinical research on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the National Health Commission of China have all updated their diagnostic and treatment guidelines for HCC. There are no differences in the definition of HCC risk populations among the AASLD 2023, NCCN 2024, and China Liver Cancer Staging and Treatment Guideline (CNLC) 2024. Notably, CNLC 2024 has updated its guidance on high-risk factors and prospective surveillance for HCC based on the characteristics of HCC patients in China. The four guidelines have seen significant updates in the areas of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, local treatments, and systemic treatments for HCC. CNLC 2024 refines the indications for local treatment, improves systemic treatment, and introduces new first-line therapy, including camrelizumab combined with rivoceranib or tislelizumab. The second-line therapy nivolumab plus ipilimumab for advanced HCC are recommended by AASLD 2023, NCCN 2024, and ASCO 2024, which may become a new first-line therapeutic option for patients with advanced HCC. We compare and interpret these four guidelines in this paper.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the clinical applicability of the global guidelines evaluation index system, and to provide some foundation for the evidence-based establishment of the clinical applicability evaluation index system in China. MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect literature on the clinical applicability evaluation index system of guidelines from inception to November 2022. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and then organized the data to form the evaluation items pool through qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis. ResultsA total of 82 articles were finally included, and 141 clinical applicability evaluation indicators were obtained, including 5 third-level topics, 14 analytical topics and 141 descriptive topics. The third-level topics were availability, readability, feasibility, acceptability and overall evaluation. Influencing factors in the feasibility field were summarized as medical staff factors, patient/patient family factors, environmental factors and guideline factors. ConclusionThis study systematically sort out the applicability evaluation items of the guidelines, which provide an evidence-based reference for the construction of relevant evaluation index systems in China.
