【摘要】 目的 比較薤白聯合阿司匹林或單用阿司匹林防治心腦血管事件的療效。 方法 2007年1月〖CD3/5〗2009年9月就診的188例高危患者納入研究,隨機分為實驗組(89例)和對照組(99例)。兩組均予口服阿司匹林0.1 g,1次/d。實驗組同時給予口服薤白0.9 g,3次/d。觀察兩組患者血管事件的發生率和不良反應的發生情況。 結果 實驗組血管總事件發生率為6.7%,對照組為19.2%,兩組間差異有統計學意義(Plt;0.05);實驗組腦梗死發生率為1.1%,對照組為9.1%,兩組間差異有統計學意義(Plt;0.05)。兩組短暫性腦缺血、心絞痛、心肌梗死的發生率比較,差異無統計學意義(Pgt;0.05)。兩組皮下出血、血尿、黑便、惡心、腹痛等不良反應的發生率比較,差異無統計學意義(Pgt;0.05)。 結論 服用阿司匹林加薤白可顯著降低高危患者心腦血管總事件發生率和腦梗死發生率,增加療效,而不良反應沒有顯著增加。【Abstract】 Objective Compare the curative effect of cerebrovascular diseases event prevented with llium macrostemon and aspirin or only with aspirin. Methods Divide the outpatient patients into experimental group (89 patients) and control group (99 patients). Use 0.1 g aspirin for two groups with oral administration once per day. The experimental group is used with 0.9 g allium macrostemon with oral administration three times per day. Observe the generation rate and adverse reaction of vascular events in two groups of patients. Results The Total generation rate of vascular events in the experimental group is 6.7% and the control group is 19.2%,the differences were statistically significant (Plt;0.05); the cerebral infarction generation rate in the experimental group is 1.1% and in the control group is 9.1%,the differences were statistically significant (Plt;0.05). There is no significant difference (Pgt;0.05) in TIA, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction generation rate in two groups. There is no significant difference (Pgt;005) in adverse reaction generation rate of subcutaneous hemorrhage, hematuria, melena, nausea, bellyache. Conclusion Taking aspirin with llium macrostemon can significantly decrease total cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events generation rate and cerebral infarction generation rate in high risk patients, improve the curative effect and the adverse reaction has not been significantly increased.
ObjectiveTo investigate the value of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with high risk of weaning induced pulmonary oedema.MethodsFrom June 2018 to June 2019, 63 patients with mechanical ventilation in the Department of Critical Care Medicine of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University were enrolled. Randomized digital table method was randomly divided into two groups and the resulting random number assignment was hidden in opaque envelopes, the experimental group received non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (n=32), and the control group received mask oxygen therapy ventilation (n=31). The heart rate, respiratory rate, means arterial pressure, hypoxemia, reintubation, blood gas analysis and other indicators were compared between the two groups after 2 hours of weaning. The length of hospital stay, mortality and complications were compared between the two groups.ResultsAfter 2 hours of weaning, the heart rate and respiratory rate were significantly lower in the non-invasive positive pressure ventilation group than in the mask group (P<0.05). There was no difference in mean arterial pressure between the two groups of patients, which was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The incidence of hypoxemia, laryngeal edema and reintubation in the noninvasive positive pressure ventilation group was significantly lower than that in the mask group, which was statistically significant (P<0.05), and the blood gas analysis index was better than the mask group (P<0.05). The non-invasive positive pressure ventilation group was significantly shorter than the mask group in the length of hospital stay and intensive care unit (P<0.05). The hospital mortality rate in 28 days was lower than that in the mask group (P<0.05), but there was no difference in tracheotomy, pneumothorax and subcutaneous emphysema between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsNoninvasive positive pressure ventilation can effectively prevent hypoxemia, laryngeal edema, and re-intubation in patients at high risk of withdrawal related pulmonary edema. It can also shorten the length of hospital stay, which is worth clinical attention and promotion.
