ObjectiveTo compare the clinical application of empirical thoracoscopic segmentectomy and precise segmentectomy planned by artificial intelligence software, and to provide some reference for clinical segmentectomy. MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the patients who underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy in our department from 2019 to 2022. The patients receiving empirical thoracoscopic segmentectomy from January 2019 to September 2021 were selected as a group A, and the patients receiving precise segmentectomy from October 2021 to December 2022 were selected as a group B. The number of preoperative Hookwire positioning needle, proportion of patients meeting oncology criteria, surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative chest drainage time, postoperative hospital stay, and number of patients converted to thoracotomy between the two groups were compared. Results A total of 322 patients were collected. There were 158 patients in the group A, including 56 males and 102 females with a mean age of 56.86±8.82 years, and 164 patients in the group B, including 55 males and 109 females with a mean age of 56.69±9.05 years. All patients successfully underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy, and patients whose resection margin did not meet the oncology criteria were further treated with extended resection or even lobectomy. There was no perioperative death. The number of positioning needles used for segmentectomy in the group A was more than that in the group B [47 (29.7%) vs. 9 (5.5%), P<0.001]. There was no statistical difference in the number of positioning needles used for wedge resection between the two groups during the same period (P=0.572). In the group A, the nodule could not be found in the resection target segment in 3 patients, and the resection margin was insufficient in 10 patients. While in the group B, the nodule could not be found in 1 patient, and the resection margin was insufficient in 3 patients. There was a statistical difference between the two groups [13 (8.2%) vs. 4 (2.4%), P=0.020]. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative thoracic drainage, postoperative hospital stay, or conversion to open chest surgery (P＞0.05). Conclusion Preoperative surgical planning performed with the help of artificial intelligence software can effectively guide the completion of thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy. It can effectively ensure the resection margin of pulmonary nodules meeting the oncological requirements and significantly reduce the number of positioning needles of pulmonary nodules.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical experience of thoracoscopic combined subsegmentectomy (CSS). MethodsThe clinical data of 76 patients who underwent thoracoscopic CSS in Anqing Municipal Hospital from May 2018 to July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 22 males and 54 females, aged 27.0-76.0 (54.3±10.5) years. All patients underwent preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography using dual source CT. The modified inflation-deflation technique or indocyanine green was used to identify the intersubsegmental border. ResultsA total of 86 pulmonary nodules were resected in 76 patients. One patient of left upper lobe S1+2c+S4a, 1 patient of right upper lobe S2b+S3a and 1 patient of right upper lobe S1b+S3b were further performed lobectomy due to insufficient margin. One patient of left upper lobe S1+2+S3a was further performed left upper division segmentectomy due to residual atelectasis. One patient of left upper lobe S1+2c+S3a was further performed left upper division segmentectomy due to B3b+c injury, and the rest completed planned surgeries successfully. The operative time was 90.0-350.0 (174.9±53.2) min. The operative hemorrhage volume was 50.0 (20.0, 50.0) mL. The postoperative hospital stay time was 6.0 (5.0, 7.0) d. Postoperative complications included pulmonary infection in 9 patients, hemoptysis in 3 patients, persistent pulmonary leakage>3 d in 4 patients, pneumothorax in 1 patient, pleural effusion in 1 patient, and myocardial infarction in 1 patient. All of the patients were cured and discharged without perioperative death. ConclusionThoracoscopic CSS is relatively complex. Preoperative planning under three-dimensional reconstruction and intraoperative fine operation are helpful for safe completion.
Objective To evaluate the application effect of modified jejunostomy in thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for middle and lower esophageal cancer from 2017 to 2023 in Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Anqing Municipal Hospital was performed. The patients from 2017 to 2020 receiving "C+I" in the upper jejunum according to the "C+I" model, with fistula fixed with only two purse-string sutures and the abdominal wall were allocated into a group A. The patients from 2021 to 2023, on the basis of "C+I" suture, with the jejunum and abdominal wall fixed with 3-0 absorbable thread for 1-2 needles at the proximal or distal end of the fistula 10-15 mm, and the upper jejunum and abdominal wall fixed into "curtain" were allocated into a group B. The operation time, jejunostomy time, postoperative pathological stage, and enteral nutrition-related complications such as the incidence of incomplete intestinal obstruction, closed loop intestinal obstruction and intestinal volvulus requiring secondary surgery, skin redness and swelling of intestinal fluid leakage, stoma tube blockage, and accidental extubation were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 243 patients were enrolled in this study. The group A consisted of 118 patients (72 males, 46 females) with a mean age of (64.58±6.30) years. The group B consisted of 125 patients (76 males, 49 females) with a mean age of (65.11±6.81) years. All patients successfully underwent thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy without perioperative mortality. There were no statistical differences between the two groups in operative time, jejunostomy creation time, or the rate of feeding tube occlusion (P>0.05). However, statistical differences were observed in the incidence of incomplete intestinal obstruction (P=0.035) and closed-loop intestinal obstruction requiring reoperation (P=0.017). The incidence of complications at the stoma site, such as intestinal fluid leakage and redness/swelling, was significantly higher in the group A (n=36) than that in the group B (n=7) (P<0.001). Conclusion The modified jejunostomy can significantly reduce the incomplete intestinal obstruction, closed loop intestinal obstruction and secondary operation rate after "C+I" jejunostomy, and significantly improve the leakage of intestinal fluid at the stoma and the injury of surrounding skin and soft tissue. Improvements in certain technologies reduce operational difficulties.
