Artificial intelligence-enhanced brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are expected to significantly improve the performance of traditional BCIs in multiple aspects, including usability, user experience, and user satisfaction, particularly in terms of intelligence. However, such AI-integrated or AI-based BCI systems may introduce new ethical issues. This paper first evaluated the potential of AI technology, especially deep learning, in enhancing the performance of BCI systems, including improving decoding accuracy, information transfer rate, real-time performance, and adaptability. Building on this, it was considered that AI-enhanced BCI systems might introduce new or more severe ethical issues compared to traditional BCI systems. These include the possibility of making users’ intentions and behaviors more predictable and manipulable, as well as the increased likelihood of technological abuse. The discussion also addressed measures to mitigate the ethical risks associated with these issues. It is hoped that this paper will promote a deeper understanding and reflection on the ethical risks and corresponding regulations of AI-enhanced BCIs.
Brain-computer interface (BCI) is a revolutionizing technology that disrupts traditional human-computer interaction by establishing direct communication and control between the brain and computer, bypassing the peripheral nervous and muscular systems. With the rapid advancement of BCI technology, growing application demands, and an increasing need for specialized BCI professionals, a new academic major—BCI major—has gradually emerged. However, few studies to date have discussed the interdisciplinary nature and training framework of this emerging major. To address this gap, this paper first introduced the application demands of BCI, including the demand for BCI technology in both medical and non-medical fields. The paper also described the interdisciplinary nature of the BCI major and the urgent need for specialized professionals in this field. Subsequently, a training program of the BCI major was presented, with careful consideration of the multidisciplinary nature of BCI research and development, along with recommendations for curriculum structure and credit distribution. Additionally, the facing challenges of the construction of the BCI major were analyzed, and suggested strategies for addressing these challenges were offered. Finally, the future of the BCI major was envisioned. It is hoped that this paper will provide valuable reference for the development and construction of the BCI major.
Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) are communication and control systems centered on neural signals that incorporate both the user and the brain into a closed-loop interaction framework, and are widely regarded as a transformative paradigm in human–computer interaction. However, despite the existence of broadly accepted definitions within the research community, the rapid acceleration of BCI translation and commercialization has led to increasing ambiguity in scientific definitions, expansion of conceptual scope, and overstatement of technical capabilities. To address these issues, this paper proposed a scientifically grounded definition of BCIs and systematically analyzed their essential system components and fundamental characteristics. On this basis, the major and specific factors that constrain the capability boundaries of current and foreseeable BCI systems were examined. Furthermore, the scope of BCI was explicitly delineated by distinguishing BCIs from adjacent neurotechnologies based on their functional roles and system characteristics. This work aims to promote a more rigorous and coherent understanding of BCI definitions, scope, and capability limits within the academic community, and to provide essential theoretical foundations for responsible translation and long-term development. By clarifying conceptual boundaries and realistic expectations, it seeks to mitigate risks associated with conceptual generalization and distorted projections in both research and industrial practice, thereby fostering a more rational, robust, and sustainable ecosystem for the BCI field.
The bidirectional closed-loop motor imagery brain-computer interface (MI-BCI) is an emerging method for active rehabilitation training of motor dysfunction, extensively tested in both laboratory and clinical settings. However, no standardized method for evaluating its rehabilitation efficacy has been established, and relevant literature remains limited. To facilitate the clinical translation of bidirectional closed-loop MI-BCI, this article first introduced its fundamental principles, reviewed the rehabilitation training cycle and methods for evaluating rehabilitation efficacy, and summarized approaches for evaluating system usability, user satisfaction and usage. Finally, the challenges associated with evaluating the rehabilitation efficacy of bidirectional closed-loop MI-BCI were discussed, aiming to promote its broader adoption and standardization in clinical practice.
