Objective To compare the value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide ( FENO) measurement and leukotriene D4 bronchial provocation test ( LTD4-BPT) in diagnosis and evaluation of asthma. Methods 20 uncontrolled,22 partially controlled, 20 controlled asthmatics, and 21 normal subjects were enrolled in the study. Measurement of FENO was performed followed by LTD4-BPT. The distribution characteristics and relationship of both results were analyzed, and the diagnostic value was compared using receiver operation characteristic ( ROC) curve.Results FENO was above 25. 0ppb in 80. 7% of the asthmatics. The proportion of asthmatics with FENO between 26.0ppb and 49.0ppb was larger in the uncontrolled and partially controlled subjects than that in the controlled subjects. Both the median and interquartile range of cumulative dosage ( PD20FEV1-LTD4) were much higher in the controlled asthmatics as compared with the uncontrolled and partially controlled asthmatics. The area under the ROC curve ( AUC) for PD20FEV1-LTD4 [ AUC: 0.914, 95% CI: ( 0.855, 0.974) ] was larger than that of FENO [ AUC: 0.820, 95% CI: ( 0.718, 0.921) ] . Higher sensitivity ( 0.8570 vs. 0.8065) and specificity ( 0.9048 vs. 0.7619) were in favor of PD20 FEV1 -LTD4 ≤ 4.800 nmol as compared with FENO ≥ 26.0ppb being the positive threshold. Conclusion Compared with FENO measurement, LTD4-BPT has higher sensitivity and specificity and is of higher diagnostic value for asthma.
