ObjectiveTo seek the evidencebased medicine (EBM) evidences of curative effects of intravitreous injection with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) for macular edema.MethodsAll articles of intravitreous injection TA for macular edema published in English or Chinese were picked up from databases of MEDLINE and CNKI and then evaluated according to EBM standard. The data in accord with research standard were selected by using excluding and including criteria, and classified according to the appraisal standard of clinical therapeutic documents.
ResultsIn the selected papers, none in gradeⅠevidence; 1 in gradeⅡevidence; 7 in grade Ⅲ evidence; 24 in grade Ⅳ evidence; and 19 in gradeⅤevidence. Forty-two papers reported that intravitreous injection with TA had significant effect for macular edema within 3 months, and the improvement of visual acuity was recorded in these papers. Regression of macular edema was recorded in 23 papers. Among 20 papers, side-effect was found in 93 eyes (31.41%) and the serious sideeffect in 4 eyes (1.35%).ConclusionsIntravitreous injection with TA has some curative effects for macular edema in short term, but the quality of current study has not been encouraging. There are no grade I document and lack of the study of validity in long term and essentiality and validity of retreatment. The special attention should be payed on the increasing persistency of efficacy and preventing the serious side-effects in the future investigation.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:220-223)
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common ocular complication of diabetes patients. It mainly involve macular which is closely related with visual function, thus DME is one of the major reasons causing visual impairment or blindness for diabetes patients. How to reduce the visual damage of DME is always a big challenge in the ophthalmic practice. In the past three decades, there are tremendous developments in DME treatments, from laser photocoagulation, antiinflammation drugs to antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy. However, the mechanism of DME development is not yet completely clear; every existing treatment has its own advantages and weaknesses. Therefore DME treatment still challenges us to explore further to reduce the DME damages.
Objective The present study focus on the macular branch retinal vein occlusion (MBRVO) with and without laser treatment,and evaluate prospectively whether laser treatment is useful in improving the visual acuity and reducing the macular edema. At the same time to learn the difference of macular light sensitivity before and after laser treatment.Methods Forty-five eyes of forty-five patients with MBRVO and macular edema were randomized to laser treatment and no laser treatment. Follow up examinations were performed every 3 months. We compared the difference of visual improvement, resolution of macular edema between the two groups. The central 30°visual field of 20 patients with MBRVO were examined at pretreatment and 3 months after laser treatment. A comparison of light sensitivity at fovea ，central 10°and 11~30°eccentricity were done between before and after laser treatment. Results Comparison of visual improvement and resolution of macular edema showed a statistical difference between laser treatment and no laser treatment. The mean reduction of macular light sensitivity at the fovea and 11~30°3 months after the treatment has no statistical difference between before and after treatment (Pgt;0.05). But the mean light sensitivity at central 10°eccentricity were significantly decreased 3 months after photocoagulation (Plt;0.05).Conclusion The laser treatment might promote or accelerate visual acuity recovery and reduce the macular edema. There is no significant difference about the efficiency on macular function after laser treatment.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis，2003，19：201-268)
Objective To systematically review the efficacy of intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) on macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Methods Databases including PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP were electronically searched to identify randomized controlled trials on different anti-VEGF drugs in the treatment of RVO-ME from inception to September 17th 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 11 RCTs were included. Data from these studies included 2 436 eyes, of which 1 682 involved central retinal vein occlusion and 754 involved branch retinal vein occlusion. The results of meta-analysis showed that at 6 months of follow-up, anti-VEGF drug treatment of RVO-ME improved corrected visual acuity (MD=14.97, 95%CI 10.09 to 19.86, P<0.000 01) and reduced central retinal thickness (MD= ?218.21, 95%CI ?295.56 to ?140.86, P<0.000 01) compared with control groups. At 12 months, anti-VEGF treatment of RVO-ME showed better improvement in corrected visual acuity compared with control group (MD=5.70, 95%CI 3.90 to 7.50, P<0.000 01). No statistically differences were observed in the improvements corrected visual acuity with different anti-VEGF drugs. However, for central retinal vein occlusion, different anti-VEGF drugs improved the central retinal thickness including aflibercept vs. bevacizumab (MD=?46.79, 95%CI ?83.12 to ?10.46, P=0.01), and bevacizumab vs. ranibizumab (MD=76.03, 95%CI 30.76 to 121.30, P=0.001) had significant differences. Conclusions The current evidence shows that anti-VEGF drugs can improve vision and reduce macular edema in the treatment of RVO-ME. Bevacizumab may be an effective alternative to ranibizumab or aflibercept. Existing evidence cannot determine differences between the improvement of best-corrected vision and the reduction of central retinal thickness during the long-term treatment of RVO, which requires to be verified by further research.
ObjectiveTo compare the one year efficacy of intravitreal injection with ranibizumb for macular edema (ME) secondary to ischemic and non-ischemic central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).MethodsA total of 88 patients (88 eyes) with ME secondary to CRVO were enrolled in this retrospective study. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was detected by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Chart. The optical coherence tomography was used to measure the foveal retinal thickness (CRT) and macular edema volume. The patients were divided into non-ischemic group and ischemic group, 44 eyes of 44 patients in each group. There was no significant differences in age (t=0.650, P=0.517) and gender (χ2=0.436, P=0.509) between the two groups. Compared with the ischemic group, the CRT was significantly decreased in the non-ischemic group (t=?2.291, P=0.024), and the edema volume in the macular area was significantly reduced (t=?2.342, P=0.022). All eyes were treated with continuous intravitreal injection of ranibizumab three times, and repeated injections were performed as needed. The patients without obvious ME regression after treatment were combined with triamcinolone acetonide injection. The patients with peripheral retinal non-perfusion area were combined with peripheral retinal laser photocoagulation. The follow-up was 1 year. The number of injections was counted. The changes of BCVA, CRT and edema volume in the macular area were compared between the two groups.ResultsDuring the 1-year follow-up period, 88 eyes were injected 1 to 10 times, with the mean of 4.51±2.33. The number of injections in the ischemic group and non-ischemic group were 4.55±1.59 and 4.48±2.91, respectively. There was no significant difference in the average number of injections between the two groups (t=0.136, P=0.892). The number of acetonide injections and laser treatment in the ischemic group was significantly higher than that in the non-ischemic group (t=3.729, 9.512; P＜0.001). At the last follow-up, compared with the ischemic group, the BCVA was increased (t=8.128), the CRT was decreased (t=?7.029) and the edema volume in the macular area was decreased (t=?7.213) in the non-ischemic group (P＜0.001).ConclusionCompared with ME secondary to ischemic CRVO, intravitreal injection of ranibizumab for ME secondary to non-ischemic CRVO has the better outcome of vision improvement and edema regression as well as less frequent of acetonide injections and laser treatment.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of intravitreous injection of conbercept for macular edema secondary to retina1vein occlusion(RVO) during 6 months period.
MethodsA retrospective clinical study. 34 patients (34 eyes) were included in this study,who were diagnosed with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion by ophthalmologic examination, fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus fluorescein angiography and other methods. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was examined using the international standard visual acuity chart, and the results were converted to the logMAR visual acuity. The average logMAR BCVA was 0.90±0.68, and the mean macular central retinal thickness (CMT) was (672.27±227.51) μm before treatment. All subjects received intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg conbercept (0.05 ml) at the first visit. Injections were repeated based on the visual acuity changes and the OCT findings. 34 eyes received 69 times of injection, the average number of injections was 2.03±1.03. BCVA, OCT were examined before and after treatment using the same method. BCVA and CMT changes, drugs and treatments associated cardiac and cerebral vascular accident, intraocular pressure elevation, retinal tears, retinal detachment, endophthalmitis and other complications after treatment were observed. Linear correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between prognosis BCVA and baseline BCVA, correlation between prognosis BCVA and baseline CMT, and also correlation between BCVA and CMT at different time points before and after treatment.
ResultsAt 1 week and 1, 2,3, 6 months after treatment, the average logMAR BCVA was 0.65±0.61, 0.56±0.61, 0.46±0.55, 0.56±0.71, 0.44±0.48 respectively. During 1, 2, 3, 6 months after treatment, the mean logMAR BCVA were improved with statistically significant difference (Z=34.029, 47.294, 41.338, 43.603;P < 0.05), while 1 week after treatment showed no obvious improvement (Z=21.941,P > 0.05). At 1 week and 1, 2, 3, 6 months after treatment, the average CMT was (285.89±96.69), (256.65±143.39), (278.68±156.92), (290.11±188.17), (217.15±48.04) μm respectively. At 1 week and 1,2,3,6 months after treatment, the mean CMT were all decreased with statistically significant difference (Z=68.500, 98.735, 93.235, 91.132, 109.162; P < 0.05). There was a positive correlation between the prognosis visual acuity and preoperative visual acuity (r=0.682,P < 0.05). However,there was no correlation between the prognosis vision and the degree of macular edema before treatment (r=0.078,P > 0.05). Before and 3, 6 months after treatment, BCVA was negatively correlated with CMT (r=0.491, 0.416, 0.386; P < 0.05), while there was no correlation in other time points (r=0.145, 0.217, 0.177; P > 0.05). Systemic adverse reactions and persistent intraocular pressure elevation, iatrogenic cataract, retinal detachment, retinal tear, endophthalmitis and ocular complications were never found in the follow-up period.
ConclusionIntravitreal conbercept is a safe and effective approach for RVO,which can significantly improve visual acuity and reduce CMT.
Perifoveal exudative vascular anomalous complex (PEVAC) are class of diseases characterized by isolated aneurysmal lesions of the perifovea with hemorrhage and hard exudates, which are found in recent years. Its pathogenesis and pathological process are not yet fully elucidated. The current consensus through multimodal imaging studies is that PEVAC is an idiopathic perifoveal retinal vascular abnormality with cystoid macular edema (CME) and hard exudate. It is not easily distinguished clinically from retinal microaneurysm due to diabetic retinopathy or retinal vein occlusion, aneurysmal telangiectasia, and type 3 macular neovascularization (stage Ⅰ). PEVAC is a partially self-healing property, and some aneurysms and CME may resolve on their own during follow-up period. Laser photocoagulation is an effective measure for the treatment of PEVAC. In the future, with the rapid development of imaging technology, the progress of research on pathogenesis and treatment strategies and the updating of theories are expected to provide more effective treatments for PEVAC.
Objective
To investigate the effects of Atorvastatin calcium on the incidence of macular edema after phacoemulsification in diabetic patients.
Methods
Forty two eyes of 42 cataract patients with diabetes and hypercholesterolemia who underwent phacoemulsification surgery were divided into interventional group (23 patients) and non-interventional group (19 patients) by random number table methods. The blood glucose and pressure of patients in two groups was controlled strictly before and after surgery. 10 mg Atorvastatin calcium per day was delivered one day after cataract surgery for the patients of interventional group and used for 24 weeks. No lipid-lowing agent was provided to the patients of non-interventional group. The main outcome measures included the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retina thickness (CRT), total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). No significant difference was shown in the BCVA, CRT, TC, LDL-C and HDL-C in two groups before phacoemulsification surgery (t=1.251, 1.257, 1.031, 1.042, 1.461; P > 0.05). At the end of the 24 weeks after surgery, the efficacy evaluation and comparative analysis were performed. The analysis included the BCVA, the incidence of macular edema, CRT, TC, LDL-C and HDL-C.
Results
The BCVA was no significantly different between two groups one day after surgery (t=1.523，P > 0.05). But 4, 12, 24 weeks after phacoemulsification surgery, the BCVA in interventional group was better than that in non-interventional group(t=3.920, 3.012, 7.025; P < 0.05). 24 weeks after the operation, macular edema was occurred in 2 eyes (8.69%) in interventional group and 4 eyes (21.05%) in non-interventional group. Significance difference was found between two groups (χ2=4.896，P < 0.05). There was no significance different of the CRT between two groups one day after operation (t=1.501，P > 0.05). Whereas, the significance difference of the CRT was occurred in two groups 4, 12, 24 weeks after surgery(t=4.673, 7.583, 9.035; P < 0.05). Comparing with that in non-interventional group, the level of TC (t=7.043, 7.930, 8.611)and LDL-C (t=9.374, 9.554, 10.856) in interventional group was significantly decreased 4 to 24 weeks after operation (P < 0.05). But no significance different of HDL-C was shown in two groups 4, 12 and 24 weeks after surgery (t=1.057, 1.127, 1.295; P > 0.05).
Conclusion
The treatment of Atorvastatin calcium effectively reduced the incidence rate of macular edema in hypercholesterolemia patients with good glycemic and hypertension control after phacoemulsification surgery.
ObjectiveTo observe the short-term efficacy of posterior sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (PSTA) in the treatment of macular edema due to ischemic retinal vein occlusions (RVO).
MethodsA retrospective clinical study. A total of 53 eyes of 53 patients with RVO macular edema diagnosed by fundus color photography, fundus fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were included in the study. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was detected by the international standard visual acuity chart, and the results were converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity. The central macular thickness (CMT) was measured by OCT. Among 53 eyes, there were 27 eyes with ischemic RVO macular edema (ischemic group) and 26 eyes with non-ischemic RVO macular edema (non-ischemic group). The mean logMAR BCVA was 0.82±0.37, mean CMT was (662.1±216.7) μm in ischemic group. The mean logMAR BCVA was 0.41±0.23, mean CMT was (548.0±161.9) μm. The differences of logMAR BCVA and CMT between the two groups were both statistically significant (t=4.745, 2.258; P<0.05). All eyes were treated with a single sub-Tenon injection of 0.4 ml triamcinolone acetonide suspension (100 mg/ml).The mean logMAR BCVA, CMT before and 1, 3 months after the treatment between the two groups were observed and compared.
ResultsOn 1 and 3 months after treatment, the mean logMAR BCVA in the non-ischemic group (0.32±0.25 and 0.27±0.29) were improved compared with ischemic group (0.76±0.37 and 0.41±0.79), the difference was statistically significant (t=5.052, 5.240; P<0.05). The mean logMAR BCVA before and after treatment had no statistically significant difference in ischemic group (F=0.516, P>0.05), but had a statistically significant difference in non-ischemic group (F=7.685, P<0.05). On 1 and 3 months after treatment, the mean CMT in the ischemic group were (534.7±223.4), (470.8±234.7) μm, which were lower (127.4±28.28), (191.4±34.55) μm before treatment. In the non-ischemic group, the average CMT was (426.2±188.8), (371.3±200.6) μm, which were lower (103.1±33.1), (164.9±49.6) μm. There were statistically significant differences in the mean CMT between the ischemic group and the non-ischemic group (F=17.040, 10.360; P<0.05). In non-ischemic group, CMT had a bigger reduction compared to the the ischemic group (t=2.056, 2.103; P<0.05). The difference of CMT decrease value between two groups was not statistically significant (t=0.560, 0.441; P>0.05). On 1 month after the treatment, there were 3 and 5 eyes had a higher intraocular pressure than 21 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) in ischemic and non-ischemic group, respectively; but all of them returned to normal after drug treatment. There were no drugs and ocular injection related complications.
ConclusionPSTA of ischemic RVO macular edema can lower the CMT in the short term, but can't significant improve the visual acuity.
Integrins is a family of multi-functional cell-adhesion molecules, heterodimeric receptors that connect extracellular matrix to actin cytoskeleton in the cell cortex, thus regulating various physiological and pathological processes. Risuteganib (Luminate?) is a novel broad-spectrum integrin inhibitor. Based on multiple biological functions of anti-angiogenesis, vitreolysis, and neuroprotection, risuteganib is hopeful in treating several fundus diseases such as diabetic macular edema, vitreomacular traction, and non-exudative age-related macular degeneration. By far, risuteganib has successfully met the endpoints for three phase 2 studies and is preparing to enter the phase 3 of diabetic macular edema clinical trials. Overall the risuteganib is safe with no serious ocular or systemic adverse events. Given the unique mechanism of action and longer duration of efficacy, intravitreal injection of risuteganib has the potential to serve as a primary therapy, or adjunctive therapy to anti-VEGF agents.
