Objective To summarize the current value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for potentially resectable gastric cancer. Methods The recent 5-year literatures searched through the PubMed with the key words: stomach neoplasm, gastric cancer/carcinoma, neoadjuvant therapy/chemotherapy and preoperative therapy/chemotherapy as well as the relevant reports presented in the ASCO Annual Meeting in 2007 and 2008 were analyzed. The present status of NAC for advanced gastric cancer was summarized, the necessity and feasibility were evaluated, and the patients features for selecting, the predictors for response, the mainly existing problems and development trend of NAC were analyzed. Results At present, there were 7 randomized control trails (RCT) published, and among them 3 were phase Ⅲ. It was safe, effective and feasible to most of trails in NAC for gastric cancer. However, it was still little to obtain survival benefit for NAC RCT, and short of randomized trial comparing strict preoperative chemotherapy to surgery alone or perioperative chemotherapy to surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy. It remained lots of problems such as how to select the appropriate patients, the effective induced regimes and the predicted factors, the evaluated indices for response. Conclusion NAC is a safe, feasible and efficient method to potentially resectable gastric cancer, but strict phase Ⅲ randomized trials are needed. In the future, substantial improvements of treatment outcome will likely depend on the novel drugs and molecular biological targeted therapies.
We reported three cases of stageⅢ/N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in our hospital, including 2 males and 1 female with a mean age of 65.7 years. The patients received two doses of the programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor toripalimab after 1 week of SBRT. Thereafter, surgery was planned 4-6 weeks after the second dose. One patient achieved pathologic complete response, one achieved major pathologic response (MPR), and one did not achieve MPR with 20% residual tumor. There were few side effects of toripalimab combined with SBRT as a neoadjuvant treatment, and the treatment did not cause a delay of surgery.
【 Abstract 】 Objective To discuss incidence of the complications in the rectal cancer patients ’ early postoperative being treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with surgical intervention. Methods The rectal cancer patients under surgical therapy being diagnosed definitely, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy under multi-disciplinary team (MDT) or without and firstly being discovered from April to October of 2007 were studied. The complication conditions of these patients 1 month after operation were studied and observed, and the differences between MDT group and non-MDT group were compared. Results According to the condition, 189 rectal cancer patients were internalized. Among all the patients, the distance of tumor to the dentate line were lt;3 cm 38 cases, 3 ～ 7 cm 86 cases, ≥ 7 cm 65 cases; pathological stage were Ⅰ stage 5 cases ， Ⅱstage 122 cases， Ⅲstage 50 cases， Ⅳstage 12 cases. There were 181 cases laparotomy, 8 cases laparoscopic operation; 33 cases stoma operation, 156 cases non-stoma operation. The total incidence of postoperative complication was 27.0% （51/189）. Of all, incision bleeding was 1 case, abdominal (deep) bleeding were 4 cases, anastomosis bleeding were 5 cases, pulmonary infection was 1 case, wound infection were 7 cases, urinary tract infection were 3 cases, abdominal (deep) infection was 1 case, unknown fever were 19 cases, superficial layer wound dehiscence was 1 case, wound co-liquation were 15 cases, anastomosis leakage were 3 cases, rectovaginal fistula were 2 cases; intestinal obstruction were 7 cases, urinary retention were 7 cases, stress ulcer were 2 cases. Follow-up in 2-10 months after operation, there was no death case. The baseline between MDT group and non-MDT group was equal. The ratio of postoperative blood transfusion of MDT group was obviously less than that of non-MDT group （P＜0.05）. Moreover, the operation time of MDT group was obviously shorter than that of non-MDT group, and the difference was statistically significant （P＜0.05）. But the ratio of laparotomy and laparoscopic operation, of stoma operation and non-stoma operation, as well as the types of radical excision operation of rectal cancer didn’t show any statistical difference between two groups (Pgt;0.05). The postoperative venting time, defecation time, intake time didn’t show any statistical difference between two groups too. But the postoperative out-of-bed activity time and the postoperative in-hospital days of MDT group was obviously shorter than that of non-MDT group, and the difference was statistically significant （P＜0.05）. In MDT group the postoperative total complication rate was less than non-MDT group, and the difference was statistically significant （P＜0.05）. Among all the complications, the MDT group had a lower rate of wound infection, wound co-liquation and urinary retention （P＜0.05）. Using multifactorial logistic regression analysis, the risk factor which influenced the postoperative complication rate in MDT group were: postoperative intake time and postoperative hospitalization time. But the risk factor in non-MDT group was only according to postoperative hospitalization time. Conclusion The patients who were treated by MDT, definite operative method combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy or not didn’t increase the postoperative complication rate and risk. So it could be believed that such a composite treatment was feasible and safe in early postoperative stage. But it needs further studies to evaluate the medium- and long-term clinical effect.
Objective To evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on breast conserving surgery and the outcomes of treatment for women with operable breast cancer. Methods We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2007), CENTRAL (1970 to 2007), PUBMED (1978 to March 2007), CBM (1978 to 2006), CNKI (1994 to 2007), CMCC (1994 to May 2007) and other relevant databases and journals. We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NAC plus breast conserving therapy (BCT) or mastectomy versus BCT or mastectomy plus postoperative chemotherapy in women with operable breast cancer. Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Meta-analyses were performed for homogenous studies by using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.10. Results Three eligible studies involving 2?391 women were included. The median follow-up in the studies ranged from 17 to 137 months. The methodological quality of the three RCTs was high. Meta-analyses showed that NAC had no significant effect on overall survival (OS) (RR 0.99, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.07), disease-free survival (RR 1.04, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.15) and ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence (RR 1.34, 95%CI 0.84 to 2.13). Two RCTs revealed that NAC significantly increased the rate of BCT in operable breast cancer patients, but the other RCT reported similar rates of BCT in both groups. One RCT indicated that NAC did not increase the incidence of surgery-related local complications. Conclusions NAC is safe for the treatment of women with operable breast cancer, which may increase the rate of BCT and help to evaluate chemosensitivity. There is insufficient evidence to assess the effect of NAC on conserving surgery procedure and survival rate in operable BCT patients. More large-scale RCTs are needed to define further the role of NAC in the treatment of operable breast cancer patients.
Objective To discuss the important role of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer. Methods From the surgical point of view, the evidences from clinic trials in literatures of recent years and also from the results of our single institution were analyzed. Results Preoperative radiotherapy with total dosage of 50 Gy had showed more and more advantages in the past two decades. Preoperative radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy had definite effects in downing stage and improving local control, while its role in sphincter preserving kept in controversy. However, this combined preoperative therapies had not improved long-term survival in rectal cancer. By now, there were no proper indicators to predict the effects of therapies. Conclusion Preoperative chemoradiotherapy is still the only way to improve the rate of R0 resection and decrease the rate of local currence after surgery for patients with mid-low advanced rectal cancer.
Objective To evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the expression of CXCR4 in breast cancer and its clinical significance.Methods The clinical data of 59 patients with breast cancer of stage Ⅱ and stage Ⅲ underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus epirubicin for 3 cycles between April 2005 and March 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. The expression of CXCR4 in the breast cancer tissues before and after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was examined by immunohistochemistry and its relationship with clinicopathologic factors was analyzed.Results The CXCR4 positive expression was observed in 56 patients with breast cancer (94.9%), but not in corresponding nontumor normal tissues. The expression level of CXCR4 was correlated to lymph nodes metastasis (P=0.019) and breast cancer stage (P=0.040), but it was not correlated to age of patients, tumor size, grade, hormone receptor (ER and PR)， and HER2 status. The expression level of CXCR4 was significantly decreased after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Decline extent of CXCR4 expression after chemotherapy and CXCR4 expression level were not correlated to the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while the effect of chemotherapy in patients expressed CXCR4 in cluster distribution was better than that in scattering distribution (P=0.015). Conclusion The decline extent of CXCR4 expression level after paclitaxel combined with epirubicin neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not correlated to the efficacy, but its expressing distribution may be considered as an index to the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Objective To study the long-term effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on advanced breast cancer. Methods The CAF neoadjuvant chemotherapy 〔CTX 500 mg/m2（1st day, 8th day), 5-FU 500 mg/m2（1st day, 8th day), and ADM 30 mg/m2 (1st day) every 3 weeks〕 was carried out in 31 breast cancer patients (stageⅢ,Ⅳ) for 2 cycles before operation, compared with 30 patients (stage Ⅲa) whose therapies were never done and operations could be feasible. Results The overall response rate was 87.1%(27/31). The stages of 19 patients among 31 (61.3%) declined (6 patients to stage Ⅲa, 8 to stageⅡb, 4 to stageⅡa, 1 to stage 0, 1 to complete response and none to pathological complete response). The diseasefree survival time of the patients was 56.3 months which was obviously longer than that of the patients without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (43.5 months, P＜0.05). The 5-year diseasefree survival rate of the patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 38.7% which was a little higher than that (33.3%) of the patients without the chemotherapy, and the two groups had no significant difference. Conclusion The neoadjuvant chemotherapy can reduce the stages of patients with advanced breast cancer, obviously prolong the diseasefree survival time of patients, and reduce or delay recurrence or metastasis.
ObjectiveTo investigate effect of carbon nanoparticles on number of lymph nodes harvested in radical operation of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
MethodsOne hundred and five patients diagnosed with low and middle rectal cancer and received radical operation after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from March 1, 2014 to October 31, 2015 were included. Thirtysix patients were injected with carbon nanoparticles by colonoscopy before surgery and were classified as study group, and the rest patients were classified as control group. According to the same principle of surgery and procedure of pathological specimen handling, the effect of carbon nanoparticles on lymph node harvested in resected specimens was analyzed.
ResultsThe total lymph nodes harvested were 764 in the study group and 1 242 in the control group. Among them, the metastatic lymph nodes were 19 in the study group, 58 in the control group. Although the average lymph nodes harvested in each patient had no significant difference between the study group and the control group (21.22±7.13 versus 18.00±9.84, t=1.739, P=0.085), the proportion of patients with 12 or more than 12 lymph nodes harvested in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group [88.9% (32/36) versus 71.0% (49/69), χ2=4.287, P=0.038]. The ratio of patients with metastatic lymph nodes [27.8% (10/36) versus 33.3% (23/69), χ2=0.339, P=0.561] and the average metastatic lymph nodes harvested in each patient (1.90±1.29 versus 2.52±2.33, t=0.788, P=0.437) all had no significant differences between the study group and the control group.
ConclusionThe injection of carbon nanoparticles by colonoscopy before surgery could increase detection rate of 12 or more than 12 lymph nodes in resected specimens of patients who were diagnosed with low and middle rectal cancer and received radical operation after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Objective
To systematically evaluate the profitability and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage Ⅲa non-small cell lung cancer.
Methods
Randomized controlled trials (RCT) on neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage Ⅲa non-small cell lung cancer were collected from WangFang Data database, Web of Science, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, The Cochrane Library, VIP and CBM databases. From building to October 2017. After two independent reviewers screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of being included in the study, Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.
Results
A total of 15 RCT were included, including 1899 non-small cell lung cancer patients. The results of Meta analysis showed that the resection rate of R0 in neoadjuvant chemotherapy group was significantly higher than that in control group (OR=2.04, 95%CI 1.52 to 2.74, P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in postoperative complications between two groups (OR=1.23, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.69, P=0.22). In terms of survival rate, the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group could improve patients for one year (OR=1.38, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.88, P=0.04), three years (OR=1.57, 95%CI 1.16 to 2.12, P=0.004) and 5 years survival rate (OR=2.09, 95%CI 1.24 to 3.53, P=0.005) significance of learning.
Conclusion
Compared with the control group, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can improve the surgical R0 resection rate and the one, three and five year survival rate of patients with stage Ⅲa non-small cell lung cancer without increasing the postoperative complications. Due to the quantity and quality limitations of the included studies, the above conclusion still needs to be verified by more high-quality research.
ObjectiveTo explore the relation between the molecular subtypes and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel together with epirubicin(TE) in breast cancer.
MethodsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 239 patients with breast cancer who at least received 3 cycles of TE-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy from May 2011 to December 2012 in this hospital were included. Molecular subtypes were categorized into luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER-2) positive, and triple negative by the immunohistochemical results of estrogen receptor(ER), progesterone receptor(PR), HER-2, and Ki-67 status. The relevant indicators of the different molecular subtypes of breast cancer patients, such as pathological complete response(pCR) rate, age, and menstruation, etc. were analyzed.
ResultsThere were 67(28.03%) patients with luminal A, 84(35.15%) luminal B, 21(8.79%) HER-2, and 67(28.03%) triple negative in these 239 patients with breast cancer. The differences of age, menstruation, axillary lymph node status etc. among the four molecular subtypes were not statistically significant(P > 0.05). The pCR rate of triple negative breast cancer(14.93%) was the highest among four subtypes, followed by luminal B(7.14%), HER-2 positive(4.76%) and luminal A(1.49%), there was a significant difference(P=0.027).
ConclusionsComparing with luminal A, luminal B, and HER-2 positive breast cancers, triple negative breast cancer is the most sensitive to TE neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and it has the highest pCR rate. Therefore, different treatment should be selected according to molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
