ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of TEC and CEF regimen in preoperative chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer. MethodsA total of one hundred breast cancer patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy were divided into TEC group (n=50) and CEF group (n=50) by the pairgroup method and received surgical therapy after three courses of chemotherapy. The efficacy and toxicity of preoperative chemotherapy of patients in two groups were analyzed. ResultsFour patients with stage ⅢB breast cancer quit from CEF group after two courses of treatment because of the worse satisfaction. Clinical complete remission (cCR) was 7 cases, clinic partial remission (cPR) was 34 cases, stable disease (SD) was 9 cases, therefore, the remission rate (RR) was 82.0% (41/50), and reduction rate of tumor was 64.0% (32/50) in TEC group. cCR was 2 cases, cPR was 32 cases, SD was 12 cases, thus the RR was 680% (34/50), and reduction rate of tumor was 40.0% (20/50) in CEF group. The clinical efficacy and reduction rate of tumor of patients in TEC group were significantly superior than those in CEF group (Plt;0.05). The negative conversion ratio of lymph nodes were 54.1% (20/37) and 57.1% (20/35) in TEC group and CEF group, which was not statistically different (Plt;0.05). The occurrence of hair loss and leukopenia of patients in TEC group were significantly higher than those in CEF group (Plt;0.05), while the differences in thrombocytopenia, low concentration of hemoglobin, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, cardiac toxicity, and neurotoxicity were not significant (Pgt;0.05). ConclusionTEC regimen is better than CEF regimen in the efficacy and safety of neo-adjuant therapy for patients with breast cancer, and well tolerated.
ObjectiveTo study the latest progress of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. MethodsLiteratures of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer, involving with theoretical basis, clinical significance, indications, drugs, predictors, and its relationship of breastconserving surgery, sentinel lymph node biopsy were reviewed. ResultsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy could reduce the clinical stage, increase opportunity of breast-conserving surgery, learn the sensitivity of drugs, prevent distant metastases, but the impact of the sentinel lymph node biopsy was still in dispute. ConclusionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy is an important part of a systemic treatment for breast cancer, but how to select sensitive drugs, develop individualized treatment programs and forecast the outcome needs further study.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and find the mechanism of multidrug resistance. MethodsTwenty patients with gastric cancer and 31 patients with colorectal cancer underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and then operations. The preoperative specimens were stained by immunohistochemical techniques for testing p53,multidrug resistanceassociated protein (MRP), glutathione S transferase（GST）, telomerase. Resection specimens were evaluated for chemotherapy effect by routine histology; at the same time, the postoperative morbidity and mortality were observed. ResultsIn 51 patients, the response rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 27.45%(14/51),so multidrug resistance was a kind of common phenomena in gastrointestinal carcinomas. The postoperative morbidity was 15.69%(8/15), the main operation complication was infection,the mortality was 1.96%(1/51),only one person died from severe infection.The expression rate of p53, MRP, GST, telomerase was 58.0%,51.0%,66.7%,74.0%respectively, the location of p53 was at cell nucleus,location of MRP,GST was at cell memberane and cytoplasm,location of telomerase was at cytoplasm.The response rate had nothing to do with age, sex and metastasis. But it was related with p53 and telomerase expression. ConclusionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy is an effective, safe therapy. But the rate of drug resistance is high in gastrointestinal carcinomas, and the response rate is related to p53, telomerase expression.
Objective To study the long-term effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on advanced breast cancer. Methods The CAF neoadjuvant chemotherapy 〔CTX 500 mg/m2（1st day, 8th day), 5-FU 500 mg/m2（1st day, 8th day), and ADM 30 mg/m2 (1st day) every 3 weeks〕 was carried out in 31 breast cancer patients (stageⅢ,Ⅳ) for 2 cycles before operation, compared with 30 patients (stage Ⅲa) whose therapies were never done and operations could be feasible. Results The overall response rate was 87.1%(27/31). The stages of 19 patients among 31 (61.3%) declined (6 patients to stage Ⅲa, 8 to stageⅡb, 4 to stageⅡa, 1 to stage 0, 1 to complete response and none to pathological complete response). The diseasefree survival time of the patients was 56.3 months which was obviously longer than that of the patients without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (43.5 months, P＜0.05). The 5-year diseasefree survival rate of the patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 38.7% which was a little higher than that (33.3%) of the patients without the chemotherapy, and the two groups had no significant difference. Conclusion The neoadjuvant chemotherapy can reduce the stages of patients with advanced breast cancer, obviously prolong the diseasefree survival time of patients, and reduce or delay recurrence or metastasis.
Objective To investigate the advances and clinical efficacy evaluation method on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer. Methods Literatures on the advances and clinical efficacy evaluation method on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer were reviewed and analyzed. The agreement between computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) and the results of histopathology and survival was analyzed.Results CT and EUS were the method of efficacy evaluation commonly used at present, but the evaluation indexes and criteria were controversial, and the criteria for solid tumors seemed to be not feasible for gastric cancer. Diffusionweighted imaging (DWI) method needed more investigation, while PET held advantage in early selection of patients without response accurately.Conclusion There is no uniform standard for clinical efficacy evaluation yet, so an integration of diverse imaging methods may be the best choice to improve the accuracy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.
【 Abstract 】 Objective To discuss incidence of the complications in the rectal cancer patients ’ early postoperative being treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with surgical intervention. Methods The rectal cancer patients under surgical therapy being diagnosed definitely, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy under multi-disciplinary team (MDT) or without and firstly being discovered from April to October of 2007 were studied. The complication conditions of these patients 1 month after operation were studied and observed, and the differences between MDT group and non-MDT group were compared. Results According to the condition, 189 rectal cancer patients were internalized. Among all the patients, the distance of tumor to the dentate line were lt;3 cm 38 cases, 3 ～ 7 cm 86 cases, ≥ 7 cm 65 cases; pathological stage were Ⅰ stage 5 cases ， Ⅱstage 122 cases， Ⅲstage 50 cases， Ⅳstage 12 cases. There were 181 cases laparotomy, 8 cases laparoscopic operation; 33 cases stoma operation, 156 cases non-stoma operation. The total incidence of postoperative complication was 27.0% （51/189）. Of all, incision bleeding was 1 case, abdominal (deep) bleeding were 4 cases, anastomosis bleeding were 5 cases, pulmonary infection was 1 case, wound infection were 7 cases, urinary tract infection were 3 cases, abdominal (deep) infection was 1 case, unknown fever were 19 cases, superficial layer wound dehiscence was 1 case, wound co-liquation were 15 cases, anastomosis leakage were 3 cases, rectovaginal fistula were 2 cases; intestinal obstruction were 7 cases, urinary retention were 7 cases, stress ulcer were 2 cases. Follow-up in 2-10 months after operation, there was no death case. The baseline between MDT group and non-MDT group was equal. The ratio of postoperative blood transfusion of MDT group was obviously less than that of non-MDT group （P＜0.05）. Moreover, the operation time of MDT group was obviously shorter than that of non-MDT group, and the difference was statistically significant （P＜0.05）. But the ratio of laparotomy and laparoscopic operation, of stoma operation and non-stoma operation, as well as the types of radical excision operation of rectal cancer didn’t show any statistical difference between two groups (Pgt;0.05). The postoperative venting time, defecation time, intake time didn’t show any statistical difference between two groups too. But the postoperative out-of-bed activity time and the postoperative in-hospital days of MDT group was obviously shorter than that of non-MDT group, and the difference was statistically significant （P＜0.05）. In MDT group the postoperative total complication rate was less than non-MDT group, and the difference was statistically significant （P＜0.05）. Among all the complications, the MDT group had a lower rate of wound infection, wound co-liquation and urinary retention （P＜0.05）. Using multifactorial logistic regression analysis, the risk factor which influenced the postoperative complication rate in MDT group were: postoperative intake time and postoperative hospitalization time. But the risk factor in non-MDT group was only according to postoperative hospitalization time. Conclusion The patients who were treated by MDT, definite operative method combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy or not didn’t increase the postoperative complication rate and risk. So it could be believed that such a composite treatment was feasible and safe in early postoperative stage. But it needs further studies to evaluate the medium- and long-term clinical effect.
ObjectiveTo evaluate clinical effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with laparoscopic gastrectomy in treatment of local advanced gastric cancer.
MethodsThe clinical data of 24 patients with local advanced gastric cancer undergoing 2 courses of FLEEOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy from July 2012 to July 2015 were analyzed. The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on radiographic results was evaluated. The gastrectomy was performed on week 2 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were treated with XELOX regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy after laparoscopic gastrectomy.
Results① Complete response occurred in 4 cases (16.6%), partial response in 18 cases (75.0%), stable disease in 1 case (4.2%), disease progressive in 1 case (4.2%). The total effective rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 91.6% (22/24). ② The serum tumor markers CEA, CA19-9, and CA125 levels after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significantly lower than those before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001) and reached normal levels. ③ Two courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and laparoscopic exploration were completed successfully in these 24 patients. Two patients with intraabdominal metastasis were underwent palliative gastrojejunostomy, the other 22 patients were underwent laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy. The operative time was (236±45) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (150±50) mL, the number of lymph node dissected was 17.4 ± 5.3, the postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time was (3.1±0.8) d. ④ There was no death due to surgery. One case suffered anastomotic leakage, 1 case intestinal obstruction, and 1 case pulmonary infection after surgery. The postoperative complications were cured by conservative treatment. ⑤ The haematological adverse events included anemia (9 patients), leukopenia (14 patients), thrombocytopenia (8 patients), aminotransferase abnormality (5 in elevated ALT, 6 in elevated AST), the most common toxicity was nausea (19 patients), 10 patients suffered nerve toxicity. All the patients were relieved after treatment. ⑥ The patients were followed up for 4-39 months, 1 case died of cachexia as the result of extensive abdominal metastasis, 1 case died of liver failure as the result of multiple liver metastases, 1 case was death as the result of brain metastasis, 1 case was death as the result of the other cause, the other 20 patients were alive.
ConclusionsThe preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that FLEEOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with laparoscopic gastrectomy for local advanced gastric cancer is safe and effective. It has advantages of minimal invasion and fast recovery.
Objective To investigate the influencing factors for the clinical remission of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, establish an individualized nomogram model to predict the clinical remission of advanced ESCC with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and evaluate its efficacy, providing serve for the preoperative adjuvant treatment of ESCC.Methods The clinical data of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nedaplatin 80 mg/m2, day 3+docetaxel 75 mg/m2, day 1, 2 cycles, 21 days per cycle interval) in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from February 2016 to August 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the WHO criteria for efficacy assessment of solid tumors, tumors were divided into complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD). CR and PR were defined as effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and SD and PD were defined as ineffective neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyze the influencing factors for the short-term efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The R software was used to establish a nomogram model for predicting the clinical remission of advanced ESCC with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and Bootstrap method for internal verification of the model. C-index, calibration curve and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the nomogram.Results Finally 115 patients were enrolled, including 93 males and 22 females, aged 40-75 (64.0±8.0) years. After receiving docetaxel+nedaplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy for 2 cycles, there were 9 patients with CR, 56 patients with PR, 43 patients with SD and 7 patients with PD. Among them, chemotherapy was effective (CR+PR) in 65 patients and ineffective (SD+PD) in 50 patients, with the clinical effective rate of about 56.5% (65/115). Univariate analysis showed that there were statistical differences in smoking history, alcoholism history, tumor location, tumor differentiation degree, and cN stage before chemotherapy between the effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and the ineffective neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that low-differentiation advanced ESCC had the worst clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, moderately-highly differentiated ESCC responded better (P<0.05). Stage cN0 advanced ESCC responded better to neoadjuvant chemotherapy than stage cN1 and cN2 (P<0.05). The C-index and the area under the ROC curve of the nomogram were both 0.763 (95%CI 0.676-0.850), the calibration curve fit well, the best critical value of the nomogram calculated by the Youden index was 70.04 points, and the sensitivity and specificity of the critical value were 80.0% and 58.0%, respectively.ConclusionThe established clinical prediction model has good discrimination and accuracy, and can provide a reference for individualized analysis of the clinical remission of advanced ESCC with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the screening of new adjuvant treatment subjects.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of CTX, EADM, VCR, and Pred (CHOP) as preoperative regional intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy in primary gastric malignant lymphoma (PGML). MethodsForty-one patients with PGML underwent preoperative regionalarterial infusion chemotherapy. The regimen consisting of CTX 600 mg/m2, EADM 50 mg/m2, VCR 1.4 mg/m2, and Pred 60 mg/m2, was administrated 14－21 d before operation. Another 33 patients with similar PGML during the same period underwent surgery directly. The response of the tumor and chemotherapy toxicity were observed, together with the survival of the cases. ResultsAmong the 33 patients undergoing surgery directly, 24 cases (72.7%) had curative resection, the 5-year survival rate was 58.3% (14/24). All 41 patients of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group completed the planned regimen of chemotherapy and surgery successfully. The most common related adverse effects were grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ gastrointestinal discomfort (22 cases) and bone marrow suppression (14 cases). Thirtyseven cases (90.2%) underwent curative resection, the 5year survival rate was 67.7% (21/31). There was no significant difference between two groups in 5year survival rate (χ2=0.517， P＝0.471), while with significant difference in curative resection rate (P＝0.041). ConclusionsNeoadjuvant intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy (CHOP) has been wellrated; it appears to have improved the resectable rate of the PGML patients studied.
Objective To explore the tumor shrinking model, the accurate image evaluation of the residual tumor, and the selection criteria for breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods To review literature on the clinical, imaging, and pathologic study of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results The possibility of breast-conserving for patients with large primary tumor is enhanced with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The tumor shrinking mode after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its correlation factors are still unclear. MRI is the most accurate image evaluation of the residual tumor at present. M.D.Anderson prognostic index and the American National Cancer Institute selection criteria for breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are helpful for selection of surgical type. Conclusion Tumor shrinking mode and its accurate image evaluation is a key to the selection of breast-conserving surgery and the control of local recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and is the research direction in future.
