ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of PDCA circulation management on pain, psychology and prognosis of patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm in the perioperative period.Methods The clinical data of seventy-six patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm who received perioperative nursing based on PDCA circulation management from April 2016 to March 2017 were retrospective analyzed and these patients were selected as the study group, including 44 males, 32 females, aged 23–65 (47.27±5.87) years. At the same time, 72 patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm who received routine perioperative nursing from April 2015 to March 2016 were selected as the control group, including 41 males, 31 females, aged 24–67 (48.30±5.26) years. The nursing effects of the two groups were compared and analyzed.ResultsThe operation time (t=11.342, P<0.05) and hospitalization time (t=5.986, P<0.05) of the study group were significantly shorter than those of the control group. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of the two groups had no significant difference before nursing (t=0.914, P=0.361), but the VAS scores in the study group after nursing were obviously lower than those in the control group (t=5.475, P<0.05). The self-rating depression scale (SDS, t=1.026, P=0.307) and self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) scores (t=7.866, P<0.05) of the two groups had no significant difference before nursing, while the SDS (t=7.657, P<0.05) and SAS (t=7.866, P<0.05) scores in the study group after nursing were obviously lower than those in the control group. The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (χ2=4.292, P=0.038).ConclusionPDCA circulation management used in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm in the perioperative period can effectively relieve patients' pain, depression and anxiety, reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, and the prognosis is good.
ObjectiveTo strengthen the management of medical equipment and improve the use value of medical equipment by PDCA cycle.
MethodsBetween March and June 2014, we introduced PDCA cycle into the management and use of newly-bought equipment.The use of newly-bought arteriosclerosis detector, TCD and ultrasound bone densitometer between March and June 2014 was regarded as the control group (before the implementation of PDCA cycle), and the use of these three kinds of equipment between March and June of 2015(after the implementation of PDCA cycle) was seen as the observation group.By analyzing the status quo through collected information, we drew a fishbone diagram to find out the factors that could influence the use efficiency of medical equipment.Then, corresponding measures were taken for continuous improvement, including adopting revised regulations, training technicians, quantifying work indexes, informatization, changing service mode, and examining and assessing the effect of implementation.Finally, feedback was summarized for the next PDCA cycle.
ResultsAfter the implementation of PDCA cycle, the daily check numbers of hospital medical equipment including arteriosclerosis detector, TCD, and ultrasound bone densitometer all improved significantly (P < 0.05).The daily check numbers of those three kinds of equipment after the implementation of PDCA cycle were respectively 48.52±19.72, 32.14±10.14 and 55.59±25.12, while the numbers before were respectively 32.46±20.69, 15.46±10.05 and 29.83±20.20.Moreover, working days, maximum working hours daily, and total working time were also increased after the implementation of PDCA cycle.
ConclusionThe application of PDCA cycle can effectively improve the use value of medical equipment, and improve the social benefit and economic benefit.
ObjectiveTo explore the application of PDCA cycle in the examination of medical quality of Tibetan area hospitals.
MethodsIn the October 2014, PDCA cycle theory was introduced into the examination of Tibetan hospital medical quality. We collected quality problems existing in the medical activities actively, analyzed the reason and influencing factors and made corresponding plans. Then we implemented the plans and measures strictly, surveyed the results, found out and analyzed the problems, summarized the results of the examination, and turned the unsolved problems to the next PDCA circulation. Continuous follow-up was performed until the results were satisfactory. Based on Sichuan Province Secondary Comprehensive Hospital Evaluation Standard, we analyzed the medical quality of the hospital before PDCA application (July to September 2014) and after PDCA application (October to December 2014).
ResultsThe incidence of medical nursing documents writing defects decreased from 12.4% to 5.9%. Hospital infection management defect rate declined from 13.5% to 5.3% and drug safety management defect rate declined from 11.8% to 2.5%, and all the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).
ConclusionPDCA cycle in the Tibetan hospital for medical quality examination has greatly improved the medical quality of Tibetan hospitals.
ObjectiveTo study the effects of PDCA cycle in the control of surgical site infection (SSI).
MethodsA total of 1 761 surgeries between January 2012 and December 2013 were chosen to be monitored. PDCA cycle was used as a tool of total quality management evaluation to enhance the control of SSI.
ResultsAfter 2 to 4 cycles of PDCA, the preventive medication rate of ClassⅠ operation incision was decreased significantly (χ2=309.513，P<0.001) and the postoperative incision infection rate did not change significantly (χ2=1.474，P=0.669).
ConclusionUsing PDCA cycle can increase SSI management level and quality significantly and total quality management can be operated effectively.
Based on the practice of large tertiary hospitals in clinical pathway (CP) entrance management, we implemented a fine CP management model with standardized clinical diagnosis and treatment, and encouraged the department to continuously optimize the path form, expand CP coverage and improve the entry rate in a flexible path. Combining PDCA cycles with CP management, it can promote the realization of management goals and achieve continuous improvement, while providing operable (repeatable) methods to the practice of hospital CP management.
Objective To explore the clinical effect of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) combined with PDCA cycle management model in the prevention and control of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in intensive care unit (ICU), and provide evidences for drawing up improvement measures in healthcare-associated MDRO infections in ICU. Methods In January 2020, a risk assessment team was established in the Department of Critical Care Medicine, the First People’s Hospital of Longquanyi District of Chengdu, to analyze the possible risk points of MDRO infections in ICU from then on. FMEA was used to assess risks, and the failure modes with high risk priority numbers were selected to evaluate the high-risk points of MDRO infections. The causes of the high-risk points were analyzed, and improvement measures were formulated to control the risks through PDCA cycle management model. The incidence of healthcare-associated MDRO infections in ICU, improvement of high-risk events, and satisfaction of doctors and nurses after the implementation of intervention measures (from January 2020 to June 2021) were retrospectively collected and compared with those before the implementation of intervention measures (from January 2018 to December 2019). Results Six high-risk factors were screened out, namely single measures of isolation, unqualified cleaning and disinfection of bed units, irrational use of antimicrobial agents, weak consciousness of isolation among newcomers of ICU, weak awareness of pathogen inspection, and untimely disinfection. The incidence of healthcare-associated MDRO infections was 2.71% (49/1800) before intervention and 1.71% (31/1808) after intervention, and the difference between the two periods was statistically significant (χ2=4.224, P=0.040). The pathogen submission rate was 56.67% (1020/1800) before intervention and 61.23% (1107/1808) after intervention, and the difference between the two periods was statistically significant (χ2=7.755, P=0.005). The satisfaction rate of doctors and nurses was 75.0% (30/40) before intervention and 95.0% (38/40) after intervention, and the difference between the two periods was statistically significant (χ2=6.275, P=0.012). Conclusions FMEA can effectively find out the weak points in the prevention and treatment of MDRO infections in ICU, while PDCA model can effectively formulate improvement measures for the weak points and control the risks. The combined application of the two modes provides a scientific and effective guarantee for the rational prevention and treatment of MDRO infections in ICU patients.
With the rapid development of information technology, medical reforms in various countries are moving towards informatization, and internet medical projects have been carried out gradually. Internet hospitals, as one of the manifestations of internet medical projects, have the advantages of improving the efficiency of medical services, revitalizing and effectively sinking high-quality medical resources, and therefore has become the focus of China’s next stage of medical reform. However, internet hospitals are innovative and local products of China, leading its practices lack of domestic and foreign theoretical research, as well as experience, which results in government policies and hospital management strategies are both moving forward in groping, and the construction outcomes vary. Therefore, this article aims to analyze the comprehensive dilemmas currently confronted by internet hospitals in China in different stages of construction, operation and management based on PDCA cycle, and thus, puts forward corresponding construction thinking and analysis in a targeted manner, and proposes guidance for the further development of internet hospitals.
Objective
To investigate the method and effect of continuous improvement of adverse drug reaction (ADR) monitoring in a major public hospital’s cooperating branch hospital.
Methods
PDCA cycle management was used to continuously improve the quality of ADR monitoring. ADR report network platform was established in the fourth quarter of 2014; ADR report specification training for the medical personnel was held in the first quarter of 2015; a examine mechanism was built in the second quarter of 2015. The quality and quantity of ADR monitoring before and after the PDCA cycle management were analyzed.
Results
ADR report timeliness conform to the requirements increased from 45.5% (from the first to third quarter of 2014) to 98.1% (from the fourth quarter of 2014 to the second quarter of 2015); accurate ADR types checking, normal name writting, and complete process description increased from 68.6%, 65.7%, 8.6% (from January 2014 to Frequency 2015) to 92.9%, 96.4%, 85.7% (from March to June 2015); the quantity of ADR report was obviously improved.
Conclusion
Learning from public hospital’s experience and considering its own condition in ADR monitoring, cooperating branch hospital utilizes PDCA cycle management which could continuously improve the ADR monitoring.
ObjectiveTo explore the application of PDCA (plan, do, check, action) circulation method in basic life support (BLS) technique training among non-medical personnel in hospitals.
MethodsIn a third-level grade-A hospital, BLS technique training was carried out for 66 non-medical personnel of various working categories between July and September 2011. During the training process, PDCA circulation method was applied to each step. The existing problems were searched and causes of the problems were found. Improving strategies were made and carried out, and finally, the effect of training was statistically analyzed.
ResultsAfter the application of PDCA circulation method, the test scores in the three training stages were significantly different (P ＜ 0.05) .
ConclusionPDCA circulation method can help non-medical personnel to master the operation process and the technique points of BLS quickly, and it also can improve the quality of BLS technique training for non-medical personnel in hospitals.
Objective
To analyze the main problem of continuous hand hygiene improvement by PDCA cycle, find out the causes and carry out corresponding measures, in order to improve hand hygiene management continuously.
Methods
Between January and June 2014, PDCA cycle was used to strengthen comprehensive training, enhance awareness of hand hygiene, reinforce supervision, and evaluate the effect of continuous hand hygiene improvement. The knowledge of hand hygiene, increase of hand hygiene facilities, use of hand hygiene products and hand hygiene implementation before (from July to December 2013) and after PDCA application (from January to June 2014) were compared and analyzed.
Results
After the implementation of PDCA cycle, the pass rate of hand hygiene knowledge increased from 61.0% to 88.3%; the total amount of hand hygiene use increased from 1 817 046 mL to 3 347 386 mL; the hand hygiene compliance rate increased from 43.03% to 71.31%; and the correct rate of hand hygiene implementation increased from 62.68% to 87.68%. All the above differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). After the implementation of PDCA cycle, the compliance rate of different hand hygiene indications became significantly different (P<0.05). The growth rate of hand hygiene implementation before aseptic manipulation and after contact with body fluids were relatively higher (34.56% and 34.01%, respectively).
Conclusion
Through the application of PDCA cycle, hand hygiene compliance rate and correct rate have gradually increased.
