Objective
To observe the expression of Galectin-3 and Galectin-1 in pancreatic cancer and explore the relationship between the expression and pathological grading.
Methods
Forty specimens of pancreatic carcinoma tissue and thirty-one specimens of normal pancreas tissue were selected, which were confirmed by surgical resection and pathology from 2002 to 2009. The expression of Galectin-3 mRNA and Galectin-1 mRNA in pancreatic cancer cell lines SW1990, PANC-1 and ASPC -1 was detected by means of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; the expression of Galectin-3 protein and Galectin-1 protein in SW1990, PANC-1 and ASPC-1 was detected by means of immunocytochemistry; the expression of Galectin-3 protein and Galectin-1 protein in pancreatic cancer and normal pancreatic tissue was detected by means of immunohistochemistry.
Results
In SW1990, PANC-1 and ASPC-1, Galectin-3 mRNA signal and protein were detected, but no Galectin-1 mRNA signal or protein was detected. There was no expression of Galectin-3 protein or Galectin-1 protein in the 31 specimens of normal pancrease tissue, while there were Galectin-3 protein and Galectin-1 protein expressed in the 40 specimens of pancreatic cancer tissue. In the 40 specimens of pancreatic cancer tissue, the expression of Galectin-3 protein was observed in pancreatic cancer cells, but not in fibroblasts or matrix cells around the cancer mass; while the expression of Galectin-1 protein was observed in fibroblasts and matrix cells around the cancer mass, but not observed in pancreatic cancer cells. There was no significant association between the expression of Galectin-3 protein in pancreatic cancer and pathological grading (P>0.05); while the expression of Galectin-1 protein in pancreatic cancer was related to the pathological grading, and the expression of Galectin-1 protein was significant higher in poorly differentiated tumors than that in well/moderately differentiated tumors (P<0.05).
Conclusions
Galectin-3 or Galectin-1 is not expressed in normal pancreases; Galectin-3 is expressed in pancreatic cancer cells; Galectin-1 is expressed in fibroblasts and matrix cells around the cancer mass. The expression of Galectin-1 is related with the differentiation of pancreatic cancer.
Objective To search for the significant gene indicators in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Methods Literatures about genetic diagnosis of pancreatic cancer were collected and reviewed. Results K-ras, p53, DPC4 and telomerase genes were considered to play important roles in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Conclusion Detection of the genes related to pancreatic cancer may be of helpful in early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.
Objective
To systematically review the diagnostic value of combined detection of K-ras gene mutation in peripheral blood and serum tumor markers for pancreatic cancer.
Methods
Databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2016), Elsevier, BMJ, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data were searched from 2000 to March 2016 to collect diagnostic tests about the diagnostic value of combined detection of K-ras gene mutation in peripheral blood and serum tumor markers in pancreatic cancer. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.
Results
A total of 23 studies involving 2?071 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) of K-ras gene mutation in peripheral blood were 65% and 92% respectively in the diagnosis for pancreatic cancer. The results of the detection of tumor marker CA19-9 were 78% and 81% respectively. The SE and SP indexes in the parallel and serial combinations of CA19-9 together with CA242 were 85%, 72%, 70% and 83% respectively. And the SE, SP indexes in the parallel and serial combinations of K-ras gene mutation combined detection with CA19-9 were 90%, 63%, 47% and 96%. The positive likelihood ratio of the parallel combination of K-ras gene mutation in peripheral blood and CA19-9 (+LR=10.89) was higher than the other three detection methods, while the negative likelihood ratio of the serial combination of K-ras gene mutation in peripheral blood and CA19-9 (-LR=0.15) was lower than the other three detection methods, which indicated that the combined detection of K-ras gene mutation in peripheral blood and and CA19-9 had a better diagnostic performance than the single dectection of K-ras gene mutation or CA19-9 or the combined detection of CA19-9 and CA242 respectively. Comparing the area under curve (AUC) of SROC curve of the two combined diagnoses, the results showed that the diagnostic value of the parallel combination of K-ras gene mutation in peripheral blood and CA19-9 (AUC=0.87) was higher than that of the parallel combination of serum tumor markers CA19-9 and CA242.
Conclusion
Current evidence indicates that the combined detection of K-ras gene mutation and and tumor marker CA19-9 levels in peripheral blood can improve the diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic cancer. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, above conclusions need to be verified by conducting more high quality studies.
Objective To summary the principle of magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging and its application progress in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Methods The newest related literatures of home and abroad were collected and reviewed. Results Magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging was a technology using the magnetic resonance phenomena and chemical shift phenomena to measure molecular organization. The spectroscopy most commonly used in clinical and scientific research includes 1H， 31P， and 23Na. Conclusion Magnetic resonance spectroscopy as the only approach to noninvasive quantitative provding biochemical information in vivo， has an important significance to the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.
【Abstract】Objective To analyze the function of BAG3 in antiapoptosis and chemotherapy resistance induction process of pancreatic cancer.Methods The expressions of BAG-3 in pancreatic cancerous tissues of patients with chemotherapy and those without chemotherapy before resection were determined by immunohistochemistry. The expression difference of BAG-3 protein 18 hours after cultured with chemotherapy drugs (concentration of drugs: 5-FU 50 μg/ml, MMC 0.5 μg/ml, EADM 1.5 μg/ml) of 3 pancreatic cancer cell lines （MIACaPa-2, PANC-1, SW1990） was measured through Western blotting method.Results The median positive rate of pancreatic cancer tissue from patients accepted chemotherapy before resection was higher than those not accepted chemotherapy, but there wasn’t significant difference. Eighteen hours after cultured with drugs, the level of BAG-3 of this three cell lines had significant increased compared with control group (P＜0.05). Conclusion Chemotherapy induces elevation of BAG-3 expression of pancreatic cancer. The upregulate of BAG-3 may associate with the chemotherapy resistance induced by drugs.
Objective To summarize the progress of endoscopic diagnosis and therapy for pancreatic cancer. Methods Domestic and international publications online involving progress of diagnosis and therapy for pancreatic cancer by using endoscope in recent years were collected and reviewed. Results Recently, early diagnostic rate of pancreatic cancer increased with the development of endoscope and endoscopic technique such as endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration, peroral pancreatoscopy, optical coherence tomography, ERCP, and cytology in pancreatic juice. Furthermore, varied therapies such as endoscopic ultrasound guided celiac plexus neurolysis, implantation of iodine 125-particles or pancreatic duct/bile duct stents were performed by endoscope for advanced pancreatic cancer. Conclusion Early diagnostic rate and novel therapeutic alternative of pancreatic cancer are supplied by digestive endoscopy.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the relationship between the expression of CXCL12/CXCR4 and pancreatic cancer.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Wiley Online Library, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect case-control studies on CXCL12/CXCR4 expression in pancreatic cancer from inception to February 1st 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies; then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 21 case-control studies involving 1 677 cases and 1 690 controls were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the expression of CXCR4 in pancreatic cancer tissue was higher than normal tissue (OR=21.40, 95%CI 5.70 to 80.31, P<0.01), in carcinoma of head of pancreas been higher than carcinoma of pancreatic body and tail, (OR=1.58, 95%CI 1.02 to 2.44, P=0.04), in pancreatic cancer with lymph node metastasis been higher than without lymph node metastasis (OR=3.14, 95%CI 1.98 to 4.99, P<0.01), in pancreatic cancer with high TNM stages (Ⅲ, Ⅳ) been higher than low TNM stages (Ⅰ, Ⅱ) (OR=3.67, 95%CI 1.98 to 6.81, P<0.01), in pancreatic cancer with distant metastasis been higher than without distant metastasis (OR=3.56, 95%CI 1.71 to 7.39, P<0.01), and in pancreatic cancer with vascular invasion was higher than without vascular invasion (OR=3.22, 95%CI 1.70 to 6.09, P<0.01). The expression of CXCR4 was not statistically correlated with age, gender, pancreatic cancer tissue and paracancerous tissue, pancreatic cancer tissue and paracancerous lymph nodes, differentiation degree. There was no statistical correlation between the expression of CXCL12 and the differentiation degree, and lymph node metastasis.ConclusionsIn pancreatic cancer, the high expression of CXCR4 is related to lymph node metastasis, high TNM stage, distant metastasis, vascular invasion indicate poor prognosis. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo study the effects of angiogenesis inhibitor SU5416 on the microvessel density(MVD) of pancreatic cancer and to evaluate its influence on the growth and metastasis of pancreatic cancer. Methods A rat model of pancreatic cancer was established with dimethylbenzanthracine(DMBA). 60 rats with pancreatic cancer were randomly divided into 4 groups: saline group, 5-Fu group, SU5416 group, 5-Fu and SU5416 group. Thirteen weeks after injection, the microvascular density (MVD) of pancreatic cancer was detected.Results The microvascular densities (MVD) were (12.3±3.2)%, (11.4±3.8)%, (2.1±1.5)% and (1.8±1.1)% in the saline group, 5-Fu group, SU5416 group and 5-Fu+SU5416 group respectively. The MVDs in the SU5416 group and 5Fu+SU5416 group were statistically lower than those in the saline group and 5-Fu group(P＜0.05). There was no significant difference between the 5-Fu group and saline group(Pgt;0.05). ConclusionSU5416 can inhibit the microvascular growth in pancreatic cancer. And the inhibition can be enhanced when combined with chemotheraputic drugs.
ObjectiveTo explore the mechanisms of perineural invasion (PNI) in pancreatic cancer so as to find a new treatment for pancreatic cancer. MethodsThe literatures on PNI, neurotropism, nerve-tumor microenvironment and nerve growth factor in pancreatic cancer were reviewed and the mechanisms of PNI were summarized. ResultsThe rich innervation of pancreatic tissue itself and the minute slits within perineural structure were the anatomic basis of PNI. Tumor cells expressed neural antigens were the pathological basis of PNI. Tumor-nerve microenvironment and nerve growth factor family and themselves receptors might play an important molecular role in PNI. However, tumor cells expressed neural antigens were not only closely related to the PNI, but also the interaction between tumor cells and nerves played an important role in PNI. ConclusionsThe detailed mechanisms of PNI are extremely complex and controversial up to today. However, it is possible to search a new therapeutic target in pancreatic cancer according to the mechanisms of PNI.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the expression of E-cadherin protein and the risk of pancreatic cancer. MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, CBM and WanFang Data from inception to October 2016 to collect case-control studies about the correlation between E-cadherin protein expression and the risk of pancreatic cancer. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software and Stata 12.0 software. ResultsSeventeen studies (986 cases in pancreatic cancer group and 433 cases in normal pancreatic tissue group) were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: the expression of E-cadherin protein in the pancreatic cancer group was lower than normal tissue group (OR=0.04, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.23, P=0.000 2), poor differentiation group was lower than high or middle differentiation group (OR=0.44, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.76, P=0.003), lymph node metastasis group was lower than without lymph node metastasis group (OR=0.50, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.81, P=0.005), and the difference was statistically significant. However, there was no significant difference between the clinical stageⅠ-Ⅱ group and Ⅲ-Ⅳ group (OR=0.63, 95%CI 0.25 to 1.59, P=0.33), pancreatic head cancer group and pancreatic body and tail cancer group (OR=1.22, 95%CI 0.72 to 2.07, P=0.46), pancreatic cancer with nerve invasion group and without nerve invasion group (OR=1.45, 95%CI 0.81 to 2.62, P=0.21), pancreatic cancer with vascular invasion group and without vascular invasion group (OR=0.55, 95%CI 0.13 to 2.22, P=0.40). ConclusionLower expression of E-cadherin protein is significantly associated with the risk of pancreatic cancer. Due to the limited quality and quanity of includied studies, the above conclusion should be approved by more studies.
