ObjectiveTo observe the curative effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with stable moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).MethodsSixty-four patients with stable moderate to severe COPD who visited during January 2016 and December 2017 were recruited in the study. They were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 32 cases in each group. The spirometry was conducted in all patients. The right deep inspiratory end diaphragm thickness and the quiet end expiratory diaphragm thickness were measured by ultrasound, and the diaphragm thickness fraction (DTF) was calculated. The routine drug treatment was given in both groups. The comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation treatment was given in the observation group (include breath training, exercise training, health education and nutrition guide). The pulmonary function, diaphragm function, severity and quality of life were evaluated before and 6 months later after the treatment.ResultsIn the observation group, the predicted value of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1%pred), FEV1/FVC ratio and DTF were all significantly improved compare with before treatment and the control group (all P<0.05). While the BODE index was significantly declined compare with before treatment and the control group (all P<0.05).ConclusionPulmonary rehabilitation treatment can help improve pulmonary function, diaphragm function, condition of the disease and quality of life.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the factors affecting the curative effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients,and to provide theoretical basis for the implementation of rehabilitation. MethodsLiterature on the influencing factors of pulmonary rehabilitation efficacy in COPD patients was systematically searched in PubMed,Web of Science,Medline,ProQuest,Embase,CNKI and Wanfang databases from August 30,2023. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the literature,the factors influencing the pulmonary rehabilitation effect of COPD patients were analyzed based on the 5 dimensions of the new implementation comprehensive framework. ResultsA total of 2620 COPD patients with 18 literatures were included in this study. Based on the new CFIR framework,11 promoting factors and 10 hindering factors of pulmonary rehabilitation efficacy were extracted and coded into 5 fields:innovation field,external factor field,internal factor field,individual characteristics field and implementation process field. ConclusionBy applying the new implementation comprehensive framework to evaluate the factors affecting the pulmonary rehabilitation effect of COPD patients,it provides an important reference for the development of rehabilitation strategies for COPD patients. It is suggested to adopt the comprehensive rehabilitation strategy of interdisciplinary,wide field and multi-team in order to promote the best benefit of both individual and social medical system in the pulmonary rehabilitation process of COPD patients.
Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a comprehensive intervention to the chronic respiratory diseases, that its benefits in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been well established. Localization of PR in China is one of the key health strategies as there are nearly 100 million patients with COPD which causes huge disease burden. In addition, the evidence of PR for patients with other chronic respiratory diseases and post-thoracic surgery should be accumulated too. Now clinician, patients, and policy makers have few recognition of PR, which needs large-scaled standardized training and popularizing. This article starts with the definition of PR, reviews its population, implementation, settings, as well as the current situation of PR in our country in order to make clinicians, researchers, and policy makers have better understanding of PR and to make some suggestions on direction of the future research and clinical work.
Objective
To investigate the effect of aerobic combined with resistance training on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with severe or very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Methods
Thirty patients with severe or very severe COPD were randomly divided into the control group (n=15) and the exercise group (n=15) from January 2011 to January 2013. The control group was given health education and routine drug treatment. The exercise group was given muscle relaxation and 6-week aerobic combined resistance exercise training on the basis of the control group. Pulmonary function, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), 30-second sit-to-stand (30-STS), 30-second arm curl test (30-ACT), Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (MRC), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Beck Anxiety and Depression Scale were performed before and after intervention in both groups.
Results
After intervention, compared with those in the control group, the 6MWT, 30-STS and 30-ACT in the exercise group increased significantly [(518.44±84.62) vs. (412.93±82.53) m, (24.53±3.98) vs. (16.87±3.91) times, (26.07±3.41) vs. (17.93±3.39) times, P<0.05], while the CAT score, Beck anxiety and depression scores decreased significantly (4.87±3.68vs. 26.10±10.18, 2.47±1.81 vs. 11.50±4.89, 2.27±2.49 vs. 12.20±6.35, P<0.05), and MRC score also decreased significantly [1.0 (1.0, 2.0)vs. 2.0 (2.0, 4.0), P<0.05]. There was no statistical difference in pulmonary function between the two groups before or after intervention (P>0.05).
Conclusion
Exercise-based pulmonary rehabilitation can significantly improve the treatment outcomes in Chinese patients with severe or very severe COPD.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on pulmonary function,perception of dyspnea and quality of life in stable COPD patients of different severity.
Methods300 patients with COPD in stable stage were divided into a moderate COPD group (n=120),a severe COPD group (n=100) and a very severe COPD group (n=80). Each group was randomly subdivided into a control group and a treatment group. The treatment groups received pulmonary rehabilitation for 6 months in addition to usual care,and the control groups received usual care without pulmonary rehabilitation. Pulmonary function(FEV1),6 minute walking distance (6MWD),modified medical research council (mMRC) scale,and acute exacerbation frequency of COPD were compared before and after intervention and among groups.
ResultsAfter pulmonary rehabilitation for 6 months,the quality of life score and 6MWD were significantly improved in the treatment groups with moderate,severe,very severe COPD,and the increscent of 6MWD was greatest in the severe COPD patients. The mMRC of the patients with very severe COPD improved significantly after pulmonary rehabilitation(P<0.05). Lung function before and after the intervention in three groups all showed no significant difference (P>0.05). The acute exacerbation frequency of the severe COPD patients was significantly reduced by pulmonary rehabilitation (P<0.05), while there was no significant change in the moderate and very severe groups (P>0.05).
ConclusionPulmonary rehabilitation can improve exercise tolerance and quality of life of COPD patients with different severity,reduce acute exacerbation frequency in severe COPD,reduce the dyspnea degree in very severe COPD. Pulmonary rehabilitation is a cost-effective treatment for stable COPD.
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the impact of shortterm preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on the exercise capacity of lung cancer patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease（COPD）. Methods Between March 2009 and August 2010, 30 lung cancer patients with moderate or severe COPD were treated with preoperative comprehensive PR for two weeks in Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital. The sample was comprised of 18 males and 12 females with an average age of 62.5±7.7 years. Twelve of the patients had moderate COPD, while 18 had severe COPD. We collected information on the length of postoperative hospital stay for each patient,as well as any pulmonary complications. Results (1) The forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced expiratory volume in one second % (FEV1%), forced expiratory volume in/ forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC),and maximal ventilatory volume (MVV) (1.30±0.30 L, 59.19±18.00 L, 47.74±1200 L, 56.63±13.00 L) values after PR were slightly better than those before PR(1.24±0.40 L, 51.89±14.00 L, 46.59±10.00 L, 49.67±13.00 L), but not significantly so(Pgt;0.05). The results for carbon monoxide diffusion capacity were similar. (2) The sixminute walking distance (before: 502.67±157.00 m, after: 594.87±116.00 m), peak expiratory flow (before: 209.33±66.00 L/min, after: 255.33±70.00 L/min), dyspnea index (Borg index) (before: 0.26±0.20, after: 0.12±0.10), and fatigue index (before:0.24±0.20, after: 0.12±0.10) all improved significantly aftercomprehensive PR (Plt;0.05). (3) All 30 patients underwent surgery, and none died during the perioperative period. Eight patients experienced cardiopulmonary complications. The average hospitalization time after surgery was 8.0±2.4 days. Conclusion Preoperative comprehensive PR appears to significantly improve exercise capacity and reduce the rate of postoperative lung complications in lung cancer, patients with lower cardiopulmonary function.
Objective To determine if supervised hospital-based exercise can maintain the benefits of functional exercise ability and quality of life gained from a pulmonary rehabilitation program in COPD.Methods A prospective and randomized study was carried out. Following completion of an eight-week pulmonary rehabilitation program in hospital, 43 COPD patients were recruited and randomized into either a supervised group ( supervised, every 10 days, hospital-based exercise, 22 cases ) or a control group ( unsupervised home exercise,21 cases) and followed for 12 months. Measurements were taken at baseline and 12 months later. Exercise measurements include six-minute walk test( 6MWT) and pulmonary function test. Quality of life was measured using the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire ( CRQ) . Results After 12 months of different exercise program,6MWT in the supervised group was significantly longer than that in the unsupervised group[ ( 532. 0 ±168. 4) m vs ( 485. 0 ±151. 6) m, P lt; 0. 05] . There was no significant difference in pulmonary function between the two groups. The quality of life of the supervised group was higher than that of the unsupervised group( 114. 6 ±20. 8 vs 105. 6 ±21. 7, P lt;0. 05) . Conclusions After the completion of pulmonary rehabilitation program, a supervised, every 10 days, hospital-based following exercise program can maintain better functional exercise capacity and quality of life compared to home exercise in COPD patients.
ObjectiveTo understand the obstacles in the practice of pulmonary rehabilitation between doctors and patients.MethodsMedical staff and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in public hospitals in this region were randomly sampled, and a questionnaire survey was conducted on possible obstacles to the practice of pulmonary rehabilitation.ResultsTotal of 265 medical staff and 120 COPD patients were recruited in this survey. The obstacles of pulmonary rehabilitation practice of medical staff in clinical work are poor cooperation of patients and their families (84.2%), medical staff’s insufficient awareness of pulmonary rehabilitation (82.3%), and lack of practice and guidelines (78.9%), lack of objective conditions such as site, equipment and equipment (75.1%), lack of multidisciplinary teams (74.3%), pulmonary rehabilitation has fallen by the wayside (73.6%) etc. The main obstacles for COPD patients in pulmonary rehabilitation are lack of access to relevant knowledge (52.4%), insufficient knowledge (36.5%), inconvenient transportation, economic problems and other objective conditions (33.3%). After multiple correspondence analysis, there are differences in the degree of correlation between obstacle factors and groups with different characteristics.ConclusionsThere are many factors hindering the development of pulmonary rehabilitation and there are certain differences among different populations, but the lack of understanding of pulmonary rehabilitation between doctors and patients is the primary problem. It is necessary to improve the cognition of both doctors and patients on pulmonary rehabilitation, and then to solve the obstacles in the implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation.
Pulmonary rehabilitation is a comprehensive intervention based on a thorough patient assessment followed by patient-tailored therapies, which include, but are not limited to, exercise training, education, and behavior change, designed to improve the physical and psychological condition of people with chronic respiratory disease and to promote the long-term adherence of health-enhancing behaviors. It has been proven beneficial in reducing dyspnea and improving functional capacity and quality of life for patients with stable chronic respiratory disease. However, recent randomized clinical trials reported conflicting results on the timing of intervention, protocol and effectiveness of acute exacerbation or intensive care unit pulmonary rehabilitation to improve patient outcomes. We should find a balance between " dynamic” and " static” to maximize the benefit of patients from early pulmonary rehabilitation.
The great clinical efficacy of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has been illustrated by the decreased incidence of perioperative complications and the shortened length of in-hospital stay. Furthermore, the ERAS programs have their own key techniques and strategies in the clinical application to the unique diseases and operative modes. The key technology of an ERAS program is the minimally invasive surgery, which has been widely utilized in the surgical specialties. The main strategy in an ERAS program consists of the intensive pulmonary rehabilitation and optimal perioperative care that aim to improve the in-hospital outcomes of lung cancer patients who are considered at high surgical risk. Pulmonary rehabilitation is regarded as the mainstay of the ERAS strategies but its clinical protocols still remain less mature. The purpose of this overview is to summarize the current pulmonary rehabilitation programs in terms of the suitable crowd, the feasible protocols and the clinical significance.
