New functional evaluation methods for coronary artery lesions have received widespread attention at home and abroad. As a new functional evaluation technique, the clinical value of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) in the accuracy and feasibility of diagnosing myocardial ischemia caused by coronary artery stenosis has been confirmed in many clinical trials. Compared with the traditional gold standard fractional flow reserve (FFR) for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis, QFR has the advantages of simple operation, time-saving and low cost. This article reviews the comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of FFR and QFR and the progress of clinical research, aiming to explore whether QFR may replace FFR as a functional evaluation method of coronary artery disease and guide clinical blood circulation reconstruction.
