Objective To investigate surgical combined management of local recurrence of rectal cancer after anterior resection. Methods Relevant references about the surgical combined treatment of local recurrence of rectal cancer， which were published recently domestic and abroad were collected and reviewed. Results The surgical combined treatment for local recurrence of rectal cancer can markedly improve the survival ratio. Conclusion The surgical combined management of local recurrence of rectal cancer after anterior resection should be performed. The active and effective surgical combined management may help prolong the survival time and improve life quality.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision （TME） in treatment for locally advanced lower rectal cancer. Methods The clinical data of 31 patients with locally advanced lower rectal cancer received concurrent chemoradiotherapy from January 2009 to December 2011 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Conventional fraction radiotherapy with total dose 50 Gy and chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX regimen were taken. The efficacy was assessed by recording results of clinical and pathological examination. The function of sphincter was also recorded. Results All 31 patients underwent TME operation. The complication morbidity and mortality was 12.9% （4/31） and 3.2% （1/31），respectively. As a result of the preoperative management，the tumor was reduced by an average of 21.9%， down-regulation of T stage was observed in 48.4% （15/31） patients，the frequency of lymph node metastasis decreased from 83.9% （26/31） to 38.7% （12/31）. Pathological complete response was observed in 5 patients （16.1%） and the total response rate was 74.2% （23/31），grade 3/4 toxicity was occurred in 2 （6.5%） patients. 84.6% （22/26） of patients underwent sphincter preservation surgery reserved good function of sphincter. Conclusions Preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with TME in treatment for locally advanced lower rectal cancer is effective and safe，which can lead to pathological complete response，decrease the tumor stage and the rate of lymph node metastasis，and can also increase the efficacy of operation.
Objective To compare the outcomes of low/ultra-low anterior rectal resection and valgus resection in elder patients with rectal or anal cancer. Methods The clinical data of 184 patients with rectal or anal cancer， who were treated with extreme sphincter preserving surgery in West China Hospital from January 2009 to December 2011， were collected and analyzed retrospectively. The intraoperative and postoperative indexes between low/ultra-low anterior rectal resection group and valgus resection group were compared. Results ①There were no significant differences in the age，body mass index， gender， diameter of tumor， TNM stage， degree of differentiation， histological type， gross type， and complications before operation， such as hypertension， chronic obstructive pulmonary disease， cardiovascular diseases， diabetes， renal disease， and hypoproteinemia in two groups （P＞0.05）. ②Compared with the low/ultra-low anterior rectal resection group， the distance from the anal verge to the tumor was shorter （P＜0.05） and the distance of distal resec-tion margin of tumor was longer （P＜0.05） in the valgus resection group. ③There were no significant differences in the operation time， blood loss， ASA grade， and the postoperative complications in two groups （P＞0.05）. ④There were no significant differences in the duration of pulling out nasogastric tube， urinary catheter， and drainage tube， the duration of first passing flatus， first defecation， first oral intake， and first ambulation， and hospitalization cost （P＞0.05）. But the postoperative hospital stay and total hospital stay in the valgus resection group were significantly longer than those in the low/ultra-low anterior rectal resection group （P＜0.05）. ⑤All the patients were followed-up for 6-24 months （average 13 months）. During the following-up， only 1 case suffered local tumor recurrence in the valgus resection group. One case suffered distant metastases in the ultra-low anterior rectal resection and valgus resection group， respectively. Eight cases （4.35%） died， of which 4 cases （4.04%） in the low/ultra-low anterior rectal group and 4 cases （4.71%） in the valgus resection group. All the patients were in functional recovery of anal control after operation. Conclusions As the extreme sphincter preserving surgery for elder patients with rectal or anal cancer， the low or ultra-low anterior rectal resection and valgus resection could both be used for elder patients with extreme-low rectal or anal cancer. However， valgus resection results in longer distal surgical margin than that low/ultra-low anterior rectal resection， and it is suitable for the patients with shorter distances from the anal verge to the tumor.
ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors of postoperative complications associated with reversal of defunctioning ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer undergoing sphincter preservation surgery.
MethodData were collected retrospectively for consecutive patients undergoing defunctioning ileostomy following sphincter preservation surgery for rectal cancer, from January 2014 to December 2014.
ResultsOne hundred and thirty patients were included (median time to reversal 132 d, range 39-692 d), of whom 35 patients (26.92%) had postoperative complications after stoma reversal. The main complications included 23 cases of diarrhea, 6 cases of bowel obstruction, 9 cases of incision infection, and 4 cases of perianal eczema. The results of univariate analysis showed that the distant of tumor from anal verge <5 cm (P=0.010), postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.002), and time to reversal (P=0.025) were related to the postoperative complications associated with reversal of defunctioning ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer undergoing sphincter preservation surgery. The result of multivariate analysis by using a logistic regression model showed that the time to reversal (OR=1.006, P=0.021) was a significant independent risk factor for it.
ConclusionDelay reversal of defunctiong ileostomy might increase risk of postoperative complications associated with reversal of defunctioning ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer undergoing sphincter preservation surgery.
Objective To summarize the application of different types of perineal and vaginal reconstruction after posterior exenteration with resection of distal vagina and perineal body for patients with primary or recurrent advanced rectal cancer with distal vagina or perineal body invasion， and to review the advantages and shortages and the application range of common reconstructive surgical procedures. Method The clinical data of 10 rectal cancer patients underwent extended surgery with distal vagina and perineal body resection accompanied with or without hysterectomy from October 2009 to September 2013 were summarized. Results There was no perioperative mortality. Omental flaps were used for obliteration of pelvic defect in 4 patients. The uterus was pushed backward to fill the pelvic defect after severing the round ligament in 2 patients. A reversed pedicled sigmoid flap was employed for reconstruction of the vagina in 2 patients. The reversed flap of anterior vaginal wall was used for vaginal and perineal reconstruction in 3 patients. Three cases had postoperative complications， in which included 1 patient with pelvic sepsis who underwent reoperation for drainage， 2 patients with perineal wound infection. All other patients had an uneventful healing postoperatively. Conclusions Some types of one-stage pelvic and perineal-vaginal reconstruction after posterior exenteration with resection of distal vagina and perineal body could produce an expedited wound healing with acceptable morbidity. Despite the well documented pedicled musculocutaneous flap for reconstruction， omental flap， pedicled sigmoid flap， overturn of anterior vaginal wall for reconstruction and pushing-back of the uterus for filling pelvic cavity might also result in reduced pelvic and perineal associated complications. Pedicled musculocutaneous flap is better reserved for huge pelvic and perineal defect and should be recommended among Chinese surgeons.
Objective To compare the clinical effect between neo-adjuvant chemotherapy combined with operation and simple operation under multi-disciplinary team in rectal cancer. Methods A survey of 72 patients with rectal cancer from Nov. 2007 to Mar. 2008 were studied. Patients were divided into two groups using a simple random method: 33 cases in combined therapy group were treated with single period neo-adjuvant chemotherapy as well as operation and 39 cases in control group received operation only. To compare the differences of perioperative period indexes between two groups. Results During the differences of indexes of age, gender, differentiation degree, clinicopathologic stage as well as the distance to dentate line of tumor, there was no statistical significance between combined therapy group and control group (Pgt;0.05). And at the same time, the operative type, operative time and bleeding quantity in operation had no statistically significant difference between two groups (Pgt;0.05). As for the postoperative rehabilitation indexes, the time of vent to normal in combined therapy group was earlier than that in control group, but the intake time was later than that in control group （Plt;0.05）. Falling range from preoperative CEA to postoperative CEA was larger in combined therapy group than that in control group （Plt;0.05）; and the falling range from preoperative WBC to postoperative WBC had no significant difference between two groups （Pgt;0.05）. Conclusion The clinical effect of combined therapy is obviously superior to simple operation, suggesting that neo-adjuvant chemotherapy combined with operation is feasible and safe.
【Abstract】Objective To investigate the recent studies on the biocharacters of keratin family (e.g. genetic mutations and abnormal expressions) and their relationships with the malignant tumors. Methods The literatures of recent years on the biocharacters of keratin family (e.g. genetic mutations and abnormal expressions) and their relationships with the malignant tumors were reviewed. Results Keratin family is a kind of structural proteins in cell which plays an important role in cytomechanics and regulates cell-cycle. The mutations of keratin genes (mRNA) or the overexpression of keratin proteins would interfere with the order of cell-cycle or the integrity of cytomechanics, and lead to some diseases and malignant tumors finally. Conclusion The studies on biocharaters of keratin family (e.g. genetic mutations and abnormal expressions) are helpful in the diagnosis, staging and the evaluation of prognosis of some diseases and cancers, e.g. liver cirrhosis, breast cancer, rectum carcinoma, etc.
Objective To approach the surgical therapeutic efficacy of local recurrence of rectal cancer. Methods Fifty-six patients with local recurrence of rectal cancer suffered from reoperation from January 2003 to January2011 in this hospital were collected. Chi-square test was performed to analyze the complete excision rates of reoperation for different recurrent time after radical resection and different surgical procedures after primary radical resection of rectalcancer. The method of log-rank test was used for survival analysis of the Miles and Dixon procedure. Results ①The opera-tion time and intraoperative bleeding of reoperation for local recurrence of rectal cancer were more than those of the primary radical resection of rectal cancer （P＜0.05）. ②The complete resection rate of the local recurrence of rectal cancer in 5 years after primary radical resection of rectal cancer was higher than that of the local recurrence of rectal cancer within 2 years after primary radical resection of rectal cancer， and the difference was statistically significant （P＜0.01）. ③The complete resection rate of the local recurrence of rectal cancer of the technique of Dixon in the primary radical resection of rectal cancer was higher than that of Miles， and the difference was statistically significant （P＜0.05）. ④The median survival time and 2-year survival rate and 5-year survival rate of the technique of Dixon in the reoperation were longer or higher than those of Miles， and the differences were statistically significant （P＜0.05）. Conclusions Surgical procedure and postoperative recurrence time after primary operation can both influence complete excision rate of reoperation for local recurrence of rectal cancer. And reoperation for local recurrence of rectal cancer can prolong the survival time.
The standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with surgery, but patients after the same treatment regimen show a large difference in outcomes. For patients with good response to neoadjuvant therapy, the waiting & observation scheme can be selected to avoid surgery and other complications. Therefore, accurate assessment of the response of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy can better develop personalized treatment strategies. Current studies have found that blood sample detection, endoscopy, imaging examination and artificial intelligence have their own advantages and disadvantages in evaluating the response of neoadjuvant therapy. Therefore, this article reviews the application of different clinical tools in evaluating and predicting the response of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer, and looks forward to the future development direction.
Objective To compare the oncologic results between laparoscopic and open approach for the treatment of rectal cancer. Methods Five hundred and twenty patients with rectal cancer from Jan. 2003 to Dec. 2008 were non-randomly divided into laparoscopic (LS) and open surgery (OS) group. Local recurrence, distant metastasis and survival rate were compared between two groups. Results One hundred and eighty-six cases received laparoscopic resection and 334 cases received open operation. There were no statistically significant differences (SSD) of demographic data between two groups (Pgt;0.05). Mean follow-up was 30.3 months. No SSD was observed in 3-year cumulative survival rate (83% in LS and 80% in OS, P=0.549), distant metastasis rate (12.5% in LS and 15.6% in OS, P=0.368), incidence of incision seeding (0.6% in LS and 0 in OS, P=0.189), or cumulative survival (P=0.142). The differences of local recurrences rate (4.8% in LS and 10.7% in OS, P=0.028), 3-year cumulative disease-free survival rate (81% in LS and 68% in OS, P=0.009), and cumulative disease-free survival (P=0.010) between two groups were statistical significant. The differences of cumulative survival, cumulative disease-free survival, local recurrences， and distant metastasis according to the TNM stageⅠ or Ⅱ between two groups were not statistical significant. The differences of cumulative disease-free survival and local recurrences according to the TNM stage Ⅲ reached statistical significance (P=0.045 and P=0.047, respectively). Conclusion Oncologic results of laparoscopic resection are similar to those of open resection for rectal carcinoma．
