Studies of evidence-based medicine have provided much important evidence, clarified problems, and guided the clinical practice in the treatment of renal diseases. As examples, several therapeutic problems in renal hypertension, renal anemia and low protein diet for the patients with chronic kidney disease are discussed in this paper.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of rehabilitation training focusing on early exercise on the time of first getting out of bed after surgery, pain during early activities, postoperative infection rate and the length of hospital stay for renal transplant recipients.MethodsThe clinical data of patients undergoing allogeneic renal transplantation in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from June to August 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the time of multidisciplinary postoperative management and the time of early rehabilitation intervention, the patients were divided into the conventional group (from June 2020 to the beginning of multidisciplinary postoperative management) and the rehabilitation group (after multidisciplinary postoperative management). The time to get out of bed for the first time after surgery, the Visual Analogue Score (VAS) during weight monitoring on the second day post operation, the number of days required to complete an independent walk of 100 meters, postoperative complications, the incidence of postoperative infection and the length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 79 patients were included. There were 46 cases in the conventional group and 33 cases in the rehabilitation group. Among the included patients, 14 patients had postoperative infection, 1 patients in the conventional group developed thrombosis, no catheter shedding or bleeding after exercise occurred. The differences between the rehabilitation group and the conventional group in the time to get out of bed for the first time after surgery [(1.1±0.2) vs. (2.2±0.4) d; t=13.224, P<0.001], the VAS during weight monitoring on the day post operation (2.5±0.9 vs. 3.4±1.4; t=3.267, P<0.001), the number of days required to complete an independent walk of 100 meters [(2.2±0.4) vs. (4.0±0.8) d; t=11.312, P<0.001], and the incidence of postoperative infection (6.1% vs. 26.1%; χ2=5.285, P=0.022) were statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the length of stay between the rehabilitation group and the conventional group [(19.8±5.8) vs. (20.7±7.4) d; t=0.584, P=0.561].ConclusionEarly postoperative rehabilitation training reduces the time required for renal transplant recipients to get out of bed for the first time post operation and to walk 100 meters independently, reduce the pain response during early activities, and reduce the incidence of postoperative infection.
ObjectiveTo conduct a Meta-analysis to determine the clinical effect of protocol biopsy (PB)-monitored therapy after renal transplantation.MethodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Standards Database and VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals were searched for trials comparing the efficacy of timely intervention under PB surveillance with the conventional treatment. The quality of included studies was assessed and Meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsSix randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria, including 698 cases. No significant difference was found between the PB group and the control group in 1-year [relative risk (RR)=0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.97, 1.01), P=0.39] and 2-year recipient survival rate [RR=1.00, 95%CI (0.97, 1.02), P=0.72]. Graft survival rate after 1 year [RR=1.01, 95%CI (0.99, 1.04), P=0.29] and 2 years [RR=1.02, 95%CI (0.99, 1.06), P=0.19] were also statistically similar. No statistical difference was found in glomerular filtration rate between the two groups [mean difference (MD)=0.45 mL/(min·1.73 m2), 95%CI (–3.77, 4.67) mL/(min·1.73 m2), P=0.83]. Renal function of PB group, monitored by serum creatinine, was superior to the control group [MD=–0.46 mg/dL, 95%CI (–0.63, –0.29) mg/dL, P<0.000 01]. No statistical difference was found in infection between the two groups [RR=1.23, 95%CI (0.69, 2.19), P=0.48].ConclusionsOur study did not suggest PB for every kidney transplantation recipient. However, long-term randomized controlled trials with larger sample size would be necessary to determine whether PB was effective for specific populations.
Objective To discuss the safety and feasibil ity of treating complex renal aneurysm with ex vivo aneurysmectomy and renal revascularization and renal autotransplantation after hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy. Methods In October 2006, one male patient with complex renal aneurysm was treated. The preoperative color Doppler ultrasonograph, CT and DSA showed that there was an aneurysm (3.4 cm × 4.3 cm × 4.5 cm) located in the main renalartery bifurcation and its five branches of the left kidney. The patient had a history of hypertension with no response to treatment. After successful hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy, the kidney off-body was perfused by the renal irrigating solution immediately to protect the kidney. Then ex vivo aneurysmectomy and renal artery revascularization were performed, the renal artery was reconstructed with an autologous right internal il iac artery. The reconstructed left kidney was re-implanted into the right il iac fossa. Results The operation was successful and the patient recovered without perioperative complications. The postoperative renal function was normal and the color Doppler ultrasonograph showed that the blood circulation in the transferred renal artery of the right il iac fossa and its branches was smooth, the blood circulation of the renal venous was smooth and no stenosis in the ureter 2 weeks after operation. Thirteen months follow-up showed the blood pressure was recovered to normal and the renal function was normal. Conclusion The method of ex vivo aneurysmectomy and autotransplantation is safe, feasible and minimally invasive for treating complex hilar renal artery aneurysms.
Objective By means of evidence-based clinical practice, to find more effective treatment for a hepatitis B related nephritis patient with renal failure. Methods The following databases as Up to Date (May 2011), The Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2011), PubMed (1978 to 2011) and CNKI (1978 to 2011) were searched to identify systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of treating hepatitis B related nephritis with glucocorticoid, immunosuppressor or antiviral therapies, and the quality of collected clinical evidence was evaluated by using GRADEpro software. Results The glucocorticoid or combined immunosuppressors was not recommended for existing adverse effects and not acting on the remission of hepatitis B related nephritis and reduction of proteinuria. However, the antiviral therapy used alone was recommended for acting on the remission of hepatitis B related nephritis and the reduction of proteinuria. In view of adverse effects and expensive price of interferon, the nucleoside analogue antiviral agent was suggested. Considering the renal toxicity of adefovir and tenofovir, and possible drug-resistance of lamivudine, the entecavir (0.5 mg qd) was finally selected with patient’s agreement, and the supporting therapies such as lowering blood pressure, and protecting the kidney and liver were adopted continually. After one month treatment, 24-hour urinary protein got reduced, serum albumin got increased, kidney function got stable, and hepatitis B virus DNA quantity got reduced. Conclusion For treating hepatitis B related nephritis with kidney failure, entacavir can reduce 24-hour urinary protein, raise serum albumin, stabilize kidney function and reduce hepatitis B virus DNA in a short term, but its long-term efficacy still requires further studies.
Objective To investigate the effect of nitric oxide (NO) on the renal function in acute biliary infection. Methods 35 Wistar rats were divided randomly into acute biliary infection group (AC), group of AC with Larginine(L), group of L-NAME(N), group of simple biliary obstruction(O) and a sham-operated group(SO), and serum NO、 BUN、 Cr and NOS were determined and pathologic changes of liver and kidney were observed. Results NO and NOS were significantly higher in L group than in any other groups (P＜0.05), BUN and Cr were significantly lower than in AC and N groups (P＜0.05), but showed no significance compared with O group (P＞0.05). The pathology of kidney in L group showed a less severe change than that in AC group; NO and NOS in N group were lower than those in other groups. BUN and Cr were higher than those in other groups (P＜0.05). Conclusion NO has a protection for renal function in acute biliary infected rats the mechanism being related to its dilative effect on renal vessels and increased renal blood perfusion.
Objective To investigate the effect of renal cell apoptosis induced by obstructive jaundice on the expression of bcl-2 in rats, and to explore the mechanism of renal impairment induced by obstructive jaundice. Methods Thirty-two male SD rats were randomly divided into 2 groups: SO group and BDL group. The rats in SO group received sham operation. Bile ducts of rats in BDL group were ligated. Pathology of kidneys was observed under the microscope. The levels of D-Bil, TBA, GOT, GPT, Cr and BUN in serum and β2-MG in urine were measured. The apoptotic rate of renal cells was calculated by flow cytometry and the forms of DNA fragmentation in renal cells were detected by agarose gel electrophoresis. The expression of inhibitory gene bcl-2 in the renal tissues was detected by immunohistochemistry. Results The color of urine in BDL group became dark yellow in day 2 after operation; The ears, tails and the muscle of abdominal wall and splanchnic organs, such as liver and kidney, also became yellow and swollen in day 7. The D-Bil, TBA, GOT, GPT, BUN of serum and β2 -MG of urine in BDL group were higher than those in SO group (P＜0.05, P＜0.01), and each value (except β2 -MG) in BDL group of 14 d was higher than that in BDL group of 7 d (P＜0.05, P＜0.01), respectively. The result of flow cytometry showed that the apoptotic rate of SO group and BDL (7 d and 14 d) group were (2.10±0.75)%， (18.17±0.86)% and (36.39±2.23)% respectively, there were significantly difference among them (P＜0.05). The expression rate of bcl-2 of renal cell in BDL group of 7 d was higher than that in BDL group of 14 d. Conclusion Obstructive jaundice could induce apoptosis of the renal cells, and activate the expression of bcl-2 of the renal tubular epithelial cells in feedback, which may regulate the process of apoptosis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine an optimal co-culture ratio of the rabbit periosteal osteoblasts (RPOB) and rabbit renal vascular endothelial cells(RRVEC) without direct contact for future study of bone tissue engineering. METHODS: RPOB and RRVEC in the ratios of 1:0(control group), 2:1(group 1), 1:1(group 2) and 1:2(group 3) were co-cultured by six well plates and cell inserts. Four days later, the proliferation of RPOB and RRVEC were examined through cell count. Differentiated cell function was assessed by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity assay and 3H proline incorporation assay. RESULTS: When RPOB and RRVEC were indirectly co-cultured, the proliferation of RPOB and 3H proline incorporation was higher in group 1 than in the other experimental groups and control group (P lt; 0.05). ALP activity of RPOB was higher in group 1 than in control group and group 3 (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between group 1 and group 2 (P gt; 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that RPOB and RRVEC co-cultured in a ratio of 2:1 is optimal for future study of bone tissue engineering.
ObjectiveTo compare dialysis catheter function and complications according to catheter site in patients undergoing hemopurification.MethodsLiteratures were searched from PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and VIP Database according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Publication years of these literatures ranged from April 1998 to April 2018. Meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.3 software. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for uncontinuous outcomes, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95%CI were calculated for continuous outcomes. The incidence of catheter related infection, other complications and patients outcome were compared between different sites for dialysis vascular access.ResultsA total of 9 articles were included, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 7 observational clinical studies, and 5 220 adult patients undergoing renal replacement therapy. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in incidences of catheter colonization or catheter-related bloodstream infection, as well as arterial puncture, local thrombosis, catheter dysfunction and spontaneous catheter withdrawal, between femoral and non-femoral (jugular or subclavian) catheterization (P≥0.05). Whereas the incidence of bleeding and local hematoma was lower in femoral catheterization [OR=0.44, 95%CI (0.23, 0.82), P=0.009], and the duration of catheters was shorter in femoral catheterization [WMD=–1.40 d, 95%CI (–2.17, –0.62) d, P=0.000 4]. The blood flow rate, filters clotting incidence and patients intensive case unit mortality were similar in different catheterization.ConclusionsIn patients undergoing renal replacement therapy, the bleeding and local hematoma incidence is lower in femoral catheterization but the duration of catheters is shorter. Nevertheless the patients have similar clinical outcome. This result may provide reference for clinical decision-making.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) after renal transplantation. Method Searching: Medline, Embase, Cochrane library and Chinese Biomedicine database (CBM); identified the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and applied Revman 4.11 for statistical analyses. Results Twenty-two RCTs were identified, involving MMF and AZA for anti-rejection after renal transplantation. The data shown that MMF (2 g/d) was more beneficial than AZA in improving the graft survival rate of short periods and the long-term patient survival rate, but there was no statistical differences between MMF (3 g/d) with AZA. Whether in 6 months or in 1 year after renal transplantation, the use of MMF (2 g/d) or MMF (3 g/d) could markedly reduce the incidence of biopsy-proven rejection. Conclusions Comparing with AZA, MMF is a more potent immunosuppressive drug, and more efficient in reducing the acute rejection after renal transplantation. MMF can improve the graft and patient survival rate. The 2 gram per day is more acceptable.
