Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) are communication and control systems centered on neural signals that incorporate both the user and the brain into a closed-loop interaction framework, and are widely regarded as a transformative paradigm in human–computer interaction. However, despite the existence of broadly accepted definitions within the research community, the rapid acceleration of BCI translation and commercialization has led to increasing ambiguity in scientific definitions, expansion of conceptual scope, and overstatement of technical capabilities. To address these issues, this paper proposed a scientifically grounded definition of BCIs and systematically analyzed their essential system components and fundamental characteristics. On this basis, the major and specific factors that constrain the capability boundaries of current and foreseeable BCI systems were examined. Furthermore, the scope of BCI was explicitly delineated by distinguishing BCIs from adjacent neurotechnologies based on their functional roles and system characteristics. This work aims to promote a more rigorous and coherent understanding of BCI definitions, scope, and capability limits within the academic community, and to provide essential theoretical foundations for responsible translation and long-term development. By clarifying conceptual boundaries and realistic expectations, it seeks to mitigate risks associated with conceptual generalization and distorted projections in both research and industrial practice, thereby fostering a more rational, robust, and sustainable ecosystem for the BCI field.
