ObjectiveTo discuss the clinical effects of T-tube with side holes in the gallbladder-common hepatic duct anastomosis.
MethodsThe clinical data of 60 cases that performed gallbladder-common hepatic duct anastomosis from Jul. 2009 to Jul. 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The contractile functions and mucosal recovery of gallbladder were compared between the conventional T-tube and T-tube with side holes.
ResultsTwenty-four cases of gallbladder-common hepatic duct anastomosis used conventional T-tube, the gallbladder were not developing in 6-8 weeks after operation by T-tube cholangiography, the gallbladder mucosa of 17 cases were normal without edema, congestion and edema were observed in 6 cases, and the normal gallbladder mucosa structure disappeared in 1 case. The gallbladder were developing in 6-8 weeks after operation by T-tube cholangiography in 36 cases that used T-tube with side holes, the gallbladder mucosa structure had not congestion, edema, and erosion. The gallbladder contractile function were normal.
ConclusionsThe floc, blood clots, and inflammatory substances in gallbladder can be discharged into the intestine or drainage in vitro, and the bile can go into gallbladder and can be concentrated through the T-tube with side holes. Physiological flow of bile can return to normal and the function of gallbladder can recover early.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration(LCBDE) with biliary stent drainage or T tube drainage.
MethodsThe clinical data of 68 cases of gallbladder and bile duct stones with the LCBDE by the same surgeon in our hospital from June 2008 to June 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-two patients were treated with LCBDE and biliary stent drainage(stent drainage group), 46 patients were treated with LCBDE and T tube drainage(T tube drainage group).
ResultsThe operation were successfully completed of 2 groups. The anal exhaust time, peritoneal drainage time, postoperative hospitalization time, and hospital expenses in stent drainage group were shorter or less than thoes T tube drainage group(P < 0.05). There were no significant difference in the operative time, postoperative bilirubin level, and incidences of postoperative complications between the two groups(P > 0.05).
ConclusionsThe stent drainage and T tube drainage after LCBDE has its own indications. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and biliary stent drainage is superior to the laparo-scopic common bile duct exploration and T tube drainage.
Objective To gain accurate imaging information of biliary tract after surgery. MethodsThe biliary tract of 170 cases after surgery had been observed dynamically from different directions for longer time. The results of data on biliary tract change were stored in disc, or picture. ResultsOf 170 cases, 120 cases were cured without any abnormal change on cholangiography, and then the Ttube was removed. Of another 50 cases, 30 cases revealed remnant stone on cholangiography, 9 cases showed inflammatory stricture of biliary tract, 4 cases displayed common bile duct tumor, and 7 cases had false fillingdefect. Then, the results were further confirmed by sonography, CT, choledochoscopy, and operation. Conclusion The dynamic observation of biliary tract by Ttube cholangiography after surgery is usual way that is handy, practical, painless, and economic.
Objective To assess the benefits and harms of routine primary suture (LBEPS) versus T-tube drainage (LCHTD) following laparoscopic common bile duct stone exploration. Methods The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs were electronically searched from the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2010), PubMed (1978 to 2010), EMbase (1966 to 2010), CBMdisc (1978 to 2010), and CNKI (1979 to 2010); and the relevant published and unpublished data and their references were also searched by hand. The data were extracted and the quality was evaluated by two reviewers independently, and the RevMan 5.0 software was used for data analysis. Results Four studies including 3 RCTs and 1 quasi-RCT involving 274 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that compared with LCHTD, LBEPS was better in shortening operation time (WMD= –17.11, 95%CI –25.86 to –8.36), abdominal drainage time (WMD= –0.74, 95%CI –1.39 to –0.10) and post-operative hospitalization time (WMD= –3.30, 95%CI –3.67 to –2.92), in lowering hospital expenses (WMD= –2 998.75, 95%CI –4 396.24 to –1 601.26) and in reducing the complications due to T-tube such as tube detaching, bile leakage after tube drawing, and choleperitonitis (RR=0.56, 95%CI 0.29 to 1.09). Conclusion LBEPS is superior to LCHTD in total effectiveness for common bile duct stone with the precondition of strictly abiding by operation indication. Due to the low quality of the included studies which decreases the reliability of this conclusion, more reasonably-designed and strictly-performed multi-centered RCTs with large scale and longer follow up time are required to further assess and verify the efficacy and safety of this treatment.
摘要:目的: 探討拔T管后出現膽漏的預防和治療。 方法 :對1986～2006年間取T管后發生膽漏的12例臨床資料作回顧性分析。 結果 :12例經保守治療后均痊愈。 結論 :拔T管后膽漏的發生是多因素的結果,改進手術技巧,適當延長拔T管的時間有助于預防膽漏的發生。膽漏發生后及時用導尿管置入竇道作引流是首選的治療方法。Abstract: Objective: To investigate the prophylaxis and treatment of biliary fistula after removal of Ttube. Methods : The clinical data of 12 patients with biliary fistula after removal of Ttube from 1986 to 2006 were analyzed retrospectively. Results : Fistula was cured with conservative treatment in 12 patients. Conclusion : Many factors may affect the development of biliary fistula after removeal of Ttube. Improvement of surgercial technique and the proper prolongation for the time of removal of Ttube may contribute to prophylaxis the biliary fistula. Inserting a Nelaton’s catheter into the sinus tract to drain is the first choice to treat the local bile peritonitis that has occurred.
Objective
To explore clinical effect of primary suture following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in treatment of patients aged over 70 years old with common bile duct (CBD) stones.
Methods
The clinical data of 62 patients aged over 70 years old with CBD stones underwent the LCBDE from January 2013 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 30 patients underwent the T tube drainage (T tube drainage group) and 32 patients underwent the primary suture (primary suture group) following the LCBDE. The intraoperative and postoperative statuses of these two groups were compared.
Results
There were no significant differences in the gender, age, body mass index, preoperative comorbidities and ASA classification, number and maximum diameter of CBD stone, and diameter of CBD between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the operative time, hospitalization cost, rates of total postoperative complications and readmission between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the T tube drainage group, the amount of intraoperative bleeding was less (P<0.05) and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter (P<0.05) in the primary suture group.
Conclusion
Primary suture is safe and feasible following LCBDE for patients aged over 70 years old with CBD stones in case of strict indications and proficiency intraoperation and it is more beneficial to recovery of patient.
