1. <div id="8sgz1"><ol id="8sgz1"></ol></div>

        <em id="8sgz1"><label id="8sgz1"></label></em>
      2. <em id="8sgz1"><label id="8sgz1"></label></em>
        <em id="8sgz1"></em>
        <div id="8sgz1"><ol id="8sgz1"><mark id="8sgz1"></mark></ol></div>

        <button id="8sgz1"></button>
        west china medical publishers
        Author
        • Title
        • Author
        • Keyword
        • Abstract
        Advance search
        Advance search

        Search

        find Author "ZHU Weiwei" 1 results
        • Comparison of Various Venae Profundae Catheterization

          目的:比較不同部位、不同方式深靜脈置管的優缺點。方法:根據患者病情及能否配合操作,分別采用鎖骨下靜脈穿刺置管術、頸內靜脈穿刺置管術、股靜脈穿刺置管術并將三種術式的優缺點及所致的并發癥進行比較。結果:276例深靜脈置管術中(1) 經鎖骨下置管者220例,占79.71%。其中術后感染2例,占0.91%;誤入動脈2例,占0.91%;縱膈血腫1例,占0.45%;(2) 經頸內靜脈置管者35例,占12.68%。其中術后感染3例,占1.40%;誤入動脈者1例,占2.86%;氣胸1例,占2.86%;術后導管脫落者1例,占2.86%;(3) 經股靜脈置管者21例,占7.60%。其中術后感染5例,占23.8%;誤入動脈者1例,占4.76%。結論:幾種深靜脈穿刺術中,尤以經鎖骨下穿刺者并發癥相對較少,是深靜脈置管方式中的首選。

          Release date:2016-09-08 10:01 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        1 pages Previous 1 Next

        Format

        Content

          1. <div id="8sgz1"><ol id="8sgz1"></ol></div>

            <em id="8sgz1"><label id="8sgz1"></label></em>
          2. <em id="8sgz1"><label id="8sgz1"></label></em>
            <em id="8sgz1"></em>
            <div id="8sgz1"><ol id="8sgz1"><mark id="8sgz1"></mark></ol></div>

            <button id="8sgz1"></button>
            欧美人与性动交α欧美精品