ObjectiveTo systematically review the diagnostic value of T-SPOT.TB and QuantiFERON-TB (QFT-GIT/QFT-Plus) in active tuberculosis (ATB). MethodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect diagnostic accuracy studies comparing QFT-GIT/QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosing ATB from inception to February 8, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 16.0 software. ResultsA total of 20 studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the pooled sensitivity of T-SPOT.TB and QFT-GIT were 0.89 (95%CI 0.85 to 0.92) and 0.84 (95%CI 0.79 to 0.89), the pooled specificity were 0.85 (95%CI 0.68 to 0.93) and 0.86 (95%CI 0.72 to 0.94), the area under the curve (AUC) of summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) were 0.93 (95%CI 0.84 to 0.97) and 0.90 (95%CI 0.56 to 0.99), respectively. The pooled sensitivity of T-SPOT.TB and QFT-Plus were 0.93 (95%CI 0.81 to 0.97) and 0.93 (95%CI 0.89 to 0.96), specificity were 0.99 (95%CI 0.39 to 1.00) and 0.94 (95%CI 0.67 to 0.99), the AUC of SROC were 0.99 (95%CI 0.67 to 1.00) and 0.98 (95%CI 0.65 to 1.00), respectively. ConclusionBoth T-SPOT.TB and QFT have high diagnostic accuracy for ATB, and the diagnostic sensitivity of T-SPOT.TB is better than QFT-GIT. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
The correct and reasonable statistical analysis method can make the results of comparative diagnosis test accuracy more convincing. In this paper, the accuracy of diagnostic tests is divided into 2 forms: binary-scale outcomes and ordinal-scale/continuous-scale outcomes. Taking diagnostic indicators such as sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under curve (AUC) values as entry points, combined with examples, this paper introduced how to compare the diagnostic results of tests by parameter estimation and hypothesis testing, with the aim of providing references for the comparative diagnosis test accuracy.
With the development of artificial intelligence, machine learning has been widely used in diagnosis of diseases. It is crucial to conduct diagnostic test accuracy studies and evaluate the performance of models reasonably to improve the accuracy of diagnosis. For machine learning-based diagnostic test accuracy studies, this paper introduces the principles of study design in the aspects of target conditions, selection of participants, diagnostic tests, reference standards and ethics.
ObjectiveTo explore the short-term effectiveness of Mako robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) via posterolateral approach.MethodsThe clinical data of 64 patients (74 hips) treated with Mako robot-assisted THA via posterolateral approach (robot group) between May 2020 and March 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and compared with the clinical data of 52 patients (55 hips) treated with traditional THA via posterolateral approach (control group) in the same period. There was no significant difference in general data such as gender, age, side, body mass index, disease type, and preoperative Harris score between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. Acetabular inclination angle, acetabular anteversion angle, and lower limbs discrepancy were measured after operation. At last follow-up, the improvement of hip pain and function was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Harris score, and forgetting joint score (FJS-12).ResultsIn the robot group, 3 patients (including 1 patient with acetabular fracture during operation) were converted to routine THA because the pelvic data array placed at the anterior superior iliac spine was loose, resulting in data error and unable to register the acetabulum; the other patients in the two groups completed the operation successfully. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the robot group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). All patients were followed up 1-10 months, with an average of 4.6 months. In the robot group, 1 patient with ankylosing spondylitis had acetabular prosthesis loosening at 2 days after operation, underwent surgical revision, and 10 patients had lower limb intermuscular vein thrombosis; in the control group, 1 patient had left hip dislocation and 5 patients had lower extremity intermuscular vein thrombosis; there was no complication such as sciatic nerve injury, incision exudation, and periprosthetic infection in both groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the robot group and the control group (17.2% vs.11.5%) (χ2=0.732, P=0.392). At last follow-up, the acetabular anteversion angle and FJS-12 score in the robot group were was significantly greater than those in the control group, and the lower limbs discrepancy was significantly less than that in the control group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in acetabular inclination angle and VAS score between the two groups (P>0.05). The Harris scores of the two groups were significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the difference of pre- and post-operative score between the two groups (t=1.632, P=0.119).ConclusionCompared with traditional surgery, Mako robot-assisted THA can optimize the accuracy and safety of acetabular cup implantation, reduce the length difference of the lower limbs, and has a certain learning curve. Its long-term effectiveness needs further research to confirm.
Scientific and rigorous study design could improve the reliability of results of the comparative diagnostic test accuracy studies. The design procedures of a comparative diagnostic test accuracy study included: constructing the clinical questions, identifying the appropriate gold standard, selecting the representative patient sample, calculating the sample size, blindly interpreting and comparing the results of diagnostic tests, and setting up the cut-off value. This paper introduced 5 categories of the designs of comparative diagnostic test accuracy studies: fully paired, partially paired with a random subset, partially paired with a nonrandom subset, unpaired randomized, and unpaired nonrandomized design.
The comparative diagnostic test accuracy (CDTA) study is an important part of diagnostic test accuracy, which aims to compare the accuracy of two or more index tests in the same study. With the development of CDTA studies and the methodology of systematic reviews, the number of CDTA systematic reviews has grown year by year and has provided evidence to support clinical decision-making. Compared with systematic review of single diagnostic test accuracy, the CDTA systematic review has its own unique features, especially in data extraction, risk of bias, and statistical analysis. This paper introduced the steps and precautions for writing a CDTA systematic review to provide references for CDTA systematic reviewers.
Objective To evaluate the accuracy of soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 ( sTREM-1) as a diagnostic index for ventilator-associated pneumonia ( VAP) . Methods We searched the PubMed, EMBase, Cochrane Library,Wanfang Database, CNKI and VIP for clinical trials which assessed the diagnosis accuracy of sTREM-1 for VAP. The methodological quality of each study was assessed by the quality assessment for studies of diagnostic accuracy ( QUADAS) tool. The Meta-disc software was used to conduct merger analyses on sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio. The heterogeneity test was performed and summary receiver operating characteristic ( SROC) curve was completed. Results 8 studies were included ( 180 VAP patients and 224 non-VAP patients) . The value of merger sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were 0. 80, 0. 74, and 13. 89, respectively. The area under of SROC curve was 0. 857, with Q point at 0. 788. Conclusion sTREM-1 showed moderate accuracy for VAP diagnosis in adult mechanically ventilated patients, which should be combined with other diagnostic markers to further improve the sensitivity and specificity.
Comparative diagnostic test accuracy study, a type of diagnostic accuracy test, aims to compare accuracy of two or more index tests in a study. The application of GRADE in comparative test accuracy differs from single test accuracy, mainly including the selection of appropriate comparative study designs, additional criteria for judging risk of bias, and the consequences of using comparative measures of test accuracy. The study focuses on basic principles and methods of GRADE approach in systematic reviews of comparative test accuracy to promote the understanding and application of the method by domestic scholars.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of robot-assisted and traditional freehand screw placement in the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation. Methods The clinical data of 55 patients with atlantoaxial dislocation who met the selection criteria between January 2021 and January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different screw placement methods, they were divided into the traditional group (using the traditional freedhand screw placement, 31 cases) and the robot group (using the Mazor X robot-assisted screw placement, 24 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, etiology, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, cervical spine Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, operation cost, and intraoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The VAS score and cervical spine JOA score were used to evaluate the improvement of pain and cervical spinal cord function before operation and at 1 month after operation. CT examination was performed at 3 days after operation, and the accuracy of screw placement was evaluated according to Neo grading criteria. Results All the 55 patients successfully completed the operation. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and operation cost in the robot group were significantly higher than those in the traditional group (P<0.05). A total of 220 C1 and C2 pedicle screws were inserted in the two groups, and 94 were inserted in the robot group, with an accuracy rate of 95.7%, among them, 2 were inserted by traditional freehand screw placement due to bleeding caused by intraoperative slip. And 126 pedicle screws were inserted in the traditional group, with an accuracy rate of 87.3%, which was significantly lower than that in the robot group (P<0.05). There were 1 case of venous plexus injury in the robot group and 3 cases in the traditional group, which improved after pressure hemostasis treatment. No other intraoperative complication such as vertebral artery injury or spinal cord injury occurred in both groups. All patients were followed up 4-16 months with an average of 6.6 months, and there was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups (P>0.05). Postoperative neck pain significantly relieved in both groups, and neurological symptoms relieved to varying degrees. The VAS score and cervicle spine JOA score of both groups significantly improved at 1 month after operation when compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the score change between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation, the accuracy of robot-assisted screw placement is superior to the traditional freedhand screw placement.
ObjectiveTo compare the safety and accuracy of manual and robot-assisted cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws fixation in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases with osteoporosis.MethodsThe clinical data of 58 cases of lumbar degenerative disease with osteoporosis treated by CBT screw fixation between February 2017 and February 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 29 cases were fixed with CBT screws assisted by robot (group A), 29 cases were fixed with CBT screws by hand (group B). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, body mass index, lesion type, T-value of bone mineral density, and operative segment (P>0.05), with comparability. The accuracy of implant was evaluated by Kaito’s grading method, and the invasion of CBT screw to the superior articular process was evaluated by Babu’s method.ResultsThe operation time and intraoperative blood loss in group A were significantly less than those in group B (t=?8.921, P=0.000; t=?14.101, P=0.000). One hundred and sixteen CBT screws were implanted in the two groups. At 3 days after operation, according to the Kaito’s grading method, the accuracy of implant in group A was 108 screws of grade 0, 6 of grade 1, and 2 of grade 2; and in group B was 86 screws of grade 0, 12 of grade 1, and 18 of grade 2; the difference was significant (Z=4.007, P=0.000). There were 114 accepted screws (98.3%) in group A and 98 (84.5%) in group B, the difference was significant (χ2=8.309, P=0.009). At 3 days after operation, according to Babu’s method, there were 85 screws in grade 0, 3 in grade 1, and 2 in grade 2 in group A; and in group B, there were 91 screws in grade 0, 16 in grade 1, 5 in grade 2, and 4 in grade 3; the difference was significant (Z=7.943, P=0.000). No serious injury of spinal cord, nerve, and blood vessel was found in the two groups. One patient in group A had delayed cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and 2 patients in group B had mild anemia. Both groups were followed up 10-14 months (mean, 11.6 months). The neurological symptoms were improved, and no screw loosening or fracture was found during the follow-up.ConclusionCompared with manual implantation of CBT screw, robot-assisted spinal implant has higher accuracy, lower incidence of invasion of superior articular process, and strong holding power of CBT screw, which can be applied to the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases with osteoporosis.
