ObjectiveTo analyze the risk factors of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.MethodsThe clinical data of 1 328 patients with esophageal cancer, who underwent esophagectomy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology from January 2010 to December 2016, were retrospectively analyzed. There were 726 males and 602 females, at an average age of 67.2±14.1 years. According to whether there was anastomotic leakage after operation, patients were divided into two groups: an anastomotic leakage group (167 patients) and a non-anastomotic leakage group (1 161 patients). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify related risk factors of anastomotic leakage after operation.Results The incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage was 12.6% (167/1 328). Univariate analysis showed that body mass index, arrhythmia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, preoperative albumin level, preoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, lesion location, anastomosis types and postoperative pulmonary infection were associated with statistically significant increase in risk of cervical anastomotic leakage (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative COPD, lesion location and postoperative pulmonary infection were independent risk factors of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy (P<0.05).ConclusionThe occurrence of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer is related to many factors. The preoperative COPD, the lesion location and the postoperative pulmonary infection are independent high risk factors. Paying attention to these factors and doing perioperative management can effectively reduce the occurrence of anastomotic leakage.
Objective To explore the strategy of intrathoracic anastomosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma when the proximal esophagus is dilated to different degrees and explore its mechanism. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who underwent esophagectomy between 2014 and 2017 in West China Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups including a significant dilatation group with inner mucosal phase diameter (IMPD)≥17.9 mm and a non-significant dilatation group with IMPD<17.9 mm. And the patients were divided into two groups (a layered manual anastomosis group and a stapled anastomosis group) according to anastomosis method and propensity score matching was applied to adjust for potential confounders. Results We finally included 654 patients. There were 206 patients with 158 males and 48 females at average age of 62.21±7.72 years in the layerd manual analstomosis group and 448 patietns with 377 males and 71 females at average age of 62.57±8.42 years in the stapled anastomosis group. We also used Masson trichrome staining to assess the collagen fiber content in the esophagus. Compared with layered manual anastomosis, the incidence of anastomotic leakage was higher in the significant dilatation group than that in the stapled anastomosis group (original cohort: 3.8% vs. 10.7%, P=0.093; propensity score-matched cohort: 1.4% vs. 15.3%, P=0.004). And there was no significant difference in anastomotic leakage b etween layered manual anastomosis and stapled anastomosis in the non-significant dilatation group (original cohort: 4.7% vs. 4.2%, P=0.830; propensity score-matched cohort: 4.8% vs. 4.0%, P=0.206). Moreover, the average collagen fiber area ratio was significantly lower in the significant dilation group than that in the non-significant dilatation group (P=0.045). Conclusion There is a significant reduction in collagen fibers in the proximal esophageal wall tissue of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with a IMPD≥17.9 mm. Intrathoracic layered manual anastomosis effectively reduces postoperative anastomotic leakage in these patients.
ObjectiveTo systematically summarize the research progress in risk prediction models for postoperative anastomotic leakage in gastric cancer, and to explore the advantages and limitations of models constructed using traditional statistical methods and machine learning, thereby providing a theoretical basis for clinical precision prediction and early intervention. MethodBy analyzing domestic and international literature, the construction strategies of logistic regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and machine learning models (support vector machine, random forest, deep learning) were systematically reviewed, and their predictive performance and clinical applicability were compared. ResultsThe traditional logistic regression and LASSO regression models performed excellently in terms of interpretability and in small-sample scenarios but were limited by linear assumptions. The machine learning models significantly enhanced predictive capabilities for complex data through non-linear modeling and automatic feature extraction, but required larger data scales and had higher demands for interpretability. ConclusionsDifferent prediction models have their own advantages and limitations; in practical clinical applications, they should be flexibly selected or complementarily applied based on specific scenarios. Current anastomotic leakage prediction models are evolving from single factor analysis to multi-modal dynamic integration. Future efforts should combine artificial intelligence and multi-center prospective clinical studies to validate, so advancing the development of precise and individualized anastomotic leakage predictive tools for patients after gastric cancer resection.
ObjectiveTo understand the related factors and prevention and treatment of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer operation.MethodThe literatures on the studies of colorectal anastomotic leakage in recent years were reviewed and analyzed.ResultsThe occurrence of postoperative anastomotic leakage of colorectal cancer was usually related to many factors, besides the patients’ nutritional status, body mass index, gender, smoking and drinking history, preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, etc., as well as the distance between the anastomotic stoma and the anal margin and the ligation of the left colonic artery. The monitors of albumin, prealbumin, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin and other indicators might be better for early prediction of anastomotic leakage. The use of oral antibiotics while mechanical bowel preparation, intraoperative ICG fluorescence angiography, single-layer intestinal anastomosis, reducing the number of staplers, preserving the left colon artery, placing drainage tube through anus, and minimally invasive colorectal cancer resection might have some advantages in reducing the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage.ConclusionsAs a surgeon, risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage should be fully understood. It is of great significance to use related markers to identify early anastomotic leakage and timely intervene, and use of more accurate surgical procedures to reduce occurrence of anastomotic leakage.
ObjectiveTo study the clinical significance of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) combined with neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in predicting the occurrence of anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.MethodsTo retrospectively analyze and collect the clinical data of 517 patients with gastric cancer who were diagnosed at the Third People’s Hospital of Shangqiu City from January 2016 to May 2020, all of the patients received radical gastrectomy. We explored the risk factors that affect the occurrence of postoperative anastomotic leakage, and explored the clinical significance of PNI combined with NLR on the third day after operation in predicting the occurrence of anastomotic leakage.ResultsAmong 517 patients undergoing radical gastrectomy, 61 had anastomotic leakage, and the incidence of anastomotic leakage was 11.8%. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients with preoperative diabetes and intraoperative blood loss ≥400 mL had a higher incidence of anastomotic leakage, and with the increase of NLR value on the 3rd and 5th day after operation, and the decrease of PNI value on the 3rd and 5th day after operation, the incidence of anastomotic leakage increased (P<0.05). The area under the curve of NLR, PNI, and NLR combined with PNI on the 3rd day after operation in predicting the occurrence of anastomotic leakage were 0.849, 0.581, and 0.949, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05), the sensitivity and specificity of NLR combined with PNI were higher than the individual indicator.ConclusionPNI combined with NLR on the 3rd day after operation has important clinical significance in predicting the occurrence of anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of fecal drainage technique on rectal anastomosis for preventing anastomotic leakage after operation for middle-low rectal cancer.MethodsThe retrospective analysis was used to collect the middle-low rectal cancer which completed operation in this hospital from 2014 to 2019. According to the way of preventing annstomotic leakage, the patients were divided into two groups: fecal drainage on rectal anastomosis group (Abbreviation: fecal drainage group) and end ileum prophylactic stoma group (Abbreviation: ileostomy group). The incidence of anastomotic leakage after operation and the different treatment methods following leakage were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 231 cases were recorded, including 84 cases in the fecal drainage group, 147 cases in the ileostomy group. There were no significant differences in the baseline data such as the gender, age, preoperative complications, operation mode, etc. between the two groups (P>0.050). There were no significant differences in the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision infection, postoperative intestinal obstruction, total hospitalization cost, death, anastomotic leakage (overall, each grade, treatment, and outcome) between the two groups (P>0.050). Although the length of hospital stay except the patients with anastomotic leakage in the fecal drainage group was significantly longer than that in the ileostomy group (P<0.001), there was no significant difference in the total length of hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.050), and the incidence of anastomotic stenosis in the fecal drainage group was significantly lower than that in the ileostomy group (P=0.029).ConclusionAccording to the results of this study, fecal drainage technique on rectal anastomosis is effective, safe, and feasible in preventing anastomotic leakage after operation for middle-low rectal cancer.
Objective To compare the safety of manual anastomosis and mechanical anastomosis after esophagectomy by meta-analysis. MethodsThe randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about manual anastomosis and mechanical anastomosis after esophagectomy were searched from PubMed, EMbase and The Cochrane Library from inception to January 2018 by computer, without language restrictions. Two authors according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria independently researched literature, extracted data, evaluated bias risk and used R software meta package for meta-analysis. Results Seventeen RCTs were enrolled, including 2 159 patients (1 230 by manual anastomosis and 1 289 by mechanical anastomosis). The results of meta-analysis showed that: (1) there was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic leakage between mechanical and manual anastomosis (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.67–1.48, P=0.181); (2) no significant difference was found in the 30-day mortality (RR=0.95, 95%CI 0.61–1.49, P=0.631); (3) compared with manual anastomosis, the mechanical anastomosis group may increase the risk of anastomotic stenosis (RR=0.74, 95%CI 0.48-1.14, P<0.001). Conclusion Esophageal cancer surgery using a linear or circular stapler can increase the incidence of anastomotic stenosis after surgery. There is no significant difference in the anastomotic leakage and 30-day mortality between manual anastomosis, linear stapler and circular stapler.
ObjectiveTo investigate the risk factors for anastomotic leakage after McKeown esophagectomy, and to establish a risk prediction model for early clinical intervention.MethodsWe selected 469 patients including 379 males and 90 females, with a median age of 67 (42-91) years, who underwent McKeown esophagectomy in our department from 2018 to 2019. The clinical data of the patients were analyzed.ResultsAmong the 469 patients, 7.0% (33/469) patients had anastomotic leakage after McKeown esophagectomy. Logistic analysis showed that the risk factors for anastomotic leakage were operation time >4.5 h, postoperative low albumin and postoperative hypoxemia (P<0.05). A prognostic nomogram model was established based on these factors with the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.769 (95%CI 0.677-0.861), indicating a good predictive value.ConclusionOperation time >4.5 h, postoperative low albumin and postoperative hypoxemia are the independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage after McKeown esophagectomy. Through the nomogram prediction model, early detection and intervention can be achieved, and the hospital stay can be shortened.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of mediastinal drainage tube placed after the esophageal cancer resection with intrathoracic anastomosis on postoperative complications such as anastomotic fistula. MethodsLiterature on the application of mediastinal drainage tubes in esophageal cancer surgery published in databases such as PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, China Biomedical Literature Database, VIP, and Wanfang were searched using English or Chinese, from the establishment of the databases to December 31, 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the included retrospective studies, the Cochrane Handbook bias risk tool was used to assess the bias risk of randomized controlled trials (RCT), and Review Manager 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 19 retrospective studies and 8 RCT involving 6320 patients were included, with 3257 patients in the observation group (mediastinal drainage tube+closed thoracic drainage tube) and 3063 patients in the control group (closed thoracic drainage tube or single mediastinal drainage tube). The NOS score of the included literature was≥6 points, and one RCT had a low risk of bias and the other RCT had a moderate risk of bias . Meta-analysis results showed that compared with the control group, the observation group had fewer postoperative lung complications [OR=0.44, 95%CI (0.36, 0.53), P<0.001], fewer postoperative cardiac complications [OR=0.40, 95%CI (0.33, 0.49), P<0.001], earlier average diagnosis time of anastomotic fistula [MD=?3.33, 95%CI (?3.95, ?2.71), P<0.001], lower inflammation indicators [body temperature: MD=?1.15, 95%CI (?1.36, ?0.93), P<0.001; white cell count: MD=?5.62, 95%CI (?7.29, ?3.96), P<0.001], and shorter postoperative hospital stay [MD=?15.13, 95%CI (?18.69, ?11.56), P<0.001]. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative anastomotic fistula between the two groups [OR=0.85, 95%CI (0.70, 1.05), P=0.13]. ConclusionPlacing a mediastinal drainage tube cannot reduce the incidence of anastomotic fistula, but it can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative respiratory and circulatory system complications in patients and improve patients’ prognosis. It can early detect teh anastomotic fistula and fully drain digestive fluid to promote rapid healing of the fistula, alleviate the infection symptoms of postoperative anastomotic fistula, and shorten the hospital stay.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the risk prediction models for anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients with esophageal cancer after surgery. MethodsA computer-based search of PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Chinese Medical Journal Full-text Database, VIP, Wanfang, SinoMed and CNKI was conducted to collect studies on postoperative AL risk prediction model for esophageal cancer from their inception to October 1st, 2023. PROBAST tool was employed to evaluate the bias risk and applicability of the model, and Stata 15 software was utilized for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 19 literatures were included covering 25 AL risk prediction models and 7373 patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.670-0.960. Among them, 23 prediction models had a good prediction performance (AUC>0.7); 13 models were tested for calibration of the model; 1 model was externally validated, and 10 models were internally validated. Meta-analysis showed that hypoproteinemia (OR=9.362), postoperative pulmonary complications (OR=7.427), poor incision healing (OR=5.330), anastomosis type (OR=2.965), preoperative history of thoracoabdominal surgery (OR=3.181), preoperative diabetes mellitus (OR=2.445), preoperative cardiovascular disease (OR=3.260), preoperative neoadjuvant therapy (OR=2.977), preoperative respiratory disease (OR=4.744), surgery method (OR=4.312), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (OR=2.424) were predictors for AL after esophageal cancer surgery. ConclusionAt present, the prediction model of AL risk in patients with esophageal cancer after surgery is in the development stage, and the overall research quality needs to be improved.
