Blood pump is the core component of artificial ventricular assist device, and thrombosis is a severe complication of blood pump in clinical application. Methods of controlling and reducing thrombosis include materials surface modification, structure and parameters optimization of blood pump, and others. The typical symptoms of thrombosis and the hazard of various types of blood pump, the formation mechanism and primary factors for thrombosis, and the simulation prediction models for thrombosis were reviewed in this paper.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, CBM and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect clinical studies on DOACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban, idoxaban, dabigatran) compared with VKA in SOT recipients from inception to May 15, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 11 cohort studies involving 1 408 SOT recipients were included. The meta-analysis results showed that compared with VKA, DOACs could reduce the risk of any bleeding (RR=0.47, 95%CI 0.37 to 0.60, P<0.05) and major bleeding (RR=0.56, 95%CI 0.37 to 0.84, P<0.05) in SOT recipients. But there were no statistically significant differences in the total incidence of thrombotic events, VTE incidence, and stroke incidence between the two groups. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that DOACs are not inferior to VKA in anticoagulation therapy for SOT recipients, but they perform better in terms of any bleeding and major bleeding. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Traditional surgical aortic valve replacement is associated with a high risk of serious complications, especially in elderly patients with other preoperative diseases and unable to undergo thoracotomy. Therefore, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is now the accepted standard treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at elevated risk for conventional surgical valve replacement. Currently, guidelines propose the use of dual antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of thromboembolic events after TAVI in the patients without an indication for oral anticoagulation. While, this strategy is empiric and largely based on expert consensus extrapolated from the arena of percutaneous coronary intervention. Antithrombotic therapy is associated with a significant occurrence of both thrombotic and bleeding complications, thus, the balance between thrombotic and bleeding risk is critical. This review summarizes current guidelines and the evidence underpinning them and explores the rational for using antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant strategies after TAVI.
ObjectiveTo realize the application status and development trend of oral anticoagulant drugs used in respiratory diseases in 72 hospitals in 6 cities from the year 2013 to 2017.MethodsFrom January 2013 to December 2017, we randomly selected the electronic information from 10 working days per quarter in 6 cities including Beijing, Guangzhou, Shanghai, Chengdu, Shenyang, and Zhengzhou, with 12 hospitals in each city, and summarized the information into the prescription database of the hospital prescription analysis project. Through the hospital information system, we screened out the information of outpatient prescriptions and inpatient medical records which used oral anticoagulants. The prescriptions with respiratory diseases related-diagnosis were selected as the research objects by manual screening. The application of oral anticoagulant drugs used in respiratory diseases was statistically analyzed by drug amount, prescription amount, prescribed daily dose (PDD), and defined daily dose (DDD).ResultsFrom 2013 to 2017, the number of warfarin sodium prescriptions was successively 4 769, 5 747, 7 549, 7 261, and 7 151, which had been always ranked the first in the five years, but decreased year by year since 2015. The proportion of warfarin sodium drug use amount decreased year by year from 32.52% in 2013 to 5.03% in 2017. The proportion of prescription and drug consumption sum of new oral anticoagulants increased year by year in the past five years. The PDD/DDD of warfarin sodium, dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, and apixaban were 0.41, 0.73, 0.68, and 0.33, respectively. There were off lable use of new oral anticoagulants.ConclusionsWarfarin still dominates the proportion of oral anticoagulants prescribed in the 72 hospitals in the 6 cities in the five years. The clinicians have made a comprehensive judgment after fully considering the safety, effectiveness, and economy of drug use when formulating drug treatment programs.
Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a common complication of heart diseases such as myocardial infarction and heart failure. Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) is currently the main method for LVT, but its use requires frequent monitoring of coagulation indicators, which may lead to poor patient compliance. The novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) is easy to administer and does not require monitoring of international normalized ratio or dietary restrictions. With the development of NOAC, the position of VKA for LVT may gradually be replaced in the future. This article provides a review of the comparative efficacy of NOAC and VKA for LVT in recent years, in order to provide new ideas for the clinical use of NOAC for LVT.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism.MethodsStudies about the efficacy and safety of NOACs versus low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism were collected by searching PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM databases from inception to August, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 8 studies involving 2 448 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there was no significant difference in the recurrent VTE rate (OR=0.74, 95%CI 0.49 to 1.11, P=0.15) or bleeding rate (OR=0.80, 95%CI 0.57 to 1.13, P=0.21) between NOACs group and VKAs group. The major bleeding rate was significantly higher in the VKAs group than in the NOACs group (OR=0.47, 95%CI 0.27 to 0.84, P=0.01). The incidences of recurrent VTE (OR=0.84, 95%CI 0.16 to 4.14, P=0.83), bleeding (OR=0.46, 95%CI 0.18 to 1.20, P=0.11), major bleeding (OR=0.45, 95%CI 0.12 to 1.60, P=0.21) were similar between NOACs group and LMWHs group.ConclusionsThe current evidence indicates that for cancer patients with VTE, NOACs are superior to warfarin and comparable to LMWHs. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
Atrial fibrillation is now the most frequent kind of adult arrhythmia in the world, with a prevalence rate at 2%-4%. In addition to the clinical symptoms of palpitation, shortness of breath, chest tightness, and decreased exercise tolerance, patients with atrial fibrillation have a 4 to 5 times higher risk of ischemic stroke than patients without atrial fibrillation, so anticoagulation therapy should be tailored to the CHA2DS2-VASc [congestive heart failure, hypertension, age≥75 years (doubled), diabetes mellitus, stroke (doubled)-vascular disease, age 65-74 years and sex category (female)] score. Oral anticoagulants not only prevent thrombosis, but also raise the risk of drug-related bleeding. This paper examines the assessment and mitigation of bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism: A position paper from ESC/EHRA/AACA/APHRS, in order to provide readers with the most up-to-date research on anticoagulant bleeding risk management in patients with atrial fibrillation.
ObjectivesTo investigate the correlation of warfarin dose genetic and polymorphism of Han-patients after heart valve replacement, to forecast the anticoagulation therapy with warfarin reasonable dosage, and to realize individualized management of anticoagulation monitoring.
MethodsWe selected 103 patients between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2012 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University who were treated by oral warfarin after heart valve replacement with monitoring anticoagulation by international normalized ratio (INR) in Anticoagulation Therapy Database of Chinese Patients after Heart Valve Replacement. There were 32 males and 71 female at age of 21-85 (48.64± 11.66) years. All the patients' CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genetic polymorphisms were detected by using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RELP) method and gene sequencing technology. Warfarin concentration in plasma was determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. The activity of coagulation factorⅡ, Ⅶ, Ⅸ, Ⅹwas determined by Sysmex CA7000 analyzer.
ResultsThe multivariate linear regression analysis showed that age, body surface area, and coagulation factor activity had no significant effect on warfarin dosage. While the gene polymor-phisms of CYP2C9 and VKORC1, warfarin concentration, and age had significant contributions to the overall variability in warfarin dose with decisive coefficients at 1.2%, 26.5%, 43.4%, and 5.0% respectively. The final equation was:Y=1.963-0.986× (CYP2C9* 3) +0.893× (VKORC1-1639) +0.002× (warfarin concentration)-0.019× (age).
ConclusionMultiple regression equation including gene polymorphisms of CYP2C9 and VKORC1, non-genetic factors of coagulation factor activity, warfarin concentration, age, and body surface area can predict reasonable dosage of warfarin for anticoagulation to achieve individualized management of anticoagulation monitoring and reduce the anticoagulation complications.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the anticoagulation efficacy of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with high-risk atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). MethodsA computer-based search was conducted on PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, SinoMed, and VIP databases to identify studies on the application of NOACs and VKAs in high-risk AF patients after TAVI. The search period was from database inception to January 2023. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk assessment tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. ResultsA total of 7 studies involving 24 592 patients were included. The meta-analysis results showed that compared to patients using VKAs, those treated with NOACs had a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality [RR=0.74, 95%CI (0.58, 0.94), P=0.01]. Subgroup analysis indicated that when the follow-up period was less than 1 year, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the NOAC and VKA groups [RR=0.57, 95%CI (0.17, 1.88), P=0.35]; however, when the follow-up period was ≥1 year, the VKA group had a higher all-cause mortality rate than the NOAC group, with a statistically significant difference [RR=0.73, 95%CI (0.57, 0.95), P=0.02]. No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding early stroke [RR=0.50, 95%CI (0.19, 1.28), P=0.15], stroke during follow-up [RR=1.04, 95%CI (0.88, 1.22), P=0.64], bleeding [RR=0.94, 95%CI (0.73, 1.21), P=0.61], major or life-threatening bleeding [RR=0.80, 95%CI (0.49, 1.31), P=0.38], or acute kidney injury [RR=0.51, 95%CI (0.16, 1.59), P=0.24]. Conclusion Compared to VKAs, the use of NOACs in patients with high-risk AF undergoing TAVI may reduce the risk of all-cause mortality, especially during long-term anticoagulation therapy, potentially offering greater benefits. However, further evidence from randomized controlled trials is needed to confirm these findings.
ObjectiveTo summarize the effectiveness and safety of antiplatelet combined with anticoagulant therapy for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). MethodUsing the search strategy developed by Cochrane Collaborative Network, the relevant literature from domestic and foreign databases as of November 1, 2023 was searched and a meta-analysis of outcome indicators was conducted using Stata 14.0 software and Review Manager 5.4.1 software provided by Cochrane Collaboration Network. ResultsA total of 15 eligible literature and 15 383 patients were included, including 7 692 in the antiplatelet combined with anticoagulant therapy group (study group) and 7 691 in the control group (only antiplatelet drug therapy). The meta-analysis results showed that: ① Symptoms: The ankle brachial index [mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI)=0.04(0.02, 0.06)] and the minimum lumen diameter [MD (95%CI)=0.48(0.40, 0.55)] of the study group were greater than those of the control group; The plasma D-2 dimer level of the study group was lower than that of the control group [MD (95%CI)=–0.55(–0.57, –0.52)], and the probability of the limb ischemia risk of the study group was lower than that of the control group [risk ratio (RR) and 95%CI=0.67(0.56, 0.80)]. ② Vascular patency: The probability of the vascular patency of the study group was higher than that of the control group [RR (95%CI)=1.13(1.08, 1.17)]; The subgroup analysis results: the vascular patency rate of the two antiplatelet drugs combined with anticoagulation therapy was highest among the different treatment regimens [effect size (ES) and 95%CI=0.90(0.86, 0.94)], which of the other measures in descending order was only one antiplatelet drug combined with anticoagulation therapy [ES(95%CI)=0.82(0.76, 0.89)], two antiplatelet drugs therapy [ES(95%CI)=0.79(0.72, 0.85)], and only one antiplatelet drug therapy [ES(95%CI)=0.71(0.54, 0.87)]; The probability of the vascular patency using vitamin K antagonists in the study group was higher than that in the control group [RR(95%CI)=1.15(1.10, 1.20)], which had no statistical difference using Ⅹa inhibitor between the study group and the control group [RR(95%CI)=1.04 (0.95, 1.15)]. ③ Bleeding risk: The risk of bleeding of the study group was higher than that of the control group [RR(95%CI)=1.55(1.27, 1.89)]; The subgroup analysis results: The bleeding rate of the only one antiplatelet drug therapy among the different intervention measures was the lowest [ES(95%CI)=0.02(0.01, 0.02)], which of the other measures in ascending order was only one antiplatelet drug combined with anticoagulant therapy [ES(95%CI)=0.04(0.03, 0.06)], two antiplatelet drugs therapy [ES(95%CI)= 0.08(0.06, 0.10)], and two antiplatelet drugs combined with anticoagulant [ES(95%CI)=0.12(0.06, 0.18)]; The probabilities of the bleeding occurring using the vitamin K antagonists and Ⅹa inhibitor in the study group were higher than those in the control group [RR(95%CI)=1.76(1.28, 2.42); RR(95%CI)=1.44(1.12, 1.84)]. ConclusionsFrom the results of this meta-analysis, it can be seen that the combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy can effectively improve symptoms of patients with PAD, increase vascular patency rate, but it has a certain risk of bleeding. The combination of only one antiplatelet drug combined with anticoagulant therapy might achieve an optimum clinical effect and lower bleeding risk.
