ObjectiveTo compare clinical outcome between single-incision laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (SILSG) versus laparoscopy-assisted subtotal gastrectomy (LASG) in treatment of benign gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer.
MethodsClinical data of 37 patients with benign gastric ulcer or duodenal ulcer who underwent laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy between Jan. 2008 and Feb. 2015 at Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University was collected retrospectively. Among them, 15 patients underwent SILSG and 22 patients underwent LASG. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data was analyzed and compared between the 2 groups.
ResultsThe operative time of SILSG group was significantly longer than that of LASG group (P < 0.050). However, the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (P < 0.050), and the total patient scar assesment scale (PSAS) score was significantly lower (P < 0.050) in the SILSG group than those of LASG group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to other variables (P > 0.050), such as conversion rate, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, incidence of complication, and visual analog scale score of pain. All patients received postoperative follow up, and the period ranged from 6 months to 25 months, with a median of 11 months. During the follow up period, no one suffered from incision hernia and recurrence of ulcer.
ConclusionCompared with LASG, SILSG is a technically feasible procedure with better cosmesis and equivalent curability.
ObjectiveTo compare the short-term efficacy of laparoscopic transanal pull through surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.MethodsRelevant literatures were retrieved from databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, Embase, CNKI, CBM, Wan-fang database, and VIP databases from Jan. 2009 to Jul. 2019, all the relevant trial documents ［included randomized controlled trial and non randomized controlled trial］ were collected for comparison of laparoscopic transanal pull through surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery on the clinical efficacy of rectal cancer patients, the qualified literatures were screened in strict accordance with inclusion and exclusion criteria, and Stata12.0 software was used for statistical analysis.ResultsA total of 19 articles were included in the literature with 2 683 patients were included among them. Meta analysis results showed that, compared with the conventional laparoscopic surgery group, in laparoscopic transanal pull through surgery group, operation time [WMD=–6.78, 95% CI was (–11.96, –1.60), P<0.01], intraoperative blood loss [WMD=–14.94, 95% CI was (–23.48, –6.40),P<0.01], postoperative exhaust time [WMD=–13.55, 95% CI was (–18.24, –8.85), P<0.01], postoperative hospitalization time [WMD=–1.60, 95% CI was (–2.00, –1.21), P<0.01], incidence of postoperative overall complication [OR=0.50, 95% CI was (0.38, 0.67), P<0.01], and incidence of incision infection [OR=0.19, 95% CI was (0.08, 0.45), P<0.01] reduced. Those differences were not significant, such as intraoperative lymph node resection [WMD=–0.02, 95% CI was (–0.44, 0.40), P=0.92], incision margin distance of tumor [WMD=0.13, 95% CI was (–0.30, 0.55), P=0.56], and incidence of anastomotic fistula [OR=0.97, 95% CI was (0.62, 1.50), P=0.87].ConclusionsLaparoscopic transanal pull through surgery has more safe, effective, and reliable effects than conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. It has further research value, but there may be inevitable bias and other effects in the included literatures, so more randomized controlled clinical trials are needed in the future.
ObjectiveTo summarize the current common clinical laparoscopic gastrointestinal tumor surgical localization methods, and to provide reference for clinicians to choose reasonable localization methods. MethodThe domestic and foreign literatures related to laparoscopic gastrointestinal tumor surgical localization methods were searched and reviewed. ResultsThe common localization methods for laparoscopic gastrointestinal tumor surgery were imaging localization, preoperative endoscopic localization, intraoperative endoscopic localization and intraoperative fluorescence localization, among which abdominal enhanced CT and endoscopic-related localization methods were the most commonly used localization methods in clinical practice at present. ConclusionA variety of methods are available for surgeons to choose from, and the precise localization of tumors is better facilitated by combining multiple methods.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical value of Caprini risk score (CRS) and D-dimer testing, both individually and in combination, for venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk stratification in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. MethodsThrough systematic literature review and analysis, we evaluated the advantages and limitations of these two tools in predicting VTE, with emphasis on their combined utility and respective detection characteristics. ResultsCRS demonstrated superior population stratification efficacy for initial VTE screening post-laparoscopy but showed limitations in assessing individual heterogeneity. D-dimer testing exhibited high sensitivity in detecting postoperative hypercoagulable states, yet its specificity was confounded by surgical stress-induced coagulation activation. Their integration established a multidimensional assessment system that significantly enhanced identification accuracy of high-risk VTE populations. ConclusionsThe combined application of CRS and D-dimer biomarkers optimizes postoperative VTE risk stratification management and provides evidence-based guidance for defining precise anticoagulation therapy timeframes. Future research should prioritize refinement of risk assessment tools to facilitate dynamic patient monitoring, thereby guiding targeted thromboprophylaxis and reducing occult VTE risk.
ObjectiveTo explore the causes of colon-anal anastomotic stenosis in patients with low rectal cancer after prophylactic ileostomy under complete laparoscopy. MethodsA total of 194 patients with low rectal cancer who received complete laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer combined with preventive ileostomy in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2020 were selected as the study objects, and were divided into non-stenosis group (n=136) and stenosis group (n=58) according to postoperative colon-anal anastomosis stenosis. The clinical data of the two groups were compared. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the factors affecting postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis, and stepwise regression was used to evaluate the importance of each factor. The risk prediction model of postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis was constructed and evaluated. ResultsIn the stenosis group, the proportion of males, tumor diameter ＞3 cm, NRS2002 score >3 points, manual anastomosis, left colic artery not preserved, anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection and patients undergoing neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were higher than those in the non-stenosis group (P<0.05). The results of univariate logistic analysis showed that female and preserving the left colonic artery were the protective factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05), and the tumor diameter >3 cm, NRS2002 score >3 points, manual anastomosis, anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were the risk factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender, tumor diameter, NRS 2002 score, anastomotic mode, anastomotic leakage, and pelvic infection were independent influencing factors for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis (P<0.05). Stepwise regression analysis showed that the top three factors affecting postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis were NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic leakage. Multivariate Cox risk proportional model analysis showed that the multivariate model composed of NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic leakage had a good consistency in the risk assessment of postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis. Based on this, a risk prediction model for postoperative colon-anal anastomotic stenosis was constructed. The results of strong influence point analysis show that there are no data points in the modeling data that have a strong influence on the model parameter estimation (Cook distance <1). Receiver operating characteristic curve results showed that the model had good differentiation ability, the area under curve was 0.917, 95%CI was (0.891, 0.942). The calibration curve was approximately a diagonal line, showing that the model has good predictive power (Brier value was 0.097). The results of the clinical decision curve showed that better clinical benefits can be obtained by using the predictive model to identify the corresponding risk population and implement clinical intervention. ConclusionThe prediction model based on NRS 2002 score, gender and anastomotic fistula can effectively evaluate the risk of colon-anal anastomotic stenosis after preventive ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer under complete laparoscopy.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and advantages of general laparoscopic cholecystectomy and gynecologic uterus and attachment surgery at the same time.
MethodsSixty patients with gallbladder stones combined with ovarian cysts, benign gynecological disease or fallopian tube adhesions aged between 35 and 55 were chosen from the department of General Surgery and Gynecology and Obstetrics to be the study subjects between January 2009 and December 2013. The inclusion criteria included: gallbladder stones; gallbladder wall thickness <0.5 cm; non-acute inflammation; symptomatic gynecological diseases; and tumor size between 5.0 and 10.0 cm. Based on similar age, body mass, and histological type, the patients were divided into laparoscopic surgery (GLS) group and staging surgery group (control group) according to the will of the patients. The anesthesia time, surgery time, the number of abdominal perforations, length of hospital stay, and total costs were detected for comparison between the two groups.
ResultsThe first-time operation was successful in all the patients in the CLS group, with two cases of abnormal liver function, which were cured within 5-6 days. In the control group, 2 cases of reoperation were transferred to laparotomy due to umbilical and peritoneal adhesions, and both of them were cured and discharged from hospital without incision infection or iatrogenic tissue and organ damage. CLS group had significant advantages in anesthesia time, surgery time, the number of abdominal perforations, length of hospital stay, and total costs over the control group (P<0.05).
ConclusionThe combined gynecologic laparoscopic surgery is feasible, safe, mini-invasive, and economical.
Objective To summarize the experience of single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery and to discuss the operative techniques. Methods The clinical data of 21 cases who underwent single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Shengjing Hospital from Jan. 2010 to Jun. 2011 were collected and analyzed. Results Of 21 cases underwent single incision laparoscopic surgery， right hemicolectomy performed in 5 cases， sigmoidectomy performed in 2 cases， rectal anterior resection performed in 9 cases， rectal abdominoperineal resection performed in 2 cases， total colectomy performed in 1 case， and colostomy performed in 2 cases. Twenty cases completed by single incision， but 1 case was added an extra 12 mm incision in order to dissect the lower segment of rectum. The operative time was （189±75） min （40-335min）；the postoperative hospitalization time was （11.5±3.4） d （7-16d）. There were no bleeding， anastomosis leakage or intestinal obstruction after operation， and no incision infection， rupture or hernia were founded. No recurrence was found within 6 months’ follow up after operation. Conclusions Under reasonable selection of indication， single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe and feasible， and it also has a satisfactory cosmetic effect and better minimally invasive effect.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery for overweight/obese patients with acute perforated or gangrenous appendicitis.
MethodsFrom January 2007 to December 2014, patients with acute perforated or gangrenous appendicitis underwent laparoscopic (152 cases) or open (60 cases) appendectomy were collected, who were retrospectively classified into overweight/obese group (BMI≥25 kg/m2, n=69) or normal weight group (BMI < 25 kg/m2, n=143). Conversion rate, operation time, hospital stay, readmission, reoperation, and postoperative complications such as incision infection, abdominal abscess, and lung infection were analyzed.
Results①The rate of conversion to open surgery had no significant difference between the overweight/obese group and the normal weight group[4.2% (2/48) versus 6.7% (7/104), χ2=0.06, P > 0.05].②The operation time of laparoscopic surgery in the overweight/obese group was significantly shorter than that of the open surgery in the overweight/obese group[(41.6±11.7) min versus (63.1±23.3) min, P < 0.01], which had no significant difference between the laparoscopic surgery in the overweight/obese group and laparoscopic surgery in the normal weight group[(41.6±11.7) min versus (39.6±12.7) min, P > 0.05].③The total complications rate and incision infection rate of the laparoscopic surgery in the overweight/obese group were significantly lower than those of the open surgery in the overweight/obese group[total complications rate:16.7% (8/48) versus 52.4% (11/21), χ2=9.34, P < 0.01; incision infection rate:4.2% (2/48) versus 33.3% (7/21), χ2=8.54, P < 0.01]. Although the total complications rate of all the patients in the overweight/obese group was increased as compared with all the patients in the normal weight group[27.5% (19/69) versus 14.7% (21/143), χ2=5.02, P < 0.01], but which had no significant difference between the laparoscopic surgery in the overweight/obese group and laparoscopic surgery in the normal weight group[16.7% (8/48) versus 12.5% (13/104), χ2=0.45, P > 0.05].④The reoperation rate of all the patients performed laparoscopic surgery was significantly lower than that of all the patients performed open operation[1.3% (2/152) versus 10.0% (6/60), χ2=6.7, P < 0.01].⑤The abdominal abscess rate, lung infection rate, and hospital stay after discharge had no significant differences among all the patients (P > 0.05).
ConclusionLaparoscopic appendectomy could be considered a safe technique for overweight/obese patients with acute perforated or gangrenous appendicitis, which could not increase the difficulty of laparoscopic surgery and the perioperative risk.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the influence on ovarian reserve function by different hemostatic methods during laparoscopic cystectomy in treatment of ovarian endometrioma (OE).
MethodsDatabases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, CBM and WanFang Data were electronically searched, to collect relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about laparoscopic electro coagulation vs. microscopically suture for OE from 1990 to Mar, 2014. Meanwhile, references of included studies were also retrieved manually. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then RevMan 5.2 software was used for meta-analysis.
ResultsA total of 16 RCTs involving 1 236 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the luteinizing hormone (LH) levels after 1 month, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months and estradiol (E2) levels after 2 months, 6 months had no significant differences between the two groups and the E2 level after 12 month of the suture group was significantly lower than that of the electro coagulation group. The levels of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), LH, E2, antral follicle count (AFC), mean ovarian stromal peak systolic blood flow velocity (PSV) and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) in the suture group were significantly superior to those in the electro coagulation group at other follow-up time.
ConclusionCurrent evidence suggests that in treatment of ovarian endometriotic cyst by laparoscopic cystectomy, compared with electro coagulation hemostasis, suture hemostasis has less influence on ovarian reserve function. Due to limited quality and quantity of included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy for distant gastric cancer. Methods All 18 patients with distant gastric cancer receiving laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy were analyzed. Results Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy was performed successfully in all patients. The mean operation time was (291.33±19.61) min. The mean blood loss was (151.32±71.78) ml. The mean numbers of harvested lymph node were 14.57±3.11. The mean time of gastrointestinal function recovery was (3.46±0.93) d, the mean out of bed activity time was (1.75±0.45) d. All patients were followed up for 1-24 months, mean 11 months. No local recurrence, trocar implant or distant metastasis happened. Conclusion Laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy is a feasible and safe surgical procedure combined with minimal trauma and fast recovery.
