ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery in metabolic surgery for weight loss.MethodThe literatures about stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery were reviewed by searching domestic and foreign literatures.ResultsIn recent years, stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery had been gradually applied in clinical practice. Compared with other weight-loss surgeries, it had better clinical effects in weight reduction and blood glucose control. It not only provided a new surgical treatment for patients with severe obesity, but also promoted the development of weight-loss metabolic surgery.ConclusionAs a new metabolic surgery, stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery is safe and feasible for weight loss.
Objective To investigate the clinical application value of unsymmetrical four-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Methods The clinical data of 114 patients with obesity who were admitted to Mianyang Central Hospital from June 2021 to May 2022 were retrospective analyzed. All the 114 patients underwent unsymme-trical four-port LSG, and were observed their surgical and postoperative conditions, complications and follow-up the patient’s esthetic satisfaction of wounds at 3 months after surgery. Results All 114 patients underwent unsymmetrical four-port LSG successfully, without conversion to open surgery. The operative time was 68–160 min, average (104.2±26.1) minutes; volume of intraoperative blood loss was 2–50 mL, average (10.7±7.6) mL; the duration of postoperative hospital stay was 3–6 d, average (4.0±0.7) days. Of the 114 patients, 8 patients (7.0%) had fat liquefaction of wounds, 68 patients (59.6%) had postoperative nausea and vomiting in the 24 hours after operation, and all patients had no serious complications such as gastrointestinal bleeding, intraperitoneal hemorrhage, or gastric leakage. One hundred and fourteen patients were followed-up for 3–14 months, with a median follow-up of 6 months. Forty patients (35.1%) had hair loss, 3 patients (2.6%) had mild anemia. Of the 114 patients, 2 (1.8%) were dissatisfied with the cosmetic effects of wounds, 64 (56.1%) were satisfied, and 48 (42.1%) were very satisfied. The satisfaction rate was 98.2% (112/114). Conclusion The unsymmetrical four-port LSG is safe and feasible, it does not affect esthetic satisfaction of wounds.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the research progress in the selection of metabolic bariatric procedures, efficacy, safety, complication prevention, and long-term management for elderly patients, so as to provide references for surgical decision-making and perioperative management in future metabolic and bariatric surgery for elderly obese patients. MethodA review of recent domestic and international literature on metabolic and bariatric surgery in elderly patients was conducted. ResultsWith the intensification of societal aging, the incidence of obesity and related metabolic diseases among the elderly population has significantly increased. Metabolic and bariatric surgery has been proven to effectively reduce weight and improve obesity-related metabolic diseases in elderly patients. Current guidelines no longer consider age an absolute contraindication for surgery. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are the most commonly used procedures internationally. SG is superior to RYGB in terms of surgical safety, while RYGB has greater advantages in improving metabolic diseases. Although the postoperative mortality and complications risks in elderly obese patients are higher than those in younger obese patients, strict preoperative assessment and individualized procedure selection can significantly reduce these risks. ConclusionsMetabolic and bariatric surgery can serve as an effective treatment for elderly obese patients, offering comprehensive benefits in weight loss and metabolic improvement. Procedure selection requires individualized assessment, balancing the patient’s baseline condition and metabolic needs. Postoperative success hinges on systematic long-term follow-up and management to ensure sustained benefits and safety. Future efforts should focus on clarifying the definitions or standards of “elderly” and “obesity,” followed by more large-sample, long-term follow-up randomized controlled studies to validate the safety and efficacy of metabolic and bariatric surgery.
This review systematically traces the two-decade evolution of bariatric and metabolic surgery. The high recidivism rate associated with conventional obesity treatments have driven rapid innovation in therapeutic strategies and simultaneously accelerated progress in the surgical management of metabolic diseases. The application of laparoscopic and robotic technologies has not only improved cosmetic outcomes through smaller incisions but also significantly enhanced operational precision, further promoting the adoption and dissemination of surgical interventions. Over time, sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass have become the mainstream procedures. Recent research has demonstrated that metabolic surgery mediates its benefits through reprogramming of the neuroendocrine axis, restructuring of the gut microbiota ecosystem, and activation of bile acid signaling pathways. Future efforts should focus on refining long-term complication management protocols and developing individualized prediction models. By utilizing precise phenotyping to optimize procedure selection and implement stratified technical approaches, the field aims to achieve sustained metabolic health.
ObjectiveTo summarize the progress of research on the interaction between bariatric surgery and intestinal flora at home and abroad in recent years, in order to provide new ideas for promoting recovery after bariatric surgery. MethodThe domestic and international literature of intestinal flora changes after bariatric surgery was searched and reviewed. ResultsThe main changes of the intestinal flora after bariatric surgery showed that the abundance of thick-walled bacteria was decreased and the numbers of Bacteroides and Aspergillus were increased. Some common complications after bariatric surgery such as anastomotic fistula, nutritional deficiencies, and inflammation were related to the intestinal flora imbalance. Supplementation with probiotics, prebiotics, dietary interventions, or fecal microbial transplantation were expected to reduce the incidence of complications after bariatric surgery. ConclusionsBariatric surgery is a durable and effective method for treating obesity and its comorbidities. Changes in individual intestinal flora after bariatric surgery have an impact on both weight loss outcomes and postoperative complications, and it is important to find ways to reduce postoperative complications after bariatric surgery by improving intestinal flora.
ObjectiveTo investigate the difference of DNA methylation before and after bariatric surgery.MethodThe relevant literatures of the research on the changes of DNA methylation level and gene expression regulation in blood and tissues before and after bariatric surgery were retrieved and reviewed.ResultsDNA methylation was an important method of epigenetic regulation in organisms and its role in bariatric surgery had been paid more and more attention in recent years. Existing studies had found that there were changes of DNA methylation in blood and tissues before and after bariatric surgery. The degree of methylation varies with different follow-up time after bariatric surgery and the same gene had different degrees of methylation in different tissues, and some even had the opposite results.ConclusionsDNA methylation levels before and after bariatric surgery are different in different tissues. And studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up time are needed, to further reveal relationship among DNA methylation, obesity, and bariatric surgery.
Obesity is a disease state characterized by the accumulation of abnormal or excessive fat that threatens human health. With the rapid development of the economy and society and the change in lifestyle, obesity is highly prevalent in our country and has become an important disease that threatens the health of the population. Different from traditional non-surgical treatments, metabolic and bariatric surgery has a definite curative effect, is not easy to rebound, has good safety, and has sufficient evidence of clinical benefit, which can make many obese patients, especially those with moderate to severe obesity, fully recover. The treatment of obesity has become an important means in the comprehensive treatment of obesity. This article intends to describe the application of bariatric metabolic surgery in the comprehensive treatment of obesity from three aspects: bariatric surgery indications, surgical method selection, and perioperative multidisciplinary intervention.
ObjectiveTo explore the trajectories of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among adolescents after metabolic bariatric surgery and to identify influencing factors. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 208 adolescents who underwent metabolic bariatric surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from June 2023 to December 2024. Data on quality of life were collected at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively, along with related scale assessments at 6 months. Latent class growth modeling was applied to identify trajectory categories of quality of life. Demographic characteristics and scale points were compared across groups, and unordered multinomial logistic regression was used to analyze influencing factors. ResultsThree distinct HRQoL trajectories were identified by latent class growth model: low-level improvement group (102 cases, 49.0%), moderate-level stable group (74 cases, 35.6%), and high-level decline group (32 cases, 15.4%). Significant differences were observed among groups in BMI, percentage of excess weight loss (EWL%), points of body image, self-esteem, objective support, support utilization and appearance anxiety index at 6 months after operation (P<0.05). At 6 months postoperatively, patients in the low-level improvement group had the lowest BMI and the highest EWL%, along with higher body image and support utilization points. Patients in the moderate-level stable group experienced less weight reduction than those in the low-level improvement group, with only limited improvement in quality of life. Although patients in the high-level decline group initially had better preoperative quality of life, they showed the least postoperative weight loss, the lowest body image and support utilization points, and higher appearance anxiety points, with a progressive decline in quality of life. Results of unordered multinomial logistic regression analysis indicated that postoperative BMI, EWL%, points of body image, and support utilization were influencing factors associated with HRQoL trajectories (P<0.05). ConclusionsMetabolic bariatric surgery improves quality of life in most adolescents, yet a subgroup experiences unfavorable trajectories. Postoperative weight loss, body image, and social support are critical determinants. Early identification and targeted interventions are needed to optimize long-term outcomes.
Metabolic and bariatric surgery has continued to evolve under the dual imperatives of efficacy and safety. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with transit bipartition (SG-TB), derived from SG, reconstructs a “dual-channel” pathway that preserves the pylorus and proximal small-bowel function, while aiming to achieve metabolic effects comparable to biliopancreatic diversion with fewer severe nutritional complications. In 2025, the first Chinese expert consensus on SG-TB was released, and the inaugural international SG-TB consensus meeting was convened in Europe, reaching preliminary alignment on procedure classification, key technical parameters, and indications/contraindications. Emerging clinical evidence indicates that SG-TB confers advantages in weight reduction, remission of type 2 diabetes, and prevention of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and also demonstrates feasibility in revisional surgeries and complex cases. Nevertheless, current studies are predominantly observational, with limited evidence quality and considerable heterogeneity. Stratification of surgical parameters and establishment of reproducible training systems remain unmet needs. Building upon a synthesis of national and international consensus statements and recent clinical advances, this commentary further analyzes the challenges that SG-TB faces in procedural heterogeneity, evidence accumulation, individualized practice, and mechanistic research. This commentary seeks to offer practical reference and research directions for the bariatric community, ultimately supporting the advancement of SG-TB from a promising technique toward standardized and mainstream adoption.
ObjectiveTo compare the safety of the incision along the upper umbilical margin (referred to as the “upper incision”) versus the transverse umbilical incision (referred to as the “transverse incision”) for single-port bariatric surgery, and to assess their effects on postoperative scar appearance and patient’s psychological adaptation. MethodsThis study was designed as a multi-center retrospective analysis. The patients who underwent bariatric surgery via the upper incision and transverse incision at the Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu, Plastic Surgery Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University from December 2024 to April 2025. The incidence of postoperative complications and the pionts of scar appearance (evaluated using the POSAS 3.0 scale) and psychological adaptation (measured with the BODY-Q scale) between the two incision methods were compared. Furthermore, multiple linear regression model was employed to evaluate the impact of different incision methods on points of scar appearance and psychological adaptation. ResultsA total of 194 patients who underwent single-port bariatric surgery were included, with 134 in the transverse incision group and 60 in the upper incision group. There was no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of incision complications between the transverse and upper incision groups [11.9% (16/134) vs. 18.3% (11/60), χ2=0.930, P=0.335]. The transverse incision group showed significantly better outcomes than the upper incision group in the overall points of BODY-Q scale [(39.86±1.02) points vs. (37.63±4.70) points, t=–6.090, P<0.001] and POSAS scale [(17.60±2.35) points vs. (21.25±6.00) points, t=5.239, P<0.001]. After adjusting for potential confounding factors such as history of diabetes mellitus, education level, smoking status, alcohol consumption status, keloid tendency, and use of scar improvement products in the multiple linear regression model, the advantage of the transverse incision remained significant [β(95%CI)=–1.81 (–2.84, –0.78), P<0.001]. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the transverse incision significantly improves the overall appearance of the postoperative scar and enhances patient’s psychological adaptation compared to the upper incision in single-port bariatric surgery. This advantage persists independently after adjusting for multiple confounding factors. Therefore, the transverse incision could be considered a more favorable approach in terms of cosmetic outcomes and patient’s psychological adaptation.
