Objective To investigate the results of skinsparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with transverse rectus abdomins musculotaneous(TRAM) flap or latissimus dorsi musculocutaneousflap plus placement of a mammary implant.Methods From June 1997 to June 2002, 11 patients were proven to have ductal carcinoma in situor huge breast carcinoid by pathological examination. The site of the biopsy incision was around the areola. The patients underwent mastectomy with skin sparing by a circumareolar incision and immediate breast reconstruction withTRAM flap or latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap plus placement of mammary implant.Autogenous tissue was used to fill the skin envelop. The second stage operation of nipple-areola reconstruction was performed on the replaced skin.Results Eleven patients were followed up 1 month to 6 years.The operative result was good and all patients had no relapse. The reconstructed breast achieved good results in shape, colour, sensation, symmetry and incision scar. Conclusion The skin sparing mastectomy and immediate autograft tissue breast reconstruction is an ideal reconstructive method for the patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ or huge breast carcinoid in condition that there were strict operative indication and relapse can be prevented.
Objective
To summarize types of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction and present situation.
Method
The relevant literatures about post-mastectomy breast reconstruction in recent years were reviewed.
Results
With the increasing incidence of the breast cancer and the progressing of the treatment methods, it has become a trend for the post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. If the patient’s condition is allowed, the post-mastectomy breast reconstruction can be performed. At present, the post-mastectomy breast reconstruction mainly include the implant based reconstruction, autologous tissue reconstruction, autologous fat transplantation, etc.. There are different options for the breast reconstruction according the indicators and it had the corresponding complications. So the selection of reconstruction technique depend on the individual requirements, determining by the patient choice, advice of the reconstructive surgeon, and anticipated post-mastectomy therapy, particularly the needs for the radiotherapy and chemotherapy, etc..
Conclusions
Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is common abroad, corresponding research has been carried out in our country, experiences in learning are shairing. With deepening of domestic and foreign exchanges and progressing of technology, it is believed that post-mastectomy breast reconstruction might become one of conventional reconstruction options in future.
ObjectiveTo analyze the value of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging in the evaluation of blood flown of ipple-areola complex (NAC) and implant selection during single-port endoscopic breast reconstruction. Methods From November 2018 to March 2020, 19 patients who underwent single-port inflatable endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy combined with breast reconstruction in Beijing Friendship Hospital were retrospectively collected. ICG fluorescence imaging technology was used to evaluate the blood supply pattern and the risk of ischemic necrosis of NAC, so as to guide the selection of implant. At the same time, 14 patients who underwent single-port inflatable endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy combined with breast reconstruction in Beijing Friendship Hospital from February 2017 to October 2018 were selected as the historical control group (control group). NAC ischemic necrosis, breast satisfaction and implant removal were compared between the two groups. Results In the ICG group, there were3 cases of V1 pattern and 2 cases of NAC ischemic necrosis (1 case of grade 1, 1 case of grade 2). There was no NAC ischemic necrosis in 16 patients with V2 mode and V3 mode. No implant loss occurred in any of the patients. In the control group, 5 cases had NAC ischemic necrosis (all were severe ischemic necrosis), and 2 cases had implant loss. The rate of severe NAC ischemic necrosis in the ICG group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.01), but there was no significant difference in implant loss rate between the two groups (P=0.17). The breast satisfaction score of the ICG group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.01), but there were no significant difference in satisfaction scores of chestwell-being, psychological well-being and sexual well-being between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions ICG imaging can be used to evaluate the blood supply pattern during the operation of prosthetic body mass reconstruction, guide the choice of implant in immediate breast reconstruction, so as to further improve postoperative breast satisfaction.
ObjectiveTo compare the satisfaction and safety of patients undergoing prepectoral breast reconstruction (PBR) versus subpectoral dual-plane breast reconstruction (SBR) with implants combined with mesh after open total mastectomy for breast cancer. MethodsA prospective cohort study on clinical data of breast cancer patients who underwent open total mastectomy and received either PBR or SBR with implants and mesh for immediate breast reconstruction from June 2021 to October 2022 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University were performed. The pain scores on postoperative days 1, 3, 7, and 14, the postoperative use of analgesics within 14 days, and the incidence of postoperative complications, breast satisfaction, and quality of life during follow-up periods were compared between the two groups. ResultsA total of 62 female patients were included, with 35 in the PBR group, having an average age of (39.6±6.5) years, and 27 in the SBR group, having an average age of (41.5±9.9) years. The pain scores of the SBR group on postoperative days 3 (P=0.032), 7 (P＜0.001), and 14 (P＜0.001) were significantly higher than those of the PBR group, and a higher proportion of patients in the SBR group used analgesics within postopeartive 14 days (P=0.001). The median follow-up time was 28.4 months for the PBR group and 34.9 months for the SBR group. There was no statistical difference in the overall (P=0.583), major (P=0.526), or minor (P=0.532) complication rates between the two groups during follow-up. One (2.9%) patient in the PBR group and 2 (7.4%) patients in the SBR group lost their implants (P=0.575). There were 4 patients of movement deformities and 4 patients of chest muscle pain in the SBR group, whereas no patients in the PBR group had these complications (P=0.031). Encapsular contracture occurred in 5 (14.3%) patients in the PBR group and 11 (40.7%) patients in the SBR group (P=0.023). The incidences of ripple sign (25.7% vs. 3.7%, P=0.047) and implant contour visibility (40.0% vs. 11.1%, P=0.020) were significantly higher in the PBR group than those in the SBR group. At 24 months post-surgery, breast satisfaction scores [(67.9±13.1) points vs. (52.6±16.9) points, P=0.025] and chest function satisfaction [(70.7±13.4) points vs. (58.7±14.3) points, P=0.035] were higher in the PBR group. No local recurrence, distant metastasis, or deaths occurred in the PBR group during the follow-up period, while 1 patient of local recurrence and distant metastasis occurred in the SBR group, with no deaths. ConclusionCompared to SBR, PBR is more in line with the physiological and anatomical levels of the breast, effectively avoiding postoperative movement deformities and chest muscle pain, with a lower incidence of capsular contracture, and higher postoperative breast satisfaction and chest function satisfaction. It is a safe and feasible reconstruction method. For some specific patients, especially those with higher physical activity demands, it is a better reconstruction choice.
Objective
To explore the value of the application of latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap in the breast reconstruction.
Methods
The clinical data of the 36 patients with breast tumor who had undergone breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap from January 2012 to December 2016 were collected retrospectively. The postoperative complications and cosmetic results were analyzed.
Results
Thirty-six patients with breast tumor who underwent breast reconstruction with latissmus dorsi myocutaneous flap, including 32 patients with immediate breast reconstruction and 4 patients with delayed breast reconstruction respectively. The operative time of the patients who undertwent immediate breast reconstruction was 235–490 min (mean of 325 min), the intraoperative blood loss was 200–260 mL (mean of 220 mL), and the hospitalization time was 18–33 d (mean of 23.6 d). The total operative time of patients who underwent delayed breast reconstruction was 325–550 min (mean of 355 min), the total intraoperative blood loss was 200–250 mL (mean of 220 mL), and the total hospitalization time was 27–45 d (mean of 32.5 d). The cosmetic results was excellent in 22 patients, good in 8 patients, fair in 6 patients, respectively, and fine rate was 83.3% (30/36). There was no flap loss, but donor site seroma occurred in 21 patients, partial necrosis of the surgical margin of back skin occurred in 1 patient, partial necrosis of the nipple and areola skin occurred in 2 patients. All the patients were followed-up for 3–60 months, and the mean follow-up time was 37 months. During the follow-up period, no patient occurred metastasis or recurrence. After undergoing radiotherapy, reconstructive breast volume of 2 patients significantly contracted. None of the patients had significant limb function.
Conclusion
The breast reconstruction with the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap is a simple, easy, and effective surgical procedure.
Objective To discuss the effectiveness of breast reconstruction with dual plane prosthesis implantation or anterior pectoralis prosthesis implantation under endoscopy by using prospective comparative study, in order to provide a reference for clinical surgical selection. Methods A total of 54 female patients with breast cancer admitted between January 2023 and December 2023 and met the selection criteria were selected as research subjects. According to the random number table, 54 patients were divided into trial group and control group with 27 cases in each. The patients in the trial group and control group were treated with dual plane prosthesis implantation and anterior pectoralis prosthesis implantation for breast reconstruction after glandular resection under endoscopy, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) in the terms of age, body mass index, affected side, breast clinical stages, molecular typing, disease duration, breast volume of healthy side, breast ptosis of affected side, and preoperative Breast-Q score (social mental health, sexual health, breast satisfaction, chest somatic health). The operation-related indicators (operation time, total volume of drainage within 7 days after operation, extubation time, and hospital stay), occurrence of complications, breast reconstruction efficacy related indicators (transverse and longitudinal distance difference), and the pre- and post-operative differences (change values) of Breast-Q scores for each item were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in operation time, total volume of drainage within 7 days after operation, extubation time, and hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients of the two groups were followed up 3-12 months (mean, 6.3 months). Three patients (11.11%) in trial group and 5 patients (18.52%) in control group experienced complications, and there was no significant difference in the occurrence of complications (P>0.05). At 7 days after operation, the transverse and longitudinal distance differences were significantly less in trial group than in control group (P<0.05). The Breast-Q scores of the two groups at 7 days after operation were significantly higher in all items than those before operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in all change values between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionFor patients with breast cancer, comparison of breast reconstruction with anterior pectoralis prosthesis implantation, breast reconstruction with dual plane prosthesis implantation has better breast reconstruction effectiveness and higher safety.
Objective To investigate if intercostal neurovascular perforator can nourish lower abdominal flap. Methods Between June 2017 and December 2020, in 39 female patients with predominant perforator originated from intercostal nerve nutrient vessels, main trunk of the deep inferior epigastric vessels was chosen to be the pedicle to harvest free lower abdominal flap for breast reconstruction. The age of the patients ranged from 28 to 52 years, with an average of 38.6 years. There were 16 cases on the left and 23 cases on the right. The duration of breast cancer was 3-32 months, with an average of 21.8 months. Pathological stage was stageⅡin 31 cases and stage Ⅲ in 8 cases. Among them, 25 cases were primary tumor resection and one stage breast reconstruction and 14 cases were delayed breast reconstruction. Results The lower abdominal flap pedicled with one side pedicle was harvested in 32 cases, all of which were supplied by the main trunk of the deep inferior epigastric vessel combined with the intercostal neurovascular perforator; 7 cases were harvested with bilateral pedicled lower abdominal flaps, of which 4 cases were supplied by the main trunk of the deep inferior epigastric vessel combined with intercostal neurovascular perforator on one side and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator on the other side, and the other 3 cases were supplied by bilateral main trunk of the deep inferior epigastric vessel and the intercostal neurovascular perforator. In the flaps nourished with the main trunk of the deep inferior epigastric vessel combined with the intercostal neurovascular perforator, the intercostal neurovascular perforators were one branch type in 15 cases, one branch+reticular type in 19 sides, and reticular type in 8 sides. The size of flap ranged from 26 cm×10 cm to 31 cm×13 cm; the thickness was 2.5-5.5 cm (mean, 2.9 cm); the vascular pedicle length was 7.0-11.5 cm (mean, 9.2 cm); the weight of the flap was 350-420 g (mean, 390 g). All the flaps survived completely and the incisions at donor sites healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 14-35 months (mean, 25.4 months). The shape, texture, and elasticity of reconstructed breasts were good and no flap contracture happened. Only linear scar left at the donor site, the function of abdomen was not affected. No local recurrence happened. ConclusionWhen the direct perforator of the deep inferior epigastric artery may not provide reliable blood supply for the lower abdominal flap, the intercostal neurovascular perforator with deep inferior epigastric vessels can ensure the blood supply of the free lower abdominal flap.
Objective
To introduce an surgical technique of endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) combined with immediate breast reconstruction through simple single-port access that placed in axillary incision.
Methods
Between January 2017 and February 2018, 15 female patients with breast cancer (stageⅠ in 5 cases and stage Ⅱ in 10 cases) were treated with endoscopic NSM combined with immediate breast reconstruction through simple single-port access that placed in axillary incision. They were 27-45 years old (mean, 37.5 years). The disease duration ranged from 1 to 24 months (mean, 8 months). The tumor located at the left breast in 8 cases and at the right breast in 7 cases. The diameter of tumor ranged from 1.5 to 3.0 cm (mean, 2.6 cm). The distance between tumor and nipple was 1.8-4.0 cm (mean, 2.3 cm).
Results
After operation, the nipple epidermal necrosis occurred in 1 case, and subcutaneous effusion in 1 case. No subcutaneous emphysema or skin flap necrosis occurred. Postoperative pathological examination showed that 1 case was nipple involvement and was treated with nipple resection. All patients were followed up 7-17 months (mean, 11 months). According to the Harris assessment criteria for appearance of reconstructed breast, there were 4 cases of excellent, 10 cases of good, and 1 case of poor. No tumor recurrence or metastasis occurred during follow-up.
Conclusion
It is a safe and feasible method of endoscopic NSM combined with immediate breast reconstruction through simple single-port access that placed in axillary incision, and can obtain good cosmetic results. It is a new option to breast reconstruction.
ObjectiveTo explore the surgical technique, effectiveness, and safety of muscle-sparing rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap vascularized with intercostal artery perforator and inferior epigastric artery perforator for breast reconstruction.MethodsBetween December 2016 and February 2019, 6 cases of early breast cancer received modified radical surgery, lower abdominal flap was applied for one- or two-staged breast reconstruction. The average age of the patients was 34.6 years (range, 29-56 years). The disease duration ranged from 2 to 16 months, with an average of 9.5 months. The tumor was located in the upper outer quadrant in 4 cases and the lower outer quadrant in 2 cases. Pathological examination showed that they were all invasive ductal carcinoma. Four cases of breast cancer were in stage Ⅰ and 2 cases was in stage Ⅱ. During operation, the inferior epigastric artery perforators were found to be close to the upper edge of the flap and/or near the umbilical cord in 4 cases, the inferior epigastric artery perforator vessels were relatively small (<0.3 mm) in 2 cases; and the breast was reconstructed with muscle-sparing rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap vascularized with intercostal artery perforator and inferior epigastric artery perforator. The length, width, and thickness of the flap were (28.9±0.2), (12.1±0.4), and (4.4±0.3) cm, respectively. The length of the vascular pedicle was (11.5±0.2) cm and the weight of the flap was (420.5±32.7) g.ResultsAll 6 muscle-sparing rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps were successful, and the breast incisions healed by first intention. There was no vascular crisis, donor site effusion, hematoma, or infection. All 6 patients were followed up 12-36 months (mean, 26.8 months). The reconstructed breast had a good shape, good elasticity, and no flap contracture or deformation; only linear scars left at the donor site of the flap, and the abdominal wall function was not affected. During follow-up, there was no breast cancer recurrence and metastasis.ConclusionWhen the inferior epigastric artery perforators are too close to the upper edge of the flap and/or near the umbilical cord, the vascularity of lower abdominal flap can be ruined, harvested in form of muscle-sparing rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap vascularized with intercostal artery perforator and inferior epigastric artery perforator can efficiently ensure blood supply safety.
Objective To overview the theoretical basis and research status of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods The domestic and foreign researches on the application of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction in breast reconstruction were retrospectively analyzed. The theoretical basis, clinical advantages, and limitations of this technique were summarized and the future development trend in this field was discussed. Results The recent advances in breast cancer oncology, the development of materials and the concept of oncology reconstruction have provided a theoretical basis for prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. The selection of patients and the experience of surgeons are crucial for postoperative outcomes. Ideal thickness and blood flow of flaps are the most important considerations for the selection of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. However, its long-term reconstruction outcomes and clinical benefits and risks in Asian populations still need to be confirmed by more studies. Conclusion Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction has a broad application prospect in breast reconstruction following mastectomy. However, the evidence is limited at present. Randomized study with long-term follow-up is urgently in need to provide sufficient evidence to evaluate the safety and reliability of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
