Objective To analyze the therapeutic effect of the posterior pedicle screw system combined with interbody fusion cage on lumbarspondylolisthesis. Methods From February 2003 to March 2006, 37 lumbar spondylolisthesis patients were treated with this operation, including21 males and 16 females and aging 3969 years.The affected lumbars were L3(3cases)，L4(23 cases), and L5(11 cases). According to the Meyerdingevaluating system, 12 cases were lassified as degree Ⅰ, 20 cases as degree Ⅱ,and 5 cases as degree Ⅲ. Taillard index, Boxall index, slipping angle, lumbar lordosis angle and intervertebral height index were measured before operation, and 2 weeks and 3 months after operation. Results All patients were followed up 336 months. There were statistically significant differences in Taillard index, Boxall index, slipping angle, lumbar lordosis angle and intervertebral height index between before operation and 2 weeks after operation (P＜0.05),and no statistically significant differences between 2 weeks and 3 months afteroperation(P＞0.05). According to Dewei Zhou’s creterior for scoring, the results were excellent in 27 cases， good in 8 cases，and fair in 2 cases. Theexcellent and good rate was 94.6%. All of the embedded osseous were fused. Thefusing time was from 3 to 8 months (mean 3-9 months). There were no breakageof screw and rod. The position and configuration of the whole cages were good. Conclusion Applying the posterior pedicle screw system combined with interbody fusion cage may achieve synergism in the treatment of lumbar vertebral spondylolisthesis. Above procedure is served as solid internal fixationand offers a satisfactory reduction, and can improve the fusion rate of the spine. So it is an ideal procedure and worthily recommended method for treatment oflumbar vertebral spondylolisthesis.
Objective To summarize research progress on application of Cup-cage reconstruction in revision of chronic pelvic discontinuity (CPD) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods Relevant literature at home and abroad in recent years was reviewed to summarize the principles of the Cup-cage reconstruction, preoperative patient assessment, intraoperative skills, clinical and radiological effectiveness, limitations, and postoperative complications. Results For the treatment of CPD, the Cup-cage reconstruction achieved long-term acetabular cup bone ingrowth, CPD healing, and biologic fixation of the prosthesis by restoring pelvic continuity. Preoperative evaluation of the surgical site and general condition is necessary. The main intraoperative objectives are to reconstruct pelvic continuity, restore the center of rotation of the hip, and avoid neurovascular injury. Current studies have demonstrated significant clinical and radiological effectiveness as well as acceptable prosthesis survival rates after operation. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence regarding the staging of CPD, the optimal surgical approach and internal fixation, and the factors influencing postoperative prosthesis survival remain undefined. Conclusion Cup-cage reconstruction can be an effective treatment for CPD after THA, but there is still a need to explore CPD staging, Cup-cage approach and internal fixation, and influencing factors on prosthesis survival.
In order to identify whether the regeneration of costal cartilage is the basis of post-surgical repair of pectus excavatum and thoracic cage remodeling, 151 cases were followed up for 0.25 to 14 years. The main procedures in treatment were 3 steps: To curve the mental strut as a bow, to repair the perichondrium as a tube, and to persist in post-operative therapy. The results showed that regeneration of the costal cartilages appeared 3 months postoperatively in the cases treated by this method. It was concluded that a satisfactory thoracic cage could be remodeled by improving the technique of repairing pectus excavatum and persisting in postoperative therapy according to the regeneration regularity.
【Abstract】 Objective To explore the midterm efficacy of superelastic cage implantation for the treatment of osteonecrosisof femoral head (ONFH). Methods From July 1996 to January 1998, 54 patients (75 hips) of ONFH were treatedwith superelastic cage and followed up. Among 54 patients, 5 patients were lost to follow up and 3 patients were dead of myocardialinfarction, renal failure and gastric cancer, respectively. Forty-six patients completed follow up including 32 males and14 females, aged from 21 to 61 with an average of 39 years old. Twenty-nine hips were classified as Ficat Stage Ⅱ and 36 as StageⅢ . Harris score was 58.20 ± 13.82. All patients were evaluated both cl inically and radiographically. Results Postoperatively,forty-six patients (65 hips) were followed up for 86 to 125 months with an average of 8 years and 8 months. Harris score was 80.78 ± 18.77. Twenty-nine hips were rated excellent, 21 good, 2 fair and 13 poor．A total of 76.9% of overall cl inical results were rated as good or excellent. Eight hips (12.3%) with the cage broken were turned to total hip replacement. Radiographicevaluation: 16 hips (24.6%) rated as grade Ⅰ , 34 (52.3%) grade Ⅱ and 15 (23.1%) grade Ⅲ . Conclusion Superelastic cage implantation is one of alternative treatments for ONFH at early and midterm stages. However, long-term follow-up is needed to know whether it is able to cure ONFH and whether cages will be broken as time passes by.
Objective To evaluate the security and effectiveness of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) cage in reconstruction of spinal stabil ity after resection of spinal tumor. Methods Between January 2008 and December2009, 11 patients with spinal tumor underwent surgical resection and strut graft with n-HA/PA66 cage. There were 6 males and 5 females with an average age of 44.5 years (range, 16-61 years). The average disease duration was 6.8 months (range, 2-14 months). The locations of lesions included cervical spine (2 cases), thoracic spine (6 cases), and lumbar spine (3 cases). Among them, there were 5 metastatic carcinomas, 2 giant cell tumors, 1 osteoblastsarcoma, 1 chondrosarcoma, and 2 non-Hodgkin lymphoma. According to Frankel criteria for nerve function classification, there were 1 case of grade A, 3 cases of grade B, 2 cases of grade C, 2 cases of grade D, and 3 cases of grade E. Results Incisions healed by first intention in all patients, no operative or postoperative compl ication occurred. Four cases of metastatic carcinoma died of primary disease during 5-9 months after operation. Seven cases were followed up 14.4 months on average (range, 10-18 months). All patients gained significant improvement of the neurological function at 3 months after operation. All cases obtained bone fusion and good spinal stabil ity without displacement and subsidence of the n-HA/PA66 cage. The intervertebral height of the adjacent segments was (110.5 ± 16.1) mm at 3 months after operation and (109.4 ± 16.2 ) mm at the final follow-up, showing significant differenecs when compared with the preoperative height [(97.5 ± 15.4) mm, P lt; 0.05], but no significant difference between 3 months after operation and the final follow-up. In 2 patients undergoing surgery via anterior approach, bilateral pleural effusion on both sides occurred and were cured after closed thoracic drainage. During the follow-up, 2 cases (1 chondrosarcoma and 1 giant cell tumor) relapsed and underwent reoperations. Conclusion n-HA/PA66 cage can provide satisfactory bone fusion and ideal spinal stabil ity without increasing the risk of recurrence and compl ications during the surgical treatment of spinal tumors. It is an idealselection for reconstruction of spinal stability.
Objective To evluate the clinical outcome of autograftsof ilium and interbody fusion cage or bone morphogenetic protein(BMP)／artificial bone material／ cage in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods From January 1997 to January 2004，114 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation． There were 45 males and 69 females with an average age of 43 years ranging from 32 to 61 years. Of 114patients, 85 cases were classified as degree Ⅰ, 24 cases as degree Ⅱ and 5 cases as degree Ⅲ. The patients were divided into three groups accordingto the material used for interbody fusion: autografts of ilium (group A, n=42), interbody fusion cages(group B, n=36), and BMP／artificial bone material／ cage (group C, n=36)．The clinical and radiographic results of the patients were compared among three groups． Results All patients were followed from 13 to 30 months with an average of 15 months． There were no statistically significant differences in surgical time, blood loss, and disc space height of preoperation(P＞0.05) among three groups. No severe complication occurred in the three groups(P＞0.05). The excellent and good rates in groups A，B and C were 81.0％, 80.6％, and 83.3％ respectively, showing no statisticallysignificant difference(P＞0.05)．The fusion rate of group C(97.0%) was significantly higher than those of group A(81.0%) and group B(83.3%) (P＜0.05) after 1 year of operation．And the average loss of disc space height in groups B and C was significantly lower than that in group A(P＜0.05). Conclusion Higher fusion rate and lower loss of disc space height can beobtained in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis with BMP／artificial bone materiel.It is an effective method in the treatment of spondylolisthesis.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of trans-intervertebral space osteotomy (TIO) combined with cage implantation in treatment of old thoracolumbar compression fracture with kyphosis. Methods A clinical data of 59 patients with old thoracolumbar compression fracture and kyphosis, who met the selection criteria between January 2010 and August 2020, was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 20 cases underwent TIO combined with cage implantation (group A), 21 patients underwent TIO (group B), and 18 patients underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO; group C). There was no significant difference in gender, age, time from injury to operation, fracture segment, and preoperative Cobb angle, average height of functional spinal unit (FSU), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) between groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were recorded. Imaging review was performed to observe the fusion of the bone graft. Cobb angle, average height of FSU, and SVA were measured. VAS score, JOA score, and ODI were used to evaluate the degree of low back pain and lumbar function. Frankel grading was used to evaluate neurological function. Results The operations of 3 groups were successfully completed. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly lower in groups A and B than in group C (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between group A and group B (P>0.05). All incisions healed by first intention. Patients in all groups were followed up 23-27 months, with an average of 24.8 months. There was no significant difference in follow-up time between groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, VAS score, JOA score, ODI, and SVA of 3 groups significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05), there was no significant difference in the differences of pre- and post-operation between groups (P>0.05). The neurological function grading of 3 groups was Frankel grade E. The Cobb angle and the average height of FSU in 3 groups at immediate and last follow-up significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05), there was no significant difference between immediately after operation and last follow-up (P>0.05). And there were significant differences in above indexes between groups at each time point (P<0.05). At last follow-up, the osteotomy site fused without internal fixation failure or pseudarthrosis formation were observed in 3 groups. ConclusionFor patients with old thoracolumbar compression fractures with kyphosis, the effectiveness of TIO combined with cage implantation is satisfactory. Compared with TIO and PSO, it can obtain more deformity correction degree and less invasive.
Objective To evaluate the surgical procedure of reinforced acetabular cage with caudal flange in reconstruction of pelvic defect after acetabular tumor resection. Methods Between June 2003 and December 2009, 25 patients with Harrington class III pelvic defect underwent reconstruction with a reinforced acetabular cage with caudal flange and total hip arthroplasty (THA). There were 13 males and 12 females with an average age of 51.2 years (range，13-73 years). The main cl inical manifestations included hip pain and buttock pain, with a median disease duration of 6 months (range, 1-96 months). Pathological findings showed 18 cases of metastasis, 3 cases of multiple myeloma, 1 case of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, 1 case of grade I chondrosarcoma, 1 case of giant cell tumor, and 1 case of chondroblastoma. For the patient with chondroblastoma, THA with LINK RIBBED system was used. An artificial total hip system made in China was used in 6 patients and LINK SP II system was used in the other 18 patients. Results No patients died perioperatively. Deep infection and hip dislocations occurred in 1 and 2 patients, respectively. At last follow-up, 8 of 18 patients with metastasis died of cancer and the average survival time was 11 months. The other 10 who were al ive were followed up 15 months on average. One patient with multiple myeloma died of pulmonary infection at 21 months after operation and the other 2 with multiple myeloma and 1 with lymphoma were al ive with an average follow-up of 17 months. The patient with grade I chondrosarcoma and patient with chondroblastoma were followed up 58 and 12 months, respectively, without recurrence. Recurrence occurred in the patient with giant cell tumor at 19 months afteroperation. Loosening of implant occurred in 3 patients because of local tumor recurrence. For the 23 patients at 6 months after operation, the mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) 93 score was 81% (range, 57%-93%). Conclusion Reinforced acetabular cage with caudal flange could be used together with THA for reconstruction of Harrington class III pelvic defects after acetabular tumor resection, and low incidence of postoperative compl ication and good functional outcome could be expected.
Spinal fusion is a standard operation for treating moderate and severe intervertebral disc diseases. In recent years, the proportion of three-dimensional printing interbody fusion cage in spinal fusion surgery has gradually increased. In this paper, the research progress of molding technology and materials used in three-dimensional printing interbody fusion cage at present is summarized. Then, according to structure layout, three-dimensional printing interbody fusion cages are classified into five types: solid-porous-solid (SPS) type, solid-porous-frame (SPF) type, frame-porous-frame (FPF) type, whole porous cage (WPC) type and others. The optimization process of three-dimensional printing interbody fusion cage and the advantages and disadvantages of each type are analyzed and summarized in depth. The clinical application of various types of 3D printed interbody fusion cage was introduced and summarized later. Lastly, combined with the latest research progress and achievements, the future research direction of three-dimensional printing interbody fusion cage in molding technology, application materials and coating materials is prospected in order to provide some reference for scholars engaged in interbody fusion cage research and application.
Objective To summarize the effect of cage height on outcomes of lumbar interbody fusion surgery and the importance of the cage height selection. Methods The related literature was widely reviewed to summarize the research progress on the complications caused by inappropriate height of the cage and the methods of selecting cage height. Results Inappropriate height of the cage can lead to endplate injury, cage subsidence, internal fixation failure, adjacent segmental degeneration, over-distraction related pain, insufficient indirect decompression, instability of operation segment, poor interbody fusion, poor sequence of spine, and cage displacement. At present, the selection of the cage height is based on the results of the intraoperative model test, which is reliable but high requirements for surgical experience and hard to standardize. ConclusionThe inappropriate height of the cage may have an adverse impact on the postoperative outcome of patients. It is important to develop a selection standard of the cage height by screening the related influential factors.
