In observational studies, multivariable analysis is commonly used to control confounding and reduce bias in the estimation of causal effect between exposure and outcome. However, in clinical problems with complex causal relationships, researchers select covariates for adjustment through clinical intuition and data-driven methods, which may lead to biased results. In recent years, directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) have become a popular method for visualizing causal relationships between variables. An appropriately constructed DAG can help researchers identify confounders, intermediate variables and other non-confounding variables, thereby improving covariates selection for multivariable analysis. In practice, researchers should incorporate clinical knowledge, systematic methods and transparent reporting to fully utilize DAG in causal inference, and support more reliable clinical decisions.
