ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness and safety of open arthrolysis combined with internal fixator removal for post-traumatic elbow stiffness.
MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the data of 80 cases treated by open arthrolysis for elbow stiffness between January 2010 and December 2011. The patients were divided into 2 groups:no internal fixation group (group A, n=39) and internal fixation group (group B, n=41) according to whether they underwent internal fixator removal at the same time. No significant difference was found in age, gender, affected side, injury time, elbow rigidity grade, and severity of heterotopic ossification (HO) between 2 groups (P>0.05) except for original injury type (P<0.05). The effectiveness was evaluated by the occurrence of complications including ulnar nerve symptoms, HO recurrence and re-fracture, the elbow range of motion (ROM) and the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS).
ResultsThe mean follow-up duration was 15.7 months (range, 12-18 months) in group A and 16.1 months (range, 12-20 months) in group B. Ulnar nerve symptoms in 5 cases (12.8%) and HO reccurrence in 1 case (2.6%) occurred in group A, while ulnar nerve symptoms in 4 cases (9.8%), HO recurrence 1 case (2.4%), and refracture in 1 case (2.4%) occurred in group B. The incidence of each complication showed no significant difference between 2 groups (P>0.05). Both the ROM and the MEPS at last follow-up increased significantly when compared with preoperative ones in 2 groups (P<0.05). Besides, MEPS of group A was significantly higher than that of group B (t=2.36, P=0.02), but no significant difference was found in the ROM between 2 groups at last follow-up (t=0.40, P=0.69). Based on MEPS, the results were excellent in 16 cases, good in 16 cases, fair in 6 cases, and poor in 1 case in group A with an excellent and good rate of 82.1%;the results were excellent in 10 cases, good in 25 cases, fair in 4 cases, and poor in 2 cases in group B with an excellent and good rate of 85.4%. There was no significant difference in excellent and good rate between 2 groups (χ2=0.16, P=0.69).
ConclusionOpen elbow arthrolysis combined with internal fixator removal for post-traumatic elbow stiffness is safe and effective. However, measures for prevention of re-fracture should always be taken into consideration.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on tennis elbow.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, VIP, CNKI and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on NSAIDs for tennis elbow from inception to May 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 8 RCTs involving 595 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in the therapeutic effect between NSAIDs and the placebo group (RR=1.10, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.35, P=0.39) or non-placebo control group (RR=0.88, 95%CI 0.77 to 1.00, P=0.06). Compared with non-placebo control group, NSAIDs group had lower VAS score difference (MD=?1.41, 95%CI ?2.28 to ?0.53, P=0.002).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the effect of NSAIDs on tennis elbow is still uncertain. The improvement of symptoms with NSAIDs may be superior to placebo, but inferior to other treatment methods. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, the above conclusions are required to be verified by more high-quality studies.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) with preservation of triceps brachii insertion approach.MethodsBetween January 2012 and September 2017, 17 patients with elbow disease were treated with TEA with preservation of triceps brachii insertion approach. There were 3 males and 14 females, with an average age of 65.2 years (range, 48-85 years). The injuries located on left elbow in 5 cases and on right elbow in 12 cases. There were 11 cases of distal humerus fracture (AO type C1 in 2 cases and type C3 in 9 cases); the interval between fracture and operation was 3-10 days (mean, 4.1 days). There were 3 cases of osteoarthritis and 3 cases of rheumatoid arthritis, with the disease duration of 2-26 years (mean, 8.7 years). The postoperative elbow function and pain was assessed by Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) score, respectively. The prosthesis position, heterotopic ossification, and periprosthetic fracture were observed by X-ray films.ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention. Sixteen patients were followed up 18-69 months (mean, 40.6 months). Intraoperative ulnar nerve injury occurred in 2 cases, and healed after symptomatic treatment. At last follow-up, the MEPS score was 55-100 (mean, 90.3). The results were excellent in 11 cases, good in 2 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 81.3%. The VAS score was 0-2 (mean, 0.4). X-ray reexamination showed that no polyethylene wear, prosthesis loosening and fracture, abnormal prosthesis position, periprosthetic fracture occurred during the follow-up period, and the prosthesis survival rate was 100%. Heterotopic ossification occurred in 2 and 3 months after operation in 2 cases, respectively.ConclusionThe triceps on approach for TEA are satisfactory for distal humerus fracture, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis.
Objective
To review the injury mechanism and the treatment progress of terrible triad of the elbow, and to analyze the direction of further research.
Methods
Related literature concerning terrible triad of the elbow was extensively reviewed and comprehensively analyzed.
Results
The main treatment of terrible triad of the elbow is operation. The ultimate goal of treatment is to reconstruct sufficient stability of the elbow. The treatment includes fixation of the coronoid by suture, screw or plate; fixation of radial head by screw and plate, partial or complete replacement of the radial head; fixation of lateral collateral ligament and the medial collateral ligament by bone suture or anchors and the application of the external fixator. These surgical treatments have their own indications and advantages, most get satisfactory results.
Conclusion
Generally, surgery is needed to maintain the stability of the elbow for patients of terrible triad elbow. However, medial ligament repair or not, the choice of approach, and mechanism of injury still need further study.
Three-dimensional finite element model of elbow was established to study the effect of medial collateral ligament (MCL) in maintaining the stability of elbow joint. In the present study a three-dimensional geometric model of elbow joint was established by reverse engineering method based on the computed tomography (CT) image of healthy human elbow. In the finite element pre-processing software, the ligament and articular cartilage were constructed according to the anatomical structure, and the materials and contacts properties were given to the model. In the neutral forearm rotation position and 0° flexion angle, by comparing the simulation data of the elbow joint with the experimental data, the validity of the model is verified. The stress value and stress distribution of medial collateral ligaments were calculated at the flexion angles of elbow position in 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, 90°, 105°, 120°, 135°, respectively. The result shows that when the elbow joint loaded at different flexion angles, the anterior bundle has the largest stress, followed by the posterior bundle, transverse bundle has the least, and the stress value of transverse bundle is trending to 0. Therefore, the anterior bundle plays leading role in maintaining the stability of the elbow, the posterior bundle plays supplementary role, and the transverse bundle does little. Furthermore, the present study will provide theoretical basis for clinical recognizing and therapy of elbow instability caused by medial collateral ligament injury.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of limited internal fixation combined with a hinged external fixator in the treatment of peri-elbow bone infection. Methods The clinical data of 19 patients with peri-elbow bone infection treated with limited internal fixation combined with a hinged external fixator between May 2018 and May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 15 males and 4 females with an average age of 44.6 years (range, 28-61 years). There were 13 cases of distal humerus fractures and 6 cases of proximal ulna fractures. All the 19 cases were infected after internal fixation of fracture, and 2 cases were complicated with radial nerve injury. According to Cierny-Mader anatomical classification, 11 cases were type Ⅱ, 6 cases were type Ⅲ, and 2 cases were type Ⅳ. The duration of bone infection was 1-3 years. After primary debridement, the bone defect was (3.04±0.28) cm, and the antibiotic bone cement was implanted into the defect area, and the external fixator was installed; 3 cases were repaired with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap, and 2 cases were repaired with lateral brachial fascial flap. Bone defects repair and reconstruction were performed after 6-8 weeks of infection control. The wound healing was observed, and white blood cell (WBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reaction protein (CRP) were reexamined regularly after operation to evaluate the infection control. X-ray films of the affected limb were taken regularly after operation to observe the bone healing in the defect area. At last follow-up, the flexion and extension range of motion and the total range of motion of the elbow joint were observed and recorded, and compared with those before operation, and the function of the elbow joint was evaluated by Mayo score. Results All patients were followed up 12-34 months (mean, 26.2 months). The wounds healed in 5 cases after skin flap repair. Two cases of recurrent infection were effectively controlled by debridement again and replacement of antibiotic bone cement. The infection control rate was 89.47% (17/19) in the first stage. Two patients with radial nerve injury had poor muscle strength of the affected limb, and the muscle strength of the affected limb recovered from grade Ⅲ to about grade Ⅳ after rehabilitation exercise. During the follow-up period, there was no complication such as incision ulceration, exudation, bone nonunion, infection recurrence, or infection in the bone harvesting area. Bone healing time ranged from 16 to 37 weeks, with an average of 24.2 weeks. WBC, ESR, CRP, PCT, and elbow flexion, extension, and total range of motions significantly improved at last follow-up (P<0.05). According to Mayo elbow scoring system, the results were excellent in 14 cases, good in 3 cases, and fair in 2 cases, and the excellent and good rate was 89.47%. ConclusionLimited internal fixation combined with a hinged external fixator in the treatment of the peri-elbow bone infection can effectively control infection and restore the function of the elbow joint.
Objective To discuss the elbow skin fold extension line in Kirschner wire internal fixation of extended supracondylar humeral fractures in children. Methods The clinical data of 58 children with extended supracondylar fractures of the humerus who met the selection criteria between August 2021 and July 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. In 28 cases, needle placement of medial epicondyle of humerus was performed with the assistance of the elbow skin fold extension line (study group), and 30 cases were assisted by routine touch of the medial epicondyle of the humerus (control group). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, side, cause of injury, Gartland type, Kirschner wire configuration, and time from injury to operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The closed reduction rate, total operation time, time of medial humeral condyle pin placement, fluoroscopy times during medial pin placement, rate of one-time determination of medial entry point, ulnar nerve injury incidence, and fracture healing time were recorded and compared between the two groups. At the same time, the closed reduction rate of patients with the time from injury to operation ≤24 hours and >24 hours was compared. The elbow function was evaluated by Mayo elbow function score. Results The closed reduction rate of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). Among all patients, the closed reduction rate of patients with the time from injury to operation ≤24 hours [73.3% (22/30)] was significantly higher than that of patients >24 hours [42.9% (12/28)] (χ2=5.545, P=0.019). The total operation time, medial needle placement time, and fluoroscopy times in the study group were significantly less than those in the control group, and the one-time determination rate of medial needle entry point in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). There were 4 cases of ulnar nerve injury in the control group, and no ulnar nerve injury in the study group, but there was no significant difference in the incidence of ulnar nerve injury between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 6-12 months (mean, 8 months). There was no bone nonunion in both groups, and the fracture healing time of the study group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05). Volkmann ischemic contracture, heterotopic ossification, myositis ossificans, and premature epiphyseal closure were not observed after operation. No complications such as loosening or fracture of Kirschner wire occurred. At last follow-up, the Mayo elbow joint function score was used to evaluate function, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of extended supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children, the elbow skin fold extension line can help to quickly locate the medial epicondyle of the humerus, quickly insert Kirschner wire, and reduce the operation time and trauma.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of transosseous tunnel fixation and drilling fixation for repair of lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC) in treatment of terrible triad of elbow (TTE).MethodsA clinical data of 50 patients with TTE between June 2012 and January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The LCLC was repaired with transosseous tunnel fixation in 22 patients (transosseous tunnel fixation group) and with drilling fixation in 28 patients (drilling fixation group). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) in gender, age, fracture side, time from injury to admission, coronoid process fracture classification, radial head fracture classification, and TTE classification. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications of the two groups were recorded. At last follow-up, the Mayo elbow performance system (MEPS) score, range of motion of elbow joint, and Broberg-Morrey classification were recorded.ResultsThe operation of two groups were successfully completed. There was no significant difference in the operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two group (P>0.05). The follow-up time was (24.43±6.84) months in the transosseous tunnel fixation group and (21.55±6.16) months in the drilling fixation group, and the difference was not significant (t=1.534, P=0.132). X-ray films showed that the coronoid process and radial head fractures in the two groups healed, and there was no significant difference in the healing time (P>0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the flexion-extension activity, rotation activity, MEPS score, and Broberg-Morrey grading (P>0.05). During the follow-up, there was no re-dislocation or instability of the elbow joint. The incidence of complication was 28.57% (8/28) in the transosseous tunnel fixation group and 27.27% (6/22) in the drilling fixation group, showing no significant difference (χ2=2.403, P=0.121).ConclusionBoth transosseous tunnel fixation and drilling fixation can achieve good results in repair of LCLC for TTE.
Objective To analyse short-term cl inical effect of total elbow arthroplasty in treatment of distal comminuted humeral fracture with serious osteoporosis in geratic patients. Methods From April 2006 to October 2007, five cases of distal comminuted humeral fractures were treated by total elbow arthroplasty with bone cement. Of them, there were 2 males and 3 females, aging 50-76 years old (mean 67.6 years old), including 4 cases of closed fracture and 1 case of open fracture (II type Gustilo-Anderson). All fractures were caused by tumbl ing. According to classification of AO, there were 2 cases of type C1, 2 cases of type C2 and 1 case of type C3. The Barnett index of osteoporosis was 0.40-0.45. The time from injury to operation was 4 to 18 days (mean 7.2 days). The rehabil itation exercise of function was done after 2 days of operation. Results The operative time was from 120 to 180 minutes (mean 150 minutes), the bleeding amount was from 150 to 250 mL (mean 200 mL). All incision achieved primary heal ing. No compl ication occurred. Five cases were followed up for 19 to 36 months (mean 24.5 months). The mean motion range of elbow joint include 141.6° for flection, 6.5° for extention, 10.2° for the degree of ectropion, 81.7° for revolve forward, and 73.8° for revolve behind respectively after 4 months of operation. The length discrepancy of upper l imb was less than 1.5 cm, the muscle force for flexion and extention of finger and wrist was normal. The X-ray films showed that the position of artificial joint was satisfactory without prosthesis dislocation or loosening. According to Mayo elbow performance score, the excellent and good rate was 80% (excellent in 1 case, good in 3 cases, and fair in 1 case). Conclusion Total elbow arthroplasty with bone cement is an effective method in treatment of distal comminuted humeral fracture with serious osteoporosis obviously in the geratic patients, but indication and technique of operation should be mastered strictly.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of elbow arthrography through lateral approach in the treatment of elbow fractures in infants.MethodsThe clinical data of 24 infants with elbow fractures admitted between May 2016 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 14 boys and 10 girls with an average age of 1.8 years (range, 2 months to 3 years). The time from injury to admission ranged from 1 hour to 7 days, with an average of 6.7 hours. The preoperative carrying angle was (30.8±4.5)° (range, 24°-41°), and the elbow range of motion was (128.5±4.5)° (range, 125°-134°). Elbow arthrography through lateral approach was used in all cases, including 10 cases of humeral lateral condylar fracture, 6 cases of distal humeral epiphysis fracture, 3 cases of fresh Monteggia fracture, and 5 cases of radial neck fracture. According to fracture types, open reduction with Kirschner wire fixation, closed reduction with plaster cast fixation, or closed reduction with percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation were used.ResultsNone of the children had adverse reactions such as drug allergy. All patients were follow-up 14-38 months, with an average of 19.6 months. The skin irritation around the needle tail occurred in 2 cases after operation, and the symptoms disappeared after the Kirschner wire was pulled out. The anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films of elbow joint showed that the fractures healed well and no mulunion at the fracture site or premature epiphysis closure was observed. At last follow-up, the carrying angle was (5.2±1.9)° (range, 2°-8°) and the elbow range of motion was (137.1±4.7)° (range, 133°-141°), which were significantly improved when compared with those before operation (t=22.670, P=0.000; t=11.910, P=0.000). According to Flynn clinical function evaluation standard of elbow joint, 22 cases were excellent, 1 case was good, and 1 case was fair. The excellent and good rate was 95.8%.ConclusionElbow arthrography through lateral approach can clearly judge the cartilage damage of the elbow joint surface in infants, and minimize the occurrence of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis, and can guide the choice of treatment.
