Malnutrition is associated with many adverse clinical outcomes, including increased deaths and complications in perioperative period. The immunonutrition support plays an important role in the recovery process of patients with nutritional risk. Reasonable support can efficiently improve the condition of these cases and strongly suppress the inflammatory response. The immuno-nutrients include glutamine, ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, arginine, nucleotides and so on. More and more evidences show that different kinds of immuno-nutrients play a regulatory role in metabolism and inflammatory response in patients with different disease stages and courses, and affect clinical outcomes and prognosis. Nowadays, there is an urgent need to standardize immunonutrition support in clinical work. In this paper, the related literatures about immunonutrition in recent years were reviewed. Our goal is to reduce the number of irregularities in the nutrition support practice, and to help nutritional risk patients achieve better clinical outcomes.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of early enteral nutrition (EN) versus parenteral nutrition (PN) for esophagus cancer patients after esophagectomy.
MethodsThe following electronic databases as PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2016), Web of Science, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI were searched from inception to June 2016 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on comparing early EN and PN for esophagus cancer patients after esophagectomy. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.
ResultsA total of 14 RCTs involving 2 275 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the PN group, the early EN group could improve postoperative levels of albumin (MD=1.12, 95%CI 0.03 to 2.20, P=0.04) and transferrin (MD=10.08, 95%CI 5.41 to 14.76, P<0.000 1), decrease the incidences of pulmonary infection (OR=0.36, 95%CI 0.25 to 0.53, P<0.000 01) and anastomotic leakage (OR=0.57, 95%CI 0.36 to 0.92, P=0.02), but there was no significant difference in postoperative level of prealbumin between two groups (MD=10.04, 95%CI -0.31 to 20.39, P=0.06).
ConclusionThe early EN could improve the postoperative levels of albumin and transferrin, decrease the incidences of pulmonary infection and anastomotic leakage, but could not improve the postoperative prealbumin level.
Objective To research the effects of recombinant growth hormone (rhGH) with total parenteral nutrition (TPN) on nitrogen balance and nutritional state of the patients following major abdominal surgery. Methods We randomly selected 45 patients receiving TPN after major abdominal surgery and distributed them to study group (rhGH+TPN, n＝30) and control group (TPN only, n＝15). For 7 days after operation, every one was given rhGH 4u or replaced by hypodermic injection of normal saline (control group). Results TPN+rhGH promoted the rehabilitant of nitrogen balance, heightened the level of plasma albumin and transferrin and increased the weight and creatinin/height index (CHI), but the thickness of triceps skin fold (TSF) had no significant change in patients following major abdominal surgery. Conclusion The rhGH can improve the effects of TPN.
Forty critical patients with respiratory failure in the intensive care unit were randomly divided into two groups,Group A with administration of parenteral nutritino(PN) and Group B,no parenteral nutrition given.Blood gas analysis and respiratory monitoring showed that the respiratory rate,pH、PaO2、PaCO2 and HCO3- had no marked difference between the two groups.But in Group A there was a slight decrease of Pao2/FiO2 and a marked increase of A-aDO2 and the pulmonary shunt.This study indicates that the content of fat emulsion and hydrocarbon in PN may be the main factor that affects the respiratory function.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy and security of early enteral nutrition (EN) on patients with gastric cancer after radical operation.
MethodsSeventy cases who treated in Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University from Dec. 2008 to Apr. 2013 were randomly divided into EN group (n=35) and parenteral nutrition (PN) group (n=35), analysis and comparison of nutrition indicators and recovery indicators between 2 groups were performed.
ResultsThere were no significant differences on levels of count of white blood cell (WBC), serum albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PA), and transferring (TRF) before operation between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). On 3 and 7 days after operation, the levels of ALB, PA, and TRF were all higher in EN group (P < 0.05) besides level of count of WBC. In addition, hospital stay and hospitalization cost were both lower in EN group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference on postoperative exhaust time and complication incidence (P > 0.05).
ConclusionsEN is a safe, effective, and economical method of nutritional supplements, and it is a preferred method of nutritional support for patients with advanced gastric cancer after operation at prophase, which is worthy to apply widely in clinical.
Objective
To analyze clinical value of early enteral nutrition following radical resection of gastric cancer.
Methods
Seventy-six patients with gastric cancer underwent radical resection from May 1, 2016 to July 1, 2016 in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University were included according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, then were randomly divided into observation group (36 cases) and control group (40 cases). The patients in the observation group received the enteral nutrition on day 2 following the surgery, in the control group received the conventional management. The gastrointestinal recovery and the adverse reaction were compared in these two groups. The preoperative and postoperative laboratory indicators and the body weight of the patients in both groups were analyzed.
Results
① The general data such as age, gender, and body weight had no significant differences in these two groups (P>0.05). ② The first anus exhaust time and the first defecation time of the observation group were significantly shorter than those of the control group (P<0.05). ③ The adverse reaction rate of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). ④ On admission, the serum albumin, urea nitrogen, creatinine, and lymphocyte count had no significant differences in these two groups (P>0.05). On day 5 after the operation, the serum albumin of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). ⑤ The body weight had no significant difference in these two groups before the operation (P>0.05), which in the observation group was significantly heavier than that of the control group on day 30 after the operation (P<0.05).
Conclusion
Preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that early enteral nutrition following radical resection of gastric cancer is safe and effective, it could promote gastrointestinal function resumption and effectively improve nutritional status.
Objective To study the manageable methods, effect of early use of enteral nutrition after operations on esophageal cancer patients. Methods By different way of nutritional support after operation, 209 cases of esophageal cancer were divided into two groups in which enteral nutrition（EN） group,146 cases, were managed with early use of nutritional support through intestine and parenteral nutrition（PN） group, 63 cases, were given nutrition by way of veins. Complications, general recovery and blood biochemical criteria after operation between those two groups were compared. Results No cases of anastomotic fistula occurred in the two groups. The incidence of complications in EN group was significantly lower than that in PN group（P〈0.01）, and the occurrence of diarrhea was higher in EN group （P=0. 000）. The time needed for recovery of bowel sounds, anal exsufflation, defecation and hospital stay was shorter and hospital fee lower in EN group than those in PN group（P=0. 000）. The total amount of gastrointestinal and closed thoracic drainages decreased more significantly in EN group （P= 0. 000） and the value of albumin, globulin and total protein was significantly higher also in EN group （P = 0. 000）. But the amount of BUN, creatinine and neutrophil was significantly lower in EN group （P = 0. 000）. Conclusion Early use of enteral nutrition after operation on esophageal cancer is safe, effective and practical, with more significant advantages than those of parenteral nutrition.
ObjectiveTo investigate the protein intake of patients in the general surgery intensive care unit (ICU) and to analyze the factors, both hindering and facilitating, that affecting protein intake from the perspective of healthcare professionals. MethodsA mixed-methods approach was used in this study, including a quantitative study and a qualitative study. The quantitative study was use to assess the protein intake in the ICU patients. The qualitative study was used to analyze the perspectives of healthcare professionals via semi-structured interviews. In the quantitative study, 32 variables were analyzed, and the sample size was estimated to be 10 times the number of study variables. The qualitative study employed the maximum difference sampling strategy, with the sample size determined by data saturation. The multiple linear regression was used to identify the risk factors affecting protein intake achievement, with a significance level of α=0.05. ResultsThe quantitative study included 459 patients, with a protein intake of (0.739±0.552) g/(kg·d). Of the patients, 90 (19.6%) had a protein intake of 1.2–2.0 g/(kg·d), 11 (2.3%) had 2.0 g/(kg·d) or more, and 358 (78.0%) had less 1.2 g/(kg·d). The multiple linear regression analysis identified several risk factors influencing protein intake attainment, including male, higher body mass index, elevated blood glucose levels upon ICU admission, early initiation of enteral nutrition (≤48 h), nasoenteric tube placement, and the only use of enteral nutrition feedings. In the qualitative study, three key themes relevant protein intake attainment were identified from the interviews: inadequate infrastructure, healthcare workers’ factors, and patient-related factors. ConclusionsThe findings of this study suggest a substantial gap between the protein intake of general surgical ICU patients and the guideline-recommended intake. The study highlights patient groups at risk for inadequate protein intake based on identified risk factors. Future efforts should focus on improving the efficiency of protein supplementation, enhancing the nutritional status of patients, standardizing protein supplementation protocols, and increasing education for both healthcare workers and patients.
ObjectiveTo summarize the existing prevention and treatment methods for postoperative enteral nutrition intolerance in patients with gastric cancer, so as to provide reference for clinical health care providers. MethodThe related literatures on the factors affecting and the prevention and treatment measures for postoperative enteral nutrition intolerance in Chinese and English databases were systematically searched, and summarized. ResultsThe occurrence of enteral nutrition intolerance after gastric cancer surgery was the result of the interaction of multiple factors. Currently, the prevention and treatment measures of enteral nutrition intolerance covered various aspects, including traditional Chinese medicine therapies such as moxibustion and massage, optimizing the nutritional formula to improve tolerance, adjusting the enteral nutrition infusion methods to reduce adverse reactions, and strategies such as enteral nutrition preconditioning. However, the effectiveness of some measures still required further validation. Conclusions At present, a series of measures have been taken in clinic for enteral nutrition intolerance, and some results have been achieved. In the future, we should strengthen the identification of people at risk of enteral nutrition intolerance to prevent the occurrence of enteral nutrition intolerance. At the same time, a scientific enteral nutrition scheme is formulated to ensure the implementation effect of enteral nutrition and promote the prognosis of patients.
Experienc of nurtitional treatment to 7 patients with acute renal failure (ARF) and nitrogemia after biliarty (tract) surgery is reported in this article. Nittrogen source inn all cases was obtained from "Renal Amine" and "7% Vamin" etc,which are composed of 8 essential amino acids (EAA), and the nergery sources are mainly supplyed by Intralipid (20 or 10%) and suitable amount of glucose. The nutritional admicture of "all in one" were employed as parenteral nutrition (PN). Satisfactary curative effecs in these patients were obtained. The suthors consider that (a) the nutritional treatment of different casuses of ARF should be providing enough energy and more EAA requirments than in normal need to synthesizw non-essential amino acide (NEAA) and protein from excessive blood urea nitrogen (BUN) for redcuing pritein breakdown and nitrogemia, and (b) 20% Intralipid is an effective low-volume, highly calories nutritional agent specially in ARF patients with restiction of waterr.
