Objective To investigate the current status of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs) on pressure sore in China. Methods We searched Chinese Journal of Nursing, Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing and Journal of Nurses Training in CNKI and VIP (January 2000 to December 2005) for Chinese articles on pressure sore, using "pressure sore", "bed sore", "nursing", "treatment", "prevention", "evaluation" and "management" as search terms. The retrieved articles were summarized. Results We identified 16 reports (10 RCTs and 6 CCTs). The studies were judged to be of low quality.There was one study on the evaluation, two on the prevention, and 13 on the treatment of pressure sores. Conclusion The current studies on pressure sore in China are focusing on treatment. Randomized controlled trials of large sample size of pressure sore are needed to improve nursing quality.
Objective To give an individualized treatment to a young woman with primary dysmenorrhea. Methods According to the basic principle and methods of evidence-base medicine, we searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2009), MEDLINE (PubMed, January 1950 to May 2009), ACP Journal Club (OVID, January 1991 to May 2007) for systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to acquire the best clinical evidence on the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea. Results A total of 11 systematic reviews and 1 RCT were identified. A reasonable treatment plan was made through combining the patient’s will with her family members’. Conclusion The treatment effect on primary dysmenorrhea of the young woman is improved by an individualized treatment plan based on an evidence-based method.
The first Global Evidence Summit (GES) was held in Cape Town in South Africa from September 13th to November 16th, 2017. This paper interprets the construction of digital and trustworthy evidence ecosystem which was proposed to be established by the GES.
To explain how to treat common gastric diseases like chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, functional dyspepsia and gastric oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) based on evidence-based medicine. Through this paper, we try to help readers find and use clinical evidence to solve clinical problems.
High-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are regarded as the gold standard for assessing the efficiency and safety of drugs. However, conducting RCTs is expensive and time consumed, and providing timely evidence by RCTs for regulatory agencies and medical decision-makers can be challenging, particularly for new or emerging serious diseases. Additionally, the strict design of RCTs often results in a weakly external validity, making it difficult to provide the evidence of the clinical efficacy and safety of drugs in a broader population. In contrast, large simple clinical trials (LSTs) can expedite the research process and provide better extrapolation and reliable evidence at a lower cost. This article presents the development, features, and distinctions between LSTs and RCTs, as well as special considerations when conducting LSTs, in accordance with literature and guidance principles from regulatory agencies both from China and other countries. Furthermore, this paper assesses the potential of real-world data to bolster the development of LSTs, offering relevant researchers’ insight and guidance on how to conduct LSTs.
As the reform of medical insurance payment methods is implemented, it is necessary for the medical institutions to further improve cost control and standardize the rational use of medical supplies. Over the years, West China Hospital of Sichuan University has made the assessment of the access of supplies by using the existing external evidence and the internal evidence created through real world data analysis methods. In this thesis, the difficulties faced by the access of medical supplies are deeply analyzed. The supplies access management system of West China Hospital of Sichuan University and its achievements in average waiting time of new supplies, rationality of purchase application, scientificity of demonstration results, support for the implementation of fourth-level surgery, and cost control are taken as examples. From this, a set of new paths can be provided for other hospitals to learn from at the time of carrying out medical supplies access management.
In the process of formulation, traditional Chinese medicine clinical practice guidelines are often faced with the dilemma of lack of evidence. Guidelines development groups tend to make final decisions based on expert experience or expert opinion, but the limitations of cognitive bias reduce the credibility and transparency of the guidelines. By clarifying the difference between the expert experience and expert opinion and expert evidence, the expert evidence of traditional Chinese medicine discipline advantages and necessity, providing the recommendation form link using expert evidence methodology design and implementation details, retaining the empirical characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine and improving the lack of evidence, has certain practical application value.
The methodology of conducting systematic review of prognostic studies has received a great deal of interest in recent years. Using GRADE for systematic review of prognostic studies, five aspects should be considered:risk of bias, indirectness, inconsistency, imprecision and publication bias. The methods of using GRADE system in systematic review of prognostic studies are similar to systematic review of interventional studies, meanwhile, there are differences. Not only the uniqueness of prognostic study but also the repeating downgrade should be taken into consideration in the GRADE process. Applying GRADE to systematic review of prognostic studies would be widely accepted along with the methodology development and quality improvement of systematic review of prognostic studies.
Evidence-based medicine is the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. The practice of evidence-based medicine means to integrate individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research. So evidence and its quality is the key issue of evidence-based medicine. The purpose of this article is to introduce to the healthcare professionals the sources of evidence and how to search for evidence for them.
Surgery is an accepted standard in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG), but the efficacy of surgery alone for locally advanced AEG is limited. In-depth studies concerning combined therapy for AEG have been carried out worldwide, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), perioperative chemotherapy (pCT), postoperative chemoradiotherapy, etc. Significantly, the contribution of nCRT and pCT to improving the prognosis of locally advanced AEG patients has been shed light on. Compared with that, multimodality treatment for AEG patients is not well established in China. An attempt was thus made to take an overview of the evidence-based research advance regarding integrated therapy of AEG.
