ObjectiveTo summarize the patterns and research progress of the concomitant ipsilateral fractures of intracapsular femoral neck and extracapsular trochanter, and to provide a common language among orthopedic surgeons for scientific exchange.MethodsAccording to related literature and authors own experiences concerning the anatomic border between femoral neck and trochanter region, the intertrochanteric line (or intertrochanteric belt) and its capsularligament attachment footprint, fracture patterns, and treatment strategies were reviewed and analyzed.ResultsWith the rapid growing of geriatric hip fractures, an increased incidence was noted in recent years regarding the proximal femoral comminuted fractures that involving ipsilateral intracapsular neck and extracapsular trochanter regions simultaneously. But the concept of femoral neck combined with trochanter fractures was ambiguous. Based on the anatomic type of femoral neck fracture, the location of fracture center, and the ability to achieve direct inferior calcar or anteromedial cortex-to-cortex apposition and buttress, we classified these complex fractures into 3 sub-types: ① Segmental femoral neck fractures (two separate fracture centers at subcapital and trochanteric region respectively); ② Femoral neck fracture (trans-cervical) with extension to the supero-lateral trochanteric region (fracture center in femoral neck); ③ Trochanteric fracture with extension to the medio-inferior femoral neck region (fracture center in trochanter, comminuted basicervical fracture, or variant type of comminuted trochanter fracture). For treatment strategy, surgeons should consider the unique characteristics of femoral neck and trochanter, usually with combined fixation techniques, or arthroplasty supplemented with fixation.ConclusionCurrently there is no consensus on diagnosis and terminology regarding the concomitant ipsilateral fractures of femoral neck and trochanter. Further studies are needed.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of internal fixation, hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients so as to provide the evidence for the selection of therapeutic methods. Methods Between May 2005 and April 2008, 108 elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures were treated by internal fixation with compression screw (IF group, n=31), hemiarthroplasty (HA group, n=37), and total hiparthroplasty (THA group, n=40). In IF group, there were 8 males and 23 females with an average age of 73 years (range, 65-80 years); fractures were caused by tumbl ing (25 cases) and traffic accident (6 cases), including 17 cases of Garden type III and 14 cases of Garden type IV; and the time from injury to operation ranged from 8 hours to 13 days with an average of 4.2 days. In HA group, there were 10 males and 27 females with an average age of 74 years (range, 65-80 years); fractures were caused by tumbl ing (29 cases) and traffic accident (8 cases), including 21 cases of Garden type III and 16 cases of Garden type IV; and the time from injury to operation ranged from 1 to 14 days with an average of 4.4 days. In THA group, there were 11 males and 29 females with an average age of 73 years (range, 66-80 years); fractures were caused by tumbl ing (32 cases) and traffic accident (8 cases), including 23 cases of Garden type III and 17 cases of Garden type IV; and the time from injury to operation ranged from 2 to 14 days with an average of 5.6 days. There was no significant difference in general data among 3 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results There were significant differences in operation time and blood loss among 3 groups (P lt; 0.05), and IF group was less than other 2 groups. All patients were followed up 1 year and 4 months to 2 years and 3 months with an average of 1 year and 8 months. In IF group, HA group, and THA group, the rates of early postoperative compl ications were 19.4% (6/31), 8.1% (3/37), and 7.5% (3/40), respectively; the rates of late postoperative compl ications were 29.0% (9/31), 13.5% (5/37), and 7.5% (3/40), respectively; and the reoperation rates were 29.0% (9/31), 10.8% (4/37), and 5.0% (2/40), respectively. The rates of the early postoperative compl ication, late postoperative compl ication, and reoperation rate were significantly higher in IF group than in HA group and THA group (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between HA group and THA group (P gt; 0.05). The mortal ity rates were 16.1% (5/31), 13.5% (5/37), and 15.0% (6/40) in IF group, HA group, and THA group, respectively; showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05). According to Harris hip score, the excellent and good rates were 65.4% (17/26), 81.3% (26/32), and 85.3% (29/34) in IF group, HA group, and THA group, respectively; showing significant differences among 3 groups (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion According to patient’s age, l ife expectancy, and general conditions, THA is a reasonable choice for the patients aged 65-80 years with displaced femoral neck fracture.
ObjectiveTo investigate and analyze the effectiveness of internal fixation with the two different cannulated screw implanting methods of rhomboid and inverted triangle in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults.MethodsThe clinical data of 38 young adults with femoral neck fracture who met the selection criteria between January 2018 and August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different methods of cannulated screw implanting, the patients were divided into two groups, 19 cases in each group. The trial group was treated with closed reduction and cannulated screw rhombic distribution internal fixation, while the control group was treated with closed reduction and cannulated screw inverted triangular distribution internal fixation. There was no significant differences in patients’ gender, age, cause of injury, Garden classification of fracture, and time from injury to operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The fracture healing time, the incidence of nonunion, femoral neck shortening, and femoral head necrosis were recorded and compared between the two groups; the effectiveness was evaluated by Harris score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score at last follow-up.ResultsThe incisions of the two groups healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-24 months with an average of 15.5 months. There were 1 case of fracture nonunion and 2 cases of shortening of femoral neck in the trial group; while there were 2 cases of fracture nonunion, 1 case of necrosis of femoral head, and 6 cases of femoral neck shortening in the control group; the difference in the incidence of complications (15.8% vs. 47.4%) between the two groups was significant (χ2=4.385, P=0.036). The remaining 18 cases in the trial group and 17 cases in the control group all achieved osteonal union, and the healing time was (14.8±1.6) weeks and (15.9±1.3) weeks, respectively, showing no significant difference between the two groups (t=1.265, P=0.214). At last follow-up, Harris score and VAS score of the trial group were 88.9±4.3 and 1.1±0.7, respectively, while those of the control group were 86.9±5.9 and 1.3±0.9, respectively, showing no significant difference (t=0.603, P=0.550; t=1.152, P=0.257). Hip function was evaluated in accordance with Harris score, the results were excellent in 12 cases, good in 6 cases, and fair in 1 case in the trial group, the excellent and good rate was 94.74%; the results were excellent in 10 cases, good in 7 cases, and fair in 2 cases in the control group, the excellent and good rate was 89.47%; there was no significant difference in the excellent and good rate between the two groups (χ2=0.368, P=0.544).ConclusionThe short-term effectiveness of the two kinds of cannulated screw implanting methods is clear, rhomboid fixation of 4 screws has strong stability with stress distribution, which can effectively reduce the incidence of femoral neck shortening, fracture nonunion, femoral head necrosis, and other complications.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) and hollow compression screw in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures.
MethodsBetween January 2010 and June 2014, 70 patients with displaced femoral neck fractures were randomly divided into 2 groups. After reduction, fracture was fixed with PCCP in 35 cases (group A) and with hollow compression screw in 35 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in the gender, age, cause, side and type of fractures, time from injury to operation, associated disease, pre-operative Harris score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The operation time, intra-operative blood loss, fracture healing time, fracture reduction quality, time of rehabilitation and weightloading; complication, post-operative Harris score and post-operative VAS score were compared between 2 groups.
ResultsThe incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 13-34 months (mean, 23.7 months). There were significant differences in operation time, intra-operative blood loss, and fracture healing time between 2 groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant in the fracture reduction quality between 2 groups (P > 0.05). Avascular necrosis of the femoral head occurred in 2 cases of group A after operation (fracture reduction quality: grade IV); and avascular necrosis of the femoral head occurred in 4 cases of group B after operation (fracture reduction quality: grade I in 2 cases, grade Ⅱ in 1 case, grade Ⅲ in 1 case, and grade IV in 1 case), nonunion in 1 case, and screw loosening in 3 cases; and there was significant difference in the incidence of bone nonunion and avascular necrosis of the femoral head between 2 groups (χ2=-3.997, P=0.046). Difference was significant in fracture reduction quality in the patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head and nonunion between 2 groups (χ2=1.991, P=0.047). The time of rehabilitation and weight-loading of group A was significantly earlier than that of group B (P < 0.05); the Harris and VAS scores of group A were significantly better than those of group B at 12 months after operation (P < 0.05).
ConclusionPCCP for treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures has better static stability and better sliding dynamic pressure effect than hollow compression screw, and it can provide earlier rehabilitation and weight-loading postoperatively and obviously decrease the incidence of bone nonunion and avascular necrosis of the femoral head, but avascular necrosis of the femoral head still occur in patients with poor reduction or comminuted fracture.
ObjectiveTo investigate the short-term effectiveness and advantages of the orthopedic robot-assisted femoral neck system (FNS) fixation in the treatment of fresh femoral neck fractures compared with the traditional manual operation. Methods A clinical data of 74 patients with fresh femoral neck fractures, who had undergone internal fixation with FNS between April 2020 and September 2021, was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, there were 31 cases of TiRobot-assisted operation (trial group) and 43 cases of traditional manual operation (control group). There was no significant difference between groups (P>0.05) in terms of gender, age, cause of injury, time from injury to operation, fracture side and type. The fracture fixation time (intraoperative fracture reduction to the end of suture), invasive fixation time (incision of internal fixation to the end of suture), the number of placing key-guide needle, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing, and Harris score of hip function were recorded and compared. Results All operations were performed with no neurovascular injury or incision complications. The invasive fixation time, intraoperative blood loss, the number of placing key-guide needle, and the incision length in the trial group were superior to the control group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in fracture fixation time between groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 4-16 months (mean, 7 months). The fracture did not heal in 1 patient of trial group, and the other fractures healed in 2 groups; the fracture healing time was (17.6±1.9) weeks in trial group and (18.2±1.9) weeks in control group, and there was no significant difference between groups (t=0.957, P=0.345). At last follow-up, the Harris score of the trial group was 82.4±5.8, which was higher than that of the control group (79.0±7.7), but the difference was not significant (t=–1.483, P=0.147). Conclusion Orthopedic robot-assisted FNS fixation in the treatment of fresh femoral neck fractures has the similar short-term effectiveness as the traditional method, but the former has advantages in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and the number of placing key-guide needle, making the operation more minimally invasive and quicker, and more suitable for older patients.
Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of cannulated screws fixation at different time points through different reduction methods on the heal ing of displaced femoral neck fractures. Methods From January 1997 to September 2007, 240 patients with displaced femoral neck fracture were treated, including 121 males and 119 females aged 22-79 years old (average 56 years old). All cases were fresh and close fractures. According to the fractured part, there were 133cases of subcapital fracture, 64 of transcervical fracture and 43 of basal fracture. According to Garden classification, there were 105 cases of type III and 135 of type IV. Cannulated screws fixation was performed on all the patients, and the time from injury to operation was 6 hours to 7 days. Fifty-five cases received closed reduction and 59 cases received l imited open reduction as emergency treatment, while 65 cases received closed reduction and 61 cases received l imited open reduction as selective operation. Different groups were compared in terms of the heal ing rate of fracture, the excellent and good rate of reduction as well as the excellent and good rate of fixation. Results There was no significant difference between the closed reduction and the l imited open reduction in terms of operation time and bleeding volume (P gt; 0.05). Postoperatively, all wounds healed by first intention, no infection was observed, avascular necrosis of femoral head occurred in 44 cases, and the rate of avascular necrosis of femoral head in the l imited open reduction at emergency group was less than that of other 3 groups (P lt; 0.01). All the patients were followed up for 12-72 months (average 38 months), 193 cases got fracture heal ing at 10-23 months after operation (average 14 months). For the closed reduction as emergency operation group, the l imited open reduction as emergency operation group, the closed reduction as selective operation group, and the l imited open reduction as selective operation group, the heal ing rate of fracture was 74.55%, 91.53%, 69.23% and 86.89%, respectively; the excellent and good rate of reduction was 73.73%, 94.92%,70.77% and 91.80%, respectively; the excellent and good rate of fixation was 76.36%, 93.22%, 73.85% and 88.52%, respectively. The heal ing rate of fracture, the excellent and good rate of reduction as well as the excellent and good rate of fixation in the l imited open groups were higher than that of the closed reduction groups (Plt; 0.01), and there was no significant difference between the emergency operation groups and the selective operational groups (Pgt; 0.05). Conclusion The reduction methods have significant influences on the heal ing of fractures after cannulated screws fixation of the displaced femoral neck fracture, and the operation time has no obvious effect on fracture heal ing.
Objective To summarize the characteristics and clinical significance of irreducible Pipkin type Ⅰ and Ⅱ femoral head fracture-dislocations. Methods The clinical data of 4 patients with irreducible Pipkin type Ⅰ and Ⅱ femoral head fracture-dislocations between January 2010 and December 2019 were collected. There were 2 males and 2 females and the age ranged from 24 to 41 years, with an average age of 33.5 years. The cause of injury included traffic accident in 3 cases and falling in 1 case. Pipkin classification was 2 cases of type Ⅰ and 2 cases of type Ⅱ. The time from injury to operation was 1-2 days. The clinical features were that the hip joint of the affected limb was in a locked position, and the passive range of motion was poor. The affected limb was slightly flexed at the hip joint and shortened, in a state of neutral position or slight adduction and internal rotation. The imaging data suggested that the femoral head dislocated backward and upward, and the hard cortex of the posterior edge of the acetabulum was embedded in the cancellous bone of the femoral head, and the two were compressed and incarcerated. Patients of cases 1-3 underwent closed reduction of hip dislocation 1-2 times at 3, 1, and 3 hours after injury respectively, and femoral neck fracture occurred. The injury types changed to Pipkin type Ⅲ, and open reduction and internal fixation were performed. Patient of case 4 did not undergo closed reduction, but underwent open reduction and internal fixation directly. Results Patients of cases 1-3 were followed up 14, 17, and 12 months, respectively. They developed osteonecrosis of the femoral head at 9, 5, and 10 months after operation respectively, and all underwent total hip arthroplasty. Patient of case 4 was followed up 24 months and had no hip pain and limited mobility; the imaging data indicated that the internal fixator position was good and the fracture healed; no collapse or deformation of the femoral head was seen, and no osteonecrosis of the femoral head occurred. Conclusion Clinicians need to improve their understanding of the unique clinical features and imaging findings of irreducible Pipkin type Ⅰ and Ⅱ femoral head fracture-dislocations. It is suggested that open reduction and simultaneous fixation of femoral head fracture should be directly used to reduce the incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Objective
To investigate the clinical efficacy of computer-assisted cannulated screw internal fixation system based on error correction method for femoral neck fractures.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 20 femoral neck fracture patients treated by computer-assisted cannulated screw internal fixation system based on error correction method between January 2014 and October 2015 (trial group), and 36 femoral neck fracture patients undergoing traditional manual surgery with closed reduction by cannulated screw fixation in the same period (the control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, side of fracture, types of fracture, and time from injury to operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative frequency of fluoroscopy and guide pin insertion, fracture healing time, fracture healing rate, and Harris hip score were compared between 2 groups.
Results
All incisions healed by first intention after operation, and no complication of blood vessel and nerve injury occurred. The operation time of trial group was significantly longer than that of control group (t=2.290,P=0.026), however, the intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative frequency of fluoroscopy and guide pin insertion of trial group were significantly less than those of control group (t=–10.650,P=0.000;t=18.320,P=0.000;t=–16.625,P=0.000). All patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 14.7 months). X-ray films showed that fracture healing was obtained in 2 groups, showing no significant difference in fracture healing time between 2 groups (t=0.208,P=0.836). No complication of ischemic necrosis of femoral head occurred during follow-up period. At last follow-up, the Harris hip score was 87.05±3.12 in trial group and was 86.78±2.83 in control group, showing no significant difference (t=0.333,P=0.741).
Conclusion
Computer-assisted cannulated screw internal fixation surgery based on error correction method for femoral neck fractures is better than traditional manual surgery in decreasing intraoperative radiation and surgical trauma during operation.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of percutaneous screwdriver rod-assisted closed reduction in the treatment of valgus-impacted femoral neck fractures. MethodsBetween January 2021 and May 2022, 12 patients with the valgus-impacted femoral neck fractures were treated with percutaneous screwdriver rod-assisted closed reduction and femoral neck system (FNS) internal fixation. There were 6 males and 6 females with a median age of 52.5 years (range, 21-63 years). The fractures were caused by traffic accident in 2 cases, falling in 9 cases, and falling from height place in 1 case. All were unilateral closed femoral neck fractures, including 7 on the left side and 5 on the right side. The time from injury to operation was 1-11 days, with an average of 5.5 days. The fracture healing time and postoperative complications were recorded. The quality of fracture reduction was evaluated by Garden index. At last follow-up, Harris score was used to evaluate the hip joint function, also the shortening of femoral neck was measured. ResultsAll the operations were successfully completed. After operation, the incision fat liquefaction occurred in 1 case, which healed after enhanced dressing change, and the other patients’ incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 6-18 months, with an average of 11.7 months. The X-ray film reexamination showed that the quality of fracture reduction was grade Ⅰ in 10 cases and grade Ⅱ in 2 cases according to the Garden index. All fractures reached bony union, and the healing time was 3-6 months, with an average of 4.8 months. At last follow-up, the femoral neck was shortened by 1-4 mm, with an average of 2.1 mm. No internal fixation failure or osteonecrosis of the femoral head occurred during follow-up. At last follow-up, the hip Harris score was 85-96, with an average of 92.4; 10 cases were rated as excellent and 2 were good. Conclusion The percutaneous screwdriver rod-assisted closed reduction can effectively reduce the valgus-impacted femoral neck fracture. It has the advantages of simple operation, effective, and less impact on blood supply.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of femoral neck system (FNS) and cannulate compression screw (CCS) in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients. MethodsThe clinical data of 82 young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fracture treated between January 2018 and September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into FNS group (24 cases) and CCS group (58 cases) according to different surgical methods. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) in general data such as gender, age, height, body mass, cause of injury, complications, fracture location, and fracture classification (Garden classification and Pauwells classification). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications (nonunion, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, shortening of femoral neck, etc.), visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 2 days after operation, clinical healing time of fracture, and Harris score of hip joint after operation were recorded and compared between the two groups. ResultsThe operation time and VAS score at 2 days after operation in FNS group were significantly lower than those in CCS group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (t=0.263, P=0.796). The patients in CCS group were followed up 6-18 months, with an average of 13.6 months; and the follow-up time in FNS group was 3-12 months, with an average of 7.3 months. There was no complication of internal fixator loosening in both groups. There were 2 cases of osteonecrosis of the femoral head, 1 case of bone nonunion, and 13 cases of femoral neck shortening in CCS group and only 2 cases of femoral neck shortening in FNS group. The difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (27.6% vs. 8.3%) was significant (χ2=36.670, P=0.015). In CCS group, 3 cases underwent secondary artificial hip arthroplasty due to bone nonunion and osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and the remaining 55 cases achieved clinical healing; in FNS group, 6 patients excluded in the statistics because the follow-up time was less than 6 months, and the remaining 18 fractures healed clinically; there was significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups (t=4.481, P=0.000). The difference of Harris score of hip joint between 9 months and 6 months after operation in FNS group was significantly higher than that in CCS group (P<0.05), and the Harris score at 9 months after operation was significantly higher than that at 6 months after operation in both groups (P<0.05). ConclusionFNS can accelerate the healing of femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients, so that patients can start functional exercise as soon as possible, thereby reducing the incidence of related complications.
