Objective To summarize the effect of biofilm (BF) on the occurrence of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Methods The domestic and abroad original l iterature in recent years about the relationship between BF and PJI was reviewed. Results Infection is a critical compl ication for prosthetic joint replacement. Basic research showes one of the reasons for PJI is BF. After adherence of the bacteria to the surface of prosthetic joint, BF forms through a series of regulation andcontrol system. And it lead to the occurrence of PJI. Recently a lot of progress have been made in the research fields of BF related PJI, which have covered aetiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Different studies show that BF has close relationship with PJI. Conclusion BF is proved to have close relationship with PJI. It is important on cl inical significances to diagnose, treat, and prevent PJI.
Objective
To summarize the research progress of the artificial wrist joint prosthesis.
Methods
Domestic and abroad literature concerning artificial wrist joint prosthesis was reviewed and analyzed thoroughly.
Results
Artificial wrist joint prosthesis has been developed to the 4th generation. The artificial wrist joint arthroplasty has advantages of pain relief and functional improvement and can achieve ideal short-term effectiveness. But there are some problems, such as loosening, subsidence, fracture, and dislocation of prosthesis. The long-term effectiveness of the 3rd and 4th generation prosthesis still need to be followed up.
Conclusion
The biomechanics of wrist joint is extremely complicated, which results in less application and slow development of artificial wrist joint prosthesis. Early-term effectiveness of artificial wrist joint arthroplasty is basically satisfactory, but there are still some long-term complications. So the artificial wrist joint prosthesis remains to be developed.
Objective To summarize the best evidence of preoperative prehabilitation for patients undergoing total joint replacement/total knee replacement (THA/TKA), and to provide reference for clinical work in the context of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), in order to speed up the postoperative rehabilitation process of patients undergoing THA/TKA. Methods Up To Date, BMJ Practice, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Cochrane Library, JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center Database, Guidelines International Network, www.guide.medlive.cn, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIPdata, and WanFang Data were searched by computer for literature about preoperative prehabilitation of THA/TKA patients. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the databases to May 31, 2022. The quality of the included literature was evaluated by 2 researchers with evidence-based training. Results A total of 11 publications were included, including 1 guideline, 3 expert consensuses, 3 systematic reviews, and 4 randomized controlled trials, covering 6 aspects of multidisciplinary team, patient education, drug management, nutritional guidance, index control, and exercise intervention. A total of 16 best evidences of preoperative prehabilitation in patients with THA/TKA were extracted, including 9 A-level recommendations and 7 B-level recommendations. Conclusions THA/TKA prehabilitation includes various comprehensive interventions. With the development of ERAS in orthopaedics, the best evidence extracted can be used by clinical staff for THA/TKA. Evidence-based evidence is provided for patients to formulate prehabilitation programs.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical effect of total hip joint replacement and hemiarthroplasty in treatment of fracture of femoral neck in old patients. METHODS One hundred and ten cases with femoral neck fracture in the aged, 70 to 106 years old, from Aug 1990 to Aug 1999 were reviewed, 96 cases were followed up, among which 52 cases received total hip joints replacement and the other 44 cases received hemiarthroplasty. All of the 96 cases were followed up for 15 to 112 months, averaged 51 months, and were evaluated in operation procedures, post-operative recovery and joint function according to Harris Scoring. RESULTS The operation time of total hip joints replacement was 20 minutes longer, bleeding volume was 120 ml larger, and post-operative drainage was 140 ml more, in average, than those in hemiarthroplasty. There was no obvious difference between the two types of operation in bed-resting time, length of stay and hospitalizing costs. According to Harris Scoring, there were 38 cases of excellent in hemiarthroplasty (86.4%) and 48 cases of excellent in total hip joints replacement (92.3%). CONCLUSION Both of the artificial joint replacements are reasonable choices for treatment of fracture of femoral neck in old patients, but total hip joints replacement is recommendable for those comparatively younger patients with good systematic status, and hemiarthroplasty is a good option for those elderly with some systematic diseases.
Doctor-patient shared decision making is an expansion and extension of the patient-centered concept, which emphasizes communication and collaboration between doctors and patients in making decisions, focuses on patients, needs, enhances communication and exchange between doctors and patients, and improves the status of patients in medical decision making. This paper reviews the concept, domestic and international research overview, advantages, and application of doctor-patient shared decision making in hip and knee arthroplasty, and discusses the future research directions, in order to provide a reference for the application of shared decision making between doctors and patients in hip and knee arthroplasty in China.
ObjectiveTo review and evaluate the research progress of the robot-assisted joint arthroplasty.MethodsThe domestic and foreign related research literature on robot-assisted joint arthroplasty was extensively consulted. The advantages, disadvantages, effectiveness, and future prospects were mainly reviewed and summarized.ResultsThe widely recognized advantages of robot-assisted joint arthroplasty are digital and intelligent preoperative planning, accurate intraoperative prosthesis implantation, and quantitative soft tissue balance, as well as good postoperative imaging prosthesis position and alignment. However, the advantages of effectiveness are still controversial. The main disadvantages of robot-assisted joint arthroplasty are the high price of the robot system, the prolonged operation time, and the increased radioactive damage of the imaging-dependent system.ConclusionCompared to traditional arthroplasty, robot-assisted joint arthroplasty can improve the accuracy of the prosthesis position and assist in the quantitative assessment of soft tissue tension, and the repeatability rate is high. In the future, further research is needed to evaluate the clinical function and survival rate of the prosthesis, as well as to optimize the robot system.
Objective To investigate the short-term effectiveness of Swanson artificial joint replacement in treating post-traumatic metacarpophalangeal joint stiffness. Methods Between August 2007 and May 2010, 11 cases (13 fingers) of metacarpophalangeal joint stiffness with soft tissue defects underwent Swanson artificial joint replacement. There were 7 males (9 fingers) and 4 females (4 fingers), aged 43 to 65 years with an average of 49 years. The involved fingers included 4 thumbs, 4 index fingers, 3 middle fingers, and 2 ring fingers. The types of injury included open and crush injury in 8 fingers, fracture of the metacarpophalangeal joint in 3 fingers, metacarpophalangeal joint severing in 2 fingers. The time from joint stiffness to hospitalization was 12 to 48 weeks (mean, 24 weeks). The joint activity was (136.82 ± 28.96)°. According to total active motion (TAM) assessment, included good in 1 finger, fair in 6 fingers, and poor in 6 fingers before operation. The activities of daily living were assessed by Sollerman score, which was 45.64 ± 11.04. The X-ray films and CT scan showed traumatic arthritis of the metacarpophalangeal joint. Results The incision healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12 to 34 months (mean, 24.1 months). At last follow-up, the joint activity was (194.64 ± 28.86)°, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative value (t=25.214, P=0.000). According to TAM assessment, including excellent in 1 finger, good in 4 fingers, fair in 7 fingers, and poor in 1 finger. The Sollerman score was 67.45 ± 8.20 postoperatively, showing significant difference when compared with the preoperative score (t=10.470, P=0.000). X-ray examination showed no prosthesis fracture, periprosthetic fracture, or joint dislocation occurred at last follow-up. Conclusion Swanson artificial joint replacement can be appl ied to treat posttraumatic metacarpophalangeal joint stiffness, which can improve the joint activity and has satisfactory short-term effectiveness.
Orthopedic joint replacement surgery is an important means of treating moderate to severe joint diseases. Preoperative pre-rehabilitation plays a significant role in enhancing the success rate of surgery, reducing postoperative complications, and promoting early recovery of patients. The joint surgery team of Department of Orthopedic Surgery of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, has developed a West China Hospital program for preoperative pre-rehabilitation of orthopedic joint replacement based on the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery, comprehensive research at home and abroad, and their own clinical experience. The purpose of this article is to systematically explain the background, team building and responsibilities, and detailed preoperative re-habilitation program for joint replacement surgery, in order to provide a reference for clinical practice, help optimize preoperative management, and improve the overall treatment effect of patients.
In order to evaluate the long-term effect of total hip replacement (THR) in patients with steroid-induced femoral head necrosis, 40 cases of 50 hips received THR patients were followed up for an average of 8.5 years after operation. Evaluation was carried act according to Harris score system. In these cases, average score was seventy-five points. Revision rate among them was 2% after four years and 18% after five to eight and a half years, with as overall rate of 20%. It was found that the main reason for revision was looseness of the prosthesis. In this follow-up, it showed that besides foreigen body reaction, abnormal osseous remodelling was the main factor in long-term failure of this arthroplasty. It was also proved that it was a good selection to perform cemented total hip replacement in younger patients, which could improve living quality.
ObjectiveTo report the preliminary clinical results and analyze the prognostic factors of prosthetic failures with non-cemented modular prosthetic reconstruction after tumor resection in lower extremities.MethodsA clinical data of 150 patients with lower extremity tumors treated with MEGASYSTEM-C non-cemented modular prosthetic reconstruction between October 2011 and September 2016 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 88 males and 62 females, aged from 12 to 81 years, with a median age of 24 years. According to World Health Organization (WHO) classification of bone tumors, 120 cases were primary malignant tumors, 27 cases were intermediate tumors, and 3 cases were metastatic tumors. Among them, 134 cases underwent primary operation and 16 cases underwent reoperation after recurrence. Eighty-seven patients with malignant tumors received chemotherapy before and after operation, and no patient received local radiotherapy during perioperative period. Proximal femur was reconstructed in 32 cases, distal femur in 83 cases, and proximal tibia in 35 cases. The postoperative follow-up time, the results of oncology (survival status and tumor recurrence), and prosthesis failure (prosthesis survival rate, reasons for failure, treatment plan after failure) were recorded. The reason of the prosthesis failure was classified into 5 types according to the classification defined by Henderson et al. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Log-Rank test were used to analyze patient and prosthesis survival. Lower extremity function was assessed by using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system and MSTS scores were compared for patients with different reconstruction sites.ResultsAll patients were followed up 5-84 months, the median follow-up time was 39 months. During the follow-up period, there were 116 cases of tumor-free survival, 10 cases of tumor-bearing survival, and 24 died of lung metastasis or multiple metastases. The 3-year and 5-year survival rates of 120 patients with primary malignant tumors were 83.1% and 76.6%. There was no significant difference in survival rate between different reconstruction sites (P=0.851). Seven cases (4.7%) had local recurrence at 7-21 months after operation. The 3-year and 5-year survival rates of the prosthesis in 150 patients were 94.4% and 92.5%. There was no significant difference in survival rate between different reconstruction sites (P=0.765). There were 26 failures in 24 patients (16.0%) during the follow-up period. There were 9 cases of type 1 failure, 1 case of type 2 failure, 3 cases of type 3 failure, 5 cases of type 4 failure, and 8 cases of type 5 failure. At last follow-up, 120 of the 126 patients survived without prosthetic failure. Except that the influence of different parts of prosthesis on the incidence of type 4 failure (P=0.029), the influence of chemotherapy on the incidence of type 5 failure (P=0.002) were significant, the influence of other types of failure on different reconstructed parts of prosthesis, initial operation, and perioperative chemotherapy had no significant difference (P>0.05). There were 5 cases of amputation (4 cases of type 5 failure, 1 case of type 4 failure), 3 cases of prosthesis removal (1 case of type 2 failure, 1 case of type 3 failure, 1 case of type 4 failure), 3 cases of revision while keeping the original prosthesis (2 cases of type 1 failure, 1 case of type 5 failure). The overall MSTS score was 24±3. The MSTS scores were 24±3, 25±3, and 23±3 in patients whose reconstruction sites located in proximal femur, distal femur, and proximal tibia, respectively, showing no significant difference (F=3.014, P=0.052).ConclusionThe short-term follow-up showed a lower incidence of complications and good function for MEGASYSTEM-C non-cement modular prosthesis system in treatment of bone defects after lower limb tumor resection. The main factors affecting the early survival of prosthesis were tumor progression and infection.
