ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility and application value of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in elderly patients.MethodsThe clinical data of patients who underwent LPD from August 2016 to July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were allocated into the elderly group (≥65 years old) and non-elderly group (<65 years old). The early surgical outcomes and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared.ResultsIn this study, 69 cases of LPD were collected, including 42 cases in the elderly group and 27 cases in the non-elderly group. Compared with the non-elderly group, the proportion of patients complicated comorbidities was higher (P<0.05), albumin level was lower (P<0.05), and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification was higher (P<0.05) in the elderly group. There were no significant differences in the intraoperative conditions, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05), and there were no significant differences in the pathological results of postoperative malignant tumor between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsFor elderly patients with over 65 years old, LPD is a safe and feasible surgical procedure for clinical practice. Meanwhile, early surgical outcomes are satisfactory, postoperative complications are not increased, and tumor cure effect can be achieved.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of totally transanal endorectal pull-through and laparoscopic assistance endorectal pull-through in the treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease (HD).MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP Database were searched to screen out the comparative studies published between January 1998 and May 2020 on the treatment of HD with totally transanal endorectal pull-through and laparoscopic assistance endorectal pull-through. Then two reviewers independently completed the literatures screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation. The Review Manager 5.3 software was used to combine the effect size of the postoperative effect indicators included in the literatures. Stata 14.0 software was used to perform Begg’s and Egger’s tests on the publication bias of the included literatures.ResultsA total of 8 clinical studies conforming to the standards were included and 702 cases of children undergoing HD radical resection were recorded, including 335 cases in the totally transanal endorectal pull-through group and 367 cases in the laparoscopic assistance endorectal pull-through group. Compared with the laparoscopic assistance endorectal pull-through group, the totally transanal endorectal pull-through group had an advantage in the incidence of postoperative faecal incontinence/soiling [OR=0.20, 95%CI was (0.07, 0.54), P=0.001], and the postoperative constipation recurrence rate was higher than the laparoscopic assistance endorectal pull-through group [OR=2.39, 95%CI was (1.05, 5.42), P=0.04]. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative enterocolitis [OR=1.01, 95%CI was (0.59, 1.75), P=0.96], postoperative adhesion intestinal obstruction [OR=0.74, 95%CI was (0.28, 1.95), P=0.54], and postoperative anastomotic stenosis [OR=1.14, 95%CI was (0.51, 2.56), P=0.74].ConclusionsCompared with laparoscopic assistance endorectal pull-through, the totally transanal endorectal pull-through can reduce the incidence of postoperative faecal incontinence/soiling, but the rate of recurrence of postoperative constipation is higher. The two surgical procedures for HD have similar incidences of postoperative enterocolitis, anastomotic stenosis, and adhesive intestinal obstruction.
ObjectiveTo compare efficacy of laparoscopic or open hepatectomy in benign liver tumors patients with different difficult operations. MethodsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the patients with benign liver tumors who underwent hepatectomy in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from September 2014 to March 2021 were collected. The enrolled patients were assigned into low, medium, and high difficulties by the Hasegawa liver resection surgical difficulty score model, then the patients were matched by propensity score matching. The liver function and inflammatory indexes, intraoperative bleeding, operative time, total hospital stay, postoperative complications, and hospitalization expenses of patients with benign liver tumors after laparoscopic (laparoscope group) or open (open group) hepatectomy were compared. ResultsA total of 209 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. According to the Hasegawa criteria, there were 59, 89, and 61 patients with low, medium, and high difficulties respectively. After 1∶1 propensity score matching, 18, 34, and 14 patients in the laparoscope group and open group were matched respectively. There were no statistic differences in the baseline data between the laparoscope group and open group (P>0.05). ① For the patients with low and medium difficulties, compared with the open group, the different values of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, white blood cell count, and neutrophil percentage were lower (P<0.05), the intraoperative bleeding and total hospital stay were less or shorter (P<0.05), and the albumin were higher (P<0.05) in the laparoscope group. There were no statistic differences in these indexes among the patients with high difficulty (P>0.05). ② Compared with the open group, the operative time of the laparoscope group was shorter in the patients with low difficulty (P<0.05) and longer in the patients with high difficulty (P<0.05), and there was no statistic difference in patients with medium difficulty (P>0.05). ③ The postoperative complications had no statistic differences between the two groups for the patients with low and high difficulties (P>0.05), while which in the laparoscope group were lower than in the open group for the patients with medium difficulty (P<0.05). ④ The hospitalization expenses of the laparoscope group was higher than the open group for the patients with high difficulty (P<0.05), while which had no statistic differences between the two groups for the patients with low and medium difficulties (P>0.05). ⑤ The total hospital stay of the laparoscope group was shorter than the open group (P<0.05) no matter which difficult operation.ConclusionsAccording to results of this study, laparoscopic hepatectomy has more obvious advantages as compared with open hepatectomy for patients with low or medium difficulty, which could greatly shorten hospital stay and accelerate rehabilitation of patients. Even for patients with high difficulty, laparoscopic hepatectomy still shows an advantage of shortening hospital stay.
ObjectiveTo evaluate and analyze the clinical effect of ambulatory surgery applied to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).MethodsThe patients who underwent LC in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from June 2017 to February 2019 were collected, then were assigned to ambulatory surgery applied to LC group (ALC group) and conventional LC group (CLC group) according to the admission process mode. The patients in the ALC group received LC in the ambulatory ward and the patients in the CLC group received LC in the conventional ward. The preoperative waiting time, postoperative gastrointestinal recovery time, postoperative 6 h pain score, total hospitalization time, total hospitalization cost, patient satisfaction, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 433 patients underwent LC were included in this study, including 176 patients in the ALC group and 257 patients in the CLC group. There were no significant differences in the age, gender, type of gallbladder diseases, etc. between the two groups (P>0.05) except body mass index (P<0.05). There was no perioperative death in the two groups. One patient converted to laparotomy in the CLC group. Compared with the CLC group, the preoperative waiting time, postoperative gastrointestinal recovery time, and the total hospitalization time were shorter, the postoperative pain score was lower, the total hospitalization cost was less, and the satisfaction rate of patients was higher in the ALC group (P<0.05). There was 1 case of incision infection and 1 case of ascites in the operation area in the ALC group and CLC group, 1 case of fever in the ALC group and 3 cases of fever in the CLC group, respectively. There was no difference in the overall incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). During the follow-up of 6 to 26 months, there was no readmission in both groups.ConclusionPatients who undergone LC based on ambulatory surgery mode recover quickly, and hospitalization cost is less, satisfaction rate is higher.
ObjectiveTo analyze the risk factors affecting delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. MethodsThe gastric cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in the Jiaozuo People’s Hospital from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2022 were retrospectively collected. The occurrence of DGE was recorded. Meanwhile, the multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was performed to screen the risk factors affecting the DGE. ResultsA total of 350 gastric cancer patients underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study were included, 17 (4.9%) of whom developed DGE. The multivariate binary logistic regression analysis results showed that the preoperative gastric outflow tract obstruction (OR=8.582, P=0.009), intraoperative jejunal nutrition tube indwelling (OR=14.317, P=0.010), more peritoneal drainage tube placement (OR=5.455, P=0.006), and intraoperative blood loss ≥140 mL (OR=4.912, P=0.018) increased the risk of DGE. ConclusionAccording to the results of this study, when patients undergoing laparoscopic distal radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer accompanied by preoperative gastric outflow tract obstruction, intraoperative jejunal nutrition tube indwelling, more peritoneal drainage tube placement, and more intraoperative blood loss, it should be paid more attention to prevention DGE, and early detection and treatment, so as to improve the prognosis of patients.
ObjectiveTo explore technical essentials and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) guided by gallbladder ampulla localization on an imaginary clock for cholecystitis.MethodsA retrospective study of 8 707 continuous patients with mild cholecystitis who underwent LC from July 1998 to February 2018 at a single institution was conducted. Among them, 3 168 patients were treated by the traditional LC from July 1998 to February 2007 (a traditional LC group), 5 539 patients were treated by the LC with the guidance of the gallbladder ampulla localization on an imaginary clock from March 2007 to February 2018 (a gallbladder ampulla localization group). The conversion to open surgery, bile duct injury, return to the operating room due to postoperative massive abdominal bleeding, bile leakage without bile duct injury, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stays were compared between the traditional LC group and the gallbladder ampulla localization group.ResultsThere were no significant differences in the gender, age, course of disease, and type of cholecystitis between these two groups (P>0.050). The rates of conversion to open surgery, bile duct injury, return to the operating room due to postoperative massive abdominal bleeding, bile leakage without bile duct injury and the operative time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stays in the traditional LC group were 3.00% (95/3 168), 0.13% (4/3 168), 0.09% (3/3 168), 0.03% (1/3 168), (43.6±12.6) min, (18.7±3.3) mL, (3.6±2.7) d, respectively, which in the gallbladder ampulla localization group were 0 (0/5 539), 0 (0/5 539), 0 (0/5 539), 0 (0/5 539), (32.2±10.5) min, (12.4±3.5) mL, (3.5±2.8) d, respectively. The differences of conversion to open surgery, bile duct injury, return to the operating room due to postoperative massive abdominal bleeding rates, and the operative time and intraoperative blood loss were statistically significant between these two groups (P<0.050). The differences of the bile leakage without bile duct injury rate and postoperative hospital stays were not statistically significant between the two groups (P>0.050).ConclusionThis study shows that gallbladder ampulla localization on an imaginary clock is useful for ductal identification so as to reduce bile duct injury and improve safety of LC in case of no conversion to open surgery.
Tumors located in the middle lobe of liver were usually subjected to extended hemihepatectomy due to its special anatomical location and high surgical difficulty. However, the incidence of postoperative liver failure and mortality increased accordingly for patients with liver cirrhosis and poor liver function because more liver parenchyma was resected. Therefore, some researchers proposed to use central hepatectomy to treat. However, due to the higher-level technology and the higher risk, it had not been carried out routinely following decades. Later, with the rapid development of laparoscopic technology in the liver surgery and its advantages such as small trauma, rapid postoperative recovery, and the same efficacy as open liver surgery, the reports on laparoscopic central hepatectomy (LCH) at home and abroad had been increasing year by year. Especially, with the standardization of LCH, the development of LCH will be promoted. LCH might become the mainstream of surgical treatment of middle liver tumors in the future.
ObjectiveTo compare the short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD).MethodsClinical data of 29 patients receiving LPD and 27 patients receiving OPD in the department of hepatobiliary surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from March 2016 to December 2018 were collected. Note that both LPD and OPD were performed by the same chief surgeon. Effectiveness and safety of LPD were compared with those of OPD.ResultsThere was no significant difference in age, sex, body mass index, total bilirubin level, direct bilirubin level, preoperative morbidities, focus size, TNM stage and ASA grade between the LPD group and the OPD group (P>0.05). The operative time of the LPD group was significantly longer than that of the OPD group ［(482±86 ) min vs. (349±73) min, P<0.01］. Patients in the LPD group had shorter postoperative anal exhaust time than that in the OPD group ［(3.3±0.8) d vs. (5.3±1.0) d , P<0.05］. There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay after operation, blood loss in operation, transfusion, second operation, death and postoperative complications between the LPD group and the OPD group (P>0.05).ConclusionsThe preliminary results of this study suggest that compared with OPD, LPD can shorten the postoperative anal exhaust time but not increase the incidence of postoperative complications and blood loss in operation. Nevertheless, this conclusion is needed to be validated by clinical studies with large sample size.
Objective To summarize and analyze the application value of triple stomach shaping technique in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Methods The clinical data of patients undergoing simple LSG with triple stomach shaping technique carried out by the General Surgery Obesity and Metabolic Diseases Center of Chengdu Third People’s Hospital from January to December 2021 were retrospectively collected, recording the operative time and the occurrence of recent complications such as postoperative nausea/vomiting, gastric leakage, bleeding, obstruction/torsion within 30 days after operation. Results A total of 966 patients were collected, including 294 males and 672 females. The age was 16–65 years, average age was (32.8±8.6) years. Body mass index was 27.5–47.2 kg/m2, average was (34.2±3.5) kg/m2. All operations were successfully completed without conversion to laparotomy. The operative time was 45–170 min, average was (100.2+33.4) minutes. Postoperative nausea/vomiting occurred in 484 cases (50.10%), bleeding in 2 cases (0.21%, intraperitoneal bleeding in 1 case, intragastric bleeding in 1 case), gastric leakage in 1 case (0.10%, grade B leakage), and no perioperative death occurred. Hospitalization time was 4–24 d, average was (7.55±2.47) d. Two patients (0.21%) were hospitalized again due to nausea and vomiting within 30 days after operation, they were relieved and discharged after conservative medical treatment. Conclusion Triple gastric shaping technology is more physiological, safe and suitable for promotion.
ObjectiveTo summarize the application status and prospect of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).MethodThe relevant literatures about studies of LPD at home and abroad were reviewed.ResultsLPD was a difficult operation, mainly suitable for pancreatic head and periampullary benign and malignant tumors. With the development of laparoscopic techniques in recent years, LPD combined the superior mesenteric vein and portal vein resection and reconstruction, or combined multi-visceral resection was feasible, but the survival benefit of LPD with arterial resection and reconstruction and extended lymph node dissection remained to be discussed. At present, there was no clear requirement on the way to reconstruct the pancreatic fluid outflow tract, but the pancreaticojejunostomy for digestive tract reconstruction was chose by the most surgeons. The most studies had confirmed that LPD was minimally invasive and had a short-term prognosis that was not inferior to that of open pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, the results of large sample analysis about long-term survival rate and oncology results were lacking, so it was difficult to judge the advantages and disadvantages of long-term prognosis of the two methods.ConclusionsLPD is a safe, feasible, reasonable, and effective surgical method. With improvement of laparoscopic technology, LPD is expected to become a standard operation method for treatment of pancreatic head cancer and periampullary carcinoma, and oncology benefits of LPD will be further confirmed in future by large-sample clinical randomized control trials and studies of long-term prognosis follow-up.
