Objective
To explore the preventive effectiveness of early physiotherapy on arm lymphedema after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer.
Methods
A total of 206 patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer in The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University from June 2014 to June 2016, enrolled in this randomized controlled clinical trial. Then these patients were randomly divided into intervention group and control group equally. Patients in the control group received routine treatment, and the patients in the intervention group began to use the air pressure pump combined with the microwave physiotherapy on the second day after the radical surgery. The incidences of limb lymphedema in 6 months and 1 year after operation between the 2 groups were compared, and the influencing factors of arm lymphedema were explored.
Results
The clinical data of 195 patients were analyzed at end, including 99 patients of the intervention group and 96 patients of the control group. ① There were statistical significance in the incidences of arm lymphedema in 6 months and 1 year after operation between the 2 groups (P<0.05), that incidences of arm lymphedema in the intervention group were both lower than those of the control group at the2 time points [6 months after operation: 2.0% (2/99)vs. 9.4% (9/96); 1 year after operation: 5.1% (5/99) vs. 17.7% (17/96)]. ② The results of non-conditional logistic regression analysis shown that, age (OR=1.45, P=0.008), tumor location (OR=1.72, P<0.001), TNM stage (OR=2.01, P=0.033), the number of invasive axillary lymph nodes (OR=1.15, P=0.005), and postoperative radiotherapy (OR=1.23, P=0.016) were the influencing factors of arm lymphedema after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer, patients with age older than 60 years, tumor position at the outside area, stage Ⅲ of TNM, the number of invasive axillary lymph nodes >5, and patients received radiotherapy after operation had high risk of arm lymphedema.
Conclusion
Early physiotherapy can effectively prevent the occurrence of arm lymphedema after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer, and early physiotherapy should be performed for patients with high risk of arm lymphedema.
ObjectiveTo summarize the treatment measures and experience for one patient with acute pulmonary thromboembolism after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. MethodsThe discussion on MDT (multi-disciplinary team) of a breast cancer patient admitted to The First Hospital of Lanzhou University in March 2018 and the results of the discussion on acute pulmonary thromboembolism after operation were summarized. ResultsThis patient had many high risk factors for deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities, such as obesity, advanced age, hypertension, malignant tumor, and surgical stress. The operative time was about 90 min and the blood loss was 30 mL, without nerve and vascular injuries. Acute pulmonary thromboembolism occurred suddenly on 10 days after operation, which led to heart failure. Eventually, the patient died of the peripheral circulatory insufficiency caused by respiratory failure and heart failure. ConclusionSurgeons should pay great attention to the perioperative management of the patients with many high-risk factors, who may occur acute pulmonary thromboembolism caused by deep venous thrombosis of lower limbs after radical mastectomy.
Objective
To investigate effect of optimizing operation procedure (OOP) on surgical outcomes of complete endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy (CESM) in treatment of gynecomastia.
Methods
A total of 217 patients with gynecomastia underwent CESM from January 2014 to March 2017 in the Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu were collected according to the criteria for inclusion and exclusion, further, based on a propensity score-matching model, a total of 94 patients were evenly assigned to OOP group (April 2015 later) and non-OOP group (before April 2015). The CESM with or without OOP was performed in the OOP group or the non-OOP group, respectively. The operative time, postoperative length of stay, treatment expenses, and favorable cosmetic effect were compared in these two groups.
Results
The differences in the general clinical data in both groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The operative time (min) was shorter (139.90±37.18versus 175.20±46.99, P=0.002), the postoperative length of stay (d) was shorter too (7.13±1.46 versus 8.47±2.71, P=0.021), and the treatment expenses (yuan) were more less (11 426.80±1 861.19 versus 12 315.75±1 306.64, P=0.036) in the OOP group as compared with the non-OOP group. Meanwhile the favorable cosmetic effect of the self-evaluation score in the OOP group was significantly higher than that in the non-OOP group (7.33±1.16 versus 5.97±1.16, P<0.05).
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that using optimizing standard CESM could shorten operative time, reduce treatment expenses, and improve satisfaction of patients.
Objective To explore the interaction of postmastectomy radiotherapy （PMRT） and breast reconstruction， and elucidate how to choose the type and timing of breast reconstruction. Method Literatures about PMRT and breast reconstruction were reviewed. Results PMRT might increase the incidence of complications and impair the cosmetic satisfaction of breast reconstruction. Breast reconstruction might also compromise the effect of PMRT. Conclusions In patients who will receive or have already received PMRT， the optimal approach is delayed autologous tissue reconstruction after PMRT. If PMRT appears likely but may not be required at the time of mastectomy，delayed-immediate reconstruction may be considered， or immediate autologous tissue reconstruction may be considered in case of patients awareness of the increased complications and impaired cosmetic outcomes from PMRT.
ObjectiveTo investigate the prognosis after breast conserving surgery (BCS) and modified radical mastectomy (MRM) in patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer, and analyze the factors related to locoregional recurrence (LRR).MethodsThe clinicopathologic and prognostic data of patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer who underwent the surgical treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2011 to December 2014 were analyzed. The clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic differences of the BCS group and MRM group were compared. The factors related to LRR of patients underwent the BCS and MRM were analyzed.ResultsA total of 1 330 patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer were included in this study, including 230 in the BCS group and 1 100 in the MRM group. Compared with the MRM group, the patients in the BCS group had higher height (P<0.001), younger age (P<0.001), smaller tumor diameter (P<0.001), and less axillary lymph node metastasis (P<0.001). Up to August 2019, 149 cases (18 cases in the BCS group and 131 cases in the MRM group) were lost, with a follow-up rate of 88.8%. The median follow-up time was 71 months (4－103 months). The LRR rate of the BCS group was higher than that of the MRM group (6.1% versus 2.5%, χ2=7.002, P<0.01). The locoregional recurrence-free survival of the MRM group was better than that of the BCS group (χ2=7.886, P<0.01). However, there were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of the distant metastasis-free survival and disease-free survival (P>0.05). In the patients underwent the BCS, the HER-2 was associated with the LRR (P<0.05), and the axillary lymph node metastasis was associated with the LRR in the patients underwent the MRM (P<0.05).ConclusionsAccording to results of this study, although there is a significant difference in locoregional recurrence-free survival between BCS group and MRM group in patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer, there are no statistical differences in distant metastasis-free survival and disease-free survival between the two groups. Therefore, it is safe and feasible for choosing appropriate patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer to underwent breast-conserving treatment.
Objective
To evaluate the feasibility, oncological safety, and aesthetic result of skin-spring mastectomy (SSM) or nipple-spring mastectomy (NSM) in breast reconstruction of implant (permanent gel or expander) for breast cancer patients who were not fit for the breast conserving surgery (BCS).
Methods
Between October 2005 and July 2011, 89 women with breast caner underwent SSM or NSM, with an average age of 42.4 years (range, 19-55 years) and an average disease duration of 5.7 months (range, 1-24 months). The pathological examination revealed invasive ductal carcinoma in 55 cases, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 15 cases, invasive ductal carcinoma + DCIS in 8 cases, DCIS with infiltration in 10 cases, and occult breast cancer in 1 case. According to tumor staging criterion of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), 15 cases were rated as stage 0, 51 cases as stage I, 22 cases as stage II, and 1 case as unclear. Finally, 33 patients underwent SSM and 56 patients underwent NSM according to the location and diameter of tumor and the infiltration of tumor to nipple. Secondary breast reconstruction was performed with permanent gel replacement after axillary lymph node dissection in 9 patients with positive sentinel lymph node and 1 patient with occult breast cancer; immediate breast reconstruction was performed with permanent gel in the other patients. All the patients received the chemotherapy or/and radiotherapy according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline.
Results
Complications occurred in 5 patients undergoing breast reconstruction of permanent gel after NSM, including 1 case of haemorrhage, 2 cases of infection, and 2 cases of local skin necrosis. Primary healing of incision was obtained in the others. No nipple necrosis was observed in patients undergoing NSM. All the patients were followed up 14-88 months (median, 40 months). At 10 months after operation, the aesthetic results were excellent in 40 cases, good in 33 cases, fair in 14 cases, and poor in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 82%. No recurrence or metastasis was found during follow-up.
Conclusion
The SSM or NSM is feasible and oncological safe for patients who are not fit for BCS, with satisfactory aesthetic result.
The report of brachial plexus injuries following radical mastectomy in patients with breast cancer was rare even though the operation was a main measure in treating with breast cancer. Nine patients treated from Oct. 1989 to Feb.1991 were summarized. The results were not ideal.
ObjectiveTo understand the progress of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in patients with T1–2N1M0 breast cancer. MethodThe studies and the treatment guidelines relevant to PMRT in the patients with T1–2N1M0 breast cancer in recent years were analyzed and summarized. ResultsThe ability of PMRT to improve the prognosis of patients with T1–2N1M0 breast cancer remained controversial. Owing to the patients with T1–2N1M0 breast cancer were heterogeneous, and the indications for PMRT had not been standardized. With the increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer, some studies had attempted to formulate decisions about PMRT based on changes in tumor characteristics before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but the findings were currently controversial. ConclusionsWhether PMRT can improve prognosis and decision-making for patients with T1–2N1M0 breast cancer is still controversial. Some ongoing clinical trials may provide some references for the optimal decision-making of PMRT for patients with T1–2N1M0 breast cancer.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy of immediate breast reconstruction with extended latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap after nipple and areola sparing modified radical mastectomy for patients with early-middle breast cancer.
MethodsSixty patients diagnosed with early-middle breast cancer by needle biopsy from November 2009 to October 2012 in this hospital were divided into two groups according to the surgical method.The breast reconstruction group (30 cases) were performed immediate breast reconstruction with extended latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap after nipple and areola sparing modified radical mastectomy, the control group (30 cases) were performed traditional modified radical mastectomy.The postoperative complications, clinical efficacy, quality of life, and recurrence and metastasis were compared in two groups.
Results①The ipsilateral breast was completely missing in the control group.The aesthetic effect in the breast reconstruction group was satisfactory including excellent in 22 patients, good in 7 patients, general in 1 patient.②The rates of flaps effusion, flap necrosis, and affectied limb activity limitation had no significant differences in two groups (P > 0.05).The wound healing time, operation area drainage time, hospital stay, and post-operative chemotherapy start time all had no significant differences in two groups (P > 0.05).③The frequency of psycho-logical pressure (inferiority/anxiety/fear) and rate of un-satisfaction of secondary sexual characteristics (body/curve) in the breast reconstruction group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.001).The rate of social interaction fitness in the breast reconstruction group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.001).④The following-up time was 12 to 38 months with an average 25 months, one case died because of brain metastasis in the control group, the rest 59 patients had no local recurrence and distant metastasis.
ConclusionsThe immediate breast reconstruction with exte-nded latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap after nipple and areola sparing modified radical mastectomy can cure cancer on the basis of satisfactory cosmetic results of breast, excellent quality of life of patients, and fewer surgical complica-tions.It does not affect postoperative adjuvant radiochemotherapy and short-and long-term efficacy for breast cancer.
ObjectiveTo investigate the factors of breast cancer patients who met breast-conserving conditions after neoadjuvant chemotherapy when choosing surgical mode.MethodsA questionnaire survey was conducted on 228 breast cancer patients who met breast-conserving conditions after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Chi square test, nonparametric rank sum test and binary logistic regression were used to analyze the factors affecting the choice of surgical mode.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that age, clinical stage, family history of cancer, molecular type, neoadjuvant chemotherapy effect, surgeon’s recommendation, chemotherapy side effects, and surgical complications were the factors affecting patient’s chose for breast-conserving surgery (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy [OR=0.312, 95%CI (0.255, 0.662), P<0.001] and the surgeon’s recommendation [OR=53.947, 95%CI (4.570, 6.239), P=0.002] were independent factors that affected the choice of surgery.ConclusionsThe decision of the surgical mode is a process in which doctors and patients participate together. Individualized neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves the remission rate and the progress of the surgeon’s comprehensive treatment strategy can play a role in improving the breast-conserving rate and the rate of breast-conserving success. Doctors should give positive guidance in accordance with the specific situation of the patient to make the best choice.
