ObjectiveTo analyze the efficacy of promoting the development of day surgery in a municipal third-level public hospital under the guidance of national hospital performance appraisal system. MethodThe annual data relevant day surgery in the Yibin Second People’s Hospital were collected from 2016 to 2022, which were divided into three stages: 2016–2018, 2019–2020, and 2021–2022. The trend and correlation of the performance appraisal indicators were analyzed. ResultsThe day surgery in the Yibin Second People’s Hospital started in 2018, and its proportion in the elective surgery was only 1.2% in 2018, then increased continuously after the implementation of performance appraisal system, and was up to 34.7% in 2022. From 2016 to 2022, the proportion of discharged patients underwent surgery in the entire hospital increased continuously from 22.4% in 2016 to 35.7% in 2022, and the average hospital stay in the entire hospital gradually decreased from 10.9 d to 8.1 d, which both had a significant linear correlation with the proportion of day surgery in the elective surgery (rs=0.93, P=0.002; rs=–0.99, P<0.001, respectively). In the recent implementation of performance appraisal system, the re-operation rate after day surgery was less than 0.1%, the readmission rate of day surgery after discharge was 0%, and the satisfaction rate of day surgery patients was more than 95.0%, which reached 97.0% by 2022, higher than the average level of inpatient satisfaction in the entire hospital. Taking laparoscopic cholecystectomy, cataract phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation, internal fixation extraction, vocal cord polypectomy, and endoscopic gastric polypectomy as example, the average total hospitalization cost and average cost excluding drug and medical materials consumption of the day surgery all decreased compared to non-day-surgery mode, respectively. ConclusionUnder the guidance of national hospital performance appraisal system, day surgery has entered a rapid developing stage, but it is still necessary to promote the medical quality by standardized, precise, and informationized day surgery management.
ObjectiveTo analyze the characteristics of colorectal cancer surgery in the current version of Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA).MethodsThe DACCA version selected for this data analysis was the updated version on April 16th, 2020. The data items included timing of operation, types of operative procedure, radical resection level of operation, patient’s wish of anus-reserving, types of stomy, date of stoma closure, surgical approaches, extended resection, and type of intersphincteric resection (ISR). The data item interval of stoma closure was added, and the selected data items were statistically analyzed.ResultsThe total number of medical records (data rows) that met the criteria was 11 757, including 2 729 valid data on the timing of operation (23.2%), 11 389 valid data on the types of operative procedure (96.9%), 4 255 valid data on the radical resection level of operation (36.2%), 3 803 valid data on patient’s wish of anus-reserving (32.3%), 4 377 valid data on types of stomy (37.2%), 989 valid data on date of stoma closure (8.4%), 4 418 valid data on surgical approaches (37.6%), 3 941 valid data on extended resection (33.5%), and 1 156 valid data on type of ISR (9.8%). In the timing of operation, the most cases were performed immediately after discovery or neoadjuvant completion (915, 33.5%). In types of operative procedure, ultra low anterior resection (ULAR), right hemicolectomy (RHC), and low anterior resection (LAR) were the most, including 1 986 (17.4%), 1 412 (12.4%), and 1 041 (9.1%) lines. Respectively in the colon and rectal cancer surgery, the proportion of RHC (50.0%) and ULAR (26.0%) was the highest, with 172 (26.1%) and 815 (27.9%) extended resection. In ISR surgery the majority was ISR-2 (741, 64.1%). In radical resection level of operation, the number of R0 was the largest with 2 575 (60.5%) lines. In patient’s wish of anus-reserving, positive and rational were the most with 1 811 (47.6%) and 1 440 (37.9%) lines, respectively. And in types of stomy, there were 2 628 lines (60.0%) without stoma and 1 749 cases (40.0%) with stoma, among which the most lines were right lower ileum stoma (612, 35.0%). The minimum value, maximum value, and median value of interval of stoma closure were 0 d, 2 678 d and 112 d. The linear regression prediction of date of stoma closure by year was \begin{document}${\hat {y}} $\end{document}=9.234 3x+22.394 (R2=0.2928, P=0.07). In the surgical approaches, the majority was standard with 3 182 (72.0%) lines.ConclusionsIn the DACCA, rectal cancer surgery is still the majority, and ULAR is the most type. The application of extended resection in both colon and rectal cancer has important significance. The data related to stoma are diversified and need to be further studied.
As an important practice of collaborative medicine, multi-disciplinary team (MDT) plays a key role in improving the level of diagnosis and treatment of difficult and complex diseases. MDT quality evaluation is an important research content to promote the development of MDT model, which directly affects the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment and patient experience. This paper systematically summarizes the relevant literature at home and abroad, focuses on MDT quality evaluation methods and tools, combs the dimensions and indicators of quality evaluation in different scenarios, and summarizes the common quality control laws in MDT practice. On this basis, combined with the characteristics and practical bottlenecks of China’s MDT model, this paper puts forward the key directions that should be paid attention to in the future MDT quality evaluation research, in order to provide theoretical references for the construction of MDT quality evaluation framework and promote the standardized development of MDT model.
Day surgery is a new medical service model, which has developed rapidly in China because of its advantages of safety, efficiency and resource conservation. However, along with the rapid development in quantity, it also presents contradictions such as the mismatch with the previous surgical quality and safety management model, the urgent need for the unification of the new system of quality and safety evaluation indicators at the national level, and the imbalance in the construction of information technology of medical institutions in China, leading to the new problem of uneven quality control of day surgery. This article constructs a “five-in-one” new system for the quality and safety management of day surgery from the perspective of high-quality development, aiming to provide a theoretical basis for the formulation of relevant policies in China and to promote the safe, efficient, and orderly development of day surgeries.
This article is based on the work practice of Medical-lnsurance-Medicine Linkage carried out by the Nanping First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University under the reform of payment based on diagnosis related group (DRG). It outlines the connotation and extension of Medical-lnsurance-Medicine Linkage in the hospital, including concept definition, organizational structure, the relationship between DRG payment and Medical-lnsurance-Medicine Linkage, and summarizes the specific measures and positive results of the Medical-lnsurance-Medicine Linkage work mechanism from four aspects: medical quality management, medical insurance management, medical drugs/consumables management, and performance evaluation. These experiences are of great significance for improving the quality and efficiency of medical care, actively responding to the reform of medical insurance payment methods, enhancing the level of medical services in public hospitals, and achieving a win situation among the medical insurance management departments, hospitals, and patients.
High-quality development has become the command stick for the current reform of medical institutions. This article combines the practical experience of West China Hospital of Sichuan University to sort out the difficulties in the construction of provincial medical quality control centers in China. It summarizes the problems in policy support, intervention methods, work content, network construction, discipline construction, and quality control efficiency of provincial medical quality control centers, and proposes that building a collaborative platform based on key management projects, establishing a multi-level operation mode, and constructing a benchmark construction model are the key paths to reform the management of provincial medical quality control centers.
ObjectiveTo analyze the tumor characteristics of colorectal cancer in the current version of Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA).MethodsThe DACCA version was the updated version on April 16, 2020. The data items including: procedure of anastomosis, shape of anastomosis, enhanced suture for anastomosis, stuffing, drainage, coverage of major omentum, anti-adhesion material, reconstruction of pelvic peritoneum, contaminate, and drug implants were analyzed for the characteristics of each selected data item.ResultsA total of 6 338 analyzable data rows were obtained by screening the DACCA database. Among the 6 338 pieces of data, the most common one was the double staple technique (58.1%), end-to-end anastomosis (69.4%), one-total-circle of enhancement (33.2%), and without stuffing (54.1%) in the items of procedure of anastomosis, shape of anastomosis, enhanced suture for anastomosis, stuffing, respectively; the ratio with drainage was higher (79.2%) in the term of drainage, the drainage time was (3.74±2.89) d and median drainage time was 3.00 d; the ratio with covering part of major omentum, without anti-adhesion material, with unilateral partial closure, without contaminate, and without drug implants were more higher, which was 41.1%, 79.8%, 58.7%, 73.9%, and 53.9% in the items of coverage of major omentum, anti-adhesion material, reconstruction of pelvic peritoneum, contaminate, and drug implants, respectively.ConclusionIt might better explain the outcome of surgery associated with intraoperative operation by studying the features of surgery of DACCA and guide the operation in the future for better outcomes.
Hospital accreditation involves a wide range of aspects and has a significant impact, receiving widespread attention from multiple parties and is a topic worthy of in-depth research. This article provides a review of research on hospital accreditation both domestically and internationally, focusing on key issues such as whether accreditation can promote the improvement of medical quality and whether third-party evaluation should be introduced. The aim is to reveal the shortcomings of research on hospital accreditation in China, provide direction for subsequent research on hospital accreditation in China, and provide a reference for improving the hospital accreditation system in China.
ObjectiveTo analyze the characteristics of colorectal cancer surgery in the current version of Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA).MethodsThe DACCA version selected for this data analysis was the updated version on July 16th, 2020. The data items included operative duration, anatomy (anatomical difficulty), pelvis (pelvic stenosis), obesity (abdominal obesity), adhesion (adhesion in surgical area), mesentery (abnormal mesenteric status), hypertrophy (tissue hypertrophy or organ hypertrophy), intestinal quality, death (risk of death), injury (risk of tissue injury), recurrence (tumor recurrence), metastasis (tumor metastasis), anastomotic leakage (risk of anastomotic leakage), difficulty of operation, prognosis, quality of operation. The selected data items were statistically analyzed.ResultsThetotal number of medical records (data rows) that met the criteria was 6 116. Spearman correlation text showed a negative correlation between operative duration and years (rs=–0.433, P<0.001). In anatomy, pelvis, obesity, adhesion, mesentery, and hypertrophy, the most cases were “normal or basically normal”, and the percentages were 32.55%, 44.52%, 48.68%, 55.79%, 53.36%, and 57.72%, respectively. In quality of intestinal, the highest proportion was “bad” (43.25%). In risk of death, risk of tissue injury, and tumor recurrence, the most cases were “very small”, and the percentages were 69.00%, 94.41%, and 68.21%, respectively. In tumor metastasis, risk of anastomotic leakage, difficulty of operation, prognosis, and quality of operation, the highest proportion were “small” (48.58%), “average” (49.25%), “average” (32.96%), “uncertain” (45.65%), and “very good” (39.85%).ConclusionsIn the DACCA, the intestinal quality is characteristic of difficulty in operation, and in the evaluation of operation quality, the judgment of anastomotic leakage deserves much more attention. However, the relationship between the difficulty of operation and postoperative effects, and the relationship between the quality of operation and the prognosis still need to be further studied.
ObjectiveTo describe the difficulties and quality evaluation of colorectal cancer surgical procedures in the West China Colorectal Cancer Database (DACCA).MethodWe used the form of text description.ResultsThe related content modules of DACCA operation in West China Hospital, included operator, operative duration, anatomy (anatomical difficulty), pelvis (pelvic stenosis), obesity (abdominal obesity), adhesion (adhesion in surgical area), mesentery (abnormal mesenteric status), hypertrophy (tissue hypertrophy or organ hypertrophy), intestinal quality, death (risk of death), injury (risk of tissue injury), recurrence (tumor recurrence), metastasis (tumor metastasis), anastomotic leakage (risk of anastomotic leakage), difficulty of operation, prognosis, and quality of operation, were elaborated. Then the surgical characteristics were detailed for their definition, label, structure, error correction, and update.ConclusionThrough detailed description and specification of surgical difficulties and quality evaluation of colorectal cancer in DACCA in West China Hospital, it can provide a reference for standardized treatment of colorectal cancer and also provide experiences for the peers who wish to build a colorectal cancer database.
