Objective To explore the current status of nutritional literacy in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients and analyze its influencing factors. Methods MHD patients in Wenjiang Hemodialysis Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University between January and April 2022 were selected by convenient sampling method. A questionnaire survey was conducted using the Nutrition Literacy Evaluation Scale for end-stage renal disease dialysis patients, and the current status and influencing factors of nutritional literacy in MHD patients were analyzed. Results A total of 214 patients were included, with an average nutritional literacy score of 19.14±5.78 for MHD patients. Among them, there were 60 cases (28.04%) of highly likely low nutritional literacy, 124 cases (57.94%) of moderate nutritional literacy, and 30 cases (14.02%) of highly likely high nutritional literacy. The correlation test results showed that hemoglobin, albumin, cholesterol, triglyceride, calcium, phosphorus, potassium, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and nutritional literacy scores were not correlated. The results of multiple linear stepwise regression analysis showed that education level [non-standardized partial regression coefficient (b)=1.821, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.143, 2.498), P<0.001], age [b=?2.460, 95%CI (?4.247, ?0.672), P=0.007], hypertensive kidney damage [b=2.233, 95%CI (0.428, 4.039), P=0.016] were all factors affecting the nutritional literacy of MHD patients. Conclusions In clinical work, more attention should be paid to MHD patients with low educational level, older age, and more primary diseases. And targeted interventions should be adopted to improve the level of nutritional literacy in order to improve the quality of life of MHD patients.
ObjectiveTo understand the impact of preoperative nutritional status on the postoperative complications for patients with low/ultra-low rectal cancer undergoing extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy. MethodsThe patients with low/ultra-low rectal cancer who underwent extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy from January 2009 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected using the Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA), and then who were assigned into a nutritional risk group (the score was low than 3 by the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002) and non-nutritional risk group (the score was 3 or more by the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002). The postoperative complications and survival were analyzed for the patients with or without nutritional risk. The postoperative complications were defined as early-term (complications occurring within 30 d after surgery), middle-term (complications occurring during 30–180 d after surgery), and long-term (complications occurring at 180 d and more after surgery). The survival indicators included overall survival and disease-specific survival. ResultsA total of 680 patients who met the inclusion criteria for this study were retrieved from the DACCA database. Among them, there were 500 (73.5%) patients without nutritional risk and 180 (26.5%) patients with nutritional risk. The postoperative follow-up time was 0–152 months (with average 48.9 months). Five hundreds and forty-three survived, including 471 (86.7%) patients with free-tumors survival and 72 (13.3%) patients with tumors survival. There were 137 deaths, including 122 (89.1%) patients with cancer related deaths and 15 (10.9%) patients with non-cancer related deaths. There were 48 (7.1%) cases of early-term postoperative complications, 51 (7.5%) cases of middle-term complications, and 17 (2.5%) cases of long-term complications. There were no statistical differences in the incidence of overall complications between the patients with and without nutritional risk (χ2=3.749, P=0.053; χ2=2.205, P=0.138; χ2=310, P=0.578). The specific complications at different stages after surgery (excluding the anastomotic leakage complications in the patients with nutritional risk was higher in patients without nutritional risk, P=0.034) had no statistical differences between the two groups (P>0.05). The survival curves (overall survival and disease-specific survival) using the Kaplan-Meier method had no statistical differences between the patients with and without nutritional risk (χ2=3.316, P=0.069; χ2=3.712, P=0.054). ConclusionsFrom the analysis results of this study, for the rectal cancer patients who underwent extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy, the patients with preoperative nutritional risk are more prone to anastomotic leakage within 30 d after surgery. Although other postoperative complications and long-term survival outcomes have no statistical differences between patients with and without nutritional risk, preoperative nutritional management for them cannot be ignored.
Objective
To investigate the correlation between nutrition related blood biochemical indexes levels and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) in preoperative nutritional assessment of patients with gastric cancer.
Methods
One hundred and seventeen gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery were enrolled in this study by the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of West China Hospital. Nutritional status of each patient was evaluated by PG-SGA, in the meantime, nutrition related blood biochemical indexes levels such as transferrin (TRF), prealbumin (PA), albumin (Alb), and hemoglobin (HGB) were measured by analysis of fasting venous blood, then take correlation analysis on the result.
Results
Eighty cases (68.4%) were in malnutrition (PG-SGA score≥4). The TRF, PA, Alb, and HGB in malnutrition patients were lower than those in non-malnutrition patients (PG-SGA score<4, n=37, P<0.05). The TRF, PA, Alb, and HGB levels of gastric cancer patients had significant negtive correlation with PG-SGA score, the correlation coefficients was –0.629, –0.545, –0.418, and –0.235, respectively (P<0.05). When the PG-SGA score was greater than or equal to 4 points, the optimum cutoff value for TRF, PA, Alb, and HGB was 2.31 g/L, 190.50 mg/L, 38.65 g/L, and 100.50 g/L, respectively (P<0.05).
Conclusions
The incidence of malnutrition is high in gastric cancer patients preoperatively. The TRF, PA, Alb, and HGB are significantly decreased in the patients with malnutrition, and these indicators has significant negtive correlation with PG-SGA score. The current study indicated that a gastric cancer patient might be in malnutrition when the biochemical levels are less than or equal to TRF 2.31 g/L, PA 190.50 mg/L, Alb 38.65 g/L, HGB 100.50 g/L, and sufficient attention should be paid when any of these occasions appear clinically. The combination of PG-SGA score and nutrition related blood biochemical indexes levels could provide a more accurate assessment of preoperative nutritional status, and the evidence of nutritional intervention for patients with gastric cancer.
ObjectiveBy mining data from the Database of Colorectal Cancer (DACCA) at West China Hospital of Sichuan University, this study aims to evaluate the relationship between nutritional risk screening (NRS) 2002 scores at initial diagnosis and long-term survival in patients. MethodsThe DACCA database version from November 24, 2023, was selected to compare the clinicopathological data of patients with NRS2002 scores <3 and ≥3, and to explore the impact of NRS2002 scores on survival. ResultsA total of 723 patients were screened, with 585 (80.9%) had NRS2002 scores <3 and 138 (19.1%) had NRS2002 scores ≥3. All 723 patients were followed up, with a follow-up period ranging from 1 to 78 months and a median follow-up time of 34 months. The median survival time for patients with NRS2002 scores <3 was 35 months, while it was 31 months for those with NRS scores ≥3. During the follow-up period, 589 patients (81.5%) survived, including 515 (71.2%) tumor-free survivors and 74 (10.2%) survivors with tumors. There were 134 deaths (18.5%), including 126 cancer-related deaths (17.4%) and 8 non-cancer-related deaths (1.1%). Multivariate logistic regression results showed that after controlling for 6 factors including age, radical surgery, adjuvant therapy, hypertension, differentation, and TNM staging, NRS2002 score was not a factor affecting the survival of colorectal cancer patients (RR=0.98, P=0.875). ConclusionNRS2002 score is not a predictive factor for the survival of colorectal cancer patients, possibly because although patients may have nutritional risks preoperatively, the long-term impact on survival is minimal following surgery and postoperative recovery.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effect of different enteral nutrition timing on patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy.MethodsPubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP databases were searched to collect RCTs for nutritional support in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients. The search time was established until March 1 2019. After two independent investigators conducted literature screening, data extraction, and evaluation of the risk of bias in the included studies, a meta-metabolic analysis was performed using the R 3.5.3 software gemtc package, JAGS 3.4.0, and Revman software.ResultsA total of 8 RCTs were included, for a total of 825 patients. The results of reticular meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the duration of hospitalization for patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy, between the enteral nutrition supported at different timing. The results of the ranking probability map suggested that preoperative enteral nutrition was a better option for supporting nutrition in patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy, secondly, timing to give was 24–48 hours after operation.ConclusionsAccording to the results of mesh meta-analysis and probabilistic ranking, the nutritional status of patients is corrected before surgery, and the effect of enteral nutrition is better than other nutritional support methods. Secondly, enteral nutrition should be given at 24–48 hours after operation in combination with ESPEN and ERAS recommendations.
Objective To investigate the relationship between the level of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and 28-day mortality in patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods A total of 955 patients admitted to intensive care unit after cardiopulmonary resuscitation between 2008 and 2019 were selected from the MIMIC-IV database and grouped according to the optimal cut-off value of PNI for retrospective cohort analysis. Primary outcome was defined as 28-day all-cause mortality. After adjusting for confounding factors by propensity score matching, the outcomes between high PNI and low PNI groups were compared. PNI and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score were incorporated into a Cox proportional risk model to construct a predictive model, and the predictive effect was assessed using the concordance index, the net reclassification index, and the integrated discriminant improvement. Results After propensity score matching, compared with the high PNI group, the low PNI group had lower 28-day survival (P<0.001), higher doses of vasoactive drugs used during intensive care unit stay (P<0.001), higher SOFA score (P<0.001) and higher Logistic Organ Dysfunction System score (P=0.002). The admission PNI and SOFA score had similar predictive effects on 28-day mortality, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.639 and 0.638, respectively. In addition, compared with SOFA score alone, PNI combined with SOFA score improved the predictive performance, with an area under the curve of 0.673, the concordance index increasing from 0.598 to 0.622, and the net reclassification index and the integrated discriminant improvement estimates of 0.144 (P<0.001) and 0.027 (P<0.001), respectively. Conclusions PNI can be used as a new predictor of all-cause death risk within 28 days after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. SOFA score combined with PNI can improve the prediction effect.
ObjectiveTo summary the effect of parenteral nutrition combined with enteral nutrition on patients with severe acute pancreatitis.
MethodsThe clinical data of 200 patients with severe acute pancreatitis admitted in our hospital in recent 10 years were retrospectively analyzed. Of which 88 cases were treated by traditional nutritional support therapy (traditional nutrition group), the rest of 112 cases of patients with early parenteral nutrition to later period gradually combined with enteral nutrition comprehensive nutritional support strategy (comprehensive nutrition group).
ResultsThe APACHEⅡscores and serum level of C-reactive protein (CRP) of patients in comprehensive nutrition group were significantly lower than patients in traditional nutrition group (P < 0.05), while the serum albumin level was significantly higher than that of traditional nutrition group (P < 0.05). In the incidence of complications and mortality, the average length of stay and total cost of comprehensive nutrition group were significantly lower than patients with traditional nutrition group (P < 0.05), the cure rate was significantly higher than that of traditional nutrition group (P < 0.05).
ConclusionThe combination of parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition of nutrition support model not only can shorten the duration of symptoms but also alleviate the burden of patients and reduce complications and mortality.
Sarcopenia is a syndrome associated with reduced strength, mass and function of skeletal muscles. Aging of gastric cancer patients, lack of nutritional intake, and pathological mechanisms of gastric cancer increase the likelihood of sarcopenia. Sarcopenia is associated with the development of gastric cancer and may be a risk factor for the formation of gastric cancer. Sarcopenia is closely related to the prognosis and treatment of gastric cancer. At present, the treatment of sarcopenia is still in the exploratory stage, and more research is needed to obtain better treatment plans and improve the quality of life of patients. This article reviews the research status of sarcopenia and gastric cancer in order to provide evidence for clinical research.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of rhGH on hypoalbuminemia in cirrhotic rats after partial hepatectomy. MethodsThirty rats were randomly divided into normal control group (n=6), liver cirrhosis group (LC group, n=6), liver cirrhosis and hepatectomy group (LCH group,n=6), PN (parenteral nutrition) group (n=6， given PN after hepatectomy) and rhGH+PN group (n=6,given rhGH and PN after hepatectomy). Liver function and blood glucose were measured. The expression of ALB mRNA was detected by RTPCR. Liver Ki67 immunohistochemistry was studied. ResultsCompared with PN group, serum ALP was lower; serum ALB and blood glucose were higher in rhGH+PN group. The expression of hepatic ALB mRNA was higher, and hepatic Ki67 labeling index was higher as well in this group. ConclusionrhGH can improve hypoalbuminemia after partial hepatectomy in cirrhotic rats with partial hepatectomy.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effects of enteral nutrition via stoma of jejunum or nasal-jejunum tube after Whipple procedure.
MethodsEighty-seven patients performed Whipple procedure were divided into nasaljejunum tube group(n=47)and stoma of jejunum group(n=40)according to the different enteral nutrition methods. The adverse reactions such as vomiting, abdominal distension, pharyngeal pain, and hypostatic pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, and serum glucose and electrolyte(CL-, Na+, K+)on day 1, 3, 5 after operation were compared between two groups.
ResultsCompared with the nasal-jejunum tube group, the rates of adverse reactions and hypostatic pneumonia were more lower(P < 0.05), the hospitalization expense was more less (P < 0.05) in the nasal-jejunum tube group. The rate of anastomotic leakage and hospital stay had no significant differences between the nasal-jejunum tube group and stoma of jejunum group(P > 0.05). The differences of serum glucose and electrolyte(CL-, Na+, K+)on day 1, 3, 5 after operation were not statistically significant between two groups(P > 0.05).
ConclusionsEnteral nutrition via the stoma of jejunum after Whipple procedure has some better clinical effects in reducing adverse reactions such as vomiting, abdominal distension, pharyngeal pain, hypostatic pneumonia. The hospitalization expenses are decreased. There are no obvious effects on the hospital stay, blood glucose and electrolyte concentration on day 1, 3, 5 after operation.
