Cerebral small vessel disease refers to a series of clinical, imaging, and pathological syndromes caused by various factors affecting small blood vessels in the brain. Cognitive impairment is one of the most common complications of cerebral small vessel disease. Current researches have found that cognitive impairment is related to various factors such as hypoxia. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy can achieve certain therapeutic effects by improving hypoxia. This article reviews the pathogenesis of cerebral small vessel disease, biomarkers of cerebral small vessel disease, research progress on hyperbaric oxygen therapy for cognitive impairment, and focuses on the research progress of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for mild cognitive impairment and dementia, providing more references for clinical treatment.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) in post-extubation intensive care unit (ICU) patients.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang, VIP Databases were searched for all published available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies about HFNC therapy in post-extubation ICU patients. The control group was treated with conventional oxygen therapy (COT) or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), while the experimental group was treated with HFNC. Two reviewers separately searched the articles, evaluated the quality of the literatures, extracted data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RevMan5.3 was used for meta-analysis. The main outcome measurements included reintubation rate and length of ICU stay. The secondary outcomes included ICU mortality and hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) rate.ResultsA total of 20 articles were enrolled. There were 3 583 patients enrolled, with 1 727 patients in HFNC group, and 1 856 patients in control group (841 patients with COT, and 1 015 with NIPPV). Meta-analysis showed that HFNC had a significant advantage over COT in reducing the reintubation rate of patients with postextubation (P<0.000 01), but there was no significant difference as compared with that of NIPPV (P=0.21). It was shown by pooled analysis of two subgroups that compared with COT/NIPPV, HFNC had a significant advantage in reducing reintubation rate in patients of postextubation (P<0.000 01). There was no significant difference in ICU mortality between HFNC and COT (P=0.38) or NIPPV (P=0.36). There was no significant difference in length of ICU stay between HFNC and COT (P=0.30), but there had a significant advantage in length of ICU stay between HFNC and NIPPV (P<0.000 01). It was shown by pooled analysis of two subgroups that compared with COT/NIPPV, HFNC had a significant advantage in length of ICU stay (P=0.04). There was no significant difference in HAP rate between HFNC and COT (P=0.61) or NIPPV (P=0.23).ConclusionsThere is a significant advantage to decrease reintubation rate between HFNC and COT, but there is no significant difference in ICU mortality, length of ICU stay or HAP rate. There is a significant advantage to decrease length of ICU stay between HFNC and NIPPV, but there is no significant difference in ICU mortality, reintubation rate or HAP rate.
Objective To compare the application effects of two kinds of oxygen and nebulizer inhalation devices applied to patients undergoing partial hepatectomy, with a view to providing reference for clinical selection oxygen and nebulizer inhalation modality. Methods A prospective case-control study was used to select 228 patients who required oxygen inhalation and nebulization after hepatectomy under general anesthesia in the Department of Liver Surgery of West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January to December 2022 as study subjects, and were randomly divided into two groups: grouping group (n=77) and integrating group (n=151). The traditional oxygen inhalation device and atomization device (grouping oxygen inhalation atomization device) commonly used in clinic were used in the grouping group, and the humidifying bottle and humidifying water were replaced every 24 hours. The integrating group adopts a new device (integrated oxygen atomization inhalation device) which integrates oxygen inhalation and atomization functions. The integrating group was divided into integrating group 1 (n=77) and integrating group 2 (n=74) according to the different time of changing the humidifying bottle and humidifying water. The time for replacing the humidifying bottle and humidifying water in the integrating 1 was the same as that in the grouping group. The time for replacing the humidifying bottle and humidifying water in the integrating group 2 was 48 h after used, and replace again it after 72 hours of used. Samples from different parts of the grouping group and the integrating group 1 were collected at 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h and 120 h after oxygen inhalation, respectively, for colony culture. In the integrating group 2, samples were taken for colony culture when the device was changed twice (48 h and 120 h). At the same time, the nurses’ fogging operation time and the fogging noise of the two groups were measured. The self-made patients’ satisfaction questionnaire and nurses’ questionnaire were used to investigate the satisfaction of two groups of patients and 30 medical staff respectively. Results There were no statistically significant difference in the number of bacterial colonies between the grouping group and the integrating group 1 at different time periods and between the two groups at the same time (P＞0.05). In terms of atomization performance, atomization noise in the integrating group was lower than that of the grouping group (P＜0.05), and the atomization preparation and disposal time in the integrating group were shorter than that of the grouping group (P＜0.05). The patients and nurses were more satisfied with the integrating group (P＜0.05). Conclusions There is no difference in pollution risk between the integrated oxygen atomization bottle and the grouped oxygen atomization bottle. The atomization performance and humidification performance of the integrated oxygen atomization bottle are better than that of the grouped oxygen atomization bottle. The noise generated during operation is small, the comfort of patients is high, and the operation time of nurses can be shortened and the work efficiency can be improved, which has high clinical application value.
Objective To investigate the efficacy of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) combined with topical oxygen therapy for deep II degree burn wounds, by comparing the effects of bFGF combined with topical oxygen therapy and bFGF with routine therapy. Methods From February 2004 to July 2009, 85 patients with deep II degree burn wounds (117 wounds) were enrolled and divided into 4 groups randomly according to different treatments. There was no significant difference in sex, age, disease course, wound size, and wound treatment size among 4 groups (P gt; 0.05). In group A, 18 patients (28 wounds) were treated routinely; in group B, 23 patients (30 wounds) were treated with routine methods and topical oxygen therapy; in group C, 19 patients (25 wounds) were treated with routine methods and bFGF therapy; and in group D, 25 patients (34 wounds) were treated with routine methods and bFGF/topical oxygen therapy. Topical oxygen therapy was administered to the wound for 90 minutes per day for 3 weeks. The bFGF therapy was appl ied everyday (150 U/ cm2) for 3 weeks. Results All cases were followed up 6-12 months (9 months on average). The wound heal ing times in groups A, B, C, and D were (27.3 ± 6.6), (24.2 ± 5.8), (22.2 ± 6.8), and (18.2 ± 4.8) days, respectively; showing significant difference between group A and group D (P lt; 0.05). The wound heal ing rates in groups A, B, C, and Dwere 67.8% ± 12.1%, 85.1% ± 7.5%, 89.2% ± 8.3%, and 96.1% ± 5.6%, respectively; showing significant differences between group A and groups B, C, D (P lt; 0.05). The therapic effective rates in groups A, B, C, and D were 75%, 90%, 92%, and 100%, respectively; showing significant difference between group A and group D (P lt; 0.05). The Vancouver scar scale scoring of group D 6 months after treatment was better than that of group A (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The bFGF combined with topical oxygen therapy can enhance deep II degree burn wound heal ing. Furthermore, the therapy method is simple and convenient.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the clinical efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as adjunctive treatment for diabetic foot ulcers.
MethodsSuch databases as The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2014), PubMed, EMbase, CBM, VIP, CNKI and WanFang Data were searched up to January 2014 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about hyperbaric oxygen therapy as adjunctive treatment for diabetic foot ulcers. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software.
ResultsFourteen RCTs involving 910 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, hyperbaric oxygen therapy combined with routine therapy was superior to routine therapy alone regarding ulcer healing rates (RR=2.16, 95%CI 1.43 to 3.26, P=0.000 3), incidence of major amputation (RR=0.20, 95%CI 0.10 to 0.38, P < 0.000 01), reduction of ulcer area (MD=1.73, 95%CI 1.34 to 2.11, P < 0.000 01), and improvement of transcutaneous oxygen tension (MD=14.75, 95%CI 2.01 to 27.48, P=0.02). However, no significant difference was found between the two group in minor amputation rates (RR=0.70, 95%CI 0.24 to 2.11, P=0.53). In addition, neither relevant serious adverse reaction nor complications were reported when using hyperbaric oxygen therapy as adjunctive treatment.
ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that hyperbaric oxygen therapy as adjunctive treatment could improve ulcer healing and reduce incidence of major amputation.
ObjectiveTo compare the therapeutic effects of invasive-high-flow oxygen therapy (HFNC) and invasive-non-invasive ventilation (NIV) sequential strategies on severe respiratory failure caused by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and explore the feasibility of HFNC after extubation from invasive ventilation for COPD patients with severe respiratory failure.MethodsFrom October 2017 to October 2019, COPD patients with type Ⅱ respiratory failure who received invasive ventilation were randomly assigned to a HFNC group and a NIV group at 1: 1 in intensive care unit (ICU), when pulmonary infection control window appeared after treatments. The patients in the HFNC group received HFNC, while the patients in the NIV group received NIV after extubation. The primary endpoint was treatment failure rate. The secondary endpoints were blood gas analysis and vital signs at 1 hour, 24 hours, and 48 hours after extubation, total respiratory support time after extubation, daily airway care interventions, comfort scores, and incidence of nasal and facial skin lesions, ICU length of stay, total length of stay and 28-day mortality after extubation.ResultsOne hundred and twelve patients were randomly assigned to the HFNC group and the NIV group. After secondary exclusion, 53 patients and 52 patients in the HFNC group and the NIV group were included in the analysis respectively. The treatment failure rate in the HFNC group was 22.6%, which was lower than the 28.8% in the NIV group. The risk difference of the failure rate between the two groups was –6.2% (95%CI –22.47 - 10.43, P=0.509), which was significantly lower than the non-inferior effect of 9%. Analysis of the causes of treatment failure showed that treatment intolerance in the HFNC group was significantly lower than that in the NIV group, with a risk difference of –38.4% (95%CI –62.5 - –3.6, P=0.043). One hour after extubation, the respiratory rate of both groups increased higher than the baseline level before extubation (P<0.05). 24 hours after extubation, the respiratory rate in the HFNC group decreased to the baseline level, but the respiratory rate in the NIV group was still higher than the baseline level, and the respiratory rate in the HFNC group was lower than that in the NIV group [(19.1±3.8) vs. (21.7±4.5) times per minute, P<0.05]. 48 hours after extubation, the respiratory rates in the two groups were not significantly different from their baseline levels. The average daily airway care intervention in the NIV group was 9 (5 - 12) times, which was significantly higher than the 5 (4 - 7) times in the HFNC group (P=0.006). The comfort score of the HFNC group was significantly higher than that of the NIV group (8.6±3.2 vs. 5.7±2.8, P= 0.022), while the incidence of nasal and facial skin lesions in the HFNC group was significantly lower than that in the NIV group (0 vs. 9.6%, P=0.027). There was no significant difference in dyspnea score, length of stay and 28-day mortality between the two groups.ConclusionsThe efficacy of invasive-HFNC sequential treatment on COPD with severe respiratory failure is not inferior to that of invasive-NIV sequential strategy. The two groups have similar treatment failure rates, and HFNC has better comfort and treatment tolerance.
Objective To compare the sequential efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) with non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV). Methods Randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of NIV sequential invasive mechanical ventilation with HFNC were included in the Chinese Journal Full-text Database, VIP Journal database, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.4 software. Results A total of 2404 subjects were included in 19 studies. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with NIV, HFNC had a statistically significant difference in reducing patients' re-intubation rate in invasive mechanical ventilation sequence [relative risk (RR)=0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50 - 0.86, Z=3.10, P=0.002]. HFNC showed statistically significant difference compared with NIV in reducing lung infection rate (RR=0.40, 95%CI 0.21 - 0.79, Z=2.67, P=0.008). HFNC was significantly different from NIV in terms of length of stay in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (MD=–5.77, 95%CI –7.64 - –3.90, Z=6.05, P<0.00001). HFNC was significantly different from NIV in improving 24 h oxygenation index (MD=13.16, 95%CI 8.77 - 17.55, Z=5.87, P<0.00001). There was no significant difference in ICU mortality between HFNC and NIV (RR=0.70, 95%CI 0.45 - 1.08, Z=1.61, P=0.11). Conclusion Compared with NIV, sequential application of HFNC in invasive mechanical ventilation can improve the reintubation rate and pulmonary infection rate to a certain extent, reduce the length of ICU stay and improve the 24 h oxygenation index, while there is no difference in ICU mortality, which is worthy of clinical application.
ObjectiveTo observe the changes of central visual acuity and extracentral visual acuity in eyes with non-arteritic central retinal artery occlusion (NA-CRAO). MethodsA retrospective clinical study. From January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2024, 140 patients (140 eyes) diagnosed with NA-CRAO through ophthalmic examination at Department of Ophthalmology of First People's Hospital of Xianyang City were included in the study. All affected eyes underwent best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual field, intraocular pressure, fundus color photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiography (FFA) examinations. After a clear diagnosis, conservative treatment such as reducing intraocular pressure, relieving spasms, and dilating blood vessels should be given immediately. Simultaneously, intravenous and/or arterial thrombolysis therapy should be administered based on the patient's overall condition. Under the same treatment conditions as other treatments, 33 eyes were treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy within 24 hours after seeking medical attention. The changes in central visual acuity (BCVA) and peripheral visual acuity of the affected eye one month after treatment were observed. BCVA improvement of ≥ 1 line was defined as the increase of no light sensitivity to light sensitivity or above, and the increase of light sensitivity to 0.01 or above. The visual acuity outside the center was determined by the 0 ° axis in front of the eyeball at eye level, and was 10 ° outside visual acuity on the temporal side. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression analysis. ResultsAmong the 140 cases (140 eyes), there were 84 males (84 eyes) and 56 females (56 eyes). The mean age was (63.89±10.78) years. The duration of illness from the onset of symptoms to the time of diagnosis was 48 (2-720) hours. 6, 1, 14, 47, 41, 16, and 15 eyes were diagnosed with BCVA without light perception, uncertain light perception, manual/anterior, digital/anterior, 0.01-0.10, and ≥ 0.10, respectively. FFA examination revealed delayed arm retinal circulation time and filling of the retinal artery trunk to the peak, with changes in the "arterial front" observed in 126 eyes. OCT examination showed extensive edema and unclear structure in the inner layer of the retina in all patients. Out of 140 eyes, 122 were treated with intravenous thrombolysis and 4 with arterial thrombolysis; 14 eyes did not receive thrombolytic therapy. After treatment, 38 eyes (27.1%) showed an improvement of BCVA ≥ 1; 67 eyes (47.9%) did not show an improvement in BCVA, and the affected eye had a BCVA of approximately 0.6 without light perception; 17 eyes (12.1%) showed improvement in peripheral vision, and the peripheral vision of the affected eyes ranged from 0.01 to 0.1, all of whom were patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis, and prior to treatment, this group of patients had complete blindness in the coarse side visual field of the Amsler grid, and their out of center visual acuity could not be measured. Among the 33 eyes treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy, 24 eyes (72.7%) showed an increase in BCVA after treatment; 9 eyes did not improve, among which 4 eyes (12.1%) showed improvement in out of center visual acuity. Among the 107 eyes that did not receive hyperbaric oxygen therapy, 49 eyes (45.8%) showed an increase in BCVA after treatment. There was no improvement in 58 eyes (54.2%), among which 13 eyes (12.1%) showed an improvement in out of center visual acuity. The results of logistic regression analysis showed that intravenous thrombolysis and hyperbaric oxygen therapy were independent predictive factors for the improvement of central and extra central visual acuity (P＜0.05). ConclusionsHyperbaric oxygen therapy within 24 hours of seeking medical attention for patients with NA-CRAO disease course ≤ 1 month has a significant effect on the recovery of central and extra central vision. Intravenous thrombolysis and hyperbaric oxygen therapy are independent predictive factors for the improvement of central and extra central vision.
Objective To explore the oxygen therapy effects of high-flow T-tube oxygen therapy on neurointensive care patients who have undergone tracheostomy and are undergoing mechanical ventilation while meeting the criteria for weaning from mechanical ventilation, especially in terms of controlling airway temperature and humidity, promoting mucus dilution, and reducing postoperative complications. MethodsCollected data from 50 neurointensive care patients who underwent tracheostomy and were on mechanical ventilation, meeting the criteria for weaning from mechanical ventilation, treated at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from September 2019 to September 2021. The three groups of patients had different weaning methods: a high-flow T-tube for weaning, a heat and moisture exchanger (artificial nose) for weaning, and a high-flow tracheal joint for weaning. The vital signs, dyspnea and blood gas analysis before and three days after weaning were collected. The primary outcomes were mechanical sputum excretion, postural drainage, phlegm-resolving drugs use, airway-related events (artificial airway blockage, artificial nose blockage, lung infection), stay in ICU (days), and death in ICU. Results Among the 50 patients, 28 were males and 22 were females. There were no significant differences in age, weight, height, gender, finger pulse oxygen saturation, heart rate, APACHEII score, sequential organ failure assessment, or Glasgow coma scale among the three groups (P>0.05). There was no statistical difference in the number of 72-hour mechanical sputum excretion or the use of phlegm-resolving drugs in the three groups (P=0.113, P=1.00). Conclusion The use of high-flow T-tube oxygen therapy in neurointensive care patients who have undergone tracheostomy, are on mechanical ventilation, and meet the criteria for weaning from mechanical ventilation can effectively control airway temperature and humidity, promote mucus dilution for better drainage, thereby reducing post-tracheostomy complications.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) in Post-extubation acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients. MethodsThe Domestic and foreign databases were searched for all published available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about HFNC therapy in post-extubation AECOPD patients. The experimental group was treated with HFNC, while the control group was treated with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). The main outcome measurements included reintubation rate. The secondary outcomes measurements included oxygenation index after extubation, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, mortality, comfort score and adverse reaction rate. Meta-analysis was performed by Revman 5.3 software. ResultA total of 20 articles were enrolled. There were 1516 patients enrolled, with 754 patients in HFNC group, and 762 patients in control group. The results of Meta-analysis showed that there were no significant difference in reintubation rate [RR=1.41, 95%CI 0.97 - 2.07, P=0.08] and mortality [RR=0.91, 95%CI 0.58 - 1.44, P=0.69]. Compared with NIPPV, HFNC have advantages in 24 h oxygenation index after extubation [MD=4.66, 95%CI 0.26 - 9.05, P=0.04], length of ICU stay [High risk group: SMD –0.52, 95%CI –0.74 - –0.30; Medium and low risk group: MD –1.12, 95%CI –1.56- –0.67; P<0.00001], comfort score [MD=1.90, 95%CI 1.61 - 2.19, P<0.00001] and adverse reaction rate [RR=0.22, 95%CI 0.16 - 0.31, P<0.00001]. ConclusionsCompared with NIPPV, HFNC could improve oxygenation index after extubation, shorten the length of ICU stay, effectively improve Patient comfort, reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions and it did not increase the risk of reintubation and mortality. It is suggested that HFNC can be cautiously tried for sequential treatment of AECOPD patients after extubation, especially those who cannot tolerate NIPPV.
