Objective
To investigate the clinical value of " O”continuous biliary-enteric anastomosis combined with percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
Methods
The clinical data of 35 patients with PD who were admitted to Xinyang Central Hospital from June 2015 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.
Results
All patients completed the " O” continuous biliary-enteric anastomosis combined with PTCD without perioperative death. ① The preoperative indwelling time of PTCD tube was (13.24±3.39) d, total bilirubin (TBIL) was (363.67±12.26) μmol/L on admission and (155.59±17.63) μmol/L on preoperative after PTCD, respectively. ② The operative time was (231.46±18.69) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (158.30±31.33) mL, the diameter of the hepatic ductal segment was (1.3±0.2) cm, and the duration of the " O” continuous biliary-enteric anastomosis was (7.31±1.52) min. ③ After surgery, the indwelling time of PTCD tube was (8.13±1.49) d, the hospitalization time was (27.31±5.49) d. Biliary leakage occurred in 1 case, pancreatic fistula occurred in 5 cases (3 cases of biochemical sputum and 2 cases of B-stage pancreatic fistula), abdominal infection occurred in 2 cases, pneumonia occurred in 3 cases, wound infection occurred in 2 cases. No postoperative biliary-enteric anastomosis stenosis, biliary tract infection, and intra-abdominal hemorrhage occurred. There was no laparotomy patients in this group and all patients were discharged. ④ All patients were followed-up for 180 days after surgery. No death, bile leakage, biliary-enteric anastomotic stenosis, biliary tract infection, pancreatic fistula, gastro-intestinal leakage, and abdominal infection occurred. One case of delayed gastric emptying and 2 cases of alkaline reflux gastritis were cured after outpatient treatment.
Conclusions
The preoperative PTCD can improve the preoperative liver function and increase the security of PD. " O” continuous biliary-enteric anastomosis is simple, safe, feasible, and has the function of preventing biliary-enteric anastomosis stenosis. For severe jaundice patients with blood TBIL >170 μmol/L, the " O” continuous biliary-enteric anastomosis combined with PTCD is an alternative surgical procedure for PD.
ObjectiveTo explore the prognostic factors of malignant tumors in ampulla, lower bile duct, head of pancreas, uncinate process, and neck of pancreas after operation.MethodThe recent literatures on malignant tumors in this region at home and abroad were summarized.ResultsThe prognosis of five groups of malignant tumors in ampulla, lower bile duct, head of pancreas, uncinate process, and neck of pancreas was correlated with their origin, growth site, tumor diameter, nerve invasion, vascular invasion, lymphatic metastasis, pathological and histological classification, and cutting edge status. The different location and pathological classification of tumors made the different neurovascular invasion rate, lymphatic metastasis rate, and R0 resection rate.ConclusionsBy summarizing and analyzing the origin, growth site, diameter, nerve invasion, vascular invasion, lymphatic metastasis, pathological and histological classification, and cutting edge status of tumors, we can improve the clinical prediction of tumors in this region, select appropriate surgical methods before operation, and formulate more reasonable adjuvant treatment plan after operation, in order to improve the pertinence of the treatment of tumors in this region, improve the prediction, and finally better serve the clinical work.
Objective To investigate the application effect of LEER (less pain, early move, early eat, and reassuring) mode in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). Methods The clinical data of patients who underwent LPD in our hospital from March 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Forty patients treated with the traditional mode during the perioperative period were classified as the traditional group, and 47 patients treated with the LEER mode were classified as the LEER group. The perioperative indicators, inflammatory stress indicators, immune indicators, nutritional indicators and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results The visual analogue scale (VAS) score and hospitalization cost of the LEER group were lower than those of the traditional group (P<0.05). The postoperative ambulation time, anal exhaust/defecation time, drainage tube removal time, time to normal diet and hospital stay in the LEER group were shorter than those of the traditional group (P<0.05). Compared with preoperative, the WBC count and C-reactive protein (CRP) level of patients in the two groups increased after operation, but the changes of WBC count and CRP level in the LEER group were smaller than those in the traditional group (P<0.05). The IgA, IgM and IgG levels of patients in the two groups were not statistically different before and after operation (P>0.05), and the postoperative IgA, IgM and IgG of patients in the LEER group were higher than those in the traditional group (P<0.05). The change values of IgM and IgG in the LEER group were smaller than those of the traditional group (P<0.05), but there was no statistical difference in the change value of IgA between the two groups before and after operation (P>0.05). Compared with preoperative value, postoperative prealbumin (PA) and lymphocyte (LYM) levels in the two groups were decreased (P<0.05). The postoperative PA and LYM levels in the LEER group were higher than those in the traditional group (P<0.05). but the change value of PA before and after operation in the LEER group was smaller than that in the traditional group (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the change of LYM between the two groups before and after operation (P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the LEER group was 8.5% (4/47), and that in the traditional group was 35.0% (14/40). The incidence of postoperative complication in the LEER group was significantly lower than that in the traditional group (P=0.002). Conclusion Applying LEER mode in LPD can promote postoperative recovery of the patients, reduce postoperative stress response, improve nutritional status and protect immunity in the patients.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effect of different enteral nutrition timing on patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy.MethodsPubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP databases were searched to collect RCTs for nutritional support in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients. The search time was established until March 1 2019. After two independent investigators conducted literature screening, data extraction, and evaluation of the risk of bias in the included studies, a meta-metabolic analysis was performed using the R 3.5.3 software gemtc package, JAGS 3.4.0, and Revman software.ResultsA total of 8 RCTs were included, for a total of 825 patients. The results of reticular meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the duration of hospitalization for patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy, between the enteral nutrition supported at different timing. The results of the ranking probability map suggested that preoperative enteral nutrition was a better option for supporting nutrition in patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy, secondly, timing to give was 24–48 hours after operation.ConclusionsAccording to the results of mesh meta-analysis and probabilistic ranking, the nutritional status of patients is corrected before surgery, and the effect of enteral nutrition is better than other nutritional support methods. Secondly, enteral nutrition should be given at 24–48 hours after operation in combination with ESPEN and ERAS recommendations.
ObjectiveTo investigate the application of imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy in pure laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
MethodsEighty-five cases of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital from May 2014 to December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. According with inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, 78 cases were investigated. They were divided into pancreatic duct-to-jejunum mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy group as controlled group (n=42) and imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy (technique of duct-to-mucosa PJ with transpancreatic interlocking mattress sutures) group as modified group (n=36). The rates of pancreatic fistula, abdominal infection/abscess, bile leakage, delayed gastric emptying, gastrointestinal/intraabdominal hemorrhage, pulmonary infection, and incision infection were investigated as well as hospital stays and pancreaticojejunostomy time in two groups were compared.
ResultsThe rate of pancreatic fistula especially B to C grade pancreatic fistula in the modified group was obviously lower compared with which in the controlled group (8.3% vs. 31.0%, P < 0.05), pancreaticojejunostomy time ofmodified group was significantly shortened [(35.6±12.4) min vs. (52.8±24.6) min, P < 0.05] and total operative time also shortened [(322.4±23.6) min vs. (384.2±30.2) min, P < 0.05). There were no significant difference of the rates of abdominal infection/abscess, bile leakage, delayed gastric emptying, gastrointestinal/intraabdominal hemorrhage, pulmonary infection, ?incision infection, and hospital stays (P > 0.05)]. Conciusions The type of pancreaticojejunostomy has a significant impact on the rate of pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy can decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after operation, and shorten the pancreaticojejunostomy time and total operative time.
ObjectiveTo compare the short- and long-term efficacy of artery-first approach pancreatico-duodenectomy (AF-PD) and standard approach pancreaticoduodenectomy (S-PD).MethodsThe PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, WanFang, and CNKI databases were searched, relevant literatures were included, and relevant data were extracted for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 30 articles were included, including 2 750 cases underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. The results of meta-analysis showed that in terms of short-term efficacy when compared with S-PD group, the AF-PD group had less intraoperative blood loss (WMD=–175.87, P<0.001), lower intraoperative blood transfusion rate (OR=0.36, P=0.002), higher R0 resection rate (OR=1.83, P<0.001), lower postoperative pancreatic leakage rate (OR=0.71, P=0.005), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (WMD=–2.69, P=0.007). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the operation time and overall postoperative complication rate between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of long-term efficacy when compared with S-PD group, the AF-PD group had lower tumor local recurrence rate (OR=0.43, P=0.004) and tumor liver metastasis rate (OR=0.60, P=0.010), but had higher 1-year (OR=1.95, P=0.007), 2-year (OR=2.04, P<0.001), 3-year (OR=2.09, P=0.001), and 5-year (OR=2.06, P=0.003) overall survival rates, and there were no significant differences in the rates of lung metastasis and peritoneal metastasis between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsAF-PD is better than S-PD in some short-term and long-term outcome indicators such as R0 resection rate, pancreatic leakage rate, overall survival rate, and so on. However, due to the limited quality of the included literatures, more high-quality studies are still needed to verify in the future.
ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility and application value of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in elderly patients.MethodsThe clinical data of patients who underwent LPD from August 2016 to July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were allocated into the elderly group (≥65 years old) and non-elderly group (<65 years old). The early surgical outcomes and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared.ResultsIn this study, 69 cases of LPD were collected, including 42 cases in the elderly group and 27 cases in the non-elderly group. Compared with the non-elderly group, the proportion of patients complicated comorbidities was higher (P<0.05), albumin level was lower (P<0.05), and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification was higher (P<0.05) in the elderly group. There were no significant differences in the intraoperative conditions, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05), and there were no significant differences in the pathological results of postoperative malignant tumor between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsFor elderly patients with over 65 years old, LPD is a safe and feasible surgical procedure for clinical practice. Meanwhile, early surgical outcomes are satisfactory, postoperative complications are not increased, and tumor cure effect can be achieved.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of transecting the body of pancreas via inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) pathway during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with venous resection. MethodsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, from February 1, 2016 to January 1, 2021, the patients who underwent PD with portal vein / superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma were gathered. According to whether the traditional approach could be adopted to create a tunnel in front of the PV/SMV axis, the patients were allocated to the standard procedure group (S-group) or a modified procedure group (M-group). In the M-group, the patients who transected the pancreatic body via IMV pathway were allocated to the IMV-subgroup, while the patients who transected the pancreatic body via the left side of PV or in the middle of the pancreas were allocated to the central subgroup (C-subgroup). The clinicopathologic characteristics and survival (overall survival) were compared between the M-group and S-group, as well as between the IMV-subgroup and C-subgroup. The survival curve was drawn using Kaplan-Meier method for survival analysis, and the risk factors affecting overall survival by Cox proportional hazards regression model. ResultsA total of 142 patients were gathered, including 77 in the S-group, 65 in the M-group, 29 in the IMV-subgroup and 36 in the C-subgroup. The results of clinicopathologic data of patients among the different groups showed that the M-group had a more intraoperative bleeding (P＜0.001), longer postoperative hospital stay (P=0.021), and a proportion of vascular invasion (P=0.017), as well as the IMV-subgroup only had a higher proportion of vascular invasion (P=0.030) as compared with the S-group; At the same time, compared with the C-subgroup, the IMV-subgroup had a less intraoperative bleeding volume (P＜0.001) and a higher proportion of R0 resection (P=0.031). There were no statistically differences in other clinicopathologic data among the groups (P＞0.05). The analysis of survival curve by Kaplan-Meier method showed that the median overall survival (OS) of IMV-subgroup, C-subgroup, and S-group was 21, 17, and 22 months, respectively. The OS of IMV-subgroup was better than that of the C-subgroup (χ2=4.676, P=0.031), which had no statistical difference between the IMV-subgroup and S-group ( χ2=0.007, P=0.934). The multivariate analysis results showed that the patients with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy [RR=0.519, 95%CI (0.324, 0.833), P=0.007] and with R0 margin [RR=0.434, 95%CI (0.218, 0.865), P=0.018] were the protective factors affecting the OS, while low tumor differentiation [RR=2.433, 95%CI (1.587, 3.730), P<0.001], PV/SMV pathological invasion [RR=2.788, 95%CI (1.543, 5.039), P=0.001], and tumor infiltration into PV/SMV intima [RR=1.838, 95%CI (1.062, 3.181), P=0.030] were the risk factors affecting the OS. ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that, transecting the body of pancreas via IMV pathway can improve the rate of R0 resection, improve OS, and do not increase postoperative morbidity and mortality. It may provide a better selection for transecting the body of pancreas when the anterior PV/SMV and posterior surface of the neck of the pancreas are invaded by tumors or has inflammatory adhesion.
ObjectiveTo investigate how to shorten the learning curve of the laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).
MethodsClinical data of 5 patients who underwent the LPD in our hospital from May 2015 to November 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.
ResultsThe mean age of 58.8 years old. There were four patients who were diagnosed with periampullary tumor, one patient was distal bile duct carcinoma. The median operative time was 588 min, the average blood loss was 290 mL, the time of feeding was 5 days, the mean hospital stay was 25 days. One case died of cardiovascular event on postoperative day 1. One patient had postoperative bleeding after LPD, who recovered smoothly after reoperation for hemostasis laparoscopiclly. Conciusions LPD needs basic learning curve. The key of this procedure are appropriate treatment of pancreatic head and digestive tract reconstruction. Rich operative experience of surgeon in pancreaticoduodenectomy, optimization of the operation process, skilled in laparoscopic procedures, appropriate cases, appropriate perioperative management, and steady surgical team are also important factor for the success of LPD and shorten learning curve.
ObjectiveThis meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the feasibility and the safety of total laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (TLPD) by comparing it with open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD).MethodsWe searched the relative domestic and international data bases systematically, such as the Cochrane Library, Medline Database, SCI, CBM, VIP-data, CNKI-data, and WanFang Data. We selected case control studies or cohort studies, and used the Review Manager 5.3 to perform statistical analysis.ResultsIn total, thirteen single-center retrospective case-control studies were included, totally 808 patients involved, and there were 401 cases in the TLPD group and 407 cases in the OPD group. There were no significant difference in terms of the cumulative morbidity, incidence of the Clavien Ⅲ-Ⅴ complication, pancreatic fistula, B/C pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, postoperative hemorrhage, pulmonary infection, and gastric emptying delay, as well as the ratio of secondary operation, mortality of perioperative period, the ration of R0 resection, and the number of lymph nodes dissected between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Although the operative time was significant longer, TLPD had significant superiority in terms of the amount of bleeding and blood transfusion during operation, the hospital stays after operation, the bowel function recovery time, the time to restart eating, and the time to reactivate (P<0.05).ConclusionIn terms of the relative complications and the parameters of oncology such as the ration of R0 resection, the number of lymph nodes dissected, both of the procedures are safe and feasible, while TLPD is more favorable to control operative bleeding and accelerate rehabilitation.
