This article discusses the concret implementation of day surgery in Ophthalmology Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University during the coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic and under the regular prevention and control, so as to provide a basis for ensuring the safety and effectiveness of clinical work in the special period. According to the requirements of health administration departments and the hospital for the prevention and control of epidemic, combining with the characteristics of concret work, the Ophthalmology Center carried out and accurately implemented a series of prevention and control management measures, and obtained good results in the clinical work on the basis of comprehensive security protection. From February to October, 2020, there were a total of 16 507 cases who underwent the day surgery in the Ophthalmology Center, with no surgical infection or suspected case of coronavirus disease 2019. The safety and quality management of epidemic prevention and control has played an active and effective role in the active development of day surgery in this center. The safe and optimized diagnosis and treatment process has reassured the patients and their families, and the strict implementation of protective measures by medical staff has ensured the safety of surgery and the work being proceed with smooth progress and high efficacy.
ObjectiveTo study the effects of PDCA cycle in the control of surgical site infection (SSI).
MethodsA total of 1 761 surgeries between January 2012 and December 2013 were chosen to be monitored. PDCA cycle was used as a tool of total quality management evaluation to enhance the control of SSI.
ResultsAfter 2 to 4 cycles of PDCA, the preventive medication rate of ClassⅠ operation incision was decreased significantly (χ2=309.513，P<0.001) and the postoperative incision infection rate did not change significantly (χ2=1.474，P=0.669).
ConclusionUsing PDCA cycle can increase SSI management level and quality significantly and total quality management can be operated effectively.
Objective To assess the operational and quality management status of outpatient multi-disciplinarytreatment (MDT) services in tertiary hospitals nationwide, identify core quality indicators and key influencing factors for their development. Methods A multicenter cross-sectional survey was conducted from November to December 2024 among tertiary medical institutions nationwide that had implemented outpatient MDT services. The entropy weight method was employed to calculate the weights of outpatient MDT quality indicators, objectively determining their importance ranking. Meanwhile, a 10-point Likert scale was used to systematically evaluate internal and external factors influencing the development of outpatient MDT services. Results A total of 521 hospitals were surveyed. Among them, there were 458 tertiary hospitals (87.9%) and 63 tertiary hospitals (12.1%). Gaps remain in key aspects of outpatient MDT quality management: 295 institutions (56.6%) lacked clear inclusion criteria for MDT case discussions; 159 (30.5%) had not implemented an electronic medical record system for outpatient MDT; and 130 (25.0%) had not established an assessment mechanism for outpatient MDT. Objective weighting via the entropy weight method revealed the top three indicators by weight: “whether outpatient MDT regulations have been formulated” (27.287%), “whether a standard approval process exists for establishing an MDT” (19.079%), and “whether a team secretary is assigned” (15.433%). Analysis of influencing factors showed that among external factors, “medical insurance policies” had the most significant impact, while among internal factors, “departmental emphasis/physician awareness” was most prominent. Conclusions The core indicators of outpatient MDT quality management were screened by entropy weighting method and the key influencing factors were explored using Liszt scoring method. This provides an objective basis for healthcare administration to standardize outpatient MDT services and enhance operational quality and efficiency.
Objective To explore the effect of applying evidence-based medicine theory to quality management in long-term-system clinical medicine teaching. Methods We introduced the concept of evidence-based quality management system of clinical medicine to the delivery of teaching with Internet-based teaching quality real time supervision system as the core. A special quality scale was used to assess the teaching quality of teachers and the results were analyzed by SPSS 10.0 using u test. Results The system stored 853 280 pieces of data from the years 2001 to 2003. Up to 96.4% (275/285) of the evaluated topics scored over 85 points. Whether the teachers had overseas experience or not and whether their ages were over 45 or not had no significant influence on the teaching quality (P ＞0.05), but their degrees had influence on the teaching quality (P ＜0.05). Conclusion In long-term-system clinical medicine teaching quality management, we should apply the concept and approach of EBM to our practice so that we can ensure that the teaching quality of long-term-system clinical medicine will improve steadily.
In recent years, China’s healthcare system reform has been continuously deepening, with third-party medical laboratories gradually transitioning from a “supplementary role” to an important component of the healthcare service system. With the introduction of regulations such as the “Basic Standards and Management Specifications for Medical Laboratories”, the requirements for industry access and operational standardization have been clarified, and increasing attention has been paid to compliance issues in the medical laboratory industry. This article systematically outlines the regulatory framework for domestic third-party medical laboratories, covering key aspects such as administrative approvals, quality management, cost control, and industry supervision. It aims to provide actionable guidance for practitioners, and promote the compliant operation and service quality improvement of third-party medical laboratories.
Early identification, early diagnosis, early intervention, proper treatment, and the best benefit for patients are the most important manifestations of the ability and quality in large general hospitals. Based on the practical experience of West China Hospital of Sichuan University, we initially sorted out the basic model of multi-disciplinary treatment/multi-disciplinary team (MDT) for the management of patients with coronavirus disease 2019. This article introduces the aspects of team building, division of responsibilities, work flow exploration, MDT discussion basic norms sorting, treatment resources, supervision and coordination of main treatment measures. In the context of the epidemic, all these measures are conducive to promote stronger medical quality assurance and more reasonable resource allocation. The implementation of MDT and shared decision-making model during epidemic provide a reference for medical institutions to carry out hospital quality management, and to improve the treatment for the maximum benefit of patients.
