The optimal treatment of stage ⅢA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC） remains controversial. Resultsof primary surgery alone are not satisfied. Surgery after induction chemotherapy yields better outcomes compared to resectiononly which has been widely accepted. Randomized studies show induction chemotherapy followed by either radiotherapy or surgery have approximately equivalent survival outcomes，significant improved survival can be achieved by combined surgery in selected patients. Low-grade N2，effective response and mediastinal downstaging after induction therapy，and successful complete resection by lobectomy，are good indications of surgery. Ideal treatments are approached base on theheterogeneity of N2 . Patients with bulky or fixed N2 disease should be considered for radical chemo-radiotherapy，and surgeryshould be a part of multi-modality management for patients with non-fixed，non-bulky，single-zone N2 disease. Further randomized trials of surgery added to multi-modality management in patients with multi-zone N2 disease should be taken in order to establish possible subgroups of patients might be benefitted more from the addition of surgery.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and side effect of non-conventional fractionated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.Methods Trials were identified by searching CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Chinese Biological Medicine Database (CBMdisc) and Chinese VIP Database. We handresearched the data from 10 kinds of important Chinese journals. Two reviewers assessed and extracted the studies. The following primary outcomes were assessed: complete relief (CR), overall survival (OS), acute side effect and late side effect. Results Twenty-three trials involving 8 411 patients were included. Thirteen trials were of good quality, and the rest were of poor quality. Meta-analysis of these trials showed that: (1) non-conventional fractionated radiotherapy vs conventional fractionated radiotherapy: ① Only S-HART and CAIR resulted in higher CR, RR=1.21 (95%CI 1.02 to 1.44), 3.31 (95%CI 1.16 to 9.42), respectively; ② Only HRT could improve 2-year OS (RR=1.32, 95%CI 1.13 to 1.54), but this difference wasn’t found in 5-year follow up; ③ Most of the non-conventional fractionated radiotherapy could increase acute side effects, but not the late ones; (2) non-conventional fractionated radiotherapy combined with concurrent chemotherapy vs non-conventional fractionated radiotherapy: ① Only C-HRT resulted in higher CR (RR=1.58, 95%CI 1.18 to 2.11); ② Higher 2-year OS could be gained when combined with chemotherapy (RR=1.35, 95%CI 1.18 to 1.54), and only C-HRT resulted in higher 5-year OS (RR=1.57, 95%CI 1.19 to 2.07). ③ Acute and late side effects of radiotherapy would not increase when combined with chemotherapy. Conclusion It can not be concluded that non-conventional fractionated radiotherapy can improve the CR and OS of head and neck cancer, for a small number of patients, but it will get effect when combined with concurrent chemotherapy, and would not increase acute or late side effects. The effects of HRT and C-HRT should be cared specially.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and surgery on the clinical outcome of esophageal cancer.MethodsPubMed and EMbase databases from inception to March 2018 were retrieved by computer. A random-effect model was used for all meta-analyses irrespective of heterogeneity. The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan5.3 software. The primary outcomes were operative mortality, incidence of anastomotic leakage, and overall survival; secondary outcomes were pathologic complete remission rate, R0 resection rate, and positive resection margin rate.ResultsA total of 17 studies with 18 173 patients were included. Among them, 13 were original studies with 2 950 patients, and 4 were database-based studies with a total of 15 223 patients. The results showed a significant positive correlation between the interval and operative mortality (Spearman coefficient=0.360, P=0.027). Dose-response meta-analysis revealed that there was a relatively better time window for surgery after nCRT. Further analysis for primary outcomes at different time cut-offs found the following results: (1) when the time cut-off point within 30-70 days, the shorter interval was associated with a reduced operative mortality (7-8 weeks: RR=0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.81, P<0.05; 30-46 days: RR=0.63, 95%CI 0.47-0.85, P<0.05; 60-70 days: RR=0.64, 95%CI 0.48-0.85, P<0.05); (2) when the time cut-off point within 30-46 days, the shorter interval correlated with a reduced incidence of anastomotic leakage (RR=0.39, 95%CI 0.21-0.72, P<0.05); when the time cut-off point within 7-8 weeks, the shorter interval could achieve a critical-level effect of reducing the incidence of anastomotic leakage (RR=0.73, 95%CI 0.52-1.03, P>0.05); (3) when the time cut-off point within 7-8 weeks, increased interval significantly was associated with the poor overall survival (HR=1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36, P<0.05). Secondary outcomes found that the shorter interval could significantly reduce the positive resection margin rate (RR=0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.75, P<0.05) when time cut-off point within 56-60 days.ConclusionShortening the interval between nCRT and surgery can reduce the operative mortality, the incidence of anastomotic leakage, long-term mortality risk, and positive resection margin rate. It is recommended that surgery should be performed as soon as possible after the patient's physical recovery, preferably no more than 7-8 weeks, which supports the current study recommendation (within 3-8 weeks after nCRT).
Objective To investigate the effect of radiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and modified radical surgery on breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) of patients with stage cT1–2N1M0 breast cancer. Methods A total of 917 cT1–2N1M0 stage breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and modified radical surgery from 2010 to 2017 were extracted from the The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Of them 720 matched patients were divided into radiotherapy group (n=360) and non-radiotherapy group (n=360) by using propensity score matching (PSM). Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to explore the factors affecting BCSS. Results Patients were all interviewed for a median follow-up of 65 months, and the 5-year BCSS was 91.9% in the radiotherapy group and 93.2% in the non-radiotherapy group, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (χ2=0.292, P=0.589). The results were the same in patients with no axillary lymph node metastasis, one axillary lymphnode metastasis, two axillary lymph node metastasis and 3 axillary lymph node metastasis group (χ2=0.139, P=0.709; χ2=0.578, P=0.447; χ2=2.617, P=0.106; χ2=0.062, P=0.803). The result of Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that, after controlling for Grade grade, time from diagnosis to treatment, efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, number of positive axillary lymph nodes, molecular typing, and tumor diameter at first diagnosis, radiotherapy had no statistically significant effect on BCSS [HR=1.048, 95%CI (0.704, 1.561), P=0.817]. Conclusions The effect of radiotherapy on the BCSS of patients with stage cT1–2N1M0 breast cancer who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and modified radical surgery with 0 to 3 axillary lymph nodes metastases is limited, but whether to undergo radiotherapy should still be determined according to the comprehensive risk of individual tumor patients.
Objective To explore the safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with sphincter-preserving operation in treatment of locally advanced low rectal cancer. Methods The clinical data of thirty-four patients admitted into our hospital between June 2007 and June 2009 with T3 and T4 low rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and sphincter-preserving operation were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Routine fraction of radiation was given with total dose of 40 Gy, five times a week, 2 Gy per fraction. Patients received oxaliplatin （150 mg/d1）, plus folinic (100 mg/d1-3) and 5FU (750 mg/d1-3) for total 1 cycles started from the 4th week of irradiation. Operation was performed 4 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy. Results After neoadjuvant therapy, all patients underwent surgical resection with average tumor size decreased by 41.2%, tumor T stage decreased in 67.6% （23/34) patients, and lymph nodenegative change rate was 58.8% (10/17). One patient had liver metastasis and one had local recurrence, but without stomal leak. And 88.2% (30/34) patients showed good function of sphincter. Conclusions Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in advanced lower rectal cancer patients has shown its efficacy in down-staging, which is safe without increasing operation complications when combined with sphincterpreserving surgery.
Objective To explore the axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) could be safely exempted in younger breast cancer patients (≤40 years of age) who receiving breast-conserving surgery combined with radiotherapy in metastasis of 1–2 sentinel lymph node (SLN) and T1–T2 stage. Methods The data of pathological diagnosis of invasive breast cancer from 2004 to 2015 in SEER database were extracted. Patients were divided into SLN biopsy group (SLNB group) and ALND group according to axillary treatment. Propensity matching score (PSM) method was used to match and equalize the clinicopathological features between two groups at 1∶1. Multivariate Cox proportional risk model was used to analyze the relationship between axillary management and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS), and stratified analysis was performed according to clinicopathological features. Results A total of 1 236 patients with a median age of 37 years (quartile: 34, 39 years) were included in the analysis, including 418 patients (33.8%) in the SLNB group and 818 patients (66.2%) in the ALND group. The median follow-up period was 82 months (quartile: 44, 121 months), and 111 cases (9.0%) died of breast cancer, including 33 cases (7.9%) in the SLNB group and 78 cases (9.5%) in the ALND group. The cumulative 5-year BCSS of the SLNB group and the ALND group were 90.8% and 93.4%, respectively, and the log-rank test showed no significant difference (χ2=0.70, P=0.401). After PSM, there were 406 cases in both the SLNB group and the ALND group. The cumulative 5-year BCSS rate in the ALND group was 4.1% higher than that in the SLNB group (94.8% vs. 90.7%). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that ALND could further improve BCSS rate in younger breast cancer patients [HR=0.578, 95%CI (0.335, 0.998), P=0.049]. Stratified analyses showed that ALND improved BCSS in patients diagnosed before 2012 or with a character of lymph node macrometastases, histological grade G3/4, ER negative or PR negative. Conclusions It should be cautious to consider the elimination of ALND in the stage T1–T2 younger patients receiving breast-conserving surgery combined with radiotherapy when 1–2 SLNs positive, especially in patients with high degree of malignant tumor biological behavior or high lymph node tumor burden. Further prospective trials are needed to verify the question.
Objective To investigate the risk factors of liver metastasis in patients with middle and low rectal cancer of Ⅱ–Ⅲ stage after preoperative short course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy. MethodsThe clinical data of 89 patients with middle and low rectal cancer of Ⅱ–Ⅲ stage admitted to the Dongnan Hospital of Xiamen University from January 2019 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with short-course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy before operation. The risk factors of postoperative liver metastasis were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. ResultsThe 89 patients were followed up for 7–53 months, with a median follow-up time of 33 months. During the follow-up period, 25 patients developed liver metastasis, the onset time was 7–35 months, and the median time of liver metastasis was 17 months. Among them, 5 patients (5.6%) developed liver metastasis in the first year after surgery, 15 patients (16.8%) developed liver metastasis at the second year after surgery, 5 patients (5.6%) developed liver metastasis at the 3rd year after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression results showed that lymph node metastasis [OR=3.550, 95%CI (1.425, 8.953), P=0.041], vascular invasion [OR=3.335, 95%CI (1.011, 11.001), P=0.048], maximum tumor diameter ≥5 cm [OR=4.477, 95%CI (1.273, 15.743), P=0.019], and peri-tumor diameter ≥1/2 [OR=4.633, 95%CI (1.387, 15.475), P=0.013] were risk factors for liver metastasis. ConclusionsLymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, maximum tumor diameter ≥5 cm, and circumferential tumor diameter ≥1/2 are risk factors for liver metastasis in patients with middle and low rectal cancer of Ⅱ–Ⅲ stage after preoperative short course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy.
Objective
To explore clinical characteristics and therapeutic strategy of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of colon.
Methods
A retrospective study of 3 patients with undifferentiated peomorphic sarcoma of the colon was conducted. These cases were treated at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital from October 1983 to July 2016. In addition, the clinicopathologic data of 23 patients with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of colon reported in the literatures were analyzed.
Results
These 3 cases all received surgery in our hospital, including two patients who received postoperative radiotherapy. These three cases died of the local relapse or metastasis respectively at 5 months, 3 years, and 5 years after surgery. The 23 patients reported in the literatures were treated surgically except for 1 case, of which received chemotherapy after operation in the 2 cases, did not receive adjuvant therapy after operation in the 15 cases, were not reported clearly in the 6 cases. Sixteen cases had the results of follow-up, of which 9 cases had no recurrences or metastases and 7 cases died.
Conclusions
Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of colon has no specific clinical manifestation, it’s prognosis is very poor. Surgery is a main treatment for it at present. Thorough resection of tumor at an early stage is essential to patient’s recovery. Treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy could be selected as postoperative adjuvant treatment, however, therapeutic schemes and effectiveness need further to be studied.
Thymoma is aggressive and persistent, but does not belong to malignant tumors. In treatments, their optimal treatment protocols still need to be studied and how about the role and the place of use of postoperative radiotherapy is not clear. Some retrospective studies indicate a direction: for the first stage of thymoma, it is adequately treated with complete resection alone. For the second stage of the thymoma, postoperative radiotherapy needs further indications. For the third and fourth stages of thymoma, postoperative radiotherapy plays an important role. A research shows that the radiation dose at 50 Gy is suitable for microscopic tumors, and higher dose of radiation is suitable for macroscopic tumors. With the development of radiotherapy technology, its application scope becomes larger and larger. What kind of the role and the place for radiotherapy in the treatment of thymoma and what is the optimal management of thymoma need to be treated prudently.
Objective
To evaluate the therapeutic effects of treatments of eye-retaining and enucleation for choroidal melanomas.
Methods
The clinical data of 44 patients (44 eyes) with choroidal melanomas after eye-retaining treatments and enucleation surgery were retrospectively analyzed. The metastasis, retention rate of eyeball after eye-retaining treatment, and visual acuity prognosis were observed and analyzed. In 44 eyes treated by eye-retaining therapy, transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) was performed primaryly on 7 (15.9%), 106 Ru brachytherapy on 25 (56.8%), and local resection of tumor combined with 106 Ru brachytherapy on 12 (27.3%).The average follow-up period was 13.3 months.
Results
Forty-four patients had no melanoma metastasis during the follow-up period. In 39 patients (88.6%) who had their eyes retained successfully, the retention rate of eyeball was 100%, 92.9%, and 83.3% in 6, 14, and 24 eyes with small, middle, and large tumor, respectively. In the patients treated by eye-retaining therapy, the visual acuity was ge;0.3 in 11 (28.2%), ge;0.05-＜0.3 in 18 (46.2%), and ＜0.05 (25.6%) in 10 eyes.
Conclusions
106 Ru brachytherapy and transpupillary thermotherapy are effective treatments for small and medium-sized choroidal melanomas; some selected cases with large choroidal melanomas was treated with local resection of tumor combined with106 Rubrachytherapy. However, longer followup will be necessary to assess if this treatment has a better comprehensive outcome, compared with enucleation surgery.
(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2006, 22: 150-153)
