Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) combines the advantages of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and avoids its relative shortcomings, which has received particular attention in recent years. HCR seems to have become the third revascularization strategy for multi-vessel disease in coronary heart diseases. However, the clinical researches on HCR are still limited. This article will systematically review the comparison of HCR with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and PCI, the results of HCR in specific patients, and the clinical results of different HCR strategies.
ObjectiveTo explore the vascular conditions and the necessity of vascular reconstruction in the treatment of chronic ischemic diseases of lower extremities with tibial transverse transport (TTT) from the perspective of vascular surgery.MethodsA clinical data of 59 patients with chronic ischemic disease of lower extremities treated by TTT between February 2014 and July 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, there were 41 patients with diabetic foot (DF), including Wagner grade 3-4, Texas grade 2-3, and stage B-D lesions; the disease duration ranged from 0.7 to 2.4 years, with an average of 1.5 years, and 5 cases complicated with arteriosclerosis obliteran (ASO). There were 14 patients with ASO (Fontaine stage Ⅳ and Rutherford stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ) with an average disease duration of 10.8 months (range, 1.5-23.4 months). There were 4 patients with thromboangiitis obliteran (TAO) with an average disease duration of 12.3 months (range, 2.1-18.2 months), and the clinical stages were all in the third stage. In 18 patients that ankle brachial index (ABI) of anterior or posterior tibial artery was less than 0.6 before operation, or the blood flow of the three branches of inferior anterior tibial artery did not reach the ankle by imaging examination, vascular reconstruction was performed before TTT (5 cases of DF combined with ASO, 12 of ASO, 1 of TAO). After operation, the effectiveness was evaluated by ulcer wound healing, skin temperature, pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, ABI, and CT angiography (CTA) examination.ResultsThe patients with DF were followed up 8-16 months (mean, 12.2 months); the ulcer wounds healed with a healing time of 5.1-9.2 weeks (mean, 6.8 weeks); CTA examination showed that the branches of inferior anterior tibial artery were opened in 5 patients after revascularization; and the tibial osteotomy healed for 5-14 weeks (mean, 8.3 weeks). The patients with ASO were followed up 13-25 months (mean, 16.8 months); the ulcer wounds healed with a healing time of 6.2-9.7 weeks (mean, 7.4 weeks). CTA examination showed that the branches of inferior anterior tibial artery were opened in 12 patients after revascularization; all tibial osteotomy healed, and the healing time was 4.5-14.4 weeks (mean, 10.2 weeks). The patients with TAO were followed up 12-23 months with an average of 12.3 months, and toe/limb amputation was performed after ineffective treatment. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether they were combined with revascularization or not. The ABI, VAS score, and skin temperature in the combined revascularization group significantly improved at 6 months after operation (P<0.05); while there was no significant difference in ABI at 6 months after operation in the TTT group (P>0.05), but the skin temperature and VAS scores significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05).ConclusionThe ABI of anterior or posterior tibial artery is more than 0.6, radiological examination shows that at least one of the three branches of inferior anterior tibial artery leads to ankle artery, which is a prerequisite for successful TTT in the treatment of chronic ischemic disease of lower extremities. DF is the indication of TTT. ASO can choose TTT, and TAO should use this technique cautiously.
ObjectiveTo summarize the experience of 4 patients with a great saphenous venous graft patency after 15 years of postoperitive great saphenous venous sequential aortic coronary artery bypass grafting.
MethodWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 4 patients accepted great saphenous vein aortic coronary artery bypass graft under moderate hypothermia cardiopulmonary bypass from November 1989 to December 1992 year. There were 3 males and 1 female with a mean age of 48.3 years ranging from 40-58 years. We harvested great saphenous vein under groin 45-50 cm. The proximal and distal anastomoses were performed with parachute technique under two clamps technique. Coronary artery bypass graft was performed by two sequential grafts routinely. Aspirin was given through nasal tube 6 hours after operation. The risk factors of arteriosclerosis were controlled by patients themselves after discharge.
ResultFour patients received coronary angiography in 15, 16, 18, and 21 years after surgery and the grafts and both proximal and distal anastomoses were patent. The patients lived about 20 years without angina.
Conclusioncarefully dealing with the vein graft, taking sequential bypass grafting to guarantee parabolic curve and meticulous anastomosis are preconditional and necessary for long-term patency.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of surgical treatment of vertebral artery stenosis and to summarize the experience.MethodThe clinical data of 6 patients undergoing surgical treatment from September 2018 to September 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsAll the procedures were successfully performed without intraoperative cerebral infarction, injury of thoracic duct or nerve disconnection by mistake. The operative time was 120 to 270 minutes, the median was 180 minutes. The blood loss was 50 to 150 milliliters, and the median was 65 milliliters. One patient suffered from Horner’s syndrome after the operation. One patient suffered from cerebral infarction on 4 days after the operation. During the follow-up of 3–10 months, three patients felt dizziness relieved and there were no anastomotic stricture or new cerebral infarction happened.ConclusionsSurgical treatment is safeand effective for vertebral artery stenosis. Revascularization of the carotid and vertebral arteries at the same time shouldbe avoided.
Objective To discuss the safety and feasibil ity of treating complex renal aneurysm with ex vivo aneurysmectomy and renal revascularization and renal autotransplantation after hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy. Methods In October 2006, one male patient with complex renal aneurysm was treated. The preoperative color Doppler ultrasonograph, CT and DSA showed that there was an aneurysm (3.4 cm × 4.3 cm × 4.5 cm) located in the main renalartery bifurcation and its five branches of the left kidney. The patient had a history of hypertension with no response to treatment. After successful hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy, the kidney off-body was perfused by the renal irrigating solution immediately to protect the kidney. Then ex vivo aneurysmectomy and renal artery revascularization were performed, the renal artery was reconstructed with an autologous right internal il iac artery. The reconstructed left kidney was re-implanted into the right il iac fossa. Results The operation was successful and the patient recovered without perioperative complications. The postoperative renal function was normal and the color Doppler ultrasonograph showed that the blood circulation in the transferred renal artery of the right il iac fossa and its branches was smooth, the blood circulation of the renal venous was smooth and no stenosis in the ureter 2 weeks after operation. Thirteen months follow-up showed the blood pressure was recovered to normal and the renal function was normal. Conclusion The method of ex vivo aneurysmectomy and autotransplantation is safe, feasible and minimally invasive for treating complex hilar renal artery aneurysms.
ObjectiveTo compare the superiority of total arterial revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) complicated with left ventricular dysfunction. MethodsThis retrospective study included the patients who were diagnosed with CAD and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤40% and underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at our hospital from January 2016 to July 2019. The patients were divided into two groups according to the different types of bypass vessels: a total arterial revascularization group (TAR group) and a conventional group (a CON group). The clinical data were compared between the two groups to explore the incidence of important complications and evaluate the safety of total arterial revascularization and its protective effect on cardiac function. Results Finally 75 patients were enrolled including 52 males and 23 females with a mean age of (61.58±7.93) years. There were 35 patients in the TAR group and 40 patients in the CON group. The operation time and the drainage volume at 24 hours after operation in the TAR group were longer or more than those in the CON group (P<0.001), but there was no statistical difference in hospital stay, postoperative complications (such as respiratory failure, mediastinal infection, renal failure), intra-aortic balloon pump or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use rate (P>0.05). After 2 years of follow-up, compared with the CON group, the cardiac function of the TAR group was significantly improved, the LVEF was higher, the left ventricular end diastolic diameter was reduced, and the graft stenosis rate was lower (all P<0.05). Conclusion Total arterial revascularization is a safe and feasible surgical method, which is helpful to improve the cardiac function and improve the quality of life.
Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization combined with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford type B aortic dissection with insufficient proximal landing zone. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection and insufficient proximal landing zone who underwent TEVAR combined with LSA revascularization or TEVAR alone at the Central Hospital of Wuhan from 2017 to 2021. Patients were divided into a revascularization group and a simple stent group based on the surgical approach. Perioperative data of the two groups were compared. ResultsA total of 144 patients were included. In the simple stent group, there were 113 patients, including 85 males and 28 females, with a median age of 56.0 (48.0, 68.0) years. In the revascularization group, there were 31 patients, including 23 males and 8 females, with a median age of 54.0 (48.2, 59.7) years. There were statistical differences in operation time, hospital stay, preoperative lesion diameter, and preoperative and postoperative right vertebral artery diameter between the two groups (P<0.05). The simple stent group had 12 (10.6%) patients of complications, which was lower than the revascularization group (9 patients, 29.0%) postoperatively. At three months postoperatively, the most common complication in the simple stent group was endoleak (5 patients), while in the revascularization group it was hoarseness (2 patients). There was no death in the two groups within 1 year postoperatively. Conclusion Both different surgical approaches have good effects on the treatment of type B aortic dissection with insufficient proximal landing zone, but further validation is needed through multicenter, large-sample, and long-term follow-up studies.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy, safety and economic value of hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for Chinese patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Methods We searched PubMed, WanFang Data, CNKI, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2016) to collect case-control studies about HCR versus CABG for Chinese patients with coronary multivessel disease from the January 1996 to April 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 9 studies, involving 1 231 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with the CABG groups, HCR group had lower length of ICU stay (MD=–25.84, 95% CI –42.55 to –9.13,P=0.002) and intubation time (MD=–4.06, 95% CI –6.43 to –1.69,P=0.000 8). However, there were no significant differences between both groups in the length of hospital stay (MD=–0.64, 95% CI –2.53 to 1.25,P=0.51), the incidence of atrial fibrillation (OR=1.41, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.30,P=0.17) and renal failure (OR=1.56, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.74,P=0.12). No significant differences were found between both groups in mortality (OR=0.36, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.11,P=0.07), the incidence of myocardial infarction (OR=0.32, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.85,P=0.20) and the incidence of target vessel revascularization (OR=1.16, 95% CI 0.48 to 2.76,P=0.74). But the incidence of the stroke (OR=0.35, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.91,P=0.03) and MACCEs (OR=0.37, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.70,P=0.002) of the HCR group were lower than those of the patients of the CABG group. Conclusion The current evidence shows that, compared with the CABG groups, HCR had lower incidence of stroke and MACCEs, however, the safety and efficacy were not significantly different between both groups. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Abstract： Objectives To evaluate the early and mid-term follow-up outcomes of “one-stop” hybrid coronary revascularization strategy for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Methods From June 2007 to December 2009, 104 consecutive patients underwent “one-stop”hybrid coronary revascularization in Fu Wai Hospital. There were 93 male patients and 11 female patients with mean age of （61.8±10.2）years（ranging from 35 to 81 years）. All the patients had multivessel coronary artery disease including left anterior descending （LAD）coronary artery stenosis, and underwent “one-stop”hybrid coronary revascularization. “One-stop”hybrid procedure was first performed through a lower partial sternotomy at the second left intercostal space. The distal anastomosis of in situ left internal mammary artery （LIMA）to LAD graft was completed. Angiography was performed immediately to confirm patency of the LIMA graft after closure of the thorax. A 300 mg loading dose of clopidogrel was administered through a nasogastric tube after confirmation of LIMA graft patency. Intravenous unfractionated heparin was administered to obtain an activated clotting time of greater than 250 s. Then percutaneous coronary intervention（PCI）was performed on the non-LAD lesions. Results All the patients underwent“one-stop”hybrid coronary revascularization including grafted LIMA to LAD，and one hundred and ninety one drug eluting stents and three bare metal stents were used for other non-LAD lesions. No death event occurred during surgery and in hospital. All the patients were followed up for a mean duration of 1.5 years. There was no myocardial infarction, neurologic event or death occurred during follow-up except one patient with stent stenosis who was treated by PCI. Conclusion “One-stop” hybrid coronary revascularization is a feasible and safe alternative for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
ObjectiveTo asses the clinical result of left ventrical total artery revascularization with "T"-type anastomosis of left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and radial artery on pump.
MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 40 patients who underwent left ventrical total artery revascularization with "T"-type anasmtomosis of LIMA and radial artery on pump in our hospital between December 2013 and December 2015 year. There were 27 males and 13 females at age of 46-70 (55.0±10.2) years. The radial artery anastomosis was made sequentially to the left obtuse artery, intermediate artery, diagonal artery and left anterior descending artery. LIMA anastomosis was made to the radial artery closed to the left anterior descending artery. Saphenous vein (SV) anastomosis was made to right coronary artery. LIMA blood flow was measured with coronary artery Butterfly Flowmeter when LIMA was in suit and after operation. cTnI was measured at different time points. Complications after operation were studied.
ResultsThe blood flow of LIMA after operation was significantly different from that in suit (P < 0.05). The plasm cTnI postoperation was higher than that preoperation, but the difference was not significant. All the patients were survival. Atrial fibrillation occurred in 2 patients and low cardiac output occurred in 1 patient after operation, but they recovered quickly after proper treatment. There was no myocardial infraction or hand ischemia during postoperation. There was no recurrence of mycardial infarction within 6 months to 1 year follow-up. Graft patency was assessed using 128-slice CT coronary angiography in 25 patients. Cumulative graft patency rates were 96.0% in LIMA and 90.4% in SV grafts.
ConclusionLeft ventrical total artery revascularization with "T"-type anasmtomosis of LIMA and radial artery on pump is safe and effective.
