Objective To compare the effectiveness of simultaneous and delayed repair of combined full-thickness rotator cuff rupture in proximal humerus fracture. Methods Between January 2015 and January 2017, 44 patients with proximal humerus fractures complicated with full-thickness rotator cuff injuries were included. Twenty-four patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and rotator cuff repair simultaneously (simultaneous operation group), and 20 patients underwent delayed arthroscopic rotator cuff repair more than 90 days after ORIF (delayed operation group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, and side of injury between the two groups (P>0.05). The fracture healing was observed by X-ray films. The shoulder function was assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation by using the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score. Results All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 17 months). Fractures all healed at 3 months after operation in simultaneous operation group. According to UCLA score, the patients had achieved significantly better outcomes in function, active forward flexion, strength of forward flexion, and subjective satisfaction in simultaneous operation group than in delayed operation group at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in pain between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion For patients with proximal humerus fracture complicated with full-thickness rotator cuff rupture, performing ORIF and simultaneous repair of rotator cuff can improve shoulder function and achieve better effectiveness when compared with delayed repair of rotator cuff.
ObjectiveTo summarize the diagnosis and measurement methods of bone defect in anterior shoulder instability (glenoid bone defect and Hill-Sachs lesion).MethodsThe related literature on the diagnosis and measurement of the bone defect in anterior shoulder instability was reviewed and summarized.ResultsThe commonly used techniques for the diagnosis of anterior glenoid bone defect and Hill-Sachs lesion of humeral head include X-ray, CT, MRI, arthroscopy, arthrography. The methods for measuring the degree of anterior glenoid bone defect include Griffith method, glenoid index method, Pico method, and best-fit circle method. The indexes for measuring the Hill-Sachs lesion include the length, width, depth, and volume. X-ray is mainly used for primary screening. Best-fit circle method on three-dimensional (3D) CT reconstruction is commonly used to measure the glenoid bone defect currently. Glenoid track theory on 3D CT reconstruction is popular in recent years. Reliability of measuring the glenoid bone defect and Hill-Sachs lesion with MRI and arthroscopy is still debatable. Arthrography is more and more used in the diagnosis of shoulder joint instability of bone defect and concomitant soft tissue injury.ConclusionHow to improve the accuracy of evaluating glenoid bone defect and Hill-Sachs lesion before surgery still need further study.
ObjectiveTo compare the mid-term effectiveness of arthroscopic shoulder capsular release combined with acromiohumeral distance (AHD) restoration in the treatment of diabetic secondary stiff shoulder and primary frozen shoulder. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of 22 patients with diabetic secondary stiff shoulder (group A) and 33 patients with primary frozen shoulder (group B), who underwent arthroscopic 270° capsular release combined with AHD restoration treatment. There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender, age, affected side, disease duration, and preoperative AHD, shoulder flexion range of motion, abduction range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and Constant score (P>0.05). Only the difference in the internal rotation cone rank and external rotation range of motion between the two groups showed significant differences (P<0.05). The improvement in shoulder pain and function was evaluated by using VAS score, ASES score, and Constant score before operation and at last follow-up. Active flexion, abduction, external rotation range of motion, and internal rotation cone rank were recorded and compared. AHD was measured on X-ray films.Results All patients were followed up 24-92 months (median, 57 months). There was no significant difference in follow-up time between group A and group B (P>0.05). No fractures or glenoid labrum tears occurred during operation, all incisions healed by first intention, and no complication such as wound infection or nerve injury was observed during the follow-up. At last follow-up, there were significant improvements in active flexion, abduction, external rotation range of motion, internal rotation cone rank, AHD, VAS score, ASES score, and Constant score when compared with preoperative ones in both groups (P<0.05). Except for the difference in change in external rotation range of motion, which had significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05), there was no significant difference in other indicators between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionArthroscopic capsular release combined with AHD restoration can achieve good mid-term effectiveness in the treatment of diabetic secondary stiff shoulder and primary frozen shoulder. However, the improvement in external rotation range of motion is more significant in the patients with diabetic secondary stiff shoulder.
We developed a three-dimensional finite element model of the shoulder glenohumeral joint after shoulder arthroplasty including humerus shaft, scapular, scapular cartilage and eight muscles, while each of the muscles was simulated with 50 spring elements. To reduce the element number and improve the analytical precision, we used mixed tetrahedral and hexahedral elements in the model. We then used the model to calculate the biomechanics of the shoulder glenohumeral joint after hemiarthroplasty during humeral external rotation. Results showed that the maximum joint reaction force was 374.72 N and the maximum contact stress was 6.573 MPa together with the contact areas at 40° external rotation. These might be one of the reasons for prosthetic disarticulation, and would provide theoretical bases to prosthetic design.
Frozen shoulder is a common disease in orthopaedic clinic. The main clinical manifestations were shoulder joint pain and limited active and passive activity. However, the etiology and pathogenesis of frozen shoulder are not fully understood, so people can not choose the appropriate treatment plan. In recent years, there have been a lot of exploration on the pathogenesis and treatment measures of this disease at home and abroad, but there is no unified standard for the treatment of frozen shoulder. This article summarizes the treatment methods of frozen shoulder at home and abroad in recent years, analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of non-surgical treatment and surgical treatment, in order to provide assistance for clinical practice.
Objective To review the research progress of bone graft resorption after Latarjet procedure for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation, and provide a guide for further research on bone graft resorption. Methods The relevant literature in recent years was extensively reviewed. The pathogenesis, classification, risk factors, clinical function impact, and management of bone graft resorption after Latarjet procedure for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation were summarized. Results Bone graft resorption is the common complication after Latarjet procedure for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. Stress shielding and poor blood supply may contribute to the occurrence of bone graft resorption. The absence of significant preoperative glenoid bone loss, open procedure, earlier graft healing may to be the risk factors for bone graft resorption. Various assessment methods and classification systems are used to evaluate the region and severity of bone graft resorption. Partial resorption may be considered as a natural glenoid remodeling process after the surgery, but severe and complete resorption is proved to be one of the reasons for failed procedures and there is no effective measure to prevent it, except for accepting revision surgery. Conclusion The pathogenesis, risk factors, clinical function impact of bone graft resorption after Latarjet procedure for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation has not been fully elucidated and there is a lack of effective management strategies, so further clinical and basic researches are needed.
Objective To review present situation and progress in cl inically treating floating shoulder injury. Methods Recent l iterature concerned treatment of floating shoulder injury was reviewed and analyzed in terms of anatomy, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Results Conservative treatment and operative treatment can get good outcome. But the value of the results was l imited, because different evaluation criteria were used in the l iterature. Conclusion There is no uniform standards about the treatment of the floating shoulder injury. Both conservative treatment and operative treatment have advantages and disadvantages, which method will be used to treat the floating shoulder injury based on local damage and the patient’s general condition.
Objective To explore the effect of self-designed early rehabilitation procedure of frozen shoulder incorporating high-frequency ultrasound technology in the outpatient treatment of patients with early frozen shoulder. Methods One hundred and eighty-two consecutive patients who attended the outpatient clinic of the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University and were diagnosed with frozen shoulder between January 2018 and May 2021 were selected and randomly divided into the trial group and the control group, with 91 patients in each group. Patients in the trial group received early rehabilitation procedures for frozen shoulder, and patients in the control group received conventional physiotherapy. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (including VAS score for resting pain and VAS score for active motion), active range of motion of the shoulder joint (external rotation, forward flexion, and abduction), Shoulder Pain and Dysfunction Index (SPADI) (including pain subscale score, dysfunction subscale score, and total score) were compared between the two groups before treatment (Week 0) and 4 and 8 weeks after the start of treatment (Week 4 and 8). Results A total of 143 patients (74 in the trial group and 69 in the control group) completed the study. There was no significant difference in any assessment index between the two groups in Week 0 (P>0.05). The results of the within-group comparison after treatment showed that the VAS score for resting pain (F=44.359, P<0.001), VAS score for active motion (F=158.458, P<0.001), anterior shoulder flexion (F=123.334, P<0.001), abduction mobility (F=117.539, P<0.001), total SPADI score (F=133.814, P<0.001), SPADI pain subscale score (F=74.093, P<0.001), and SPADI dysfunction subscale score (F=145.336, P<0.001) in Week 4 and 8 were better than those in Week 0, and the assessments in Week 8 were better than those in Week 4 in each group (P<0.05); in the control group, there was no statistically significant difference in the external rotation mobility of the shoulder in Week 4 compared with that in Week 0 (P=0.599), and the external rotation in Week 8 improved significantly compared with that in Week 0 (P<0.001), whereas the external rotation of the shoulder in Week 4 and 8 in the trial group improved significantly compared with that in Week 0 (P<0.001). The results of the between-group comparison after treatment showed that the two groups had statistically significant differences in resting shoulder pain VAS score (F=93.712, P<0.001), active motion VAS score (F=103.565, P<0.001), external shoulder rotation (F=13.388, P<0.001), anterior shoulder flexion (F=66.375, P<0.001), abduction mobility (F=110.253, P<0.001), total SPADI score (F=7.917, P=0.006), and SPADI pain subscale score (F=39.091, P<0.001); the SPADI dysfunction subscale score was lower in the trial group than that in the control group in Week 4 (P=0.002), but by Week 8 there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.352). Conclusion The early rehabilitation program for frozen shoulder incorporating high-frequency ultrasound technology is more effective than conventional physiotherapy in the intervention of patients with early frozen shoulder, and may provide a referenceable example for the combined application of high-frequency ultrasound technology and physiotherapy.
In post-coronavirus disease 2019 era, people’s style of work and life have undergone major changes. The sedentary style of work and life, such as long-time office work, online meetings, home eating, online social interactions, and reduced range of activities, affect people’s physical and mental health. Neck and shoulder pain is one of the common symptoms. By combining the clinical practice experience of orthopedic medical experts in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, and reviewing a large number of literatures, this article summarized the definition, incidence, hazards, causes, evaluation and prevention of neck and shoulder pain in post-coronavirus disease 2019 era. It aimed to provide experience for the prevention and treatment of neck and shoulder pain in post-coronavirus disease 2019 era.
Objective
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different site injection of compound betamethasone injection, ropivacaine and sodium hyaluronate for treatment of frozen shoulder at early stage.
Methods
A Total of 68 participants were included from May 2015 to May 2017 and randomly assigned to the glenohumeral joint and subacromial space group (IA+SA group, n=34) and glenohumeral joint group (IA group, n=34). In the IA+SA group, a solution of 1 mL corticosteroid, 6 mL ropivacaine, 2 mL sodium hyaluronate, and 8 mL normal saline were prepared and injected to glenohumeral joint, and a solution of 1 mL corticosteroid, 2 mL ropivacaine, 2 mL sodium hyaluronate, and 2 mL normal saline were injected to subacromial space. In the IA group, participants were given the same dose of drugs to the glenohumeral joint. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and Constant-Murley score were used to assess pain and function of shoulder respectively. The change of VAS score and Constant-Murley score after treatment were used to evaluate pain relief and shoulder function improvement.
Results
Of the 68 participants, two in each group were lost to follow up and one in the IA+SA group dropped out. There was significant effect on pain relief and shoulder function improvement on all measurement in both groups (P<0.001) during the 12 weeks after treatment. In the IA group, group- by-time interaction were significant for pain relief at 6 and 12 weeks comparing with that at 3 weeks (P<0.001), while no significant difference at 6 weeks comparing with 12 weeks. In the IA+SA group, group-by-time interaction were significant for pain relief at all endpoints (3 weeksvs. 6 weeks: P<0.001; 3 weeksvs. 12 weeks: P<0.001; 3 weeksvs. 6 weeks: P=0.034). In both groups, there was significant effect on shoulder function improvement when compared at each endpoint within group (P<0.001). Between-group comparison revealed no significant effect on pain relief (P=0.386) or shoulder function improvement (P=0.685). There was also no significant effect on pain relief (3 weeks: P=0.898; 6 weeks: P=0.448; 12 weeks: P=0.216) and shoulder function improvement (3 weeks: P=0.120; 6 weeks: P=0.152; 12 weeks: P=0.868) at each same endpoint.
Conclusions
Different site injection can effectively release pain and improve shoulder function for the patients with frozen shoulder at early stage and be well tolerated. However, it is not found that two site injection is inferior to single site injection.
