ObjectiveTo compare the postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI), and to explore the risk factors for PONV. MethodA total of 220 patients at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from June 2022 to December 2022 were prospectively collected, and were randomly divided into the LSG group and the SASI group; the general condition of the patients was recorded. PONV was assessed on the POD0, POD1, POD2, POD30, POD60, POD90, using the Rhodes index score.ResultsThe total Rhodes index score in the LSG group was higher than that in the SASI group [(25.56±13.54) vs. (16.06±11.28), P＜0.05]. The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that female (P=0.014), LSG (P＜0.001), young age (P=0.050), and low BMI (P=0.019) were risk factors for PONV. ConclusionsCompared with LSG, the Rhodes index score after SASI is low. For young women with low BMI, special attention should be paid to the prevention and treatment of PONV after LSG.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 8, 2014), CNKI and WanFang Data from inception to December 2014, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of LRYGB vs. LSG for obesity and T2DM. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software.
ResultsA total of 8 RCTs including 828 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:There were no significant differences between the LRYGB group and the LSG group in body mass index (MD=-1.02, 95%CI -2.90 to 0.86, P=0.29), remission rate of T2DM (OR=1.11, 95%CI 0.71 to 1.73, P=0.64), reoperation rate (OR=2.74, 95%CI 1.01 to 7.42, P=0.05), level of fasting plasma glucose (MD=2.71, 95%CI -0.80 to 6.21, P=0.13), and level of serum low density lipoprotein (MD=-23.85, 95%CI -47.20 to -0.50, P=0.05). However, the LSG group had lower postoperative complication rate (OR=2.28, 95%CI 1.43 to 3.62, P=0.000 5) than that of the LRYGB group.
ConclusionIn short term, both LRYGB and LSG were equally efficient in the treatment of obesity and T2DM, but LSG has lower postoperative complication rate than LRYGB. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo analyze why sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with jejunojejunal bypass (SG-JJB), despite being the second most common bariatric procedure in China, has not been recommended in national and international guidelines nor endorsed by expert consensus; to investigate the primary obstacles to its standardization and widespread adoption; and to propose strategies leveraging China’s extensive clinical experience to refine the technique, establish standardized protocols, and address existing challenges, thereby defining its future role in metabolic surgery. MethodsBy systematically reviewing the evolution, current evidence profile, and distinctive features of SG-JJB compared to other SG-Plus procedures, this study aimed to identify constraints hindering its adoption. Concurrently, considering the characteristics of domestic healthcare resources, we explored the feasibility of procedural refinements, key steps for standardization, and solutions to potential challenges, thereby facilitating the optimization and standardization of SG-JJB. ResultsThe three key constraints hindering SG-JJB development were: risks of blind loop syndrome, uncertainty regarding optimal bypass limb length, and limited evidence on long-term efficacy. To address these issues, this study proposed leveraging China’s clinical and multi-center collaboration strengths to: conduct high-quality studies defining the impact of bypass length on outcomes, establish unified diagnostic and monitoring protocols for blind loop syndrome, and systematically collect longitudinal data to evaluate long-term efficacy, thereby informing evidence-based surgical standardization. ConclusionsSG-JJB holds significant potential in Chinese bariatric-metabolic practice, yet its standardization faces persistent challenges. Addressing concerns about blind loop syndrome, defining optimal bypass limb length, and accumulating robust long-term efficacy data are pivotal for advancing SG-JJB standardization and adoption. Leveraging domestic clinical resources through multi-center collaborations, high-quality research, and evidence-based protocol development is the essential pathway to overcoming these barriers, achieving standardized implementation, and securing recognition in authoritative guidelines.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of three kinds of sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and sleeve gastrectomy combined with transit bipartition (SG+TB ) as three weight-loss surgical differences in weight loss and glucose control as well as alleviation of nephropathy in obese rats with diabetic nephropathy (DN). MethodsTwelve of 60 SD male rats were randomly selected according to their average body mass and fed with a standard diet (12% fat fever) as normal control (NC) group, and the remaining 48 were fed with high-fat diet (40% fat calories) for 1 month and combined with low-dose 1% streptozotocin method to induce the establishment of obese combined diabetic nephropathy rat model, and subsequently randomized equally into SG group, RYGB group, SG+TB group and sham-operated group. Body mass and food intake were weighed and the fasting blood glucose (FBG) level after fasting for 6 hours was detected before and every month at 1–6 months after operation. At the same time, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), insulin tolerance test (ITT), urinary albumin creatinine ratio (UACR), serum creatinine (Scr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were tested before operation and at the 1st and 6th month after operation. Finally, rat kidney tissues were taken to observe the pathological changes. Results Body mass and food intake of the SG group, the RYGB group and the SG+TB group were lower than that of the sham-operated group at 1–6 months after operation (P<0.05). The body mass of the RYGB group and the ST+TB group were lower than that of the SG group at 1–6 months after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in food intake among the SG group, the RYGB group and the SG+TB group (P>0.05). The FBG levels in the SG group, the RYGB group and the SG+TB group were lower than those in the sham-operation group at 1–6 months after operation (P<0.05). The FBG levels in the RYGB group and the SG+TB group were lower than those in the SG group at 4–6 months after operation(P<0.05). The blood glucose levels detected by OGTT and ITT in the SG group, the RYGB group and the SG+TB group after operation were all lower than those in the sham-operation group (P<0.05), and all were lower than before operation (P<0.05), and the blood glucose level detected by OGTT in the RYGB group at the 1st postoperative month was lower than those in the SG group and the SG+TB group (P<0.05). Whereas there was no significant difference in the blood glucose levels detected by OGTT at the 6-month postoperative period between the the RYGB group and the SG+TB group (P>0.05), but were lower than the SG group (P<0.05). The levels of UACR, Scr and BUN in the SG group, the RYGB group and the SG+TB group after operation were lower than those in the sham-operation group (P<0.05) and lower than those before operation (P<0.05). The UACR and Scr levels in the RYGB group and the SG+TB group were lower than those in the SG group at the 1st and 6th month after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in BUN level among the SG group, the RYGB group and the SG+TB group after operation (P>0.05). Typical pathological changes of diabetic nephropathy occurred in the kidney of rats in sham operation group, such as glomerular edema, capillary cavity congestion and congestion, and mesangial matrix increase. The mesangial matrix of rats in the SG group, the RYGB group and the SG+TB group were significantly improved compared with that in the sham-operation group. Conclusion SG, RYGB and SG+TB can effectively reduce weight, reduce blood sugar and relieve diabetic nephropathy, and SG+TB and RYGB are better than SG.
ObjectiveTo summarize the mechanism of effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and the research progress of LSG in combination with fundoplication on obesity with GERD. MethodThe literatures of studies relevant to relation between LSG and GERD and effect of LSG combined with fundoplication on obesity accompanying GERD at home and abroad were searched and reviewed. ResultsAlthough there was considerable disagreement over the effect of LSG on GERD, the evidence showed that the LSG alone might worsen the existing GERD or promote new GERD, which mainly due to the destruction of the lower esophageal sphincter, deactivation of His angle, elevated intragastric pressure, and shape of sleeve stomach. Currently, the LSG in combination with fundoplication had been gradually applied in the clinical treatment of obese patients with GERD. And the short-term results of follow-up showed that the effects of weight loss and anti-reflux could be obtained, which needed to be evaluated by more studies and longer follow-up. ConclusionsThere is a risk of worsening existing GERD or promoting new GERD after LSG surgery. The LSG in combination with fundoplication is safe and feasible, which not only makes up for the adverse effects of LSG only on GERD after surgery, but also achieves the same similar effect of weight loss as LSG, providing a new choice for obese patients with GERD.
ObjectiveTo investigate effects of sleeve gastrectomy (SG)-transit bipartition (SG-TB) and simple SG on bariatric and anti-diabetic and protective effect on esophagus reflux. MethodsA total of 36 male Sprague-Dawley rats were used to successfully induce the obesity with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) model by dietary feeding and receiving intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (35 mg/kg), then were randomly averagely divided into SG, SG-TB, and sham operation (SO) groups according to the surgical methods, and 8 rats from each procedure were randomly selected and included to use for experimental observation. The observation period was 12 weeks. The changes of terminal esophageal mucosa were observed at the 12th week after operation. The body weight and food intake were measured every 2 weeks after operation. The fasting blood glucose (FBG), oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and insulin tolerance test (ITT) blood glucose levels were measured before operation and at the 4th and 12th week after operation. And the changes of glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and insulin levels were measured before operation and at the 12th week after operation. ResultsThere were no significant differences in all indexes among the 3 groups before operation (P>0.05). ① No esophageal papillomatosis was observed in the SG-TB group at the 12th week after operation, but more severe esophageal papillomatosis was observed in the SG group, and the mucosal height in the SG-TB group was lower than that in the SG group (P<0.05). ② From the 4th week after operation, the body weight and food intake of the SG-TB group and SG group were lower than the SO group (P<0.05), and their changes of these two groups over time were generally stable. While no significant difference was found in the reduction of body weight between the SG-TB group and the SG group (P>0.05), however the food intakes of the SG-TB group were higher than the SG group at the 10th and 12th week after operation (P<0.05). ③ The levels of FBG, OGTT and ITT blood glucoses in the SG-TB group and SG group were lower than in the SO group at the 4th and 12th week after operation (P<0.05) and remained stable after operation. However, no significant difference was found in the FBG and ITT blood glucose level between the SG-TB group and the SG group (P>0.05), while the level of OGTT blood glucose in the SG-TB group was lower than that in the SG group at the 12th week after operation (P<0.05). ④ The levels of GLP-1 in the SG-TB group and SG group were higher than in the SO group and still higher than before operation (P<0.05), while the insulin levels were lower than in the SO group and lower than before operation (P<0.05). ConclusionsFrom preliminary results of this study, change of terminal esophageal mucosa after SG-TB is weaker than that of SG operation, and it is found that SG-TB surgery shows a better trend in blood glucose control as compared with SG operation. However, due to the limitations of sample size, further research and anti-reflux effect of SG-TB operation still need to be verified.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the research progress in the selection of metabolic bariatric procedures, efficacy, safety, complication prevention, and long-term management for elderly patients, so as to provide references for surgical decision-making and perioperative management in future metabolic and bariatric surgery for elderly obese patients. MethodA review of recent domestic and international literature on metabolic and bariatric surgery in elderly patients was conducted. ResultsWith the intensification of societal aging, the incidence of obesity and related metabolic diseases among the elderly population has significantly increased. Metabolic and bariatric surgery has been proven to effectively reduce weight and improve obesity-related metabolic diseases in elderly patients. Current guidelines no longer consider age an absolute contraindication for surgery. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are the most commonly used procedures internationally. SG is superior to RYGB in terms of surgical safety, while RYGB has greater advantages in improving metabolic diseases. Although the postoperative mortality and complications risks in elderly obese patients are higher than those in younger obese patients, strict preoperative assessment and individualized procedure selection can significantly reduce these risks. ConclusionsMetabolic and bariatric surgery can serve as an effective treatment for elderly obese patients, offering comprehensive benefits in weight loss and metabolic improvement. Procedure selection requires individualized assessment, balancing the patient’s baseline condition and metabolic needs. Postoperative success hinges on systematic long-term follow-up and management to ensure sustained benefits and safety. Future efforts should focus on clarifying the definitions or standards of “elderly” and “obesity,” followed by more large-sample, long-term follow-up randomized controlled studies to validate the safety and efficacy of metabolic and bariatric surgery.
Objective To investigate the clinical application value of unsymmetrical four-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Methods The clinical data of 114 patients with obesity who were admitted to Mianyang Central Hospital from June 2021 to May 2022 were retrospective analyzed. All the 114 patients underwent unsymme-trical four-port LSG, and were observed their surgical and postoperative conditions, complications and follow-up the patient’s esthetic satisfaction of wounds at 3 months after surgery. Results All 114 patients underwent unsymmetrical four-port LSG successfully, without conversion to open surgery. The operative time was 68–160 min, average (104.2±26.1) minutes; volume of intraoperative blood loss was 2–50 mL, average (10.7±7.6) mL; the duration of postoperative hospital stay was 3–6 d, average (4.0±0.7) days. Of the 114 patients, 8 patients (7.0%) had fat liquefaction of wounds, 68 patients (59.6%) had postoperative nausea and vomiting in the 24 hours after operation, and all patients had no serious complications such as gastrointestinal bleeding, intraperitoneal hemorrhage, or gastric leakage. One hundred and fourteen patients were followed-up for 3–14 months, with a median follow-up of 6 months. Forty patients (35.1%) had hair loss, 3 patients (2.6%) had mild anemia. Of the 114 patients, 2 (1.8%) were dissatisfied with the cosmetic effects of wounds, 64 (56.1%) were satisfied, and 48 (42.1%) were very satisfied. The satisfaction rate was 98.2% (112/114). Conclusion The unsymmetrical four-port LSG is safe and feasible, it does not affect esthetic satisfaction of wounds.
ObjectiveTo explore a surgery of effective weight loss concentrating on gut hormone release. MethodsWistar rats were fed with high-fat diet for inducing obesity and which randomly divided into sleeve gastrectomy plus decent jejunoileal bypass (SJB) group (n=12), sleeve gastrectomy (SG) group (n=12), and sham operation (SO) group (n=11), the body weight reduction, food intake, plasma ghrelin level, and glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) level were compared among three groups. ResultsThere were no differences of the body weight and food intake before operation among three groups (Pgt;0.05). Compared with the SO group, the body weight descended and the food intake decreased obviously on 1-8 weeks after operation in the SJB group (Plt;0.05), the body weight of rats on 1-8 weeks after operation in the SJB group significantly descended as compared with the SG group (Plt;0.05), and the food intake of rats on week 3, 6, 7, and 8 in the SJB group signicantly decreased as compared with the SG group (Plt;0.05). There were no differences of the levels of the plasma ghrelin and GLP-1 before operation among three groups (Pgt;0.05). Compared with SO group, the plasma ghrelin level decreased and the GLP-1 level increased in the SJB group and the SG group, meanwhile the SJB group significantly decreased level of plasma ghrelin and elevated level of plasma GLP-1 as compared with the SG group on week 8 after operation(Plt;0.05). ConclusionThe data demonstrate that SJB could represent an effective way of losing weight by interfering with food intake and obesity related hormone levels.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILS+1) for patients with obesity. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on obese patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) from January 2023 to November 2024 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Patients were stratified into two groups: SILS+1 group and conventional multi-port LSG (MPLSG) group. Comparative parameters included operative time, postoperative hospital stay, complications rate, weight loss outcomes, and improvement in metabolic indicators [including hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)]. ResultsA total of 95 patients with obesity were enrolled, including 40 in the SILS+1 group and 55 in the MPLSG group. The SILS+1 group had significantly lower preoperative body mass index (BMI), HbA1c, and TC level compared to the MPLSG group (P<0.05), and a significantly higher proportion of female patients (P<0.05). Other baseline characteristics, such as age, TG and HDL-C levels, showed no statistically significant differences (P>0.05). Operative time was significantly longer in the SILS+1 group than in the MPLSG group [(100.16±17.53) min vs. (93.82±20.83) min, P<0.001]. The proportion of patients requiring drainage tube placement was significantly lower in the SILS+1 group as compared with the MPLSG group [55.0% (22/40) vs. 76.4% (42/55), P=0.049]. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the need for additional trocar sites, change in hemoglobin level from preoperative to postoperative day 1, postoperative hospital stay, or incidence of postoperative (Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅰ) complications (P>0.05). No 30-day readmissions occurred in either group. One patient in the SILS+1 group required an additional trocar site. Gastrointestinal patency was normal in all patients, with no signs of contrast agent leakage or stricture observed. Both SILS+1 and MPLSG procedures demonstrated equivalent efficacy in weight loss outcomes (P>0.05) and in their effects on HbA1c, TG, and TC levels (P>0.05). The SILS+1 procedure showed a significant advantage in improving HDL-C level (F=6.221, P=0.015), with significantly higher postoperative HDL-C level observed at 6 months postoperatively compared to the MPLSG group (F=2.500, P=0.027). ConclusionsFor selected obese populations, SILS+1 represents a feasible and safe alternative to MPLSG. This technique demonstrates equivalent efficacy to MPLSG in early-stage weight loss and metabolic improvement, serving as a transitional approach toward pure single-incision LSG.
