ObjectiveTo summarize the recent development of surgical treatment for portal hypertension with hypersplenism.
MethodsThe related literatures on various operation treatment of hypertension with hypersplenism at home and abroad in recent years were collected and reviewed.
ResultsThere are many operation treatment methods of hypertension with hypersplenism, includes the pericardial devascularization, subtotal splenectomy, partial splenic embolization, spleen radiofrequency ablation, splenic artery ligation, distal splenorenal shunt, and so on. The different operation methods each has its advantages and disadvantages, but there are a certain percentage of the incidence of complications. At the same time, due to the limited understanding of the function of the spleen in portal hypertension, the treatment of "resecting" or "reserving" spleen has always been the hot spot of the academic dispute.
ConclusionFor what kind of operation method is the most suitable for the treatment of hypertension with hypersplenism is no fixed conclusion.
ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors of intraoperative massive hemorrhage in patients with pancreatitis-induced sinistral portal hypertension (SPH) and to explore its strategies of treatment.MethodsThe clinical data of patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH admitted to the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2015 to March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The intraoperative massive hemorrhage was defined as the blood loss exceeding 30% blood volume. The factors closely associated with the intraoperative massive hemorrhage were analyzed by the forward logistic regression model.ResultsA total of 128 patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH were enrolled in this study, including 104 males and 24 females, with an average age of 47 years old and a median intraoperative bleeding volume of 482 mL. Among them, 93 patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH caused by the pancreatic pseudocyst after acute pancreatitis and 35 caused by the chronic pancreatitis. There were 36 patients with history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 46 patients with hypersplenism. Thirty-six patients suffered from the massive hemorrhage. Among them, 30 patients underwent the distal pancreatectomy concomitant with splenectomy, 1 patient underwent the duodenum- preserving resection of pancreatic head, and 5 patients underwent the pseudocyst drainage. The univariate analysis showed that the occurrence of intraoperative massive hemorrhage in the patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH was not associated with the gender, age, body mass index, albumin level, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, hypersplenism, type of pancreatitis, course of pancreatitis, number of attacks of pancreatitis, size of spleen, maximum diameter of lesions in the splenic vein obstruction site, or number of operation (P>0.05), which was associated with the diameter of varicose vein more than 5.0 mm (χ2=19.83, P<0.01), the intraperitoneal varices regions (χ2=13.67, P<0.01), the location of splenic vein obstruction (χ2=5.17, P=0.03), the operation time (t=–3.10, P<0.01), or the splenectomy (χ2=17.46, P<0.01). Further the logistic regression analysis showed that the varicose vein diameter more than 5.0 mm (OR=6.356, P=0.002) and splenectomy (OR=4.297, P=0.005) were the independent risk factors for the intraoperative massive hemorrhage in the patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH.ConclusionsSplenectomy and having a collateral vein more than 5.0 mm in diameter are independent risk factors for intraoperative massive blood loss in surgeries taken on patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH. Attention should be paid to dilation of gastric varices and choice of splenectomy.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the operative technique and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) combined with esophagogastric devascularization in treatment of portal hypertension induced by liver cirrhosis. MethodsTwelve cases with esophageal and gastric varices induced by portal hypertension and liver cirrhosis were treated by the LS combined with esophagogastric devascularization in our department from March 2009 to August 2010, which clinical data were analyzed and summarized retrospectively. ResultsThe splenic artery was ligated before the treatment of splenic pedicle in 12 cases, LS combined with pericardial devascularization was successfully performed in 10 cases, 7 cases of which were treated by the level two transection method of splenic pedicle, and 2 cases were converted to open surgery due to intraoperative bleeding. In 10 cases, the operative time was 180-300 min (average 210 min), and intraoperative blood loss was 200-1 000 ml (average 480 ml). The postoperative hospital stay was 8-15 d (average 9 d)， the postoperative complications included plural effusion （lt;300 ml） in 2 cases， mild ascites （lt;300 ml） in 2 cases, and mild pancreatic leakage in 1 case， but all were cured eventually， and no mortality occurred. Followup was conducted in 12 patients for 4 to 20 months (average 7 months), and no rebleeding occurred. ConclusionsLS combined with pericardial devascularization is relatively safe and effective methods in treatment of portal hypertension induced by liver cirrhosis. The keys to success include ligation of splenic artery, and the use of harmonic scalpel combined with ligasure to treat splenic pedicle.
Objective To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic splenectomy （LS） and open splenectomy （OS） forhypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension. Methods Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials， Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews， Medline， Embase， CINAHL， CBM， CNKI， VIP and WanFang database were searched for randomized control trials or retrospective studies related to the effect of LS and OS for hyper-splenism secondary to liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension. Then studies were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criterias， data were collected， and quality of studies were evaluated. RevMan 5.1.0 software was used for meta-analysis. Results Seventeen retrospective studies and one randomized control trial were enrolled. The results of meta analysis showed that， the estimated blood loss， postoperative hospital stay， rate of postoperative complication， and WBC level on 1 day after operation of LS group were significantly lower or shorter than those of OS group （P＜0.05）. However， there were no significant differences on operative time， WBC level on 7 days after operation， postoperative platelets （1 day and 7 days after operation）， alanine aminotransferase （1 day and 7 days after operation）， and total bilirubin （1 day and 7 days after operation） between LS group and OS group （P＞0.05）. Conclusions LS may be more effective to reduce blood loss， postoperative hospital stay， and rate of postoperative complication in patients with hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension in comparison to OS. However， the effectiveness of LS on liver function is not clear.
ObjectiveTo summarize the pathogenesis, epidemiology, and risk factors of portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy, and combined with the latest advances in clinical prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy, so as to provide some references for clinical prevention and treatment in the future.MethodLiteratures on portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy were collected and reviewed.ResultsThe incidence of portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy was high and its occurrence was the result of multiple factors. It was mainly related to the change of splenic venous blood flow mechanics after splenectomy. In terms of diagnosis, enhanced CT scan was the first choice. Currently, there was no consensus on treatment options, which mainly focused on individualized treatment and emphasized that preventive anticoagulant use of low-molecular-weight heparin may reduce the risk of portal vein thrombosis.ConclusionThe concept of tertiary prevention of portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy should be established, and individualized treatment should be adopted in combination with the patient’s condition.
ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors of rebleeding after laparoscopic selective pericardial devascularization combined with splenectomy.MethodsThe clinical data of 147 cases of portal hypertension treated by the laparoscopic selective devascularization combined with splenectomy from February 2014 to September 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The univariate analysis was used to find the difference between the rebleeding group (n=20) and the non-bleeding group (n=127), then the multivariate logistic regression analysis was selected for screening out the most closely related risk factors for the rebleeding.ResultsThe rebleeding occurred in 20 of 147 patients (13.6%). There were differences in the platelet count, prothrombin time, serum albumin, diameter of main portal vein, classification of liver function, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and portal hypertensive gastropathy between the rebleeding group and the non-bleeding group (P<0.050). The classification of liver function ［OR=3.444, 95% CI (1.211. 9.793）, P=0.020］, ascites ［OR=2.859, 95% CI (1.069, 7.645), P=0.036］, hepatic encephalopathy ［OR=4.265, 95% CI（1.121, 16.230）, P=0.033］, and portal hypertensive gastropathy ［OR=6.744, 95% CI (1.675, 27.156), P=0.007］, and platelet count ［OR=4.744, 95% CI (1.073, 20.969), P=0.040］ were the independent factors for the postoperative rebleeding by the logistic regression analysis.ConclusionFor patients with risk factors of rebleeding, preoperative treatment should be actively taken and postoperative prevention of rebleeding should be highly vigilant.
Objective
To discuss surgical skills and clinical value of laparoscopic splenectomy with behind splenic hilus tunnel-building technique.
Method
The clinical data of 1 patient with HBV-related hepatic cirrhosis combined splenomegaly and hypersplenism treated in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University was discussed and summarized.
Results
The patient underwent the laparoscopic splenectomy with surgical approach of from bottom to top, front to back, and shallow to deep. The key point of the tunnel-building technique was fully exposed the upper and lower poles of the splenic pedicle. The operative time was 70 min, the intraoperative blood loss was 50 mL, and the discharge time was 5 d after operation.
Conclusion
Laparoscopic splenectomy with behind splenic hilum tunnel-building technique is safe and feasible, especially for beginners.
Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic radical resection of the body and tail pancreatic cancer is gradually being accepted due to its shorter hospital stay, reduced intraoperative blood loss, and comparable perioperative and oncological prognosis. The proposal of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) has established a standardized approach for resection scope and lymph node dissection in pancreatic body and tail cancers. Studies have confirmed that RAMPS surgery can achieve a higher N1 station lymph node dissection, R0 margin ratio, and satisfactory patient survival rates. Furthermore, RAMPS has demonstrated oncological advantages in terms of postoperative local control. Laparoscopic RAMPS (LRAMPS) has been shown to be technically feasible and to yield long-term oncologic outcomes comparable to open RAMPS. An increasing number of studies have evaluated LRAMPS as the standard surgical modality for resectable body and tail pancreatic cancers. This article discusses the main points and challenges of LRAMPS surgery, and presents some personal experiences.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy through the ligament of Treitz approach for pancreatic body and tail cancer. MethodsOn 13th November 2017, we selected a patient with a suspicious malignant tumor in the body of pancreas but no evidence of metastasis or local invasion of the retroperitoneum for laparoscopic antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy through the ligament of Treitz approach. The time of operation, the estimated blood loss, and post-operative complications were observed. ResultsThe procedure was completed successfully in 255 min, and the estimated blood loss was 200 mL, there was no need of transfusion and no significant post-operational complications had been observed. No tumor recurrence or distal metastasis was found after a 12 month’s follow-up. ConclusionLaparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy through the ligament of Treitz approach is a feasible and safe procedure for pancreatic body and tail malignant tumor in strictly selected patients.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of the subtotal splenectomy versus total splenectomy with gastroesophageal devascularization for patients of hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Methods We searched the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to August, 2008), EMbase (1966 to August, 2008), the China Biological Medicine Database (1978 to August, 2008), Chinese Sci-tech Periodical Full-text Database (1989 to August, 2008) and Chinese Periodical Full-text Database (1994 to August, 2008), as well as hand-searched several related journals and conference proceedings for the randomized controlled trials involving the comparison of the efficacy of the subtotal splenectomy with the total splenectomy for the patients of the hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Results Three studies involving 136 patients were identified. The results of two studies indicated that both of the subtotal splenectomy increased less the peripheral platelet count and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups [WMD= –?39.27, 95%CI (–?62.57, –?15.97)]. Two studies indicated that the serum tuftsin level was increased significantly after the subtotal splenectomy [WMD= 165.28, 95%CI (159.36, 171.21)]. One study indicated that both of the subtotal splenectomy and total splenectomy with gastroesophageal devascularization increased the peripheral white blood cell count and there was statistical difference between the two groups [WMD= –?0.93, 95%CI (–?1.52, –?0.34)]. There was no statistical difference in serum IgA level between the two groups. One study indicated the average fever time after the total splenectomy was longer than the subtotal splenectomy; there was statistical differences in 5 years survival rate between the two groups (Plt;0.05). Conclusions After the subtotal splenectomy the hypersplenism of patients suffered from hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension was corrected obviously and the blood cells were increased smoothly so that high blood viscosity was prevented and occurrence of the thrombotic diseases was decreased. And the immune system reserve functions of the patients with hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension were maintained. More randomized controlled trials, with large sample sizes, may lead to more accurate results.
