ObjectiveTo evaluate the operative technique and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) combined with esophagogastric devascularization in treatment of portal hypertension induced by liver cirrhosis. MethodsTwelve cases with esophageal and gastric varices induced by portal hypertension and liver cirrhosis were treated by the LS combined with esophagogastric devascularization in our department from March 2009 to August 2010, which clinical data were analyzed and summarized retrospectively. ResultsThe splenic artery was ligated before the treatment of splenic pedicle in 12 cases, LS combined with pericardial devascularization was successfully performed in 10 cases, 7 cases of which were treated by the level two transection method of splenic pedicle, and 2 cases were converted to open surgery due to intraoperative bleeding. In 10 cases, the operative time was 180-300 min (average 210 min), and intraoperative blood loss was 200-1 000 ml (average 480 ml). The postoperative hospital stay was 8-15 d (average 9 d)， the postoperative complications included plural effusion （lt;300 ml） in 2 cases， mild ascites （lt;300 ml） in 2 cases, and mild pancreatic leakage in 1 case， but all were cured eventually， and no mortality occurred. Followup was conducted in 12 patients for 4 to 20 months (average 7 months), and no rebleeding occurred. ConclusionsLS combined with pericardial devascularization is relatively safe and effective methods in treatment of portal hypertension induced by liver cirrhosis. The keys to success include ligation of splenic artery, and the use of harmonic scalpel combined with ligasure to treat splenic pedicle.
Objective
To summarize the effect of the splenectomy in patients with portal hypertension on the occurrence and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Methods
The related literatures about the splenectomy in patients with hepatocirrhosis combined with portal hypertension or patients with hepatocellular carcinoma combined with portal hypertension in recent years were reviewed.
Results
At present, most academics considered that, for patients with hepatocirrhosis combined with portal hypertension, splenectomy could reduce the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma combined with portal hypertension, splenectomy+hepatectomy didn’t increase the perioperative mortality, and it could reduce the recurrence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Conclusion
Splenectomy for patients with portal hypertension is safe, and it can inhibit the occurrence and progress of hepatocellular carcinoma, however, the specific mechanism remain needs further study.
ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and feasibility of the treatment of laparoscopic splenectomy for patients with traumatic splenic rupture. MethodsBetween October 2006 and October 2009, 48 cases of traumatic splenic rupture underwent laparoscopic splenectomy were analyzed in this hospital. According to the differrent styles of splenic stalk, different operative methods were taken， including titanic clipping in 12 cases， titanic clipping combining silk suture ligation in 8 cases， snare combining titanic clipping in 10 cases， LigaSure in 8 cases， and EndoGIA in 8 cases. ResultsLaparoscopic splenectomy was successfully completed in 32 cases; Handassisted laparoscopic splenectomy was applied in 14 cases, and 2 cases were converted to laparotomy because of tight spleen adhesion with surrounding tissues and bleeding rupture of the short gastric vessels. The operation time was 120－170 min with an average 140 min; the estimated intraoperative amount of blood loss was 300－1 200 ml with an average 800 ml. No postoperative complication occurred such as gastric fistula, pancreatic fistula or hemorrhage. Conclusion According to the differrent styles of splenic stalk, individual operative method can improve mission success rate in the laparoscopic splenectomy in traumatic splenic rupture.
ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors of intraoperative massive hemorrhage in patients with pancreatitis-induced sinistral portal hypertension (SPH) and to explore its strategies of treatment.MethodsThe clinical data of patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH admitted to the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2015 to March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The intraoperative massive hemorrhage was defined as the blood loss exceeding 30% blood volume. The factors closely associated with the intraoperative massive hemorrhage were analyzed by the forward logistic regression model.ResultsA total of 128 patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH were enrolled in this study, including 104 males and 24 females, with an average age of 47 years old and a median intraoperative bleeding volume of 482 mL. Among them, 93 patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH caused by the pancreatic pseudocyst after acute pancreatitis and 35 caused by the chronic pancreatitis. There were 36 patients with history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 46 patients with hypersplenism. Thirty-six patients suffered from the massive hemorrhage. Among them, 30 patients underwent the distal pancreatectomy concomitant with splenectomy, 1 patient underwent the duodenum- preserving resection of pancreatic head, and 5 patients underwent the pseudocyst drainage. The univariate analysis showed that the occurrence of intraoperative massive hemorrhage in the patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH was not associated with the gender, age, body mass index, albumin level, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, hypersplenism, type of pancreatitis, course of pancreatitis, number of attacks of pancreatitis, size of spleen, maximum diameter of lesions in the splenic vein obstruction site, or number of operation (P>0.05), which was associated with the diameter of varicose vein more than 5.0 mm (χ2=19.83, P<0.01), the intraperitoneal varices regions (χ2=13.67, P<0.01), the location of splenic vein obstruction (χ2=5.17, P=0.03), the operation time (t=–3.10, P<0.01), or the splenectomy (χ2=17.46, P<0.01). Further the logistic regression analysis showed that the varicose vein diameter more than 5.0 mm (OR=6.356, P=0.002) and splenectomy (OR=4.297, P=0.005) were the independent risk factors for the intraoperative massive hemorrhage in the patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH.ConclusionsSplenectomy and having a collateral vein more than 5.0 mm in diameter are independent risk factors for intraoperative massive blood loss in surgeries taken on patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH. Attention should be paid to dilation of gastric varices and choice of splenectomy.
ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors of rebleeding after laparoscopic selective pericardial devascularization combined with splenectomy.MethodsThe clinical data of 147 cases of portal hypertension treated by the laparoscopic selective devascularization combined with splenectomy from February 2014 to September 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The univariate analysis was used to find the difference between the rebleeding group (n=20) and the non-bleeding group (n=127), then the multivariate logistic regression analysis was selected for screening out the most closely related risk factors for the rebleeding.ResultsThe rebleeding occurred in 20 of 147 patients (13.6%). There were differences in the platelet count, prothrombin time, serum albumin, diameter of main portal vein, classification of liver function, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and portal hypertensive gastropathy between the rebleeding group and the non-bleeding group (P<0.050). The classification of liver function ［OR=3.444, 95% CI (1.211. 9.793）, P=0.020］, ascites ［OR=2.859, 95% CI (1.069, 7.645), P=0.036］, hepatic encephalopathy ［OR=4.265, 95% CI（1.121, 16.230）, P=0.033］, and portal hypertensive gastropathy ［OR=6.744, 95% CI (1.675, 27.156), P=0.007］, and platelet count ［OR=4.744, 95% CI (1.073, 20.969), P=0.040］ were the independent factors for the postoperative rebleeding by the logistic regression analysis.ConclusionFor patients with risk factors of rebleeding, preoperative treatment should be actively taken and postoperative prevention of rebleeding should be highly vigilant.
ObjectiveTo explore the security and advantages of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) for occupancy lesions in pancreatic body and tail.
MethodsA total of 97 patients with occupancy lesions in pancreatic body and tail who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in our hospital from June 2010 to August 2014 were collected retrospectively, and were divided into LSPDP group (n=60) and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (LDPS) group (n=37) according to the surgery, clinical effect was compared between the 2 groups.
ResultsThe operations got well in all patients, no one died during perioperative period. The operation time was shorter in LSPDP group than that of LDPS group[(190.83±66.39) min vs. (224.46±83.23) min, P=0.030], but there was no significant difference between LSPDP group and LDPS group in the blood loss[45.35 mL vs. 54.92 mL], hospital stay[(8.38±4.06) d vs. (9.76±4.54) d], incidence of total postoperative complication[23.33% (14/60) vs. 13.51% (5/37)], and degree of postoperative complication (P>0.050). There were 86 patients were followed up for 3-54 months, with the median time of 18 months. For patients with tumor, no one suffered from recurrence, metastasis, and death during the follow-up period, and other patients with benign diseases had an excellent prognosis.
ConclusionFor occupancy lesions in pancreatic body and tail, LSPDP is feasible and safe.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of the subtotal splenectomy versus total splenectomy with gastroesophageal devascularization for patients of hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Methods We searched the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to August, 2008), EMbase (1966 to August, 2008), the China Biological Medicine Database (1978 to August, 2008), Chinese Sci-tech Periodical Full-text Database (1989 to August, 2008) and Chinese Periodical Full-text Database (1994 to August, 2008), as well as hand-searched several related journals and conference proceedings for the randomized controlled trials involving the comparison of the efficacy of the subtotal splenectomy with the total splenectomy for the patients of the hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Results Three studies involving 136 patients were identified. The results of two studies indicated that both of the subtotal splenectomy increased less the peripheral platelet count and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups [WMD= –?39.27, 95%CI (–?62.57, –?15.97)]. Two studies indicated that the serum tuftsin level was increased significantly after the subtotal splenectomy [WMD= 165.28, 95%CI (159.36, 171.21)]. One study indicated that both of the subtotal splenectomy and total splenectomy with gastroesophageal devascularization increased the peripheral white blood cell count and there was statistical difference between the two groups [WMD= –?0.93, 95%CI (–?1.52, –?0.34)]. There was no statistical difference in serum IgA level between the two groups. One study indicated the average fever time after the total splenectomy was longer than the subtotal splenectomy; there was statistical differences in 5 years survival rate between the two groups (Plt;0.05). Conclusions After the subtotal splenectomy the hypersplenism of patients suffered from hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension was corrected obviously and the blood cells were increased smoothly so that high blood viscosity was prevented and occurrence of the thrombotic diseases was decreased. And the immune system reserve functions of the patients with hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension were maintained. More randomized controlled trials, with large sample sizes, may lead to more accurate results.
Objective
To discuss surgical skills and clinical value of laparoscopic splenectomy with behind splenic hilus tunnel-building technique.
Method
The clinical data of 1 patient with HBV-related hepatic cirrhosis combined splenomegaly and hypersplenism treated in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University was discussed and summarized.
Results
The patient underwent the laparoscopic splenectomy with surgical approach of from bottom to top, front to back, and shallow to deep. The key point of the tunnel-building technique was fully exposed the upper and lower poles of the splenic pedicle. The operative time was 70 min, the intraoperative blood loss was 50 mL, and the discharge time was 5 d after operation.
Conclusion
Laparoscopic splenectomy with behind splenic hilum tunnel-building technique is safe and feasible, especially for beginners.
Objective To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic splenectomy （LS） and open splenectomy （OS） forhypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension. Methods Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials， Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews， Medline， Embase， CINAHL， CBM， CNKI， VIP and WanFang database were searched for randomized control trials or retrospective studies related to the effect of LS and OS for hyper-splenism secondary to liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension. Then studies were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criterias， data were collected， and quality of studies were evaluated. RevMan 5.1.0 software was used for meta-analysis. Results Seventeen retrospective studies and one randomized control trial were enrolled. The results of meta analysis showed that， the estimated blood loss， postoperative hospital stay， rate of postoperative complication， and WBC level on 1 day after operation of LS group were significantly lower or shorter than those of OS group （P＜0.05）. However， there were no significant differences on operative time， WBC level on 7 days after operation， postoperative platelets （1 day and 7 days after operation）， alanine aminotransferase （1 day and 7 days after operation）， and total bilirubin （1 day and 7 days after operation） between LS group and OS group （P＞0.05）. Conclusions LS may be more effective to reduce blood loss， postoperative hospital stay， and rate of postoperative complication in patients with hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension in comparison to OS. However， the effectiveness of LS on liver function is not clear.
ObjectiveTo summarize the recent development of surgical treatment for portal hypertension with hypersplenism.
MethodsThe related literatures on various operation treatment of hypertension with hypersplenism at home and abroad in recent years were collected and reviewed.
ResultsThere are many operation treatment methods of hypertension with hypersplenism, includes the pericardial devascularization, subtotal splenectomy, partial splenic embolization, spleen radiofrequency ablation, splenic artery ligation, distal splenorenal shunt, and so on. The different operation methods each has its advantages and disadvantages, but there are a certain percentage of the incidence of complications. At the same time, due to the limited understanding of the function of the spleen in portal hypertension, the treatment of "resecting" or "reserving" spleen has always been the hot spot of the academic dispute.
ConclusionFor what kind of operation method is the most suitable for the treatment of hypertension with hypersplenism is no fixed conclusion.
