Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of single and bilateral lung transplantation in the treatment of end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Chinese and English databases were searched by computer, including PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang database, VIP database and CBM. Case-control studies on single lung transplantation or bilateral lung transplantation for COPD were collected from the inception to July 31, 2022. We evaluated the quality of the literature via Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). All results were analyzed using Review Manager V5.3 and STATA 17.0. Results A total of 8 studies were included covering 14076 patients, including 8326 patients in the single lung transplantation group and 5750 patients in the bilateral lung transplantation group. NOS scores were≥6 points. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical difference in the postoperative 1-year survival between the two groups (P=0.070). The 2-year survival rate (P=0.002), 3-year survival rate (P<0.001), 5-year survival rate (P<0.001), overall survival rate (P＜0.001), postoperative forced expiratory volume in one second/predicted value (P<0.001), postoperative forced vital capacity (P<0.001), and postoperative 6-minute walking distance (P=0.002) were lower or shorter than those in the bilateral lung transplantation group, the postoperative intubation time (P=0.030) was longer than that in the bilateral lung transplantation group. Bilateral lung transplantation group showed better surgical results. There was no statistical difference in the mortality, obliterative bronchiolitis, length of hospitalization, primary graft dysfunction, or postoperative adverse events (P>0.05). Conclusion Bilateral lung transplantation is associated with better long-term survival and postoperative lung function compared with single lung transplantation. In-hospital mortality and postoperative complications are similar between them.
ObjectiveTo evaluate effect of RAS gene mutation after liver metastasis resection on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for patients with colorectal cancer combined with liver metastasis. MethodsA comprehensive and systematic literature search in the PubMed and other databases was conducted, with the final search ending on January 5, 2022. The impact of RAS gene mutation after liver metastasis resection on survival of patients with colorectal cancer combined with liver metastasis was analyzed by the Stata 12.0 software and Review Manager version 5.3 software, meanwhile which were analyzed according to subgroups, including study type (retrospective and prospective studies), region (Asian and European), and number of RAS gene mutation sites (>2 and ≤2). ResultsA total of 26 studies with 13 356 patients were included. The integrated analysis results showed that the patients with RAS mutations had statistically shorter OS [HR=1.54, 95%CI (1.43, 1.65), P<0.001] and DFS [HR=1.32, 95%CI (1.19, 1.44), P<0.001] as compared with RAS wild-type. Except the 1-year overall survival rate, the 2–5-year overall survival rate and 1–5-year disease-free survival rate of patients with RAS gene mutation were statistically lower than those of patients with RAS wild-type (P<0.05). The results of subgroup analysis showed that no matter retrospective and prospective studies, as well as studies in Asian and European countries, it was found that the OS and DFS for patients with RAS gene mutation were shorter than those of patients with wild-type (P<0.05); At the same time, subgroup analysis of the number of RAS gene mutation sites showed that OS and DFS of patients with number of mutation sites >2 were shortened as compared with ≤2 (P<0.05). ConclusionFrom the overall analysis results, the survival of patients with RAS gene mutation after liver metastasis resection is worse than that of patients with RAS wild-type for patients with colorectal cancer combined with liver metastasis.
ObjectiveTo detect expressions of Lgr5 and E-cadherin (E-cad) proteins in gastric cancer tissues and analyze their relationships with the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.MethodsThe expressions of Lgr5 and E-cad proteins in the 69 patients with gastric cancer and adjacent normal gastric mucosa tissues were measured by the immunohistochemical SABC method, and the relationships between the Lgr5 or E-cad protein expression in the gastric cancer tissues and the clinicopathologic characteristics and the survival of patients with gastric cancer were analyzed.ResultsThe expressions of Lgr5 and E-cad proteins were positive in 60 cases (87.0%) and 30 cases (43.5%) of gastric cancer tissues, respectively, and in 5 cases (16.7%) and 30 cases (100%) of adjacent normal gastric mucosa tissues. There was a significant difference in the positive rate of Lgr5 or E-cad protein expression in the different tissues, respectively (Lgr5 protein: χ2=45.814, P<0.001; E-cad protein: χ2=11.249, P=0.001). The positive rates of Lgr5 and E-cad protein expressions in the gastric cancer were related to the degree of differentiation and the depth of invasion. Meanwhile the positive rate of Lgr5 protein expression in the gastric cancer tissue was also related to the lymph node metastasis and Helicobacter pylori infection, while the positive rate of E-cad protein expression was not related to these (P>0.05). The 5-year total survival time had no significant difference in the patients between with positive and with negative expressions of Lgr5 protein (χ2=1.819, P=0.117), which had a significant difference in the patients between with positive and with negative expressions of E-cad protein (χ2=5.814, P=0.016). The positive expression of Lgr5 was negatively correlated with that of E-cad (rs=?0.355, P=0.003).ConclusionsLgr5 protein may get involved in the mechanism of tumor invasion, lymph nodal metastasis, and low differentiation, while no relationship between the Lgr5 protein and prognosis has been confirmed. E-cad protein may get involved in the mechanism of tumor invasion and affect the prognosis of patients.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy of different surgical approaches for Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG). MethodsThe clinical data of the patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG who received sugeries in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Gansu Provincial People's Hospital from August 2014 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical approach: a transabdominal group (transabdominal diaphragmatic esophageal hiatus approach) and a combined group (thoracoabdominal combined with right thoracic approach). Perioperative clinical data and postoperative follow-up data were collected to compare the short- and long-term efficacy of the two groups. Results A total of 87 patients were enrolled. There were 48 patients (31 males and 17 females, with an average age of 60.85±8.47 years) in the transabdominal group, and 39 patients (25 males and 14 females, with an average age of 61.13±8.51 years) in the combined group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the baseline indicators such as gender, age, tumor size and stage (P>0.05). Compared with the combined group, the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative bed rest time, postoperative total drainage volume were shorter or less, and the visual analogue scale score on the 3rd day after surgery were lower in the transabdominal group (P<0.05). However, the total number of lymph nodes dissected, the number of thoracic lymph nodes dissected and the number of positive thoracic lymph nodes in the combined group were larger than those in the transabdominal group, and the differences were statistically significant (P=0.001). The median survival time in the combined group and transabdominal group was 25.85 months and 20.86 months, respectively. The 3-year overall survival rate of the combined group was higher than that of the transabdominal group (46.2% vs. 38.9%, χ2=5.995, P=0.014). However, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in the postoperative catheter time, esophageal and gastric resection margin distance, number of abdominal lymph nodes dissected, number of positive abdominal lymph nodes, or incidence of postoperative complications (P>0.05). ConclusionFor patients with Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction, thoracoabdominal combined with right thoracic approach is safe and effective, and has advantages in thoracic lymph node dissection, bringing more benefits to the patients, so it is recommended to be popularized in clinical practice.
ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of primary tumor site on prognosis of colorectal cancer after radical resection in different stages.MethodsFour hundreds and twenty patients with colorectal cancer in our hospital from Jan. 2008 to Dec. 2016 were selected as study subjects, all patients were confirmed by pathology. According to the location of colorectal cancer, the patients were divided into rectum group (n=220), left colon group (n=105) and right colon group (n=95). The difference of clinicopathological features of patients with different group were compared. The risk factors affecting the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients were analyzed by single factor and multi factor unconditional Cox regression analysis, and the survival curve was drawn by Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference test was carried out by log-rank method.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the three groups in age, BMI, smoking history, alcohol history, family history, vascular tumor thrombus, N staging, tumor diameter, nerve invasion and cancer nodule (P>0.05). There were significant differences in sex, pathological type, anterior intestinal obstruction, TNM staging, T staging and M staging (P<0.05). The results of single factor Cox regression analysis showed that sex, pathological type, anterior intestinal obstruction, TNM staging, T staging, M staging, primary tumor site, nerve invasion and cancer nodule were the risk factors for the prognosis of the patients (P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that TNM staging, location of primary tumor and nerve invasion were risk factors affecting prognosis of patients (P<0.05). The total 5-year survival rate of the rectal group was 80.45% (177/220), the total 5-year survival rate of the left hemicolon group was 67.62% (71/105), and the total 5-year survival rate of the right hemicolon group was 68.42% (65/95). The survival curves of Kaplan-Meier showed that the difference between the three groups was statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusonsThe 5-year survival rate of patients with rectal cancer is significantly higher than that of patients with left colon cancer and right colon cancer. For patients with different stage of colorectal cancer after radical resection, the prognosis of colorectal cancer can be predicted by the location of primary tumor.
ObjectiveTo compare the 5-year survival rates between two different follow-up patterns of postoperative stage Ⅰ-ⅢA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.MethodsPathological stage Ⅰ-ⅢA NSCLC 11 958 patients who underwent surgical resection and received follow-up within 6 months after initial diagnosis through telephone follow-up system were included in nine hospitals from July 2014 to July 2020. The patients were divided into two groups including a proactive follow-up group (n=3 825) and a passive follow-up group (n=8133) according to the way of following-up. There were 6 939 males and 5 019 females aged 59.8±9.5 years. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used.ResultsThe median follow-up frequency was 8.0 times in the proactive follow-up group and 7.0 times in the passive follow-up group. The median call duration was 3.77 minutes in the proactive follow-up group and 3.58 minutes in the passive follow-up group. The 5-year survival rate was 81.8% and 74.2% (HR=0.60, 95CI 0.53-0.67, P<0.001) in the proactive follow-up group and the passive follow-up group, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that follow-up pattern, age, gender and operation mode were independent prognostic factors, and the results were consistent in all subgroups stratified by clinical stages.ConclusionThe proactive follow-up leads to better overall survival for resected stage Ⅰ-ⅢA NSCLC patients, especially in the stage ⅢA.
ObjectiveTo analyze impact of body mass index (BMI) on postoperative complications and disease-free survival (DFS) after hepatectomy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
MethodsIn total, 858 patients with HCC underwent hepatectomy were analyzed by retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into two groups according to BMI:normal group (18.5 kg/m2 < BMI < 25.0 kg/m2) and obesity group (BMI≥25.0 kg/m2). The clinical and postoperative follow-up data were collected and statistically analyzed.
Results① Compared with the normal group, the preoperative HBV-DNA loading was significantly lower (P<0.05), albumin was significantly higher (P<0.05), intraopera-tive blood loss was significantly increased (P<0.05), operation time, and the first portal hepatis occlusion time were signifi-cantly prolonged (P<0.05) in the obesity group. The postoperative complications and hospital stay had no significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05). ② The results of univariate analysis showed that the preoperative HBV-DNA≥ 104 U/mL, total bilirubin >21 μmol/L, albumin <35 g/L, grade B of Child-Pugh, intraoperative blood loss >500 mL, and operation time >240 min were associated with the postoperative complications after hepatectomy for patients with HCC (P<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis showed that preoperative total bilirubin >21 μmol/L, albumin <35 g/L, and operation time >240 min were the independent risk factors for postoperative complications (P<0.05). ③ Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the 3-year DFS in the obesity group was significantly better than that in the normal group (P<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis showed that the major blood vessel tumor thrombi, multicenter tumor, tumor diameter ≥5 cm, and operation time >240 min were the independent risk factors for DFS (P<0.05), while the obesity was the protective factor for DFS (P<0.05).
ConclusionFor HCC patients who receiving hepatectomy, obesity does not increase risk of postoperative complications, and could increase 3-year DFS. Thus preoperative improvement of nutritional status of patient with HCC has a great significance.
Objective To compare the effects of flap delay and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) on the viability of the rat dorsal flap. Methods Thirty rats were divided into 3 groups: saline group, flap delay group and VEGF group. The rats in flap delay group underwent flap delay by keeping bipedicle untouched, and the cranial pedicle was cut 7 days later. The rats in VEGF group were given VEGF solution locally when the flaps were elevated in the operation. The ratsin saline group were given saline solution in the same way. Five days after thesingle pedicle flaps were performed, the flap survival rate was measured. Theflap tissues were collected to measure and analyze the microvascular density, diameter and sectional area by immunochemical method. Results The flap survival rate of flap delay group was similar to that of VEGF group andthere is no statistically significant difference(Pgt;0.05). The vascular diameter of flap delay group was much larger than that of saline group and VEGF group, showing statistically significant difference (Plt;0.05). The vascular density of VEGF group was much higher than that of saline group and flap delay group, showing statistically significant difference (Plt;0.05). The vascular sectional area of flap delay group was similar to that of VEGF group(Pgt;0.05). Conclusion The change in the flap after flap delayis manifested as obvious dilatation of microvessels, while the change in the flap after the injection of VEGF is manifested as obvious vascular proliferation. Both flap delay and VEGF can increase the vascular sectional area and the viability of the flap, but the mechanism is different.
ObjectiveTo provide clinical reference for the perioperative management of esophageal cancer patients with different stages of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) through investigating the impact of COPD on postoperative complications and survival in esophageal cancer patients undergoing oesophagectomy.MethodsThe clinical data of 163 patients who underwent radical resection of esophageal cancer in our department from January 2015 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, including 124 males and 39 females, with a median age of 64 years (IQR: 23.8 years). They were divided into a COPD group (n=87) and a non-COPD group (n=76) according to the presence of COPD before operation. The clinical data were collected and the postoperative complications and 2-year survival between the two groups were compared and analyzed.ResultsThe incidence of major postoperative complications (pulmonary infection, respiratory failure, arrhythmia and anastomotic leakage) in the COPD group were higher than those in the non-COPD group (all P<0.05). Spearman correlation analysis showed that the severity of preoperative COPD was positively correlated with the incidence of postoperative complications in patients with esophageal cancer (r=0.437, P<0.001). The incidence of postoperative respiratory failure and mortality in patients with severe COPD were significantly higher than those in patients without COPD and those with mild or moderate COPD. The 2-year survival rate of patients with esophageal cancer in the COPD group was lower than that in the non-COPD group (56.1% vs. 78.5.%, P=0.001), and the severity of COPD was negatively correlated to the survival rate.ConclusionCOPD significantly increases the incidence of postoperative complications in patients with esophageal cancer, which is not conducive to the prognosis of patients, and the severity of COPD is correlated with postoperative complications and 2-year survival rate.
ObjectiveTo explore the application value of machine learning models in predicting postoperative survival of patients with thoracic squamous esophageal cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 369 patients with thoracic esophageal squamous carcinoma who underwent radical esophageal cancer surgery at the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital from January 2014 to September 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 279 (75.6%) males and 90 (24.4%) females aged 41-78 years. The patients were randomly divided into a training set (259 patients) and a test set (110 patients) with a ratio of 7 : 3. Variable screening was performed by selecting the best subset of features. Six machine learning models were constructed on this basis and validated in an independent test set. The performance of the models' predictions was evaluated by area under the curve (AUC), accuracy and logarithmic loss, and the fit of the models was reflected by calibration curves. The best model was selected as the final model. Risk stratification was performed using X-tile, and survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test. ResultsThe 5-year postoperative survival rate of the patients was 67.5%. All clinicopathological characteristics of patients between the two groups in the training and test sets were not statistically different (P>0.05). A total of seven variables, including hypertension, history of smoking, history of alcohol consumption, degree of tissue differentiation, pN stage, vascular invasion and nerve invasion, were included for modelling. The AUC values for each model in the independent test set were: decision tree (AUC=0.796), support vector machine (AUC=0.829), random forest (AUC=0.831), logistic regression (AUC=0.838), gradient boosting machine (AUC=0.846), and XGBoost (AUC=0.853). The XGBoost model was finally selected as the best model, and risk stratification was performed on the training and test sets. Patients in the training and test sets were divided into a low risk group, an intermediate risk group and a high risk group, respectively. In both data sets, the differences in surgical prognosis among three groups were statistically significant (P<0.001). ConclusionMachine learning models have high value in predicting postoperative prognosis of thoracic squamous esophageal cancer. The XGBoost model outperforms common machine learning methods in predicting 5-year survival of patients with thoracic squamous esophageal cancer, and it has high utility and reliability.
